Literature DB >> 34337238

Highly Selective and Catalytic C-N Bond Cleavage of Tertiary Sulfonamides: Scope and Mechanistic Insight.

Aditya Bhattacharya1, Pushpendra Mani Shukla1, Biswajit Maji1.   

Abstract

A highly chemoselective C-N bond cleavage reaction of p-methoxybenzyl- (PMB), 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl- (DMB), or cinnamyl-substituted tertiary sulfonamides in the presence of catalytic Bi(OTf)3 is presented. A wide range of sulfonamide substrates smoothly furnished the corresponding C-N bond cleavage products in good to excellent yields. Great efforts have been made to obtain insights into the reaction mechanism based on a series of control experiments and mass spectroscopy.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34337238      PMCID: PMC8320137          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c02276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

The cleavage of the C–N bond of amines or amides with activated groups, such as 4-methoxybenzyl- (PMB) or dimethoxybenzyl- (DMB) including prenyl- or cinnamyl-substituents, is frequently used in organic synthesis.[1] The common use of such activated groups over the other unactivated groups (alkyl- or benzyl-) was mostly privileged due to its high proclivity to undergo cleavage under mild acidic conditions. The stability of the in situ-generated carbocation and, in sequel, the use of a suitable nucleophilic scavenger in a stoichiometric amount are keys to success (Scheme ).[2] Great progress has been made in developing milder N-debenzylation conditions with substrates like PMB- or DMB-protected amines and amides.[3] Nucleophilic scavengers, for example, anisole or thioanisole, and the use of excess acid are often used to increase the yield of the cleavage product. The other well-accepted methods are either Pd-C-mediated hydrogenolysis[4] or oxidative cleavage mediated by 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ)[5] or ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN).[6]
Scheme 1

General Approaches for C–N Bond Cleavage of Amine/Amides with π-Activated Protecting Groups

In our recent intriguing study on Friedel–Crafts reactions,[7] we unexpectedly isolated a C–N bond cleavage product 3a during the attempted Friedel–Crafts-type alkylation of tertiary sulfonamide 1d in the presence of bismuth(III)-triflate as a catalyst (Scheme ). While the substrates 1a–b (X = CH2) underwent smoothly Friedel–Crafts-type hydroarylation and afforded the desired tetracyclic compounds 2a–b in excellent yields, under the same catalytic condition, the substrate 1d (X = NTs) gave only the C–N bond cleavage product 3a in a good yield (84%). We envisaged that this catalytic procedure might constitute a new method for the selective C–N bond cleavage of tertiary sulfonamides under the catalytic acid condition.
Scheme 2

Initial Observation of C–N Bond Cleavage of Tertiary Sulfonamide in the Presence of Catalytic Bi(OTf)3

In prior works on C–N bond cleavage of N-alkyl sulfonamides or N,N-dialkyl sulfonamides, reagent systems with more than stoichiometric amounts such as PhI(OAc)2-I2,[8] excess acid H5IO6-Cr3(OAc)7(OH)2,[9] and KBr-oxone[10] including the organic electron donor[11] were employed. There was half-stoichiometric use of CuII(CH3CN)4PF6 (0.5 equiv)–K3PO4 (8.0 equiv) reagent systems for N-dealkylation/N-arylation of secondary sulfonamides in the presence of air.[12] Solely, a single catalytic method, AgISbF6-mediated deprenylation of allylsulfonamides, has been reported at a very high temperature and under microwave-irradiated conditions.[13] Furthermore, a ruthenium-catalyzed C–N bond cleavage of N-propargyl sulfonamides and amides has also been reported.[14] Recently, an electrochemical method for C–N bond cleavage of secondary and tertiary N-alkyl sulfonamides has been developed.[15] Nevertheless, the CN bond cleavage of N-alkyl sulfonamides needing harsh conditions and the use of toxic metals and excess oxidants still make many of these methods inappropriate in the current scenario. Recently, Javorskis and Orentas described a highly chemoselective detosylation (N–S bond cleavage) process of N-aryl sulfonamides in the presence of either nearly or more than a stoichiometric amount of triflic acid.[16] In this perspective (N–S vs CN bond cleavage) and in view of the mechanistic standpoint (stoichiometric vs catalytic), the observation of CN bond cleavage of tertiary N-aryl or alkyl sulfonamide using Bi(OTf)3 in a catalytic amount is still significant and needs to be further studied (Scheme ).
Scheme 3

