Hanta hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: A pathology in whose diagnosis kidney biopsy plays a major role (Review).

Hantavirus infection belongs to a group of zoonoses rare in the Balkan Peninsula, causing two major syndromes, depending on the viral serotype involved: Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) also known as endemic nephropathy and cardiopulmonary syndrome (CPS). Because there is no specific treatment or vaccine for this condition approved in the USA or Europe, the key to minimizing the risk of adverse progression to chronic kidney disease, secondary hypertension or even death is primarily the recognition and early diagnosis of this condition with prompt therapeutic intervention. The aim of this study was to review the literature data on the epidemiology, pathogenesis and management of this disease and to identify several aspects related to the difficulties encountered in diagnosing this pathology, taking into consideration that the disease is not endemic in this geographical area. Copyright: © Lupuşoru et al.

1. Introduction

The hantavirus infection is part of a rare group of zoonoses with increasing frequency and geographic spread in the last years. The Hantavirus genus includes various human pathogenic serotypes, whose hosts are mainly wild rodents (1). Hantaviruses are classified in two large groups, according to their geographic distribution: The Old World hantaviruses and The New World hantaviruses (1). The Old World hantaviruses cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS), while the New World hantaviruses are associated with hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome (CPS) (1).

Onset of HFRS is similar to a flu-like syndrome, with fever and prospects to evolve into an acute kidney injury (AKI) with severe thrombocytopenia, anemia and coagulation dysfunction (2), mimicking the thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) from the hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), with which it is frequently confused. The renal dysfunction is manifested through decrease in the glomerular filtration rate, hematuria and transient proteinuria, often in the nephrotic range, which indicates a lesion of the glomerular filtration barrier (2). The typical histological aspect is that of an acute tubulointerstitial nephritis with hemorrhage in the outer medulla, but glomerular endothelial lesions are also present (3).

This review emphasizes the importance of the renal biopsy in the diagnosis of hantavirus hemorrhagic nephritis and draws attention on this zoonosis that may be highly underdiagnosed in the Balkan Peninsula.

2. Epidemiology

Hantavirus infection belongs to a group of rare zoonotic diseases but with increasing incidence and geographical range in the last years. The genus Hantavirus is a member of the Bunyaviridae family and includes over 28 serotypes that cause infections in humans, rodents being regarded as the main reservoir for the pathogen. Hantaviruses have a diameter of 80-120 nm and are enveloped viruses; the lipoprotein envelope being easily inactivated by disinfectants. They are characterized by a negative-sensed trisegmented single-stranded RNA genome (2). The envelope has glycoprotein projections with hemagglutinin activity (Gn and Gc). The genome comprises three segments (small, S; medium, M; and large, L) coding the viral nucleocapsid protein (N), two envelope glycoproteins and the genome associated RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (4). The viruses replicate within the cytoplasm of the infected cells and are released in the bloodstream by virus budding.

The history of hantaviruses initiated between 1951 and 1953, during the Korean war, when the first cases of hemorrhagic fever (Korean hemorrhagic fever) were reported in an area along the Hantaan River, after which they were named (1). The virus was isolated in 1978 by Ho Wang Lee from lung tissue belonging to the striped field mouse Apodemus agrarius that was experimentally inoculated with the pathogen of the Korean hemorrhagic fever (5). Hantaviruses are spread worldwide in endemic areas and their classification is performed according to the geographical distribution: The Old World hantaviruses which cause HFRS and The New World hantaviruses which cause CPS; these diseases are responsible for the hospitalization of 150.000-200.000 individuals worldwide each year (2,6). Within the Old World hantaviruses, which are usually found in Europe and Asia, the best known species are Puumala orthohantavirus (PUUV), Hantaan orthohantavirus (HTNV), Seoul orthohantavirus (SEOV) and Dobrava-Belgrade orthohantavirus (DOBV), the latter being spread mostly in the Balkan Peninsula, but also the Saaremaa virus (SAAV) which is genetically related to DOBV, and the Tula virus (TULV) (2). DOBV, the most prevalent serotype observed in the Balkan Peninsula, is responsible for a 12% mortality rate associated with infection (7). There are four rodent species constituting the virus host: Apodemus, Microtus, Myodes and Rattus; the rodents do not develop the disease, but their growth may be affected as a consequence of the infection (8,9) and they can also spread the virus to other animals: Moose, red fox, bat, domestic cat and dog (10-13). The New World hantaviruses are found in America; the best known are Sin Nombre virus and Andes virus, the latter being the only Hantavirus for which person-to-person transmission may take place (14,15).

