Literature DB >> 34344359

Differential effect of pre-pregnancy low BMI on fetal macrosomia: a population-based cohort study.

Guoju Li1, Yuhan Xing2, Guolan Wang1, Jun Zhang3, Qin Wu1, Wei Ni1, Na Jiao1, Wenjing Chen3, Qing Liu3, Li Gao1, Zhenhong Zhang4, Yao Wang4, Quansheng Xing5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The differential effect of pre-pregnancy low BMI on macrosomia has not been fully addressed. Herein, we conducted a city-wide population-based cohort study to illuminate the association between pre-pregnancy low BMI and macrosomia, stratifying by maternal age, parity, and GDM status.
METHODS: All pregnant women who paid their first prenatal visit to the hospital in Qingdao during August 1, 2018, to June 30, 2020, were recruited to this study. The interactive effect of maternal age and pre-pregnancy low BMI on macrosomia was evaluated using logistic regression models, followed by strata-specific analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 105,768 mother-child pairs were included, and the proportion of fetal macrosomia was 11.66%. The interactive effect of maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and age was statistically significant on macrosomia irrespective of parity (nullipara: Padjusted=0.0265; multipara: Padjusted=0.0356). The protective effect of low BMI on macrosomia was most prominent among nullipara aged 35 years and above (aOR=0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.49) and multipara aged 25 years and below (aOR=0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.55). In nullipara without GDM, the risk estimates gradually declined with increasing conception age (20-to-24 years: aOR=0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.80; 25-to-29 years: aOR=0.43 95% CI 0.36-0.52; 30-to-34 years: aOR=0.40 95% CI 0.29-0.53; and ≥35 years: aOR=0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.60). A similar pattern could also be observed in nullipara with GDM, where the aOR for low BMI on macrosomia decreased from 0.54 (95% CI 0.32-0.93) in pregnant women aged 25-29 years to 0.30 (95% CI 0.12-0.75) among those aged 30-34 years. However, younger multiparous mothers, especially those aged 25 years and below without GDM (aOR=0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.68), were more benefited from a lower BMI against the development of macrosomia.
CONCLUSIONS: Maternal low BMI is inversely associated with macrosomia irrespective of maternal age and parity. The impact of pre-pregnancy low BMI on macrosomia varied by maternal age and parity. The protective effect of a lower maternal BMI against fetal macrosomia was more prominent in nulliparous mothers aged 35 years and above, whereas multiparous mothers younger than 25 years of age were more benefited.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gestational diabetes mellitus; Macrosomia; Maternal age; Parity; Pre-pregnancy BMI

Year:  2021        PMID: 34344359     DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02046-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med        ISSN: 1741-7015            Impact factor:   8.775


  26 in total

Review 1.  Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Beta; N Khan; A Khalil; M Fiolna; G Ramadan; R Akolekar
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  The hefty fetal phenotype hypothesis revisited: high birth weight, type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in a Saskatchewan cohort of First Nations and non-First Nations women.

Authors:  R F Dyck; C Karunanayake; P Pahwa; N D Osgood
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  The Association between Advanced Maternal Age and Macrosomia: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rui-Xue Dai; Xiu-Jie He; Chuan-Lai Hu
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Skin Autofluorescence of Pregnant Women With Diabetes Predicts the Macrosomia of Their Children.

Authors:  Ninon Foussard; Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire; Kalina Rajaobelina; Cécile Delcourt; Catherine Helmer; Thierry Lamireau; Concepcion Gonzalez; Virginie Grouthier; Magalie Haissaguerre; Laurence Blanco; Laure Alexandre; Kamel Mohammedi; Vincent Rigalleau
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  Maternal pre-pregnancy obesity and the risk of macrosomia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rui-Xue Dai; Xiu-Jie He; Chuan-Lai Hu
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Macrosomia in 23 developing countries: an analysis of a multicountry, facility-based, cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Ai Koyanagi; Jun Zhang; Amarjargal Dagvadorj; Fumi Hirayama; Kenji Shibuya; João Paulo Souza; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Obesity in pregnancy.

Authors:  C K H Yu; T G Teoh; S Robinson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  [Mobile terminal-based survey on the birth characteristics for Chinese newborns].

Authors:  L J Zhao; H T Li; Y L Zhang; Y B Zhou; J M Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-10-18

9.  Macrosomia, Perinatal and Infant Mortality in Cree Communities in Quebec, 1996-2010.

Authors:  Lin Xiao; Dan-Li Zhang; Jill Torrie; Nathalie Auger; Nancy Gros-Louis McHugh; Zhong-Cheng Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Macrosomic Births in a Tertiary Public Hospital: A Survey of Maternal Characteristics and Fetal Outcome.

Authors:  James Osaikhuwuomwan; Abieyuwa Osemwenkha; Godwin Orukpe
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2016-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Protective Effect of Maternal First-Trimester Low Body Mass Index Against Macrosomia: A 10-Year Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Yongqing Sun; Man Zhang; Ruixia Liu; Jingjing Wang; Kai Yang; Qingqing Wu; Wentao Yue; Chenghong Yin
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.555

2.  Risk Factors for Macrosomia in Multipara: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Juan Juan; Yumei Wei; Geng Song; Rina Su; Xu Chen; Ruiqin Shan; Jianying Yan; Mei Xiao; Ying Li; Shihong Cui; Xianlan Zhao; Shangrong Fan; Ling Feng; Meihua Zhang; Yuyan Ma; Zishan You; Haixia Meng; Haiwei Liu; Jingxia Sun; Yan Cai; Kejia Hu; Huixia Yang
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  Analytical Comparison of Risk Prediction Models for the Onset of Macrosomia Based on Three Statistical Methods.

Authors:  Jinbo Zhang; Xiaozhi Wu; Qingqing Song
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.464

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.