C–N Bond Cleavage vs N–S Bond Cleavage of Tertiary Sulfonamide

Results and Discussion

To establish the reaction condition, N-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide 4a was chosen as a model substrate. The substrate 4a was reacted under various metal triflate-/halide-based Lewis acids in 1,2-dicholoroethane (ClCH2CH2Cl) at 85 °C. The key results are summarized in Table . Lewis acids such as Bi(OTf)3, Fe(OTf)3, Sc(OTf)3, and Al(OTf)3 afforded the desired C–N bond cleavage product 3a in good to excellent yields (78–95%; entries 1–4). Halide-based Lewis acids such as FeCl3 and AlCl3 were also tested using this catalytic method, albeit slightly lower yields were observed (entries 5 and 6). Among these Lewis acids, Bi(OTf)3 in 5 mol % was found to be the best in terms of yield (95%) and clean reaction (entry 1). However, other Bi(III)-Lewis acids with variation of counterions such as Bi(NO3)3 and BiCl3 were not found suitable for the cleavage reaction (entries 7 and 8). This observation suggests that the triflate counteranion might have played an important role in enhancing the chemical yield of the cleavage product. While the reaction was conducted at room temperature (25 °C), no C–N bond cleavage product was observed, even after 24 h. Other solvents such as 1,4-dioxane, acetonitrile, toluene, and ethanol were also studied; however, none of the solvents gave the desired product 3a as high as 1,2-dichloroethane (entries 9–12). It is noteworthy that the reaction was studied in the presence of air or N2 (balloon), and under both conditions, the cleavage product 3a was obtained in comparable yields, 95 and 92%, respectively (entries 1 and 13). Thus, the optimum conditions for this C–N bond cleavage reaction were 4a (1.0 equiv) and Bi(OTf)3 (0.05 equiv) in 1,2-dichloroethane heated at 85 °C in an open air atmosphere for 2 h, which afforded the desired cleavage product 4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide 3a in a 95% yield.
Table 1

Reaction Optimizationa

entryLewis acidsolventbtime (h)yield of 3a (%)c
1Bi(OTf)3DCE295
2Fe(OTf)3DCE284
3Sc(OTf)3DCE381
4Al(OTf)3DCE378
5FeCl3DCE271
6AlCl3DCE261
7Bi(NO3)3DCE1222
8BiCl3DCE1218
9Bi(OTf)31,4-dioxane386
10Bi(OTf)3acetonitrile1.571
11Bi(OTf)3toluene281
12Bi(OTf)3ethanol243
13dBi(OTf)3DCE292

Reaction conditions: 4a (1.0 equiv, 0.25 mmol) and Lewis acid (0.05 equiv, 0.0125 mmol) were mixed together in 2 mL of solvent and heated at 85 °C.

Solvent used in the reaction without any further purification protocol.

Isolated (column purified) yield was reported.

The reaction was conducted under a N2-balloon and a degasified solvent was used (DCE = 1,2-dichloroethane).

Reaction conditions: 4a (1.0 equiv, 0.25 mmol) and Lewis acid (0.05 equiv, 0.0125 mmol) were mixed together in 2 mL of solvent and heated at 85 °C. Solvent used in the reaction without any further purification protocol. Isolated (column purified) yield was reported. The reaction was conducted under a N2-balloon and a degasified solvent was used (DCE = 1,2-dichloroethane). To explore the scope of the C–N bond cleavage reactions, various DMB- or PMB-protected N-aryl sulfonamides 4 were studied under the optimized conditions. The results are summarized in Scheme . With the variation of the aryl moiety (Scheme A), the substrates bearing phenyl- (4a), p-tolyl- (4b), 2,4-dimethylphenyl- (4c), and m-chlorophenyl- (4d) substituted p-tolylsulfonamides provided the corresponding C–N bond cleavage products 3a–d in good to excellent yields (90–95%). Interestingly, the substrate with electron-rich 3,4-dimethoxyphenyl-substituted sulfonamides (4e) afforded the C–N bond cleavage product in a moderate yield (60%). In this example, additional detosylated product 3e’ (23%) through N–S bond cleavage and the intermolecular p-tolylsulfonyl-group-migrated product 3e’’ (12%) were formed. The in situ-generated triflic acid might be the plausible explanation for these observations.[16] Similarly, PMB-protected arylsulfonamides (4f–i) were also examined under the stated reaction conditions, and all of the substrates afforded C–N bond cleavage products 3a, 3c, 3d, and 3f in high yields (89–95%), respectively (Scheme A). However, N,N-4-methylbenzyl-phenyl-substituted p-tolylsulfonamide (4j) gave the cleavage product with a little low yield (89%). However, while a 4-bromobenzyl-substituted substrate (4k) was subjected to the optimized conditions, it was found completely inactive to this catalytic method (Scheme B). Furthermore, we also studied the substrates with the variation of different substituents at the aryl moiety on the sulfonyl part; the results are summarized in Scheme C. Likewise, p-tolyl-, α-naphthyl- (4l), p- and o-trifluoromethylphenyls- (4m and 4n), and p-nitrophenyl- (4o) substitutions at the aryl moiety (Ar3) were well tolerated and gave the cleavage products in high yields (80–90%).
Scheme 4

