Introduction: Current methods of managing osteomyelitic voids after debridement are inadequate and result in significant morbidity to patients. Synthetic ceramic void fillers are appropriate for non-infected bone defects but serve as a nidus of re-infection in osteomyelitis after debridement. CERAMENT G (CG) is an injectable ceramic bone void filler which contains gentamicin and is currently being evaluated for use in osteomyelitic environments after debridement due to its theoretical ability to serve as a scaffold for healing while eliminating residual bacteria after debridement through the elution of antibiotics. The goal of this study was to evaluate (1) the rate of persistent infection and (2) new bone growth of a debrided osteomyelitic defect in a rat model which has been treated with either gentamicin-impregnated ceramic cement (CERAMENT G) or the same void filler without antibiotics (CERAMENT, CBVF). Methods: Osteomyelitis was generated in the proximal tibia of Sprague Dawley rats, subsequently debrided, and the defect filled with either (1) CG ( n = 20 ), (2) CBVF ( n = 20 ), or (3) nothing ( n = 20 ). Each group was euthanized after 6 weeks. Infection was detected through bacterial culture and histology. Bone growth was quantified using microCT. Results: Infection was not detected in defects treated with CG as compared with 35 % of defects ( 7 / 20 ) treated with CBVF and 50 % ( 10 / 20 ) of empty defects ( p = 0.001 ). Bone volume in the defect of CG-treated rats was greater than the CBVF (0.21 vs. 0.17, p = 0.021 ) and empty groups (0.21 vs. 0.11, p < 0.001 ) at 6 weeks after implantation. Conclusions: Ceramic void filler with gentamicin (CERAMENT G) decreased the rate of persistent infection and increased new bone growth as compared to the same void filler without antibiotics (CERAMENT) and an empty defect in a rat model of debrided osteomyelitis. Copyright:
Introduction: Current methods of managing osteomyelitic voids after debridement are inadequate and result in significant morbidity to patients. Synthetic ceramic void fillers are appropriate for non-infected bone defects but serve as a nidus of re-infection in osteomyelitis after debridement. CERAMENT G (CG) is an injectable ceramic bone void filler which contains gentamicin and is currently being evaluated for use in osteomyelitic environments after debridement due to its theoretical ability to serve as a scaffold for healing while eliminating residual bacteria after debridement through the elution of antibiotics. The goal of this study was to evaluate (1) the rate of persistent infection and (2) new bone growth of a debrided osteomyelitic defect in a rat model which has been treated with either gentamicin-impregnated ceramic cement (CERAMENT G) or the same void filler without antibiotics (CERAMENT, CBVF). Methods:Osteomyelitis was generated in the proximal tibia of Sprague Dawley rats, subsequently debrided, and the defect filled with either (1) CG ( n = 20 ), (2) CBVF ( n = 20 ), or (3) nothing ( n = 20 ). Each group was euthanized after 6 weeks. Infection was detected through bacterial culture and histology. Bone growth was quantified using microCT. Results:Infection was not detected in defects treated with CG as compared with 35 % of defects ( 7 / 20 ) treated with CBVF and 50 % ( 10 / 20 ) of empty defects ( p = 0.001 ). Bone volume in the defect of CG-treated rats was greater than the CBVF (0.21 vs. 0.17, p = 0.021 ) and empty groups (0.21 vs. 0.11, p < 0.001 ) at 6 weeks after implantation. Conclusions: Ceramic void filler with gentamicin (CERAMENT G) decreased the rate of persistent infection and increased new bone growth as compared to the same void filler without antibiotics (CERAMENT) and an empty defect in a rat model of debrided osteomyelitis. Copyright:
Osteomyelitis is an infectious disease of bone which is often caused by
methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (Aragón-Sánchez
et al., 2009; Hatzenbuehler and Pulling, 2011; Lew and Waldvogel, 1997,
2004). While acute osteomyelitis is generally responsive to intravenous
antibiotics, chronic osteomyelitis requires surgical debridement due to the
presence of necrotic bone
(Eckardt
et al., 1994; Norden et al., 1992; Stengel et al., 2001). Large segments of
dead bone, termed sequestra, can become avascular and harbor invasive
organisms thus preventing adequate treatment with intravenous antibiotics.
