Literature DB >> 34341121

Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube.

Homa Hosseinmardi1, Amir Ghasemian2,3, Aaron Clauset4,5,6, Markus Mobius7, David M Rothschild8, Duncan J Watts1,9,10.   

Abstract

Although it is under-studied relative to other social media platforms, YouTube is arguably the largest and most engaging online media consumption platform in the world. Recently, YouTube's scale has fueled concerns that YouTube users are being radicalized via a combination of biased recommendations and ostensibly apolitical "anti-woke" channels, both of which have been claimed to direct attention to radical political content. Here we test this hypothesis using a representative panel of more than 300,000 Americans and their individual-level browsing behavior, on and off YouTube, from January 2016 through December 2019. Using a labeled set of political news channels, we find that news consumption on YouTube is dominated by mainstream and largely centrist sources. Consumers of far-right content, while more engaged than average, represent a small and stable percentage of news consumers. However, consumption of "anti-woke" content, defined in terms of its opposition to progressive intellectual and political agendas, grew steadily in popularity and is correlated with consumption of far-right content off-platform. We find no evidence that engagement with far-right content is caused by YouTube recommendations systematically, nor do we find clear evidence that anti-woke channels serve as a gateway to the far right. Rather, consumption of political content on YouTube appears to reflect individual preferences that extend across the web as a whole.

Entities:  

Keywords:  news diet; online platforms; political radicalization; user behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34341121      PMCID: PMC8364190          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2101967118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  Protecting elections from social media manipulation.

Authors:  Sinan Aral; Dean Eckles
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The science of fake news.

Authors:  David M J Lazer; Matthew A Baum; Yochai Benkler; Adam J Berinsky; Kelly M Greenhill; Filippo Menczer; Miriam J Metzger; Brendan Nyhan; Gordon Pennycook; David Rothschild; Michael Schudson; Steven A Sloman; Cass R Sunstein; Emily A Thorson; Duncan J Watts; Jonathan L Zittrain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Studying human attention on the Internet.

Authors:  David Lazer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Content-based features predict social media influence operations.

Authors:  Meysam Alizadeh; Jacob N Shapiro; Cody Buntain; Joshua A Tucker
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube.

Authors:  Homa Hosseinmardi; Amir Ghasemian; Aaron Clauset; Markus Mobius; David M Rothschild; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook.

Authors:  Michela Del Vicario; Gianna Vivaldo; Alessandro Bessi; Fabiana Zollo; Antonio Scala; Guido Caldarelli; Walter Quattrociocchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization.

Authors:  Christopher A Bail; Lisa P Argyle; Taylor W Brown; John P Bumpus; Haohan Chen; M B Fallin Hunzaker; Jaemin Lee; Marcus Mann; Friedolin Merhout; Alexander Volfovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; David G Rand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem.

Authors:  Jennifer Allen; Baird Howland; Markus Mobius; David Rothschild; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 14.136

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Quantifying partisan news diets in Web and TV audiences.

Authors:  Daniel Muise; Homa Hosseinmardi; Baird Howland; Markus Mobius; David Rothschild; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 14.957

2.  Hybrid social learning in human-algorithm cultural transmission.

Authors:  L Brinkmann; D Gezerli; K V Kleist; T F Müller; I Rahwan; N Pescetelli
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.019

3.  Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube.

Authors:  Homa Hosseinmardi; Amir Ghasemian; Aaron Clauset; Markus Mobius; David M Rothschild; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Monitoring event-driven dynamics on Twitter: a case study in Belarus.

Authors:  Natalie M Rice; Benjamin D Horne; Catherine A Luther; Joshua D Borycz; Suzie L Allard; Damian J Ruck; Michael Fitzgerald; Oleg Manaev; Brandon C Prins; Maureen Taylor; R Alexander Bentley
Journal:  SN Soc Sci       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 5.  Cause and effect: On the antecedents and consequences of conspiracy theory beliefs.

Authors:  Joseph Uscinski; Adam M Enders; Casey Klofstad; Justin Stoler
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2022-05-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.