The European Center for Disease Prevention and Control published a list with 29 countries reporting 1,826 cases of hantavirus infection for the year 2018, with most of the cases (97%) involving PUUV (16). However, there is the possibility that most HFRS cases, being mild and moderate forms of disease, are underdiagnosed and thus, the incidence of the disease in Europe may be underestimated. The Dobrava strain was confirmed as the causative agent in endemic nephropathy cases in Central and South Eastern Europe (17).

Humans do not belong to the natural host range of hantaviruses and infection generally occurs by inhalation of virus-containing aerosols from rodent faeces, urine and saliva, but also by rodent bite and skin lesions (18,19). People at increased risk of infection are those who live or work in rural areas and come into close contact with virus reservoirs: Forestry workers, farmers, hunters, and military personnel (who can be easily infected during military exercises) (2). The existence of a genetic susceptibility involved in the pathogenesis of the disease was recently revealed: The HLA-B8 DR3 and DQ2 haplotypes are associated with a severe clinical course of the infection, while HLA-B27 is associated with a benign clinical course of the infection (20-23). There are two peaks of incidence over the course of one year: The first peak is in August, during the vacation season that starts in July, and the second peak is in November and December when the onset of cold weather causes mice to search for shelter in people's homes (24).

3. Pathogenesis

In patients with endemic nephropathy, hantaviruses infect renal endothelial cells, podocytes and tubular epithelial cells. The pathogenesis of the infection is complex and not yet fully understood and it is characterized by endothelial damage with enhanced capillary permeability, disruption of tight junctions of tubular epithelial cells and alterations of the podocyte cytoskeleton (25-29).

Endothelial integrity is the result of a complex interaction between endothelial cells, thrombocytes and immune cells (29).

Hantaviruses infect the susceptible cells (endothelial cells, tubular epithelial cells and glomerular cells) by interaction of the viral envelope glycoproteins (Gn and Gc) with β-integrin surface molecules. Both pathogenic and nonpathogenic hantavirus strains infect the human cells, but the receptors they use for cellular entry are different: αvβ1 and αvβ3, respectively (26); these surface receptors, usually involved in matrix adhesion, are being blocked in the process of virus attachment. Thus, the virus affects the renal tubular epithelium, the podocytes and the capillary endothelial cells by disturbing the integrity of cell-to-cell contacts and also by stimulating the immune system. Evidence has revealed that immature dendritic cells are involved in the dissemination of hantaviruses, as they express on their surface the αvβ3 integrin and can be found in the proximity of epithelial cells (30). Hantavirus-infected dendritic cells help spread the virus by migrating through lymphatic vessels to the regional lymph nodes and then to the endothelial cells (31), as they exert their role of antigen-presenting cells and induce the immune activation of T lymphocytes. High levels of cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes were detected in the serum of patients with HFRS and the evidence revealed that the endothelial damage was not caused by direct cellular cytotoxicity of the hantavirus, but by pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by the virus-specific T lymphocytes that attack the endothelial cells expressing viral antigens on their surface (32), thus contributing to the capillary leakage. Infection of the endothelial cells initiates an inflammatory response involving the activation of the complement system and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TGF, interferons, interleukins (IL-6 and IL-10) and TNF (33). Increased levels of IFNγ, IL-10 and TNFα were revealed in the serum of patients with PUUV and DOBV and also in patients with severe clinical course of disease (34). Several signaling cascades that use vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), IL-6 or urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) as mediators have been described to be involved in the regulation of podocyte function; these mediators are also known to be upregulated in endemic nephropathy (35), thus supporting the involvement of podocyte alteration in the hantavirus infection pathogenesis.

4. Pathological findings

The most frequent pattern of injury observed in HFRS kidney biopsy specimens is acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (3).

The kidney biopsy performed in the acute phase of the disease course can raise the suspicion of hantavirus infection immediately after removal of tissue, as it reveals macroscopic features of hemorrhage in the renal medulla (3).

