| Literature DB >> 34349420 |
Rahul R Bhowate1, Vidya K Lohe1, Mrunal Ghusaji Meshram1, Suwarna B Dangore1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Areca nut is deeply rooted sociocultural habit in India. Areca nut reported to be infested by fungi during the field and storage conditions. Areca nut alkaloids, nitrosamines, tobacco and aflatoxin are cytotoxic, immunotoxic to red blood cell and epithelial cell. Hence, the present study was conducted to assess the serum aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) antibody titer, percent hemolysis and transaminases in oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) patients.Entities:
Keywords: Aflatoxin B1; hemolysis; transaminases and oral submucous fibrosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34349420 PMCID: PMC8272487 DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_226_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Pathol ISSN: 0973-029X
Characteristics of study and control group: descriptive statistics
| Characteristics | OSMF ( | Habit without OSMF (habitual control) ( | Healthy control ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean±SD | 29.47 ±8.52 | 34.05±11.37 | 23.5±1.40 |
| Gender (%) | |||
| Male | 83(94.32) | 18 (90) | 20 (100) |
| Female | 5 (5.68) | 02 (10) | 00 |
| Male:female ratio | 16:1 | 9:1 | |
| Type of habit (%) | |||
| Only areca nut | 4 (4.54) | ||
| Only Kharrha | 63 (71.59) | 20 (100) | |
| Only Gutkha | 3 (3.40) | ||
| Kharaa + Gutkha | 14 (15.90) | ||
| Pan quid with areca nut | 4 (4.54) | ||
| Frequency per day, mean±SD | 6.44±1.29 | 6.45±2.15 | |
| Amount of betel nut/tobacco consumed per day (g), mean±SD | 24.47±3.31 | 24.51±4.23 | |
| Duration of habit (years), mean±SD | 7.95±6.61 | 11.7±7.35 | |
| Mean inter-incisal distance (mm) | 24.68±6.02 |
SD: Standard deviation, OSMF: Oral submucous fibrosis
Comparison of serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase in three groups
| Descriptive statistics | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Mean (IU/L) | SD | SE | 95% CI for mean | Minimum | Maximum | ||
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||||
| OSMF | 88 | 33.90 | 13.23 | 1.41 | 31.10 | 36.71 | 13.90 | 77.80 |
| Habit without OSMF (habitual control) | 20 | 27.35 | 8.30 | 1.85 | 23.46 | 31.24 | 14.20 | 41.70 |
| Healthy control | 20 | 25.62 | 9.07 | 2.02 | 21.37 | 29.86 | 14.60 | 49.10 |
| Between groups | 1543.64 | 2 | 771.82 | 5.325 | 0.006 (significant), | |||
| Within groups | 18117.97 | 125 | 144.94 | |||||
| Total | 19661.61 | 127 | ||||||
SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error, CI: Confidence interval, OSMF: Oral submucous fibrosis
Comparison of serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase in three groups
| Descriptive statistics | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Mean (IU/L) | SD | SE | 95% CI for mean | Minimum | Maximum | ||
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||||
| OSMF | 88 | 28.32 | 12.82 | 1.36 | 25.61 | 31.04 | 11.70 | 78.10 |
| Habit without OSMF (habitual control) | 20 | 21.82 | 6.02 | 1.34 | 19.00 | 24.63 | 12.70 | 30.40 |
| healthy control | 20 | 20.96 | 8.01 | 1.79 | 17.21 | 24.71 | 11.30 | 35.90 |
| Between groups | 1329.85 | 2 | 664.92 | 5.12 | 0.007 (significant), P<0.05 | |||
| Within groups | 16215.33 | 125 | 129.72 | |||||
| Total | 17545.19 | 127 | ||||||
SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error, CI: Confidence interval, OSMF: Oral submucous fibrosis
Comparison of percentage hemolysis in three groups
| Descriptive statistics | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Mean | SD | SE | 95% CI for mean | Minimum | Maximum | ||
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||||
| OSMF | 88 | 6.09 | 8.38 | 0.89 | 4.32 | 7.87 | 0.20 | 68.50 |
| Habit without OSMF (habitual control) | 20 | 3.01 | 2.27 | 0.50 | 1.95 | 4.08 | 0.90 | 10.50 |
| Healthy control | 20 | 1.60 | 1.02 | 0.22 | 1.12 | 2.08 | 0.30 | 4.10 |
| Between groups | 414.39 | 2 | 207.19 | 4.15 | 0.018 (significant), | |||
| Within groups | 6235.29 | 125 | 49.88 | |||||
| Total | 6649.69 | 127 | ||||||
SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error, CI: Confidence interval, OSMF: Oral submucous fibrosis
Comparison of Aflatoxin B1 antibody titer in three groups
| Descriptive statistics | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Mean | SD | SE | 95% CI for mean | Minimum | Maximum | ||
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||||
| OSMF | 88 | 0.67 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.23 | 1.58 |
| Habit without OSMF (habitual control) | 20 | 0.47 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 0.23 | 0.80 |
| Healthy control | 20 | 0.34 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.49 |
| Between groups | 2.08 | 2 | 1.04 | 22.29 | 0.000 (significant), | |||
| Within groups | 5.83 | 125 | 0.04 | |||||
| Total | 7.91 | 127 | ||||||
SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error, CI: Confidence interval, OSMF: Oral submucous fibrosis, Df: Degrees of freedom
Correlation of serum Aflatoxin B1 antibody titer and percentage hemolysis in oral submucous fibrosis
| Pearson's correlation coefficient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | Correlation “ | |||
| Percentage hemolysis | 3.01±2.27 | 20 | 0.593 | 0.006 (significant), |
| Aflatoxin B1 antibody titer | 0.47±0.15 | 20 | ||
SD: Standard deviation
Correlation of serum Aflatoxin B1 antibody titer and percent hemolysis in betal nut habitual without oral submucous fibrosis (habitual control)
| Percentage hemolysis | 3.01±2.27 | 20 | 0.593 | 0.006 (significant), |
| Aflatoxin B1 antibody titer | 0.47±0.15 | 20 | ||
SD: Standard deviation
Figure 1Role of area nut alkaloids and aflatoxin B1 in the progression of oral submucous fibrosis