C–N Bond Cleavage of N-Aryl Sulfonamides

Next, we turned our focus toward the cinnamyl- and (3,4-dihydro-naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-substituted various N-aryl sulfonamides. Successfully, all of the substrates (5a–e and 1d) well accepted this cleavage method and afforded the desired cleavage products in a range of good to high yields (Scheme ). Likewise, electron-rich aryl-substituted sulfonamide substrates (4e) and the detosylation and tosyl-group-migrated products were also observed for the substrate 5e. Further, the effect of electronic tuning on the dibenzyl moieties (chemoselectivity) in the sulfonamides (6a–c) was examined, and expectedly, the PMB group deprotected products (3l and 3n) were obtained in good yields (Scheme ). Interestingly, the substrate 6c with di-PMB-substituted sulfonamide afforded the fully PMB-deprotected tosylamide product 3n in 80% yield. Similarly, other N-alkyl sulfonamides (7a and 7b) also responded well to this catalytic method and afforded the desired cleavage products 3o–p in good yields (76%).
Scheme 5

C–N Bond Cleavage of N-Cinnamylsulfonamides

Scheme 6

C–N Bond Cleavage of PMB-Protected N-Alkyl Sulfonamides (Chemoselectivity)

Several control experiments were conducted to obtain insights into the plausible reaction mechanism (Scheme ). Irrespective of whether the Lewis acid Bi(OTf)3 or the highly acidic in situ-generated hidden Brønsted acid (triflic acid)[17] plays the key role in this C–N bond cleavage reaction, we performed a reaction in anhydrous 1,2-dichoroethane in the presence of molecular sieves (MS 4A). A trace amount of the (<5%) cleavage product was formed (Scheme i). Another experiment, in DCE-H2O (10:1 v/v), using catalytic Bi(OTf)3 was conducted, which afforded the desired product in 93% yield (Scheme ii). It proves that the presence of water in the reaction system is essential for the C–N bond cleavage under optimized conditions. Further, a separate reaction using catalytic triflic acid (10 mol %) yielded 3a almost in a similar yield (89%; Scheme iii). With these observations, we hypothesized that the cleavage reaction undergoes in the presence of hidden in situ-generated triflic acid. Moreover, the catalytic presence of triflic acid afforded the cleavage product with very high yields, deliberately, compelling us to examine further control experiments. Consequently, a reaction was conducted in the presence of the triflic acid scavenger DTBMP (2,6-di-tertiary-butyl-4-methylpyridine (Scheme iv).[18] The very low yield of the cleavage product obtained in this control experiment seemingly suggests that the true catalyst in the cleavage reaction could be triflic acid. The C–H oxidation at the benzylic position of the sulfonamides in the presence of oxygen (solvated oxygen/air) and followed by hemiaminal hydrolysis may give the desired product via a radical mechanism.[19] However, such a possibility is unlikely as the reaction under the N2 gas atmosphere and using degasified solvent systems (DCE-H2O) yielded the desired product in a similar yield (91%; Scheme v). Finally, under the dark condition and also in the presence of a radical scavenger BHT[20] (1.5 equiv), the same set of reaction provided the desired cleavage products 3a in high yields (Scheme vi,vii). Thus, it can be unambiguously concluded that the cleavage method never follows the radical steps.
Scheme 7

Control Experiments for Mechanistic Insight

Reagent and conditions: (i) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %) ″dry DCE″, MS 4Α, 85 °C; (ii) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %), ″DCE-H2O″ (10:1), 85 °C; (iii) ″TfOH″ (10 mol %), 85 °C; (iv) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %), ″DCE-H2O″ (10:1), DTBMP (1.5 equiv), 85 °C; (v) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %), ″DCE-H2O″ (10:1), ″N2 balloon″, 85 °C; (vi) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %), ″DCE-H2O″ (10:1), ″dark condition″, 85 °C; (vii) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %), ″DCE-H2O″ (10:1), BHT (1.2 equiv), 85 °C.

Control Experiments for Mechanistic Insight

Reagent and conditions: (i) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %) ″dry DCE″, MS 4Α, 85 °C; (ii) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %), ″DCE-H2O″ (10:1), 85 °C; (iii) ″TfOH″ (10 mol %), 85 °C; (iv) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %), ″DCE-H2O″ (10:1), DTBMP (1.5 equiv), 85 °C; (v) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %), ″DCE-H2O″ (10:1), ″N2 balloon″, 85 °C; (vi) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %), ″DCE-H2O″ (10:1), ″dark condition″, 85 °C; (vii) Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %), ″DCE-H2O″ (10:1), BHT (1.2 equiv), 85 °C. Arguably, triflic acid is the true active catalyst in this cleavage method, and with this validity, a plausible reaction mechanism is proposed, which is depicted in Scheme . The reaction mechanism presumably starts with the protonation event. There is a dual chance of the protonation taking place on both the nitrogen atom of sulfonamide or oxygen atoms of the sulfonyl group in the tertiary sulfonamide substrate.[21] To validate this, the substrates with N-aryl-N-3,4-dimethoxybenzylcarboxamides (4p–q) were reacted under the optimized conditions. These substrates completely failed to give the corresponding C–N bond cleavage products. The results from these unsuccessful substrates (with lack of a sulfonamide moiety) might be due to the higher electron-withdrawing capability of carboxamide (COR) rather than sulfonamide (SO2R). On the basis of prior reports and experimental results, it can be concluded that the initial protonation most likely is taking place on the N atom of tertiary sulfonamide (Scheme ).[21] Following the protonation, substrate 4 forms the intermediate I, which consequently releases a highly reactive benzyl carbocationic intermediate II or its resonance-stabilized intermediate III, affording the desired cleavage product 3a. The in situ formation of highly reactive intermediate II or III is also further confirmed. The cleavage reaction was executed in the presence of the external nucleophile 1,2-dimethoxybenzene (2.0 equiv) under the optimized conditions. Pleasingly, we were able to isolate the Friedel–Craft alkylated products 8a (45%) and 8b (23%) in moderate yields alongside the desired cleavage product 3a in 93% yield (Scheme i).
Scheme 8