Light microscopy (LM) can reveal normal glomeruli or glomeruli with increased mesangial cellularity. A few studies have described cases of mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis in hantavirus infection (3,36). The pathognomonic histopathological finding is the interstitial hemorrhage (with both isomorphic and dysmorphic erythrocytes), most commonly found in the outer medulla, that can compress the renal tubules (Fig. 1). The interstitial hemorrhage is present in 20-60% of the kidney biopsy specimens in the acute phase of hantavirus infection (17). LM also reveals interstitial and periglomerular lymphoplasmacytic cell infiltrates, tubulitis and arterial endothelial swelling.

Figure 1

Needle biopsy revealing histomorphologic changes in the kidney of a patient with hantavirus infection. (A and B) Light microscopy and toluidine blue staining (x400). Glomeruli with normal appearance. Resorption droplets in the proximal tubular cells. (C and D) Light microscopy and toluidine blue staining (x200). Extensive interstitial hemorrhage in medulla and tubulitis. (E) Electron microscopy (x5,000). Extravasation of erythrocytes into the interstitium. (F) Electron microscopy (x10,000). Glomerular capillaries exhibited endothelial swelling with reduced fenestrations and foot process effacement. (Images were obtained from the collection of the Nephrology Department of Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania).

In immunofluorescence (IF), the staining is usually negative, but a few studies have described mild granular C1q, C3, IgG and IgM deposits along the glomerular capillary walls, thus supporting the theory of classical complement pathway activation in hantaviral infection (11,36-38).

Electron microscopy (EM) can reveal diffuse foot process effacement, denudation of the tubular epithelial cells, resorption droplets in the tubules (in cases of high levels of 24-h proteinuria) and endothelial swelling in the glomerular or peritubular capillaries (Fig. 1); the infected cells can display hypertrophy of the Golgi apparatus (3). The foot process effacement and detachment of podocytes from the glomerular basement membranes explains the nephrotic range proteinuria observed in some cases of AKI and strengthens the role of podocyte cytoskeletal alterations in the pathogenicity of HSRF (27,28,39).

5. Clinical manifestations

Hantavirus infection causes two types of clinical syndromes in humans: HFRS and CPS; the difference consisting in the implicated strains and the affected vascular circulation: Capillaries from renal medulla and pulmonary capillaries, respectively. The common lesion is the increased capillary permeability and both forms of disease begin with fever syndrome and flu-like symptoms and have in common thrombocytopenia, left-shifted leukocytosis and arterial hypotension (1,2,29). In the following sections, detailed aspects of HFRS, also known as endemic nephropathy, are presented. Clinical presentation can range from mild to severe forms of disease, depending on the causing strain. Therefore, strains such as HTNV and DOBV can cause severe forms of disease with mortality ranging from 5 to 15% and strains such as SEOV, PUUV and SAAV in general cause moderate or mild forms of disease with a mortality below 1% (18). The disease evolution has five chronological phases including:

i) Febrile phase

After an incubation period of 2-4 weeks, the disease begins with flu-like syndrome including high grade fever, myalgia, low back pain, headache, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. At this stage most clinicians will first look for a cause of the fever and the following basic laboratory tests will be necessary: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C reactive protein, hemoglobin, platelet count and differential, electrolytes, creatinine, abdominal ultrasonography and other imaging studies (40). This phase lasts 3-7 days and it can be accompanied by ophthalmological disorder; in PUUV infection, a decrease of intraocular pressure was reported in 88% of the cases, myopia in 78% of the cases and visual acuity reduction in 87% (41).

ii) Hypotensive phase

This phase lasts between a few hours and 2 days. It can appear as severe arterial hypotension and irreversible shock. This is the phase when thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, haemorrhagic manifestations such as skin and mucous petechiae, hematemesis, epistaxis, melena, hematuria or even intracerebral haemorrhage appear; in addition, the production of urine decreases in this phase.

iii) Oliguric phase

The duration of this phase is between 3 and 7 days and it can be accompanied by abdominal or low back pain. Glomerular filtration rate diminishes and oliguria or even anuria appear, nitrogen waste products increase and microscopic hematuria and proteinuria occur. This is the phase when arterial hypotension disappears and patients can even develop arterial hypertension through hydrosaline retention.

iv) Polyuric phase

The duration of this phase ranges from a few days to a few weeks. The recovery of renal function begins and diuresis increases to a few liters per day, thus, important hydroelectrolytic disorders may occur.

v) Convalescence

This phase lasts from 2 to 6 months. This is the period when renal function and laboratory abnormalities are completely recovering; however, there are cases which can develop long-term complications and persistent complications such as arterial hypertension and chronic kidney disease (42-44).

