Maia van Kan1, Kathryn E Burns2, Nuala A Helsby2. 1. Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. m.vankan@auckland.ac.nz. 2. Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Melphalan is a bifunctional alkylating agent that elicits its cytotoxic activity by rapidly forming an initial DNA monoadduct, which then produces an inter-strand crosslink. Most studies exploring the role of inherited differences in DNA repair and melphalan outcomes focus on inter-strand crosslink repair, however, monoadduct repair likely plays a key role since it minimises the ultimate production of these crosslinks. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess evidence of an association between variation in monoadduct repair pathways and melphalan response. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken using Medline, Embase, Scopus and PubMed databases. Duplicates were removed and only full-text articles were included. To be included for critique in this systematic review, articles were assessed for relevance using strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were identified that involved patients treated with melphalan, however, in 3, only a minority of the cohort received melphalan. Across the remaining 11 studies, 61 genes/proteins in DNA monoadduct repair pathways were assessed. Both germline SNP (CDKN1A, ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC4, ERCC6, EXO1, MLH1, MNAT1, MUTYH, PARP4, PCNA, POLE, POLR1G, RAD23B, RFC1, RFC3, RPA1, RPA3, TREX1, UNG, XPC, XRCC1) and somatic expression (CDKN1A, PARP1, PCNA, MGMT, RECQL, RFC5) were associated with melphalan outcomes in ≥ 1 study. CONCLUSION: It appears that inherited germline differences in monoadduct repair genes may be a risk factor for poor outcomes. However, the diversity of study design, patient cohorts, genes assessed and lack of replication, preclude any meta-analysis. Further prospective studies are required to validate these findings.
PURPOSE: Melphalan is a bifunctional alkylating agent that elicits its cytotoxic activity by rapidly forming an initial DNA monoadduct, which then produces an inter-strand crosslink. Most studies exploring the role of inherited differences in DNA repair and melphalan outcomes focus on inter-strand crosslink repair, however, monoadduct repair likely plays a key role since it minimises the ultimate production of these crosslinks. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess evidence of an association between variation in monoadduct repair pathways and melphalan response. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken using Medline, Embase, Scopus and PubMed databases. Duplicates were removed and only full-text articles were included. To be included for critique in this systematic review, articles were assessed for relevance using strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were identified that involved patients treated with melphalan, however, in 3, only a minority of the cohort received melphalan. Across the remaining 11 studies, 61 genes/proteins in DNA monoadduct repair pathways were assessed. Both germline SNP (CDKN1A, ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC4, ERCC6, EXO1, MLH1, MNAT1, MUTYH, PARP4, PCNA, POLE, POLR1G, RAD23B, RFC1, RFC3, RPA1, RPA3, TREX1, UNG, XPC, XRCC1) and somatic expression (CDKN1A, PARP1, PCNA, MGMT, RECQL, RFC5) were associated with melphalan outcomes in ≥ 1 study. CONCLUSION: It appears that inherited germline differences in monoadduct repair genes may be a risk factor for poor outcomes. However, the diversity of study design, patient cohorts, genes assessed and lack of replication, preclude any meta-analysis. Further prospective studies are required to validate these findings.
Authors: Sheelu Varghese; Hui Xu; David Bartlett; Marybeth Hughes; James F Pingpank; Tatiana Beresnev; H Richard Alexander Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-03-11 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Vicent M Guillem; Cristina Arbona; Juan Carlos Hernández-Boluda; María José Terol; Rosa Goterris; Carlos Solano; Mar Tormo Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2011-04-04
Authors: Avinash K Persaud; Junan Li; Jasmine A Johnson; Nathan Seligson; Douglas W Sborov; Ernest Duah; Yu Kyoung Cho; Danxin Wang; Mitch A Phelps; Craig C Hofmeister; Ming J Poi Journal: Mol Carcinog Date: 2019-09-22 Impact factor: 4.784
Authors: C Dumontet; S Landi; T Reiman; T Perry; A Plesa; I Bellini; R Barale; L M Pilarski; J Troncy; S Tavtigian; F Gemignani Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2009-12-07 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Luca Agnelli; Laura Mosca; Sonia Fabris; Marta Lionetti; Adrian Andronache; Ivo Kwee; Katia Todoerti; Donata Verdelli; Cristina Battaglia; Francesco Bertoni; Giorgio Lambertenghi Deliliers; Antonino Neri Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 5.006