Plausible Mechanism

On the other hand, during the course of the reaction, the intermediate II or III might be trapped by water and the corresponding benzyl alcohol should be formed as a major byproduct as the reaction medium contains sufficient water. However, 3,4-dimethoxyphenylmethanol (R = OMe) was never isolated from the reaction system or traced by the TLC during the course of the reaction. Gratifyingly, a tribenzocyclononane (2,3,7,8,12,13-hexamethoxy-10,15-dihydro-5H-tribenzo[a,,g]cyclononane) compound 10 was isolated in a 22% yield (based on sulfonamide substrate 4a). To further probe, a separate reaction was conducted with 3,4-dimethoxyphenylmethanol in the presence of a catalytic amount of Bi(OTf)3 (5 mol %) under the same optimized reaction conditions (Scheme ii). After 1 h, the alcohol was completely consumed, and as expected, tribenzocyclononane compound 10 was isolated in 76% yield (Scheme ii). The formation of compound 10 can be elucidated by acid-catalyzed trimerization reactions of 3,4,-dimethoxybenzylphenylmethanol under acidic conditions.[22] It is further verified using mass spectroscopic techniques. In the mass spectrum, the intense characteristic peak exhibited at 468.2575 m/z (M+) can be attributed to compound 9, which, in turn, can be easily cyclized to afford a tribenzocyclononane product 10, which appeared at 451.2277 m/z (M + H+). Based on these control experiments and observations, we conclude that this C–N bond cleavage protocol of tertiary sulfonamides (4, 5, and 6) proceeds via the protonation event, followed by the C–N bond cleavage step (step I to step II). Finally, the methodology was applied to the gram scale for the one-pot synthesis of N-phenyl-N-tosylacetamide 11 from 4a (Scheme ).
Scheme 9

One-Pot Synthesis of N-Phenyl-N-tosylacetamide

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed a catalytic C–N bond cleavage protocol of tertiary PMB/DMB-protected sulfonamides under a mild acidic condition. Various DMB- or PMB-protected N-aryl/alkylsulfonamides underwent smoothly and afforded highly selective C–N bond cleavage products with high yields in most of the substrates. This catalytic protocol is applicable also to the cinnamyl-substituted N-aryl sulfonamides. However, both C–N and N–S bond cleavages including tosyl migration are observed in a parallel way while the electron-rich substituted N-aryl sulfonamides are used. On the basis of several control experiments and observations, the catalytic cleavage reaction most likely is proposed, which generally comprises protonation on the nitrogen atom of N-aryl or N-alkyl tertiary sulfonamides, followed by C–N bond cleavage. The immediate stability of the in situ-generated benzylic carbocationic intermediate (II) is possibly the driving force for the highly selective C–N bond cleavage over the N–S bond cleavage (detosylation). Great efforts have been made regarding mechanism interrogation to realize a plausible reaction mechanism based on a series of control experiments and mass spectroscopy.

Experimental Section

All reactions were conducted using oven-dried glassware. Commercial AR-grade reagents were used without further purification. Solvents were dried and distilled following usual protocols. However, all of the cleavage reactions were performed in DCE directly without any further purification (bottle-grade) purchased from CDH make in India. Flash column chromatography was performed in all cases using the indicated solvent system on silica gel (230–400 mesh). Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on aluminum-backed plates coated with silica gel 60 with an F254 indicator (Merck). The 1H NMR spectra were measured with 400 MHz, and 13C NMR spectra were recorded with 400 (100 MHz), using CDCl3 as the solvent. 1H NMR chemical shifts are expressed in parts per million (δ) downfield to CHCl3 (δ = 7.26), and 13C NMR chemical shifts are expressed in parts per million (δ) relative to the central CDCl3 resonance (δ = 77.0). Coupling constants in 1H NMR are in Hz. The following abbreviations classify the multiplicity: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triple; m, multiplet or unresolved; dd, doublet of doublets. Electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry (MS) experiments were performed on Agilent Technologies 6530 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC/MS. All 1,2-dihydronaphthalene-based alkenes were synthesized according to the reported literature procedure.[23]N-Benzyl and N-cinnamyl amines were prepared by reaction between commercially available aniline and respective aldehydes using the following standard literature procedure.[24] 3,4-Dihydro-naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-aryl amines were prepared by reaction between commercially available anilines and the respective carbaldehyde using the following standard literature procedure.[23] All secondary amines were further protected by following standard protocols. All Lewis acids, Brønsted acids, and other solvents and reagents used in this study were purchased from commercial suppliers.

