Literature DB >> 34342581

Cortical Magnification in Human Visual Cortex Parallels Task Performance around the Visual Field.

Noah C Benson1, Eline R Kupers2, Antoine Babot3, Marisa Carrasco2, Jonathan Winawer2.   

Abstract

Human vision has striking radial asymmetries, with performance on many tasks varying sharply with stimulus polar angle. Performance is generally better on the horizontal than vertical meridian, and on the lower than upper vertical meridian, and these asymmetries decrease gradually with deviation from the vertical meridian. Here we report cortical magnification at a fine angular resolution around the visual field. This precision enables comparisons between cortical magnification and behavior, between cortical magnification and retinal cell densities, and between cortical magnification in twin pairs. We show that cortical magnification in human primary visual cortex, measured in 163 subjects, varies substantially around the visual field, with a pattern similar to behavior. These radial asymmetries in cortex are larger than those found in the retina, and they are correlated between monozygotic twin pairs. These findings indicate a tight link between cortical topography and behavior, and suggest that visual field asymmetries are partly heritable.
© 2021, Benson et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human; neuroscience

Year:  2021        PMID: 34342581     DOI: 10.7554/eLife.67685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  10 in total

1.  Structural covariance and heritability of the optic tract and primary visual cortex in living human brains.

Authors:  Toshikazu Miyata; Noah C Benson; Jonathan Winawer; Hiromasa Takemura
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Non-neural factors influencing BOLD response magnitudes within individual subjects.

Authors:  Jan W Kurzawski; Omer Faruk Gulban; Keith Jamison; Jonathan Winawer; Kendrick Kay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Visual field asymmetries vary between children and adults.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Mariel Roberts; Caroline Myers; Lavanya Shukla
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 10.900

4.  Severe distortion in the representation of foveal visual image locations in short-term memory.

Authors:  Konstantin F Willeke; Araceli R Cardenas; Joachim Bellet; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Linking individual differences in human primary visual cortex to contrast sensitivity around the visual field.

Authors:  Jonathan Winawer; Marisa Carrasco; Marc M Himmelberg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Reflexive Saccades Used for Objective and Automated Measurements of Contrast Sensitivity in Selected Areas of Visual Field.

Authors:  Peter Essig; Yannick Sauer; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.048

7.  Asymmetries around the visual field: From retina to cortex to behavior.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Noah C Benson; Marisa Carrasco; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Presaccadic attention enhances contrast sensitivity, but not at the upper vertical meridian.

Authors:  Nina M Hanning; Marc M Himmelberg; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-01

9.  Mapping spatial frequency preferences across human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  William F Broderick; Eero P Simoncelli; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Cross-dataset reproducibility of human retinotopic maps.

Authors:  Marc M Himmelberg; Jan W Kurzawski; Noah C Benson; Denis G Pelli; Marisa Carrasco; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.