In addition, S. aureus invades the osteocyte lacuno-canalicular network (OLCN) of
live cortical bone during chronic osteomyelitis
(de Mesy
Bentley et al., 2017, 2018). Moreover, these bacteria are not susceptible to
local high-dose antibiotic treatment in mouse models of osteomyelitis
(Masters
et al., 2020; Schwarz et al., 2021). Proper debridement requires removal of
all necrotic tissue, which can leave a large defect that must be managed to
both prevent the recurrence of infection and provide mechanical
stability
(Davis,
2005; Eckardt et al., 1994; Lew and Waldvogel, 2004; Parsons and Strauss,
2004).Many approaches to dead space management exist: healing by secondary
intention, closed irrigation, temporary antibiotic-laden
polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) beads, and autologous bone grafts (Parsons and Strauss, 2004). None of these options
are ideal. Healing by secondary intention and closed irrigation systems have
high rates of recurrent infection
(Cierny, 1990; Clawson et al.,
1973; Kelly et al., 1970). Antibiotic-laden polymethylmethacrylate beads are
effective at eradicating infections but require a second procedure for
removal and subsequent management of the ensuing defect
(Adams et al., 1992;
Cierny, 1990). Autologous and allogeneic bone grafts are the most
commonly used void fillers, but limited bone stock, concern for disease
transmission, and donor site morbidity preclude their use in many situations
(Lew and Waldvogel, 2004). Other solutions
such as vascularized bone flaps and bone transport mechanisms are
cumbersome, expensive, and more suited for larger, segmental defects
(Green,
1991; Ilizarov, 1989; Weiland et al., 1984; Wood et al., 1985).A synthetic alternative that retains the osteoconductive and mechanical
qualities of autologous bone graft while also being abundant may be of use
in the management of osteomyelitic voids. Ceramic cements composed of
hydroxyapatite and calcium sulfate (e.g., CERAMENT Bone Void Filler, CBVF)
have been developed which could be superior to PMMA because they are
resorbable, osteoconductive, and biologic, thus obviating the need for
subsequent removal (Nilsson et al., 2004).
Unfortunately, use of these composites in infected environments is not
advisable because of their propensity to serve as a nidus of continued
infection. Similarly, other ceramic composites consisting of calcium
phosphate (Norian SRS), -tricalcium phosphate (Vitoss®), coralline hydroxyapatite and calcium carbonate (Pro Osteon®),
and calcium sulfate (BonePlast® and OSTEOSET®)
exist and have their own unique properties, but all are contra-indicated in
infected environments (Ricciardi and Bostrom,
2013). Bacterial colonization of these materials could be overcome by
impregnating the cement with antibiotics such as gentamicin, a cheap, broad
spectrum compound with a low rate of microbial resistance
(Klemm, 2001). A new formulation of a calcium
sulfate-hydroxyapatite cement impregnated with gentamicin (CERAMENT G, CG) has been developed but is not yet approved by the United States Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) for human use. The advantages of using
CERAMENT as a drug delivery device are that it forms a paste that can be
injected into bone defects, completely filling the cavity and excluding any
dead space, which obliterates any areas that may harbor residual bacteria
or small fragments of biofilm
(Ferguson et al., 2017;
McNally et al., 2016). Other commercially available ceramic formulations
with impregnated antibiotics include Herafill-G® (calcium
sulfate and calcium carbonate) and OSTEOSET® (calcium
sulfate with tobramycin) (Oliver et al.,
2020) but are non-injectable and therefore may be less ideal for eradication
of infection. In addition, the biodegradability of the product allows
single-stage surgery and has previously been demonstrated to be highly
efficient for treatment of chronic bone infections when combined with
debridement and systemic antimicrobials in clinical
studies (McNally
et al., 2016; Niazi et al., 2019; Oliver et al., 2020). While
CERAMENT G has shown overall effectiveness in humans, our study
represents the first evaluation of CERAMENT G in a small animal
model of debrided osteomyelitis and thus is useful in quantifying the
ability of this compound to eradicate infection as well as facilitate new
bone growth.The aim of this study was to evaluate the hypotheses that the ceramic cement
with gentamicin (CG) would (1) decrease the rate of persistent infection and
(2) increase new bone growth in a rat model of debrided osteomyelitis as
compared to the same cement without gentamicin (CERAMENT, CBVF) or an empty mechanically stable defect.
