Literature DB >> 34344417

Household income and medical help-seeking for fertility problems among a representative population in Japan.

Arisa Iba1, Eri Maeda2, Seung Chik Jwa3, Ayako Yanagisawa-Sugita1, Kazuki Saito4, Akira Kuwahara5, Hidekazu Saito6, Yukihiro Terada7, Osamu Ishihara3, Yasuki Kobayashi8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fertility treatments help many infertile couples to have children. However, disparities exist in access to fertility tests and treatments. We investigated the association between household income and medical help-seeking for fertility in Japan.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the National Fertility Survey 2015. Respondents were 6598 married women younger than 50 years old. The primary outcome was medical help-seeking for fertility among those who experienced fertility problems. Multiple logistic regression models were used to assess the association between household income and medical help-seeking, adjusting for age, length of marriage, educational level, employment status, number of children, childbearing desires, living with parents, and region of residence.
RESULTS: Among 2253 (34%) women who experienced fertility problems, 1154 (51%) sought medical help. The proportion of help-seekers increased linearly from 43% in the low-income group (< 4 million Japanese yen [JPY]) to 59% in the high-income group (≥ 8 million JPY) (P for trend < 0.001). Respondents with upper-middle (6-8 million JPY) or high household income were more likely to seek medical help, compared to those with low household income: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.86) and aOR 1.78 (95% CI: 1.29-2.47), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that higher household income was associated with a higher probability of seeking medical help among Japanese women who experienced fertility problem. Along with policy discussion about additional financial support, further studies from societal, cultural, or psychological views are required.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Care-seeking; Healthcare disparities; Infertility; Japan; Socioeconomic status

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34344417     DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01212-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.223


  21 in total

1.  Utilization of infertility treatments: the effects of insurance mandates.

Authors:  Marianne P Bitler; Lucie Schmidt
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective.

Authors:  Mark P Connolly; Stijn Hoorens; Georgina M Chambers
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  Stronger reduction of assisted reproduction technique treatment cycle numbers in economically weak geographical regions following the German healthcare modernization law in 2004.

Authors:  G Griesinger; K Diedrich; C Altgassen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Socioeconomic disparities in the use and success of fertility treatments: analysis of data from a prospective cohort in the United States.

Authors:  James F Smith; Michael L Eisenberg; David Glidden; Susan G Millstein; Marcelle Cedars; Thomas J Walsh; Jonathan Showstack; Lauri A Pasch; Nancy Adler; Patricia P Katz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care.

Authors:  Jacky Boivin; Laura Bunting; John A Collins; Karl G Nygren
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Who receives a medical evaluation for infertility in the United States?

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Ai-Ris Y Collier; Katharine F Correia; Francine Grodstein; Jorge E Chavarro; Janet Rich-Edwards; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Socioeconomic disparities in access to ART treatment and the differential impact of a policy that increased consumer costs.

Authors:  G M Chambers; V P Hoang; P J Illingworth
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Utilization of infertility services: how much does money matter?

Authors:  J Farley Ordovensky Staniec; Natalie J Webb
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Use of fertility treatment modalities in a large United States cohort of professional women.

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Stacey A Missmer; Janet Rich-Edwards; Jorge E Chavarro; Robert L Barbieri; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Assisted reproductive techniques in Latin America: The Latin American registry, 2016.

Authors:  Fernando Zegers-Hochschild; Juan Enrique Schwarze; Javier A Crosby; Carolina Musri; Maria Teresa Urbina
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2019-08-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  Out-of-pocket payment and patients' treatment choice for assisted reproductive technology by household income: a conjoint analysis using an online social research panel in Japan.

Authors:  Eri Maeda; Seung Chik Jwa; Yukiyo Kumazawa; Kazuki Saito; Arisa Iba; Ayako Yanagisawa-Sugita; Akira Kuwahara; Hidekazu Saito; Yukihiro Terada; Takashi Fukuda; Osamu Ishihara; Yasuki Kobayashi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 2.908

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.