Literature DB >> 34344939

Trade-offs between vocal accommodation and individual recognisability in common marmoset vocalizations.

Y Zürcher1, E P Willems2, J M Burkart2.   

Abstract

Recent studies find increasing evidence for vocal accommodation in nonhuman primates, indicating that this form of vocal learning is more prevalent than previously thought. Convergent vocal accommodation (i.e. becoming more similar to partners) indicates social closeness. At the same time, however, becoming too similar may compromise individual recognisability. This is especially problematic if individual recognisability is an important part of the call function, like in long-distance contact calls. In contrast, in calls with a different function, the trade-off between signalling social closeness and individual recognisability might be less severe. We therefore hypothesized that the extent and consequences of accommodation depend on the function of a given call, and expected (1) more accommodation in calls for which individual identity is less crucial and (2) that individual identity is less compromised in calls that serve mainly to transmit identity compared to calls where individual recognisability is less important. We quantified vocal accommodation in three call types over the process of pair formation in common marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus, n = 20). These three call types have different functions and vary with the degree to which they refer to individual identity of the caller. In accordance with our predictions, we found that animals converged most in close contact calls (trill calls), but less in calls where individual identity is more essential (phee- and food calls). In two out of three call types, the amount of accommodation was predicted by the initial vocal distance. Moreover, accommodation led to a drop in statistical individual recognisability in trill calls, but not in phee calls and food calls. Overall, our study shows that patterns of vocal accommodation vary between call types with different functions, suggestive of trade-offs between signalling social closeness and individual recognisability in marmoset vocalizations.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34344939     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95101-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  8 in total

1.  The different roles of social learning in vocal communication.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Dialects in pygmy marmosets? Population variation in call structure.

Authors:  Stella de la Torre; Charles T Snowdon
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.371

3.  The communicative content of the common marmoset phee call during antiphonal calling.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Katherine Mandel; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Convergence and divergence in Diana monkey vocalizations.

Authors:  Agnès Candiotti; Klaus Zuberbühler; Alban Lemasson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Social processes in communication and cognition in callitrichid monkeys: a review.

Authors:  C T Snowdon
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2001-07-27       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 6.  A paradox in the evolution of primate vocal learning.

Authors:  S E Roian Egnor; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Degree of social contact affects the emission of food calls in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Augusto Vitale; Michela Zanzoni; Armelle Queyras; Flavia Chiarotti
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.371

8.  Social learning of vocal structure in a nonhuman primate?

Authors:  Alban Lemasson; Karim Ouattara; Eric J Petit; Klaus Zuberbühler
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.260

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  A convergent interaction engine: vocal communication among marmoset monkeys.

Authors:  J M Burkart; J E C Adriaense; R K Brügger; F M Miss; K Wierucka; C P van Schaik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  The function and evolution of child-directed communication.

Authors:  Johanna Schick; Caroline Fryns; Franziska Wegdell; Marion Laporte; Klaus Zuberbühler; Carel P van Schaik; Simon W Townsend; Sabine Stoll
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 9.593

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.