Preparation of Substrates

General Procedure I: Synthesis of Secondary Amines

In an oven-dried round-bottom flask, aniline derivative (1.0 equiv), aldehyde (1.0 equiv), and triethyl amine (1.5 equiv) were dissolved in MeOH, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature until the starting material was completely consumed and imine was formed (checked by TLC). The reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C, and NaBH4 or Zn(BH4)2 (1.1 equiv) was added slowly and allowed to stir at room temperature until the intermediate imine was completely reduced to the corresponding amine. The reaction mixture was diluted with water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vaccuo, and the crude mixture was purified by flash column chromatography using petroleum ether and ethyl acetate as the eluent.

General Procedure II: Synthesis of Tertiary Sulfonamides (Protection of Secondary Amines)

All sulfonyl protected tertiary N-aryl sulfonamides were prepared from the corresponding secondary amine and sulfonyl chloride (2.0 equiv) in the presence of Et3N (3.0 equiv) and DMAP (10 mol %) in DCM at room temperature. N-Alkyl sulfonamides were synthesized via the N-alkylation reaction of monosubstituted sulfonamides with the corresponding alkyl halide following the standard literature procedure.[16]

General Procedure III: Friedel–Crafts Alkylation of 1,2-Dihydronaphthalene-Based Alkenes

To a stirred solution of alkene 1 (0.43 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in dichloroethane (2 mL), Bi(OTf)3 (0.05 equiv) was added, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC to ensure completion. On completion, DCE was removed under reduced pressure and the crude mixture was directly subjected to purification by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture as the eluent, affording the desired Friedel–Crafts alkylated product 2.

