Literature DB >> 34346173

Counterfactual mediation analysis in the multistate model framework for surrogate and clinical time-to-event outcomes in randomized controlled trials.

Isabelle R Weir1,2, Jennifer R Rider3, Ludovic Trinquart1,4,5.   

Abstract

In cancer randomized controlled trials, surrogate endpoints are frequently time-to-event endpoints, subject to the competing risk from the time-to-event clinical outcome. In this context, we introduce a counterfactual-based mediation analysis for a causal assessment of surrogacy. We use a multistate model for risk prediction to account for both direct transitions towards the clinical outcome and indirect transitions through the surrogate outcome. Within the counterfactual framework, we define natural direct and indirect effects with a causal interpretation. Based on these measures, we define the proportion of the treatment effect on the clinical outcome mediated by the surrogate outcome. We estimate the proportion for both the cumulative risk and restricted mean time lost. We illustrate our approach by using 18-year follow-up data from the SPCG-4 randomized trial of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We assess time to metastasis as a surrogate outcome for prostate cancer-specific mortality.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analysis; mediation analysis; progression-free survival; randomized controlled trials as topic; surrogate endpoint; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34346173      PMCID: PMC8776584          DOI: 10.1002/pst.2159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  41 in total

Review 1.  Statistical challenges in the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in randomized trials.

Authors:  Geert Molenberghs; Marc Buyse; Helena Geys; Didier Renard; Tomasz Burzykowski; Ariel Alonso
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-12

Review 2.  Biomarkers and surrogate end points--the challenge of statistical validation.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Daniel J Sargent; Axel Grothey; Alastair Matheson; Aimery de Gramont
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Restricted Mean Survival Times to Improve Communication of Evidence from Cancer Randomized Trials and Observational Studies.

Authors:  Ludovic Trinquart; Anna Bill-Axelson; Jennifer R Rider
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Limitations of hazard ratios in clinical trials.

Authors:  Mats J Stensrud; John M Aalen; Odd O Aalen; Morten Valberg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Surrogate marker analysis in cancer clinical trials through time-to-event mediation techniques.

Authors:  Sjouke Vandenberghe; Luc Duchateau; Leen Slaets; Jan Bogaerts; Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Meta-analysis for surrogacy: accelerated failure time models and semicompeting risks modeling.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh; Jeremy M G Taylor; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Estimation of indirect effect when the mediator is a censored variable.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Assessing the value of a censored surrogate outcome.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Intermediate Endpoints After Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy: 5-Year Distant Metastasis to Predict Overall Survival.

Authors:  William C Jackson; Krithika Suresh; Vasu Tumati; Steven G Allen; Robert T Dess; Simpa S Salami; Arvin George; Samuel D Kaffenberger; David C Miller; Jason W D Hearn; Shruti Jolly; Rohit Mehra; Brent K Hollenbeck; Ganesh S Palapattu; Matthew Schipper; Felix Y Feng; Todd M Morgan; Neil B Desai; Daniel E Spratt
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Quantifying the association between progression-free survival and overall survival in oncology trials using Kendall's τ.

Authors:  Enya M Weber; Andrew C Titman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Informed decision-making: Statistical methodology for surrogacy evaluation and its role in licensing and reimbursement assessments.

Authors:  Christopher J Weir; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.234

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.