Literature DB >> 34337683

What is the current clinical practice in pituitary adenoma surgery in Europe? European Pituitary Adenoma Surgery Survey (EU-PASS) results-technical part.

Martin Májovský1, Andre Grotenhuis2, Nicolas Foroglou3, Francesco Zenga4, Sebastien Froehlich5, Florian Ringel6, Nicolas Sampron7, Nick Thomas8, Martin Komarc9,10, David Netuka11.   

Abstract

Pituitary adenoma surgery has evolved rapidly in recent decades, changing clinical practice markedly and raising new challenges. There is no current consensus or guidelines for perioperative care that includes possible complication management. This study aims to determine current practice across European neurosurgical centres. We created a list of eligible departments performing pituitary adenoma surgery based on cooperation with EANS, national neurosurgical societies, and personal communication with local neurosurgeons. We contacted the chairpersons from each department and asked them (or another responsible neurosurgeon) to fill out the survey. The survey consisted of 58 questions. For further analysis, departments were divided into subgroups: "academic"/ "non-academic centre", "high-volume"/"low-volume", "mainly endoscopic"/ "mainly microscopic"/ "mixed practise", and by geographical regions. Data from 254 departments from 34 countries were obtained. The average time to complete the survey was 18 min. Notably, the endoscopic approach is the predominant surgical approach in Europe, used in 56.8% of the centres. In routine cases without intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, high-volume centres are less pedantic with sellar closure when compared with low-volume centres (p < 0.001). On the other hand, when a postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak occurs, high-volume centres are more active and indicate early reoperation (p = 0.013). Less than 15% of the participating centres perform early postoperative MRI scans. Marked variation was noted among different groups of respondents and some contentious issues are discussed. Such information can encourage useful debate about the reasons for the variations seen and perhaps help develop standardised protocols to improve patient outcomes. A future research focus is to compare European results with other regions.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endocrinology; Neurosurgery; Pituitary adenoma; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34337683     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01614-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   2.800


  29 in total

1.  Sellar repair in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: results of 170 cases.

Authors:  Paolo Cappabianca; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Felice Esposito; Vinicio Valente; Enrico De Divitiis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  The 'ring sign': is it a reliable indicator for cerebral spinal fluid?

Authors:  D J Dula; W Fales
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 3.  Volume-outcome relationships in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Jason M Davies; Alp Ozpinar; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 4.  The awake endoscope-guided sealant technique with fibrin glue in the treatment of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after extended transsphenoidal surgery: technical note.

Authors:  Luigi M Cavallo; Domenico Solari; Teresa Somma; Dragan Savic; Paolo Cappabianca
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 5.  Diagnostic values of beta-2 transferrin and beta-trace protein as markers for cerebrospinal fluid fistula.

Authors:  Gregor Bachmann-Harildstad
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 6.  Delayed Complications After Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Gmaan Alzhrani; Walavan Sivakumar; Min S Park; Philipp Taussky; William T Couldwell
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  The Role of the Lumbar Drain in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 811 Cases.

Authors:  Chiara Caggiano; David L Penn; Edward R Laws
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leonie H A Broersen; Nienke R Biermasz; Wouter R van Furth; Friso de Vries; Marco J T Verstegen; Olaf M Dekkers; Alberto M Pereira
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Fibrin Sealants in Dura Sealing: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Felice Esposito; Filippo Flavio Angileri; Peter Kruse; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Domenico Solari; Vincenzo Esposito; Francesco Tomasello; Paolo Cappabianca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Criteria for the definition of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE): A Pituitary Society Statement.

Authors:  Felipe F Casanueva; Ariel L Barkan; Michael Buchfelder; Anne Klibanski; Edward R Laws; Jay S Loeffler; Shlomo Melmed; Pietro Mortini; John Wass; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.107

View more
  1 in total

1.  Endocrinological aspects of pituitary adenoma surgery in Europe.

Authors:  David Netuka; André Grotenhuis; Nicolas Foroglou; Francesco Zenga; Sebastien Froehlich; Florian Ringel; Nicolas Sampron; Nick Thomas; Martin Komarc; Mikuláš Kosák; Martin Májovský
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.