General Procedure IV: C–N Bond Cleavage of Tertiary Sulfonamides

To a stirred solution of tertiary sulfonamides [4-6] (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) in 1,2-dichloroethane (2 mL), Bi(OTf)3 (0.05 equiv) was added, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC to ensure completion. On completion, DCE was removed under reduced pressure and the crude mixture was directly subjected to purification by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture as the eluent, affording the desired cleavage product. Characterization data for compounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 11 3-Phenethyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (1a): Prepared according to the reported literature procedure; 80% yield; viscous oil. All spectroscopic data are identical to those reported in the literature.[23] 5,6,6a,7,8,12b-Hexahydrobenzo[c]phenanthrene (2a): Prepared according to general procedure III using 1a (100 mg, 0.43 mmol, 1.0 equiv); colorless oil (94 mg, 94% yield); R = 0.2 (2% EA/PE); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.30–7.13 (m, 8H), 4.02 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 2.90–2.83 (m, 4H), 2.51–2.40 (m, 1H), 2.06–1.97 (m, 2H), 1.67–1.48 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 138.9, 137.5, 129.8 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 128.3, 126.0 (2C), 125.3 (3C), 42.9, 32.4, 28.1 (2C), 27.3 (2C); HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C18H19, 235.1487 m/z (M + H)+; found, 235.1488 m/z. 3-(4-Methylphenethyl)-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (1b): Prepared according to the reported literature procedure; 21% yield; colorless oil. All spectroscopic data are identical to those reported in the literature.[23] 2-Methyl-5,6,6a,7,8,12b-hexahydrobenzo[c]phenanthrene (2b): Prepared according to general procedure III using 1b (100 mg, 0.40 mmol, 1.0 equiv); colorless oil (91 mg, 91% yield); R = 0.2 (2% EA/PE); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.34–7.19 (m, 4H), 7.17–7.06 (m, 2H), 7.00 (s, 1H), 4.04 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.01–2.84 (m, 4H), 2.49–2.44 (m, 1H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.14–1.96 (m, 2H), 1.72–1.52 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 139.0, 138.6, 137.5, 134.6, 134.3, 130.5, 129.8, 128.5 (2C), 126.8, 125.9, 125.3, 42.8, 32.4, 27.9, 27.6, 27.3, 27.2, 21.2; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C19H21, 249.1643 m/z (M + H)+; found, 249.1647 m/z. 3-(4-Chlorophenethyl)-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (1c): Prepared according to the reported literature procedure;[1] 40% yield; colorless oil; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.46–7.24 (m, 3H), 7.19–7.12 (m, 4H), 7.06 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 3.04–2.85 (m, 4H), 2.56 (t, J = 14.4 Hz, 2H), 2.35 (t, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 141.0, 140.5, 134.9, 134.5, 131.7, 129.9 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 127.3, 126.6, 126.4, 125.6, 123.1, 39.3, 33.7, 28.3, 27.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C18H18Cl, 269.1097 m/z (M + H)+; found, 269.1099 m/z. 2-Chloro-5,6,6a,7,8,12b-hexahydrobenzo[c]phenanthrene (2c): The reaction was performed according to general procedure III using 1c (100 mg, 0.37 mmol, 1.0 equiv). No cyclized product was obtained. Yield, 0%. N-(3,4-Dihydronaphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (1d). Prepared according to general procedure II; 89% yield; off-white solid; mp = 130–132 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.48 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.24–7.21 (m, 5H), 7.05–7.02 (m, 5H), 6.84–6.83 (m, 1H), 6.10 (s, 1H), 4.27 (s, 2H), 2.67 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 2.35 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.3, 138.2, 135.4, 135.3, 135.2, 133.8, 129.6 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 127.9 (2C), 127.8, 127.4, 127.2, 127.0, 126.04, 126.0, 56.4, 27.9, 24.8, 21.7; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C24H23NNaO2S, 412.1347 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 412.1348 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (3a):[25] Prepared according to general procedure III using 1d (100 mg, 0.26 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (54 mg, 84% yield). R = 0.25 (25% EA/PE); mp = 102–104 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.73 (d, J = 6.48, 2H), 7.44 (s, 1H), 7.25–7.22 (m, 4H), 7.15–7.08 (m, 3H), 2.37 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.9, 136.7, 136.1, 129.7 (2C), 129.3 (2C), 127.4 (2C), 125.2, 121.5 (2C), 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C13H14NO2S, 248.0745 m/z (M + H)+; found, 248.0743 m/z. N-(3,4-Dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (4a): Prepared according to general procedure II; 85% yield; off-white solid; mp = 158–160 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.52 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.18–7.15 (m, 3H), 6.95–6.92 (m, 2H), 6.77 (s, 1H), 6.62–6.60 (m, 2H), 4.64 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 6H), 2.41 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 149.0, 148.9, 143.5, 139.0, 135.8, 129.6 (2C), 129.1 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 128.4, 127.9, 127.8 (2C), 121.1, 111.7, 110.7, 55.9, 55.8, 54.6, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C22H23NNaO4S, 420.1245 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 420.1245 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (3a):[25] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4a (100 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (59 mg, 95% yield). All spectroscopic data are identical to 3a obtained from 1d and those reported in the literature. N-(3,4-Dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-p-tolyl-benzenesulfonamide (4b): Prepared according to general procedure II; 83% yield; yellow solid; mp = 130–132 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.54 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.83–6.80 (m, 3H), 6.64 (s, 2H), 4.62 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 2.25 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 148.9, 148.4, 143.4, 137.8, 136.3, 135.9, 129.54 (3C), 129.52 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 128.5, 127.8, 121.0, 111.6, 110.7, 55.9, 55.8, 54.6, 21.6, 21.1; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C23H25NNaO4S, 434.1402 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 434.1401 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-p-tolyl-benzenesulfonamide (3b):[25] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4b (100 mg, 0.24 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (60 mg, 95% yield); R = 0.2 (25% EA/PE); mp = 117–119 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.67 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (s, 1H), 7.20 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 7.02–6.97 (m, 4H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 2.24 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.8, 136.0, 135.2, 133.9, 129.9 (2C), 129.7 (2C), 127.4 (2C), 122.1 (2C), 21.6, 20.9; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C14H16NO2S, 