Literature DB >> 34345066

Technical Considerations for Sampling and Sample Preparation of Biomedical Samples for Trace Element Analysis.

Robert M Parr1.   

Abstract

Sampling and sample preparation procedures are to a large extent determined by the analytical method used since different methods vary in the amount of material required for analysis and in how this is pre-treated before being introduced into the measuring instrument. Judging from intercomparison studies conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the most widely applicable methods now in use are Neutron Activation Analysis, Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, and Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry, though the latter still seems to have insufficient sensitivity for many trace elements of biomedical interest. Common to all these methods is the problem of contaminating the sample before or during analysis. For many elements (e.g., As, Cd, Co, Cr, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, and V) sufficient control over contamination can only be achieved by the use of special tools and reagents, and by working in a controlled (dust-free) environment. Several important elements (e.g., As, Hg, Sb, and I) are subject to losses on drying or ashing, but can be recovered reliably if wet-ashed in a closed container such as a PTFE "bomb." For representative sampling it is almost always necessary to start with several grams of material, and to homogenize this, if the effects of sample heterogeneity are to be reduced to an acceptable level. Quality assurance procedures covering all these aspects are difficult both to define and to apply. However, much can be learned from the statistical evaluation of results for duplicate samples, and from a determination of the limit of quantitation of the analytical procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analysis; analyte losses; biomedical samples; contamination; quality assurance; sample handling; sampling; trace elements

Year:  1986        PMID: 34345066      PMCID: PMC6658442          DOI: 10.6028/jres.091.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Res Natl Bur Stand (1977)        ISSN: 0160-1741


  10 in total

1.  Contamination as a limiting parameter in trace analysis.

Authors:  L Kosta
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 6.057

2.  Sample contamination as a source of error in trace-element analysis of biological samples.

Authors:  J Versieck; F Barbier; R Cornelis; J Hoste
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 6.057

3.  Purified reagents for trace metal analysis.

Authors:  J R Moody; E S Beary
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 6.057

4.  Purification of analytical reagents.

Authors:  J W Mitchell
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 6.057

5.  Analysis of precision of activation-analysis methods.

Authors:  K Heydorn; K Nørgård
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 6.057

6.  Cryogenic homogenization of biological tissues.

Authors:  R Zeisler; J K Langland; S H Harrison
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  The effects of dissecting tools on the trace element concentrations of fish and mussel tissues.

Authors:  M Heit; C S Klusek
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Analytical methods for the mineral content of human tissues.

Authors:  K M Stika; G H Morrison
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1981-06

9.  Sample selection, collection, preservation and storage for a data bank on trace elements in human tissue.

Authors:  S R Koirtyohann; H C Hopps
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1981-06

10.  Sources of error in sampling and sample preparation for trace element analysis in medicine.

Authors:  D Behne
Journal:  J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1981-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.