Gun Ha Kim1, Pyeong Hwa Kim1, Jin Hyoung Kim2,3, Pyo-Nyun Kim1, Hyung Jin Won1, Yong Moon Shin1, Sang Hyun Choi1. 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Republic of Korea. jhkimrad@amc.seoul.kr. 3. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 86, Asanbyeongwon-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Republic of Korea. jhkimrad@amc.seoul.kr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the efficacy and safety of thermal ablation for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochran Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes in patients with ICC treated with thermal ablation. Meta-analyses of cumulative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), Kaplan-Meier survival rates according to time to local tumor progression (TTLTP), technical efficacy, and incidence of complications were analyzed. Pooled hazard ratios of common variables were calculated to explore factors associated with OS. RESULTS: Twenty observational studies comprising 917 patients were reviewed (primary ICC [n = 502]; post-surgical recurrent ICC [n = 355]; information not available [n = 60]). The pooled proportion of technical efficacy was 91.9% (95% CI, 87.3-94.9%). The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 82.4% (95% CI, 75.1-88.9%), 42.1% (95% CI, 36.0-48.4%), and 28.5% (95% CI, 21.2-36.2%). Primary tumors showed higher 3-year OS rates than recurrent ones, with borderline significance (p = 0.072). The pooled 1- and 3-year RFS rates were 40.0% (95% CI, 33.6-46.4%) and 19.2% (95% CI, 8.4-32.7%). The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year TTLTP rates were 79.3% (95% CI, 65.1-90.9%), 59.5% (95% CI, 49.1-69.4%), and 58.2% (95% CI, 44.9-70.9%). The pooled incidence of major complications was 5.7% (95% CI, 4.1-7.8%). Tumor size (> 3 cm), multiple tumors, and age (> 65 years) were factors associated with shorter OS. CONCLUSION: Thermal ablation is a successful alternative with a good safety profile, especially for a single ICC smaller than 3 cm. KEY POINTS: • The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates following thermal ablation for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were 82.4%, 42.1%, and 28.5%. • The pooled incidence of major complications was 5.7%. • A tumor size > 3 cm (HR: 2.12, p = 0.006), multiple tumors (HR: 1.67, p = 0.004), and age > 65 years (HR: 1.67, p = 0.006) were factors associated with shorter OS.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the efficacy and safety of thermal ablation for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochran Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes in patients with ICC treated with thermal ablation. Meta-analyses of cumulative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), Kaplan-Meier survival rates according to time to local tumor progression (TTLTP), technical efficacy, and incidence of complications were analyzed. Pooled hazard ratios of common variables were calculated to explore factors associated with OS. RESULTS: Twenty observational studies comprising 917 patients were reviewed (primary ICC [n = 502]; post-surgical recurrent ICC [n = 355]; information not available [n = 60]). The pooled proportion of technical efficacy was 91.9% (95% CI, 87.3-94.9%). The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 82.4% (95% CI, 75.1-88.9%), 42.1% (95% CI, 36.0-48.4%), and 28.5% (95% CI, 21.2-36.2%). Primary tumors showed higher 3-year OS rates than recurrent ones, with borderline significance (p = 0.072). The pooled 1- and 3-year RFS rates were 40.0% (95% CI, 33.6-46.4%) and 19.2% (95% CI, 8.4-32.7%). The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year TTLTP rates were 79.3% (95% CI, 65.1-90.9%), 59.5% (95% CI, 49.1-69.4%), and 58.2% (95% CI, 44.9-70.9%). The pooled incidence of major complications was 5.7% (95% CI, 4.1-7.8%). Tumor size (> 3 cm), multiple tumors, and age (> 65 years) were factors associated with shorter OS. CONCLUSION: Thermal ablation is a successful alternative with a good safety profile, especially for a single ICC smaller than 3 cm. KEY POINTS: • The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates following thermal ablation for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were 82.4%, 42.1%, and 28.5%. • The pooled incidence of major complications was 5.7%. • A tumor size > 3 cm (HR: 2.12, p = 0.006), multiple tumors (HR: 1.67, p = 0.004), and age > 65 years (HR: 1.67, p = 0.006) were factors associated with shorter OS.
Authors: John Bridgewater; Peter R Galle; Shahid A Khan; Josep M Llovet; Joong-Won Park; Tushar Patel; Timothy M Pawlik; Gregory J Gores Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Itaru Endo; Mithat Gonen; Adam C Yopp; Kimberly M Dalal; Qin Zhou; David Klimstra; Michael D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Lawrence Schwartz; Nancy Kemeny; Eileen O'Reilly; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Hiroshi Shimada; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Michelle L DeOliveira; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Farin Kamangar; Jordan M Winter; Keith D Lillemoe; Michael A Choti; Charles J Yeo; Richard D Schulick Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Hauke Lang; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; George Sgourakis; Klaus J Schmitz; Andreas Paul; Philip Hilgard; Thomas Zöpf; Tanja Trarbach; Massimo Malagó; Hideo A Baba; Christoph E Broelsch Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: J Harder; B Riecken; O Kummer; C Lohrmann; F Otto; H Usadel; M Geissler; O Opitz; H Henss Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2006-09-12 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Yi-Te Lee; Amit G Singal; Marie Lauzon; Vatche G Agopian; Michael Luu; Mazen Noureddin; Tsuyoshi Todo; Irene K Kim; Marc L Friedman; Kambiz Kosari; Nicholas N Nissen; Lewis R Roberts; Julie K Heimbach; Gregory J Gores; Ju Dong Yang Journal: Cancer Date: 2022-08-23 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Matthias P Fabritius; Najib Ben Khaled; Wolfgang G Kunz; Jens Ricke; Max Seidensticker Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Maria A Gonzalez-Carmona; Christian Möhring; Robert Mahn; Taotao Zhou; Alexandra Bartels; Farsaneh Sadeghlar; Maximilian Bolch; Annabelle Vogt; Dominik J Kaczmarek; Dominik J Heling; Leona Dold; Jacob Nattermann; Vittorio Branchi; Hanno Matthaei; Steffen Manekeller; Jörg C Kalff; Christian P Strassburg; Raphael U Mohr; Tobias J Weismüller Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 4.379