| Literature DB >> 34337405 |
Svenja Schwarck1,2, Nancy Busse1,2, Gabriel Ziegler1,2, Wenzel Glanz1,2, Andreas Becke1,2, Emrah Düzel1,2.
Abstract
Heart rate variability (HRV) rapidly gains attention as an important marker of cardiovascular autonomic modulation. Moreover, there is evidence for a link between the autonomic deficit measurable by reduced HRV and the hypoactivity of the cholinergic system, which is prominently affected in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Despite the positive influence of physical exercise on cognition and its promising association with HRV, previous studies did not explore the effect of long-term physical exercise in older adults with AD. Taking advantage of a longitudinal study we analyzed the effect of a 20-week dual task training regime (3 × 15-min per week) on the vagal mediated HRV index RMSSD (root mean square of successive RR interval differences) during physical exercise and the short-term memory performance in a AD cohort (N = 14). Each training contained physical exercise on a bicycle ergometer while memorizing 30 successively presented pictures as well as the associated post-exercise picture recognition memory test. Linear-mixed modeling revealed that HRV-RMSSD significantly increased over the intervention time. Moreover, the reaction time in the picture recognition task decreased while the accuracy remained stable. Furthermore, a significantly negative relationship between increased fitness measured by HRV-RMSSD and decreased reaction time was observed. This feasibility study points to the positive effects of a dual task regime on physical and cognitive fitness in a sample with impaired cognitive performance. Beyond this, the results show that the responsiveness of parasympathetic system as measured with HRV can be improved in patients with dementia.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; cardiovascular training; cognition; dual task; heart rate variability; neurovisceral integration model
Year: 2021 PMID: 34337405 PMCID: PMC8319237 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.684089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Sports Act Living ISSN: 2624-9367
Demographic data and neurological characteristics.
| Age (years) | 69–80 ( |
| Sex | Female: |
| ICD-10 diagnosis | Alzheimer's disease (F00.1) |
| MMSE before | |
| MMSE after | |
Demographic data and neurological characteristics of the sample (N = 14). MMSE before = Mini Mental Status Examination score before the start of the intervention. MMSE after = Mini Mental Status Examination score after the end of the 24-week intervention.
N = 13 due to one missing value. M, mean, SD, standard deviation.
Descriptive statistics of the primary and secondary outcomes.
| RMSSD | 9.89 (4.36) | 10.38 (5.70) | 11.20 (4.37) | 11.33 (6.25) | 14.47 (6.37) |
| cvRMSSD | 1.45 (0.59) | 1.59 (0.77) | 1.72 (0.59) | 1.80 (0.96) | 2.33 (1.06) |
| meanRR | 671.13 (85.56) | 636.56 (68.24) | 641.04 (71.28) | 638.81 (71.60) | 640.53 (75.91) |
| bikepower | 47.45 (1.67) | 61.53 (20.60) | 62.67 (20.20) | 66.23 (21.66) | 67.95 (23.45) |
| accuracy | 83.41 (11.69) | 86.93 (10.50) | 83.12 (13.38) | 83.76 (11.35) | 83.37 (14.96) |
| Reaction time | 3.85 (1.14) | 2.63 (0.61) | 2.78 (0.72) | 2.84 (0.69) | 2.68 (0.58) |
Descriptive statistics of the within-session RMSSD (ms) and adjusted cvRMSSD (coefficient of variation: RMSSD/meanRR *100) as parasympathetic HRV index, the meanRR (mean of all RR intervals, ms) and the bike.
Figure 1LME results of (A) the vagal mediated HRV index cvRMSSD adjusted for meanRR (coefficient of variation: RMSSD/meanRR *100) and (B) the reaction time in seconds over the five measurement time points 1 (week 1), 2 (week 6), 3 (week 11), 4 (week 16), and 5 (week 20). The trajectories are shown for each subject (colored solid lines, N = 14) and for the estimated group model (black dashed line) with a 95% confidence interval (gray area). Both LME analysis revealed a significant increase, respectively, decrease over the measurement time points. β, beta coefficient of measurement time point effect; SE, standard error; 95%-CI, 95% confidence interval.
LME outcome.
| cvRMSSD | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.08, 0.31 | 0.55 | 0.17 |
| meanRR | −5.89 | 3.60 | −13.47, 1.68 | 70.96 | 9.23 |
| Accuracy | −0.32 | 0.49 | −1.31, 0.66 | 8.83 | 0.67 |
| Reaction time | −0.21 | 0.06 | −0.34, −0.09 | 0.83 | 0.12 |
Results of the LME analysis of the longitudinal data over the five measurement time points (week 1–week 20). The analysis was calculated for the vagal HRV index cvRMSSD adjusted for meanRR (coefficient of variation: RMSSD/meanRR *100), the meanRR (ms) and the picture recognition test outcome measures accuracy (percentage correct) and reaction time (s). Each LME analysis was calculated separately (N = 14). β, beta coefficient of measurement time point effect; SE, standard error; 95%-CI, 95% confidence interval; Intercept SD, standard deviation of the random intercept; Slope SD, standard deviation of the random slope.
LME analysis—short-term memory performance and cvRMSSD.
| Accuracy | −0.30 | 1.32 | −2.40, 2.91 | 10.80 |
| Reaction time | −0.40 | 0.14 | −0.70, −0.11 | 0.60 |
Results of the short-term memory performance and cvRMSSD LME model analysis. The analysis was calculated for reaction time (s) and accuracy (percentage correct) as dependent variable separately (N = 14). The fixed factor was cvRMSSD adjusted for meanRR (coefficient of variation: RMSSD/meanRR *100). β, beta coefficient of measurement time point effect; SE, standard error; 95%-CI, 95% confidence interval. Intercept SD, standard deviation of the random intercept.
Figure 2LME results for the model with reaction time (s) as dependent variable (y-axis) and the fixed factor cvRMSSD (coefficient of variation: RMSSD/meanRR *100) on the x-axis. The trajectories are shown for each subject (colored dots, N = 14) and for the estimated group model (black dashed line) with a 95% confidence interval (gray area). The LME analysis revealed a significant influence of cvRMSSD on the reaction time. β, beta coefficient of measurement time point effect; SE, standard error; 95%-CI, 95% confidence interval.