262.0902 m/z (M + H)+; found, 262.0903 m/z. N-(3,4-Dimethoxy-benzyl)-N-(2,4-dimethyl-phenyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (4c): Prepared according to general procedure II; 81% yield; yellow solid; mp = 108–110 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.61 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.91 (s, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.90 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 2.00 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 148.7, 143.4, 140.0, 138.1, 136.5, 135.3, 132.1, 129.6 (2C), 128.2, 128.0 (3C), 127.9, 126.9, 121.9, 112.5, 110.6, 55.8 (2C), 55.7, 21.7, 21.1, 18.4; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C24H27NNaO4S, 448.1558 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 448.1553 m/z. N-(2,4-Dimethyl-phenyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3c):[26] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4c (100 mg, 0.24 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (62 mg, 95% yield); R = 0.25 (30% EA/PE); mp = 93–95 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.60 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, J = 8.04 Hz, 1H), 6.93–6.88 (m, 2H), 6.50 (s, 1H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 1.95 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.7, 136.9, 136.4, 132.2, 131.8, 131.6, 129.7 (2C), 127.6, 127.3 (2C), 125.3, 21.7, 21.0, 17.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C15H18NO2S, 276.1058 m/z (M + H)+; found, 276.1061 m/z. N-(3-Chloro-phenyl)-N-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (4d): Prepared according to general procedure II; 78% yield; white solid; mp = 156–158 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.53 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.15–7.11 (m, 2H), 6.96 (s, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (s, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 4.61 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 2.43 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 149.0, 148.7, 143.9, 140.2, 135.3, 134.2, 129.8, 129.7 (2C), 129.1, 128.1, 127.8 (2C), 127.7, 127.3, 121.1, 111.6, 110.8, 55.9, 55.8, 54.4, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C22H22ClNNaO4S, 454.0856 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 454.0862 m/z. N-(3-Chloro-phenyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3d):[25] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4d (100 mg, 0.23 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (59 mg, 90% yield); R = 0.25 (25% EA/PE); mp = 135–137 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.72 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (t, J = 8.04 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.00–6.97 (m, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 144.4, 138.0, 135.6, 134.9, 130.4, 130.0 (2C), 127.4 (2C), 125.2, 120.8, 118.9, 21.7; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C13H13ClNO2S, 282.0356 m/z (M + H)+; found, 282.0355 m/z. N-(3,4-Dimethoxy-benzyl)-N-(3,4-dimethoxy-phenyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (4e): Prepared according to general procedure II; 90% yield; off-white solid; mp = 125–127 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.54 (d, J = 8.04 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.04 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (s, 1H), 6.64–6.58 (m, 3H), 6.43–6.36 (m, 2H), 4.58 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 9H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 2.40 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 148.9, 148.7, 148.5, 148.3, 143.5, 135.9, 131.7, 129.5 (2C), 128.6, 127.9 (2C), 121.5, 121.3, 112.9, 111.8, 110.7, 110.6, 55.9 (4C), 55.1, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C24H27NNaO6S, 480.1457 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 480.1463 m/z. N-(3,4-Dimethoxy-phenyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3e):[27] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4e (100 mg, 0.22 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (40 mg, 60% yield); R = 0.25 (35% EA/PE); mp = 115–117 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.61 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.77 (s, 1H), 6.70–6.66 (m, 2H), 6.54–6.51 (m, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 2.38 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 149.3, 147.4, 143.8, 136.0, 129.6 (2C), 129.5, 127.5 (2C), 115.7, 111.3, 107.9, 56.1, 56.0, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C15H18NO4S, 308.0957 m/z (M + H)+; found, 308.0958 m/z. (3,4-Dimethoxy-benzyl)-[4,5-dimethoxy-2-(toluene-4-sulfonyl)-pheny]-amine (3e′): Obtained during the course of C–N bond cleavage of 4e according to general procedure IV; white solid, (23 mg, 23% yield); R = 0.2 (35% EA/PE); mp = 130–132 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.52 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (s, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.56 (s, 1H), 6.49 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.44 (s, 1H), 6.10 (S, 1H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.46 (s, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 149.4, 147.9, 147.8, 147.5, 143.8, 136.8, 131.6, 129.6 (2C), 127.7, 127.3, 127.2 (2C), 120.3, 113.4, 111.6, 111.5, 110.1, 56.1, 56.02, 56.01, 55.9, 37.0, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C24H28NO6S, 458.1637 m/z (M + H)+; found, 458.1634 m/z. N-[4,5-Dimethoxy-2-(toluene-4-sulfonyl)-phenyl]-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3e″): Obtained during the course of CN bond cleavage of 4e according to general procedure IV; white solid (13 mg, 12% yield); R = 0.22 (35% EA/PE); mp = 123–125 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.43 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (s, 1H), 7.31 (s, 1H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (s, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 2.21 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 151.2, 146.4, 144.0, 136.0, 135.7, 133.5, 132.9, 130.0 (2C), 129.6 (2C), 127.4 (2C), 126.9 (2C), 118.6, 112.8, 104.8, 56.3, 56.2, 21.7, 21.1; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C22H24NO6S2, 462.1045 m/z (M + H)+; found, 462.1043 m/z. N-(4-Methoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (4f): Prepared according to general procedure II; 91% yield; off-white solid; mp = 130–132 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.52 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.18–7.17 (m, 3H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.95–6.92 (m, 2H), 6.71 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.64 (s, 2H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 159.1, 143.5, 139.0, 135.9, 130.0 (2C), 129.6 (2C), 129.2 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 128.1, 127.8 (3C), 113.8 (2C), 55.3, 54.3, 21.7; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C21H21NNaO3S, 390.1140 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 390.1142 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (3a):[25] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4f (100 mg, 0.27 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (60 mg, 89% yield). All data are similar to the compound