Materials and methods
Preparation of inoculum
A week prior to the first surgical date, a strain of Staphylococcus aureus known to be methicillin-
and gentamicin-sensitive (ATCC 29213, American Type Culture Collection,
Manassas, VA) was revived from a C freezer and incubated at
37 C for 24 h on a tryptone soy agar plate. On the day before
surgery, a single colony from a S. aureus streak plate was selected and inoculated
into tryptic soy broth. This culture was then incubated for 16 h at
37 C with shaking agitation. On the morning of the induction of
osteomyelitis, a subculture of S. aureus was made and grown for
several hours until reaching an absorbance of 0.6 at 600 nm, which correlates to
a viable count of approximately bacteria. This was then
kept on ice until needed during surgery.Study design: S. aureus ( CFU) was injected into a drill hole
in the right tibia of adult Sprague Dawley rats (). After 3 weeks, the
osteomyelitic defect was debrided and treated with (1) CERAMENT G
(), (2) CERAMENT (), or (3) nothing (); 6 weeks after the
second surgery, 20 rats from each group were euthanized, and the right
tibias were harvested. To determine the long-term outcome of the treatment,
another group () of CERAMENT G-treated rats was also
euthanized at 6 months after the debridement and treatment.
Induction of osteomyelitis
Using a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
of our institution, we carried out this study using a previously described
and published rat model of a mechanically stable osteomyelitic defect
(Fukushima et al., 2005;
Zelken et al., 2007). Our overall study design is shown in Fig. 1. We
chose to utilize a model without the use of a sclerosing agent or a foreign
body in order to induce a local mechanically stable, consistently sized
osteomyelitis in the proximal tibia for ease of debridement and standardized
evaluation of the region of interest (Fukushima
et al., 2005). Adult male Sprague Dawley rats weighing g (, Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana) were anesthetized
using isoflurane through inhalational anaesthesia in the animal operating
room. Subsequently, under sterile conditions, animals received a drill hole
(1 mm diameter, 3 mm depth) in the proximal tibia which was inoculated with
CFU (10 ) of gentamicin-sensitive S. aureus. The center of the defect
was positioned 3 mm inferior to the growth plate and 3 mm lateral to the
lateral edge of the tibial tuberosity. The depth of the drill hole was
controlled with a 3 mm stop on the end of the drill. Prior to randomization,
during the surgery to induce osteomyelitis, nine animals perished due to an
error in anaesthesia protocol. No further animals perished prior to the
completion of the experiment. Thus, the final sample size was .
Animals were housed with a single other companion in clear plastic cages
containing bedding as well as free access to water and food. Subcutaneous
buprenorphine was administered during the perioperative period for
analgesia. Animals were assessed clinically and weighed three times per
week. All animals maintained weight throughout the study period and did not
display signs of clinical infection.
Confirmation of infection
After 3 weeks, the animals were examined, and the right hind legs were imaged
with high-resolution X-ray (Faxitron X-ray Corp, Wheeling, IL).
Osteomyelitis was confirmed using an established scoring system which
evaluated the presence of osteomyelitis by detection of sequestrum,
involucrum, osteolysis, soft tissue swelling and joint effusion
(Norden
et al., 1980; Rissing et al., 1985; Zelken et al., 2007). Animals positive
for at least three of these findings were considered to have developed
osteomyelitis. All animals used in this study () were positive for
osteomyelitis in the operative limb prior to randomization.
