Chiara Caggiano1, David L Penn1, Edward R Laws2. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: elaws@bwh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: With increasing use of the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach, wider attention is being paid to treatment and prevention of its complications. The aim of this study was to determine whether lumbar drainage (LD) has been effective in preventing and treating postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (poCSF) leakage or in assisting in achieving tumor gross total removal (GTR). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of purely endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal cases at a single center between 2008 and 2017 was done. We studied intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (ioCSF) and poCSF leakage rates, duration of hospitalization, and GTR rate of the lesions, comparing patients with and without LD. RESULTS: Among 811 endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal procedures, LD was used in 38 cases. There was no statistically significant difference between patients with and without LD with regard to incidence of ioCSF leakage. A statistically significant difference was found in obese patients with LD, who had an apparently increased rate of poCSF leak. The length of stay of patients with LD was significantly longer than the control group without LD. The GTR rate was also higher in patients without LD. CONCLUSIONS: Use of LD is correlated with longer immobilization and hospitalization without providing statistically significant advantages in terms of prevention or treatment of ioCSF and/or poCSF in low-risk and high-risk patients. Moreover, LD was not helpful in achieving GTR of tumors.
OBJECTIVE: With increasing use of the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach, wider attention is being paid to treatment and prevention of its complications. The aim of this study was to determine whether lumbar drainage (LD) has been effective in preventing and treating postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (poCSF) leakage or in assisting in achieving tumor gross total removal (GTR). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of purely endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal cases at a single center between 2008 and 2017 was done. We studied intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (ioCSF) and poCSF leakage rates, duration of hospitalization, and GTR rate of the lesions, comparing patients with and without LD. RESULTS: Among 811 endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal procedures, LD was used in 38 cases. There was no statistically significant difference between patients with and without LD with regard to incidence of ioCSF leakage. A statistically significant difference was found in obesepatients with LD, who had an apparently increased rate of poCSF leak. The length of stay of patients with LD was significantly longer than the control group without LD. The GTR rate was also higher in patients without LD. CONCLUSIONS: Use of LD is correlated with longer immobilization and hospitalization without providing statistically significant advantages in terms of prevention or treatment of ioCSF and/or poCSF in low-risk and high-risk patients. Moreover, LD was not helpful in achieving GTR of tumors.
Authors: Martin Májovský; Andre Grotenhuis; Nicolas Foroglou; Francesco Zenga; Sebastien Froehlich; Florian Ringel; Nicolas Sampron; Nick Thomas; Martin Komarc; David Netuka Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 2.800
Authors: Regin Jay Mallari; Michael B Avery; Alex Corlin; Amalia Eisenberg; Terese C Hammond; Neil A Martin; Garni Barkhoudarian; Daniel F Kelly Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Danyal Z Khan; Ahmad M S Ali; Chan Hee Koh; Neil L Dorward; Joan Grieve; Hugo Layard Horsfall; William Muirhead; Thomas Santarius; Wouter R Van Furth; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Hani J Marcus Journal: Pituitary Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.107