The most frequent laboratory abnormalities are thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, increase of C-reactive protein, increase of creatinine, proteinuria and hematuria. Increased levels of procalcitonin, IFNγ, TNFα and IL-10, especially in patients with DOBV infection have also been revealed (34,45). In PUUV infection, IL-6 serum level has been revealed to be correlated with thrombocytopenia and severity of renal function damage and it is used as a disease severity marker (46); the urinary level of IL-6 has been demonstrated to be correlated with proteinuria, suggesting local production of this cytokine (47).

It is already recognized that alternative pathway complement activation contributes to pathogenesis of PUUV infection (48,49) and there is evidence that increased serum levels of the C5b-C9 complex and reduced C3 level from acute phases appear, especially in patients with pulmonary radiologic abnormalities (24).

Thrombocytopenia is recognized as a severity marker of hantavirus infection (46) and is caused by peripheral consumption related to endothelial activation (24,50). It has been demonstrated that platelet adhesion to infected endothelial cells is directed by hantavirus pathogenic strains through β3 integrin receptor (25). This results in alteration of platelet activation with reduction of their count and loss of vascular integrity, so that the endothelial lesions may promote coagulation activation and fibrinolysis, effects observed through increased prothrombin and D-dimers (50). Literature data has revealed that platelet count is a predictor of severity and progression of disease (51,52).

Most frequently the recovery of hantavirus infection is complete, but there are cases which evolve with acute or chronic complications. The majority of the acute complications that can be life-threatening are caused by hydroelectrolytic disorders, shock with ischemia, haemorrhage or necrosis (24). Thus, in PUUV and DOBV strain infections, pituitary gland haemorrhage and necrosis, meningoencephalitis, AKI with renal replacement therapy, pulmonary edema, pericarditis, myocarditis, disseminated intravascular coagulation have been observed (6,53-66) (Table I).

Table I

Acute complications of hantavirus infection [adapted from Vaheri et al (24)].

Acute complications in hantavirus infection with PUUV and DOBV serotypes
Renal
Acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy required (53,54)
Cardiopulmonary
Pulmonary edema (55)
Arterial hypotension and shock (6)
Pericarditis, myocarditis (56)
Neurological
Meningoencephalitis (57,58)
Seizures (59)
Pituitary haemorrhage (60)
Guillain-Barre syndrome (61)
Neurogenic bladder and hemiparesis (62,63)
Hematological
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (50)
Digestive
Pancreatitis (64,65)
Others
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (66)

PUUV, Puumala virus; DOBV, Dobrava virus.

Arterial hypotension is one of the most common acute complications of HFRS, being caused by dehydration secondary to nausea and vomiting and by vascular injury from complement activation (33,48,49), thrombocytes (24,46,50) and immune effector cell activation that synthetize vasoactive mediators, interleukins and TNF. Patients can also develop arterial hypertension based on decreased glomerular filtration rate in the oliguric phase of disease, but also on capillary leak phenomenon with high protein extravasation to third space leading to weight gain (revealed by severe hypoalbuminemia), acute pulmonary edema and renal interstitial edema.

The most frequent chronic complications of hantavirus infection are hormone deficiency (hypopituitarism and hypothyroidism) and tubulointerstitial nephritis with tubular proteinuria developed after years from infection, as well as membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and arterial hypertension (67-72) (Table II).

Table II

Chronic complications of Hantavirus infection [adapted from Vaheri et al (24)].