Description of tested materials
Both CERAMENT (CBVF) and CERAMENT G (CG) were provided by the
sponsoring company (BONESUPPORT AB, Lund, Sweden) in sealed, sterile
packaging as prefabricated plugs (3 mm in diameter, 2.98 mm in length).
CERAMENT plugs consisted of 40 % hydroxyl apatite and 60 % calcium
sulfate. CERAMENT G plugs had identical compositions to CBVF plugs
with the exception of 0.29 mg of gentamicin added in the mixture (17.5 mg/mL
of paste). This is identical to the composition of both commercially
available compounds (Fig. 2b).Diagrams of experimental materials and regions of interest. After
confirmation of osteomyelitis, all animals underwent debridement using a 3 mm diameter drill centered on the previous 1 mm diameter hole used to create
the osteomyelitic cavity with a depth stop of 3 mm (a). Afterwards animals
randomized to receive CBVF or CG were filled with their respective plugs (b). During microCT testing, the region of interest (ROI) mimicked the
contours of the original implant in its dimensions, which were 3 mm in
diameter to a depth of 1.8 mm, at which point the remaining 1.2 mm of depth
was tapered to a diameter of 1.5 mm (c).
Debridement and implantation
After confirmation of osteomyelitis, all animals underwent debridement and
implantation. Debridement of the defect was performed using a 3 mm diameter
drill, with a depth stop at 3 mm (Fig. 2a). Copious amounts of normal saline
were used for irrigation. After debridement and re-draping and disinfecting
all instruments, animals were randomized using block randomization to have
the defect filled with (1) CERAMENT G, CG (), (2) CERAMENT,
CBVF (), or (3) empty (no filler, ) (Fig. 1). After
randomization, individuals analyzing subsequent data were blinded to
experimental group until the completion of the study. Skin incisions were
closed with absorbable suture. Once again, subcutaneous buprenorphine was
administered during the perioperative period for analgesia. Animals were
assessed clinically and weighed three times per week. All animals maintained
weight throughout the study period and did not display signs of clinical
infection.No systemic antibiotics were administered either orally or intravenously.
Six weeks after the implantation surgery, 20 rats from each group were
euthanized using carbon dioxide asphyxiation. Six months after the
implantation surgery, the remainder of the CG group rats () were
euthanized to serve as the long-term CG group.
Microbiology
All procedures for tissue collection were carried out using standard sterile
technique. The right tibias and surrounding muscle of all animals were
harvested immediately after sacrifice. The drill hole was exposed, and the
tibia was cut transversely 5 mm distal to the infection site. This was done
in such a way to expose both the original inoculation site and the
intramedullary canal to sonication and thus provided a microbiological
culture of both sites. The samples were vortexed and sonicated in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to dislodge the bacteria from the bone and
into the PBS solution. The tibias were then removed from the phosphate-buffered saline and placed in 10 % formalin for subsequent microCT and
histological analysis. The PBS sonicate fluid was serially diluted and
afterwards plated on 5 % sheep blood trypticsoy agar (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The specimens were then incubated for 48 h and underwent
colony enumeration as per standard microbiological protocol
(Breed and Dotterrer, 1916). The limit of detection was set at
150 CFU per milliliter. Six random contralateral limbs (CG: 1, CBVF: 2, empty: 3) were
also selected as negative controls and tested in this manner for quality
control of our microbiological procedure.
Microcomputed tomography (microCT)
The tibias in formalin were kept at room temperature for 1 d, placed at
4 C for 2 d and then switched to 70 % alcohol. The
samples were scanned by microCT (CT 35; SCANCO Medical, Bassersdorf,
Switzerland). The region of interest (ROI) mimicked the contours of the
original implant in its dimensions, which were 3 mm in diameter to a depth
of 1.8 mm, at which point the remaining 1.2 mm of depth was tapered to a
diameter of 1.5 mm. A global threshold was used to exclude any unmineralized
tissue or cement. The bone volume fraction (BVF), defined as the bone volume
divided by the total volume of the drill hole (BV TV), was analyzed and
compared among groups (Fig. 2c).
