| Literature DB >> 34339446 |
Jun Zhang1,2, Yu Gao1, Ningning Yang1, Enhua Dai1, Minghang Yang1, Zhoufeng Wang2, Yani Geng1.
Abstract
Due to various human activities, soil quality under different land use patterns is deteriorating all over the world. This deterioration is very complex in the river irrigation area and is caused by multi-point and non-point source pollution and seasonal variation. Therefore, the characteristics and sources of soil metal pollution in river irrigation area of Baoji city were analyzed. The contents of 8 metals were given by ICP-MS, in the soil samples. Statistical methods, geo-accumulation index (Igeo) and potential ecological risk index (RI) were conducted to evaluate the spatial distribution features, sources and ecological risks of metal contamination from the study area soil. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis were used to analyze the pollution sources of metal. The analysis showed that Cd is the most polluted, and human activities represented a great impact on the contents of Zn, Ni, Cu and Cd in soil, Cd post moderate-strong pollution and strong risk, Cd has a maximum Igeo value of 3.17. All rivers were at risk of moderate pollution levels in study. Among them, some rivers had even reached strong pollution level. Pollution caused by human activities was the most significant pollution source of metal in the research area soil.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34339446 PMCID: PMC8328313 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Soil type and land use type in the study area.
Fig 2Sampling point layout.
The physical chemical properties of the soil.
| Total nitrogen (TN) | Total phosphorus (TP) | Organic matter (OM) | pH | Cation exchange capacity (CEC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.78 | 2.53 | 31.5 | 8.31 | 8.90 |
Igeo classification standards.
| Classification level | Geo-accumulation index | Pollution level |
|---|---|---|
| No pollution | ||
| 0< | Light—moderate pollution | |
| 1< | Moderate pollution | |
| 2< | Medium-strong pollution | |
| 3< | Strong pollution | |
| 4< | Strong-severe polluted | |
| 5< | Severe pollution |
E and RI classification standards.
| Level of ecological hazard | Ecological risk levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Slight | Slight | ||
| Moderate | Moderate | ||
| Strong | Strong | ||
| Stronger | Stronger | ||
| Extremely intense | - | - |
Heavy metal contents in soil of study area (n = 70).
| Elements | The minimum value | The maximum value | The median | The average value | Standard deviation | Coefficient of variation | Background value of Shaanxi province | Soil environmental quality standard(GB15618-2018) | Excess rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg·kg-1) | % | (mg·kg-1) | % | ||||||
| 27.75 | 41.23 | 34.02 | 33.75 | 2.77 | 8 | 62.5 | 250 | - | |
| 23.80 | 64.46 | 43.33 | 43.10 | 8.65 | 20 | 557 | - | - | |
| 4.34 | 69.44 | 6.75 | 8.92 | 8.61 | 97 | 28.8 | 190 | - | |
| 3.08 | 101.57 | 10.24 | 14.17 | 12.60 | 89 | 21.4 | 100 | 1.42 | |
| 138.32 | 818.61 | 244.70 | 269.02 | 109.81 | 41 | 69.4 | 300 | 27.14 | |
| 14.41 | 21.32 | 17.82 | 18.41 | 1.56 | 9 | 11.2 | 25 | - | |
| 0.31 | 9.36 | 0.72 | 1.14 | 1.36 | 120 | 0.094 | 0.6 | 68.57 | |
| 0.75 | 38.10 | 4.51 | 5.32 | 4.43 | 83 | 21.4 | 170 | - | |
Fig 3Distribution maps of heavy metal content in soil around the river in Baoji City.
Fig 4The spatial distribution of soil heavy metal I in the study area.
Fig 5RI of heavy metal in soil in the study area.
Fig 6Cluster analysis heat map based on ward method.
PCA results of 8 heavy metals in soil.
| Component | Initial Eigenvalues | Rotation eigenvalues | Heavy metals | Rotating ingredient matrix | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalues | Variance contribution rate /% | Cumulative contribution rate /% | Eigenvalues | Variance contribution rate /% | Cumulative contribution rate /% | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| 2.18 | 27.34 | 27.34 | 2.18 | 27.29 | 27.29 | Cr | 0.89 | -0.04 | 0.03 | |
| 1.76 | 22.01 | 49.36 | 1.49 | 18.66 | 45.96 | Mn | 0.88 | 0.07 | 0.06 | |
| 1.14 | 14.26 | 63.62 | 1.41 | 17.66 | 63.62 | Ni | -0.05 | 0.10 | 0.60 | |
| 0.85 | 10.70 | 74.33 | - | - | - | Cu | -0.02 | 0.35 | 0.55 | |
| 0.78 | 9.76 | 84.09 | - | - | - | Zn | 0.03 | -0.18 | 0.80 | |
| 0.62 | 7.80 | 91.90 | - | - | - | As | 0.77 | -0.00 | -0.16 | |
| 0.39 | 4.98 | 96.89 | - | - | - | Cd | 0.03 | 0.76 | 0.25 | |
| 0.24 | 3.10 | 100.00 | - | - | - | Pb | 0.00 | 0.86 | -0.07 | |