Chronic complications of hantavirus infection
Renal
Chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis (67)
Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (36,68)
Cardiovascular
Arterial hypertension (69)
Endocrine
Testicular insufficiency (70)
Hypopituitarism (70)
Hypothyroidism (71,72)

One of the proposed mechanisms for arterial hypertension in hantavirus infection is the renal microvascular impairment along with significant tubulointerstitial inflammation. Every factor inducing vasoconstriction in renal medulla and the adjacent cortex can cause arterial hypertension. Hantavirus infection constitutes an initiating factor for renal vasoconstriction, a theory supported by the histological appearance with congestion and haemorrhage around the vessels in the outer medulla and corticomedullary junction and also by the endothelial injury (73).

6. Diagnosis and treatment

Diagnosis is performed based on epidemiological, clinical and laboratory findings. However, it has to be suspected whenever a patient presents with fever, headache, abdominal or low back pain, AKI and thrombocytopenia and confirmed with serological testing. At hospitalization, patients usually already have IgM and IgG anti-hantavirus antibodies because they become positive along with the occurrence of symptoms. The most commonly used method of serological detection of antibodies is by indirect ELISA for IgM and IgG, however indirect IF and rapid immunochromatographic tests are also used. Hantavirus infection can also be revealed through detection of the viral genome from the serum of patients using RT-PCR and the level of viremia has been revealed to be correlated with disease severity (74-77). Due to the specificity of interstitial hemorrhage on the kidney biopsy specimens of patients with HFRS as well as the frequency of chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis as a complication of this pathology, a kidney biopsy should be considered as a diagnostic tool. It is important to estimate the risk/benefit ratio of kidney biosy in these patients, as thrombocytopenia associated to HFSR increases the risk of bleeding. Careful attention should be paid to the medical history of patients regarding the treatments that could interfere with the level of thrombocytes and coagulation tests such as oral anticoagulation (OA) recognizing that both traditional OA and new oral anticoagulants are used at an increasing scale (78).

Considering that the hantavirus typically causes a self-limiting infection and it resolves in 2-3 weeks, treatment is mainly supportive. Occasionally renal replacement therapy is required (in <5% of the cases) (24,79) and this is mostly due to hypervolemia. Thus, an effective option of supportive treatment is the proper monitoring of hydroelectrolytic balance and avoidance of fluid retention, especially for patients with anuria (2). Platelet transfusions may be provided in cases of severe thrombocytopenia with bleeding risk (2,43).

Among the antiviral drugs, anti-hantavirus activity was demonstrated with ribavirin in vitro and in vivo and there are several Chinese studies on patients with HFRS that exhibited an important reduction of mortality and morbidity when it was administered in the first 5 days after appearance of symptoms (80,81). Another study revealed that early intravenous administration of ribavirin in HFRS reduced the severity of AKI and the occurrence of oliguria (82).

Treatment with icatibant, an antagonist of bradykinin B2 receptor, may be beneficial in severe forms of HFRS with important capillary leakage phenomenon (83,84) due to the role of bradykinin in vascular permeability.

Corticosteroids are not part of the routine viral infection therapy, however, considering the damage of the hantavirus on endothelial cells and the cytokine storm with increased capillary permeability, it appears that methylprednisolone has beneficial effects on the pathogenesis of the disease, controlling the immune response. A retrospective study from Chile that included 22 patients with CPS treated with high-dose methylprednisolone demonstrated its efficacy in decreasing mortality (85), and therefore this treatment was implemented for hantavirus infection in various medical centers (86). Conversely, there are phase 2 studies that tested the safety and efficacy of intravenous administration of methylprednisolone which did not demonstrate favorable effects (86), therefore treating hantavirus infection with corticosteroids depends on the decision of the clinician.

7. Conclusions

Hantavirus endemic nephropathy belongs to a group of rare zoonoses in the Balkan Peninsula and the most frequently involved serotypes are Dobrava and Puumala. The disease begins with flu-like symptoms such as fever and progresses to AKI with severe thrombocytopenia, anemia and coagulation disorders, symptoms similar to microangiopathy in hemolytic uremic syndrome with which it may often be confused. In a geographic region with only sporadic cases, multiple diagnostic difficulties are encountered, especially related to the absence of initial diagnosis suspicion. Therefore, the need to include this pathology in the algorithm of differential diagnosis of pathologies associated with thrombocytopenia, anemia, hepatic cytolysis syndrome and renal injury, is emphasized.