Histology
All samples underwent decalcification with 10 % EDTA in phosphate-buffered
saline and were embedded in paraffin through serial dehydration. Axial,
7 sections were taken at the level of the center of the drill hole
and went on to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical
staining.H&E staining was utilized to detect infection in the ROI. The presence of
infection in each sample was assessed by recording the presence or absence
of histological evidence of osteomyelitis in the form of a
neutrophil-predominant response in addition to necrosis of the bone as
judged by a single blinded attending musculoskeletal pathologist (Giorgio Perino). This clinical method detects osteomyelitis with a sensitivity of 43 %–84 % and a
specificity of
93 %–97 % (Abdul-Karim et
al., 1998; Lew and Waldvogel, 2004). Immunohistochemistry was performed
using anti-pro-collagen I antibodies (SP1.D8, Developmental Studies
Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) as a marker of osteoblasts and anti-cathepsin
K antibodies as a marker of osteoclasts
(Zenger et al., 2007). Images
of sections were obtained at magnification using a slide scanner (Zeiss
EVO 50 SEM, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, LLC, Thornwood, NY). The total numbers of
pro-collagen I-positive and cathepsin K-positive cells were manually counted
within the area of the previous defect, normalized by bone area, and the
results were expressed as osteoblast or osteoclast numbers per square millimeter.
Statistical analysis
Differences in microCT, as well as immunohistochemical counts between treatments,
were assessed with one-way ANOVA followed by a Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc
method. Proportions of infected samples were compared using chi-squared analysis (histology) and Fisher's exact test (culture) on a contingency table.
Descriptive statistics were gathered for the long-term group in terms of
histological or microbiological evidence of osteomyelitis but were not
compared to the others as it did not have a control group at the same time
point. The level of significance was .Power was calculated using previous studies that estimated a mean healing
response (bone growth) of 6.4 % for the control group and 14.2 % for the
CBVF-filled defects with a coefficient of variation of 60 % based on
internal data provided by the company. The sample size required to detect
such a difference using Satterthwaite's test with 5 % significance level
and 80 % statistical power was 16 rats in each group. The sample size was
increased to 20 per group as the assumptions about the average percent bone
growth in CG-filled defects compared with CBVF were uncertain.Detection of persistent infection: percentage of samples in each
group positive for growth ( per group). CERAMENT G inhibited
bacterial growth in the osteomyelitic defect as seen by the percentage of
samples in each group that had positive growth on culture medium (a) and
positive histological evidence of osteomyelitis (b). *
using contingency table and Fisher's exact test.Bacterial counts: colony forming units per milliliter of sonicate
taken from empty, CERAMENT Bone Void Filler, and CERAMENT G groups
( per group). Bacterial quantities were not significantly different
between treatment groups owing to the large standard deviations of the
non-CERAMENT G groups. Error bars represent standard
deviation.
Results
Bacterial culture (Figs. 3a and 4)
Bacterial cultures were positive in 25 % () of animals left with an
empty defect, 30 % () of animals treated with CBVF, and 0 % ()
of the animals treated with CG (Fig. 3a). The CG group was found to have
significantly fewer positive cultures than either the CBVF or empty control
groups (). The proportion of positive cultures in the CBVF group
was not significantly different than the empty group. None of cultures taken
from contralateral limbs (negative controls) were found to be positive.
Bacterial colony counts trended towards being higher in CBVF-treated animals
than in animals left with an empty defect but did not reach significance due
to a large standard deviation in colony forming units per milliliter
(CFU per milliliter) in the non-CG groups (Fig. 4). None of the long-term group
animals filled with CG had positive cultures at 6 months after
implantation.
