| Literature DB >> 34349177 |
Tomohiro Nomura1, Yoshiaki Seki1, Makoto Matsuoka2, Kenji Yano3, Koki Chigira1, Shunsuke Adachi4, Francisco J Piñera-Chavez5, Matthew Reynolds5, Satoshi Ohkubo1, Taiichiro Ookawa6.
Abstract
It is generally believed that rice landraces with long culms are susceptible to lodging, and have not been utilized for breeding to improve lodging resistance. However, little is known about the structural culm strength of landraces and their beneficial genetic loci. Therefore, in this study, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed using a rice population panel including Japanese rice landraces to identify beneficial loci associated with strong culms. As a result, the landraces were found to have higher structural culm strength and greater diversity than the breeding varieties. Genetic loci associated with strong culms were identified, and it was demonstrated that haplotypes with positive effects of those loci were present in a high proportion of these landraces. These results indicated that the utilization of the strong culm-associated loci present in Japanese rice landraces may further improve the lodging resistance of modern breeding varieties that have relied on semi-dwarfism.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34349177 PMCID: PMC8339031 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95268-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Frequency distribution of lodging resistance-associated traits. Histograms of phenotypic values: (a) ODMI in 2018; (b) BM in 2018; (c) culm length in 2018; (d) ODMI in 2019; (e) BM in 2019; (f) culm length in 2019. The yellow, blue and black bars indicate landraces, breeding varieties and unidentified varieties, respectively.
Figure 2Trait values of landraces vs. breeding varieties. Bar graphs of mean (SD) phenotypic values: (a) ODMI in 2018; (b) BM in 2018; (c) culm length in 2018; (d) ODMI in 2019; (e) BM in 2019; (f) culm length in 2019. The yellow and blue bars indicate landraces and breeding varieties, respectively. *** indicates significant differences at P < 0.001 (two-tailed Welch’s t-test). Two-tailed Welch’s t-test was performed by R software (https://www.R-project.org/)[65].
Figure 3Phenotypic values of the studied varieties arranged in chronological order. Bar graphs of trait values of the varieties arranged by year of establishment, from left to right: (a) ODMI; (b) BM; (c) culm length. The 2019 data of phenotypic values were used, those whose year of establishment was unclear were removed. The yellow and blue bars indicate landraces and breeding varieties, respectively.
Figure 4Genetic structure of temperate japonica rice varieties in Japan. Principal component analysis of temperate japonica rice in Japan based on whole-genome sequence data, with the x-axis representing the PC1 and the y-axis representing the PC2: (a) 2018; (b) 2019. Values in parentheses indicate the percentage contribution of each principal component. The yellow, blue and black markers indicate landraces, breeding varieties and unidentified varieties, respectively. Principal component analysis was performed using the package ‘pcaMethods’[67] for R software (https://www.R-project.org/)[65].
Figure 5Manhattan plots of lodging resistance-associated traits. (a) ODMI in 2018; (b) BM in 2018; (c) culm length in 2018; (d) ODMI in 2019; (e) BM in 2019; (f) culm length in 2019. The x-axis indicates the SNPs or indels that physically mapped on each chromosome. The red and blue dashed lines indicate the threshold lines (− log10 (P) = 5) set in this study and the Bonferroni correction, respectively. Manhattan plots were created using the package ‘rrBLUP’[68] for R software (https://www.R-project.org/)[65].
Positions of peaks identified in both years.
| Trait | Chr | Interval (Mb) | Peak maker position in 2018 | Peak maker position in 2019 | − log10 ( | − log10 ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outer diameter of the minor axis | 2S | 3.8–4.0 | 3,949,848 | 3,963,409 | 5.78 | 5.62 |
| 2L | 28.7–29.3 | 29,197,385 | 28,876,750 | 6.35 | 9.89 | |
| 6L | 22.7 | 22,664,648 | 22,658,357 | 6.40 | 6.81 | |
| 8L | 26.2–26.8 | 26,259,466 | 26,259,466 | 5.51 | 7.32 | |
| 10S | 0.0–0.1 | 75,142 | 27,796 | 5.25 | 5.46 | |
| Bending moment at breaking | 3S | 0.5–0.9 | 836,083 | 920,744 | 6.61 | 9.21 |
Figure 6Combined effects of QTLs for lodging resistance-associated traits. Box plots of the trait values by the genotypes classified at the peak marker position in 2019: (a) ODMI; (b) BM; (c) culm length. Test results: (d) ODMI; (e) BM; f culm length. “2L” and “3S” mean the peak positions on chrs. 2L and 3S, respectively. “(−)” and “(+)” indicate the reference and alternative genotypes, respectively (based on the Nipponbare genome). The white, grey and black boxplots indicate the genotype combinations where both are references, one is a reference and the other is an alternative, and both alternatives, respectively. In the boxplots, different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 (Steel–Dwass’s test). In the table, n.s. indicates no significant difference. *, **, *** indicate significant differences at P < 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively (Steel–Dwass’s test). Steel–Dwass test was performed using the package ‘NSM3’ for R software (https://www.R-project.org/)[65].
Figure 7Ratio of genotypes per QTL for landraces and breeding varieties. Stacked bar graphs showing the ratio of genotypes at the peak: (a) on chr. 2L; (b) on chr. 3S. The grey and red bars indicate the reference and alternative genotypes, respectively. The numbers on the bars indicate the ratio, and the numbers in parentheses indicate the number of varieties.
List of candidate genes with amino acid replacements or deletions.
| Chr | Position (bp) | MSU ID | RAP ID | Gene symbol | Annotation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2L | 28,939,788–28,947,843 | Protein kinase, putative, expressed | |||
| 2L | 28,967,587–28,971,989 | Syntaxin, putative, expressed | |||
| 2L | 29,026,099–29,028,176 | 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 1, chloroplast precursor, putative, expressed | |||
| 2L | 29,059,400–29,062,130 | DNA-binding protein, putative, expressed | |||
| 2L | 29,069,440–29,072,094 | Phosphatase, putative, expressed | |||
| 2L | 29,206,676–29,208,686 | ZF-HD protein dimerisation region containing protein, expressed | |||
| 2L | 29,270,114–29,274,643 | Class I glutamine amidotransferase, putative, expressed | |||
| 2L | 29,324,774–29,328,372 | Aminotransferase, classes I and II, domain containing protein, expressed | |||
| 3S | 781,076–781,879 | DUF584 domain containing protein, putative, expressed | |||
| 3S | 800,033–809,279 | STE_PAK_Ste20_STLK.3 -STE kinases include homologs to sterile 7, sterile 11 and sterile 20 from yeast, expressed | |||
| 3S | 812,826–814,725 | AAA-type ATPase family protein, putative, expressed | |||
| 3S | 848,054–849,141 | Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim17, putative, expressed | |||
| 3S | 850,769–851,768 | Plastocyanin-like domain containing protein, putative, expressed | |||
| 3S | 852,383–857,144 | GHMP kinases ATP-binding protein, putative, expressed | |||
| 3S | 861,320–862,938 | PPR repeat domain containing protein, putative, expressed | |||
| 3S | 884,706–886,943 | Retinol dehydrogenase, putative, expressed | |||
| 3S | 906,127–909,697 | Inner membrane protein, putative, expressed |
Genes of unclear function and genes related to transposon were removed.