Literature DB >> 34344561

Effect of Acoustic Parameters and Microbubble Concentration on the Likelihood of Encapsulated Microbubble Coalescence.

David Q Le1, Virginie Papadopoulou2, Paul A Dayton1.   

Abstract

Microbubble contrast agents are commonly used for therapeutic and diagnostic imaging applications. Under certain conditions, these contrast agents can coalesce on ultrasound application and form larger bubbles than the initial population. The formation of large microbubbles potentially influences therapeutic outcomes and imaging quality. We studied clinically relevant ultrasound parameters related to low-pressure therapy and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging to determine their effect on microbubble coalescence and subsequent changes in microbubble size distributions in vitro. Results indicate that therapeutic ultrasound at low frequencies, moderate pressures and high duty cycles are capable of forming bubbles greater than two times larger than the initial bubble distribution. Furthermore, acoustic parameters related to contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging that are at higher frequency, low-pressure and low-duty cycle exhibit no statistically significant changes in bubble diameter, suggesting that standard contrast ultrasound imaging does not cause coalescence. Overall, this work suggests that the microbubble coalescence phenomenon can readily occur at acoustic parameters used in therapeutic ultrasound, generating bubbles much larger than those found in commercial contrast agents, although coalescence is unlikely to be significant in diagnostic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. This observation warrants further expansion of parameter ranges and investigation of resulting effects.
Copyright © 2021 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Microbubble coalescence; Ultrasound; Ultrasound contrast agent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34344561      PMCID: PMC8547186          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   3.694


  39 in total

1.  Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles.

Authors:  P Dayton; A Klibanov; G Brandenburger; K Ferrara
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Basic acoustic properties of microbubbles.

Authors:  Nico de Jong; Ayache Bouakaz; Peter Frinking
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 3.  Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions.

Authors:  Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  David Cosgrove; Chris Harvey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Microbubble Agents: New Directions.

Authors:  Eleanor Stride; Tim Segers; Guillaume Lajoinie; Samir Cherkaoui; Thierry Bettinger; Michel Versluis; Mark Borden
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  An in vivo validation of the application of acoustic radiation force to enhance the diagnostic utility of molecular imaging using 3-d ultrasound.

Authors:  Ryan C Gessner; Jason E Streeter; Roshni Kothadia; Steven Feingold; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Clustering dynamics of microbubbles exposed to low-pressure 1-MHz ultrasound.

Authors:  Carole Lazarus; Antonios N Pouliopoulos; Marc Tinguely; Valeria Garbin; James J Choi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction.

Authors:  Mark A Borden; Dustin E Kruse; Charles F Caskey; Shukui Zhao; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Nico de Jong; Marcia Emmer; Annemieke van Wamel; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 10.  Ultrasound-Responsive Cavitation Nuclei for Therapy and Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Klazina Kooiman; Silke Roovers; Simone A G Langeveld; Robert T Kleven; Heleen Dewitte; Meaghan A O'Reilly; Jean-Michel Escoffre; Ayache Bouakaz; Martin D Verweij; Kullervo Hynynen; Ine Lentacker; Eleanor Stride; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.