Histology (Figs. 3b and 5)
Histological evidence of osteomyelitis (i.e., a neutrophil-predominant
inflammatory reaction bone necrosis) was found in 50 % () of
animals with empty defects, 35 % () of animals treated with CBVF, and
none () of the animals treated with CG (Fig. 3b). The proportion of
animals with histological evidence of osteomyelitis in the CG group was
significantly lower than animals in both the CBVF and empty groups (). The proportion of animals with histological evidence of
osteomyelitis in the CBVF group was not different from the empty control
group. No histological evidence of osteomyelitis was found in any animals in
the CG-treated long-term group. The proportion of animals with positive
cultures was not significantly different than the proportion of samples with
histological evidence of osteomyelitis within the respective groups (). Osteoblast and osteoclast counts were not different between the
short-term treatment groups (empty, CBVF or CG).Representative microCT and low/high-magnification H&E sections
of representative samples in empty, CERAMENT, and CERAMENT G groups. MicroCT and low-power images show significant bone growth in the previous defect in CERAMENT and CERAMENT G groups. High-power histology images show evidence of
persistent osteomyelitis in the empty and CERAMENT groups as evidenced by a
neutrophil predominant infiltrate and necrotic bone with empty lacunae. No
such reaction is seen in the CERAMENT G group. Scale bars on the bottom
left show 1 mm in microCT and low-magnification histology. Scale bars in high-magnification histology show 100 .Measurement of new bone growth in empty, CERAMENT, and
CERAMENT G groups (): CERAMENT G increased new bone
growth compared to empty and CERAMENT groups (a). Animals in the CERAMENT
group with histologically evident osteomyelitis formed significantly less
bone than those that did not have osteomyelitis (b). Animals which were
culture-positive or culture-negative formed a similar level of bone in both empty
and CERAMENT groups. * using ANOVA
Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc method. Error bars represent standard
deviation.
MicroCT (Figs. 5 and 6)
The bone volume fraction (BV TV) of the region of interest in the CG group
was greater than that of CBVF (0.21 vs. 0.17, ) and rats with
empty defects (0.21 vs. 0.11, ). The BV TV of CBVF-treated
rats was greater than rats treated with empty defects (0.17 vs. 0.11, ) (Fig. 6a). In subgroup analysis, the CBVF group BV TV of
the ROI in rats without histological evidence of osteomyelitis was greater
than that of rats with a substantial evidence of infection 0.19 vs. 0.14 () and similar to rats in the CG group, which all had no evidence of
infection (0.19 vs. 0.21, ; Fig. 6b). Similarly, rats in the
CBVF group without histological evidence of infection had a greater BV TV
than rats with empty defects (0.19 vs. 0.10, ), while rats
with histological evidence of infection were similar to rats with an empty
defect (0.14 vs. 0.10, ). A similar trend was not seen in culture-positive and culture-negative rats. There was no significant difference between
culture-positive and culture-negative animals within CERAMENT and empty groups
(Fig. 6c). Culture-positive CERAMENT samples had a greater BV TV than
culture-positive empty samples (0.19 vs. 0.09, ). Similarly
culture-negative CERAMENT samples had a greater BV TV than culture-negative
empty samples (0.16 vs. 0.11, ).
Discussion
Osteomyelitis is a common infectious disease of bone which frequently
necessitates debridement for appropriate management. The ensuing defect can
require the use of a void filler. In this study we demonstrated that a
calcium sulfate–hydroxyapatite cement with gentamicin (CERAMENT G,
CG) decreased the rate of persistent infection and increased new bone growth
as compared to both the same cement without gentamicin (CBVF) and an empty
defect in a rat model of debrided osteomyelitis.Two different methods of determining persistent infection were utilized in
this study: bacterial culture and histological evidence of a osteomyelitis.
By either criterion, no infection was detectable in CERAMENT G-treated (CG) rats at both 6 weeks and 6 months after implantation. By
contrast, animals treated with an empty defect or a cement void filler
without antibiotics (CBVF) had a 25 %–50 % rate of infection at 6 weeks
after implantation. Previous studies examining the use of bone void fillers
without antibiotics or defects left empty in osteomyelitis found high rates
of persistent infection after debridement
(Clawson
et al., 1973; Gerhart et al., 1993; Jiang et al., 2012; Joosten et al.,
2005; Kelly et al., 1970). By contrast, antibiotic-impregnated void fillers
are known to be effective at treating osteomyelitis
(Branstetter
et al., 2009; McNally et al., 2016; Rand et al., 2015; Xie et al., 2009).
While the majority of previous studies examined calcium sulfate carriers,
this study utilized combination hydroxyapatite and calcium sulfate carrier,
CERAMENT G. The advantages of these combination carriers include
theoretically slower resorption, osteoconduction, controlled antibiotic
release, and stronger mechanical properties
(Iundusi
et al., 2015; Nilsson et al., 2004, 2013; Raina et al., 2016; Solberg et
al., 1999; Stravinskas et al., 2016). In contrast to our findings, a similar
study carried out in pigs using CERAMENT G without the
administration of systemic antibiotics found high rates of persistent
infection with both limited and extensive debridement
(Blirup-Plum
et al., 2020). This study differed from ours as it utilized a foreign body
and had a higher severity of osteomyelitis prior to debridement than that
which was encountered in our study. Multiple clinical studies examining the
use of CERAMENT G in clinical settings have demonstrated effective
dead space management with low infection recurrence
rate (Ferguson
et al., 2019; McNally et al., 2016; Niazi et al., 2019).In order to examine the osteoconductive properties of the groups, this study
utilized microcomputed tomography to determine new bone formation within the
debrided osteomyelitic cavity. New bone growth was higher in animals treated
with CERAMENT G as compared with both the cement without antibiotics
(CERAMENT, CBVF) and empty drill hole groups. Overall, defects that were
implanted with cement formed more new bone in the defect compared with
defects in the empty control group (BV TV CG: 0.21 vs. CBVF: 0.17 vs. empty:
0.11). This result is consistent with the finding that resorbable cements
enhance bone growth
(Ferguson
et al., 2019; Frankenburg et al., 1998; Hak, 2007). Interestingly,
CERAMENT G improved bone growth even when compared with the CERAMENT
(without antibiotic) group. While it is possible that this could be an
unknown osteoinductive effect of gentamicin, it appears as if this is
mediated primarily by the eradication of infection. The presence of
persistent infection after debridement appeared to have a negative effect on
bone growth in animals treated with cement without impregnated antibiotics.
Subgroup analysis showed that animals without histological evidence of
infection (indicated by a neutrophil-dominant inflammatory reaction necrotic bone) in the CBVF group had a bone volume fraction comparable to
that of the CG-treated group (BV TV of 0.19 vs. 0.21, respectively), while
animals with infection had rates of new bone growth that were comparable to
animals treated without any cement at all (BV TV of 0.14 vs. 0.12,
respectively). Thus, lack of histologically detectable infection was
associated with increased new bone growth in the cement group without
antibiotics and is likely the primary reason for improved bone growth in the
CERAMENT G group as compared with the CBVF group. This trend was not
seen among animals with an empty defect, and these rats showed similar levels
of bone growth regardless of the presence or absence of histological
evidence of infection. Animals subdivided by culture-positive and culture-negative
status did not show the same trend, likely due to the decreased sensitivity
of culture relative to histology for the detection of
osteomyelitis (Lew and Waldvogel, 2004). No
animals treated with CERAMENT G (CG) had any detectable infection so
a similar comparison could not be drawn within this group. Both CERAMENT
Bone Void Filler and CERAMENT G have been previously shown to
facilitate new bone growth when utilized in uninfected environments, but
literature which directly compared the two compounds in the absence of
infection is not available
(Nilsson et al., 2004;
Oliver et al., 2020). To our knowledge there is no published literature
detailing the relationship between persistent infection and decreased bone
growth when bone graft substitutes are used in osteomyelitic environments.We recognize that our study has several limitations. In clinical patients
with osteomyelitis, surgical debridement is generally indicated in the
presence of a significant amounts of necrotic bone. Abundant necrotic bone
is typically produced in animal models by administering sclerosing agents or
implanted foreign bodies. The downsides of using these agents are that they
can be cumbersome or produce widespread osteomyelitis throughout the entire
tibial medullary canal
(Korkusuz et al.,
1993; Rissing et al., 1985). We chose to utilize a model without the use of
a sclerosing agent or a foreign body in order to induce a local mechanically
stable, consistently sized osteomyelitis in the proximal tibia for ease of
debridement and standardized evaluation of the region of
interest (Fukushima et al., 2005). Even so,
68 % () of animals used in this study showed evidence of sequestrum,
and 100 % had evidence of osteomyelitis on radiography immediately prior
to debridement despite the lack of utilization of sclerosing agents. Having
said this, at the end of our study, only 25 %–50 % of animals treated with
an empty defect had histologically or microbiologically detectable infection,
thus making assessing interventions more challenging given that the rats
were likely to be able to clear the infection with debridement only.Further, the animals used in this study did not receive any oral or intravenous antibiotics in contrast to the standard of care in real-world
scenarios. While our model did not precisely mimic the clinical situation in
this regard, we feel that the stark contrast in persistent infection between
groups treated with and without local antibiotic therapy still represents an
interesting and valid finding that displays bactericidal properties of the
gentamicin within the ceramic composite. We utilized both culture and
histology in order to detect infection, which both have separate
disadvantages. It was expected that culture was a less sensitive marker for
infection than histology especially because the method used for culturing
bacteria in this study was non-destructive to the tissue and instead
attempted to separate bacteria from the sample using mechanical agitation.
This approach may have prevented the complete retrieval of bacteria from the
bone tissue and thus lowered our sensitivity
(Reizner et al., 2014). Conversely, a method
relying on pulverization of the sample would have allowed a more thorough
retrieval of bacteria for the purposes of culture but would have precluded
histological or radiographic analysis. Thus we elected to utilize histology
in addition to culture for a more robust detection of infection using
multiple methods. These two methods did not differ significantly in the rate
of positive results (). Next, it is now known that S. aureus invades the
osteocyte lacuno-canalicular network (OLCN) of live cortical bone during
chronic osteomyelitis and that these bacteria are not susceptible to local
high-dose antibiotic treatment. It is unclear whether our methods of
detection would capture these bacteria if they were present in any of our
groups
(Masters
et al., 2020; de Mesy Bentley et al., 2017, 2018; Schwarz et al., 2021).
Lastly, in vivo gentamicin elution characteristics and systemic toxicity data were
not recorded in these animals as they were outside the scope of the study
and have been described elsewhere
(Stravinskas et al.,
2016).
Conclusion
The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis often leaves large defects that
require bone grafting. Unfortunately, current bone graft materials have
inadequacies including donor site morbidity, expense, or propensity to act
as a nidus of infection. This study demonstrated decreased persistent
infection rates and increased bone growth in debrided osteomyelitic cavities
filled with a calcium sulfate–hydroxyapatite composite impregnated with
gentamicin (CERAMENT G) when compared with an identical void filler
without antibiotic impregnation and an empty defect. This study supports
further investigation into the use of this material as a readily available
void filler to be used in osteomyelitic environments after debridement.
Authors: M A McNally; J Y Ferguson; A C K Lau; M Diefenbeck; M Scarborough; A J Ramsden; B L Atkins Journal: Bone Joint J Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 5.082
Authors: Sophie A Blirup-Plum; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Henrik E Jensen; Kasper N Kragh; Bent Aalbæk; Hans Gottlieb; Mats Bue; Louise K Jensen Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 5.853
Authors: D B Raina; A Gupta; M M Petersen; W Hettwer; M McNally; M Tägil; M-H Zheng; A Kumar; L Lidgren Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 5.853
Authors: Marcel Niemann; Frank Graef; Sufian S Ahmad; Karl F Braun; Ulrich Stöckle; Andrej Trampuz; Sebastian Meller Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-05-11
Authors: Deepak Bushan Raina; Vetra Markevičiūtė; Mindaugas Stravinskas; Joeri Kok; Ida Jacobson; Yang Liu; Erdem Aras Sezgin; Hanna Isaksson; Stefan Zwingenberger; Magnus Tägil; Šarūnas Tarasevičius; Lars Lidgren Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-03-02