obtained from 4a. N-(2,4-Dimethyl-phenyl)-N-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (4g): Prepared according to general procedure II; 80% yield; off-white solid; mp = 110–112 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.62 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.03 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.91 (s, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.46 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 2.45 (s, 3H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 1.97 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 159.3, 143.4, 140.0, 138.1, 136.6, 135.3, 132.0, 130.8 (2C), 129.6 (2C), 128.1, 128.0 (2C), 127.9, 126.9, 113.6 (2C), 55.4, 55.3, 21.7, 21.2, 18.3; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C23H25NNaO3S, 418.1453 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 418.1458 m/z. N-(2,4-Dimethyl-phenyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3c):[26] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4g (100 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (66 mg, 95% yield). All data are similar to the compound obtained from 4c. N-(3-Chloro-phenyl)-N-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (4h): Prepared according to general procedure II; 87% yield; white solid; mp = 138–140 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.53 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.17–7.09 (m, 4H), 6.98 (s, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 4.62 (s, 2H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 2.44 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 159.1, 143.9, 140.2, 135.1, 134.2, 129.9 (2C), 129.7 (3C), 129.1, 128.1, 127.7 (2C), 127.4, 127.2, 113.9 (2C), 55.2, 54.0, 21.7; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C21H20ClNNaO3S, 424.0750 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 424.0753 m/z. N-(3-Chloro-phenyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3d):[25] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4h (100 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (67 mg, 95% yield). All data are similar to the compound obtained from 4d. N-(4-Fluoro-phenyl)-N-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (4i): Prepared according to general procedure II; 86% yield; white solid; mp = 142–144 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.53 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.88–6.84 (m, 4H), 6.73 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 4.61 (s, 2H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 2.43 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 161.7 (d, JC-F = 246.4 Hz), 159.1, 143.7, 135.4, 134.7 (d, JC-F = 3.04 Hz), 130.9 (d, JC-F = 8.7 Hz), 130.0 (2C), 129.7 (2C), 127.7 (3C), 127.6, 115.8 (d, JC-F = 22.5 Hz), 113.8 (3C), 55.2, 54.4, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C21H20FNNaO3S, 408.1046 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 408.1043 m/z. N-(4-Fluoro-phenyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3f).[28] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4i (100 mg, 0.26 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (65 mg, 94% yield); R = 0.25 (25% EA/PE); mp = 84–86 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.64 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.30 (s, 1H), 7.21 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.07–7.04 (m, 2H), 6.90 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 161.9, 159.6, 144.2, 135.7, 132.5 (d, JC-F = 2.9 Hz), 129.8 (3C), 127.4 (2C), 124.5 (d, JC-F = 8.3 Hz), 116.2 (d, JC-F = 22.6 Hz), 21.7; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C13H13FNO2S, 266.0651 m/z (M + H)+; found, 266.0649 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-(4-methyl-benzyl)-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (4j): Prepared according to general procedure II; 82% yield; white solid; mp = 149–151 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.52 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.18–7.16 (m, 3H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.00–6.94 (m, 4H), 4.66 (s, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 2.23 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.5, 139.1, 137.3, 135.8, 133.0, 129.6 (2C), 129.1 (2C), 129.0 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 127.8 (3C), 54.5, 21.7, 21.2; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C21H21NNaO2S, 374.1191 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 374.1195 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (3a):[25] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4j (100 mg, 0.28 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (63 mg, 89% yield). All data are similar to the compound obtained from 4a. N-(4-Bromo-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (4k): Prepared according to general procedure II; 80% yield; off-white solid; mp = 125–127 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.43 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.13–7.11 (m, 3H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.88–6.87 (m, 2H), 4.58 (s, 2H), 2.35 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.8, 138.8, 135.4, 135.2, 131.6 (2C), 130.3 (2C), 129.6 (2C), 129.1 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 128.1, 127.8 (2C), 121.7, 54.2, 21.7; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C20H18BrNNaO2S, 440.0119 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 440.0120 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (3a): The reaction was performed according to general procedure IV using 4k (100 mg, 0.24 mmol, 1.0 equiv). No product was obtained. Yield = 0%. Naphthalene-1-sulfonic Acid (3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-phenyl-amide (4l): Prepared according to general procedure II; 80% yield; off-white solid; mp = 160–162 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.55 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 8.05 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.58–7.45 (m, 3H), 7.14–7.12 (m, 3H), 6.94–6.92 (m, 2H), 6.62–6.60 (m, 2H), 6.56–6.54 (m, 1H), 4.73 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.63 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 148.7, 148.5, 138.6, 134.5 134.4, 134.3, 131.1, 129.7 (2C), 128.9 (4C), 128.5, 128.0 (2C), 126.9, 125.6, 124.2, 121.3, 111.7, 110.6, 55.9, 55.7, 55.0; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C25H23NNaO4S, 456.1245 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 456.1243 m/z. Naphthalene-1-sulfonic Acid Phenylamide (3g):[29] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4l (100 mg, 0.23 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (52 mg, 80% yield); R = 0.25 (25% EA/PE); mp = 150–152 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.77 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.65–7.63 (m, 1H), 7.60–7.58 (m, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.11 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.02–6.96 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 136.5, 134.8, 134.3, 134.1, 130.5, 129.4, 129.3 (3C), 128.7, 128.2, 127.0, 125.3, 124.3, 124.2, 121.5; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C16H14NO2S, 284.0745 m/z (M + H)+; found, 284.0739 m/z. N-(3,4-Dimethoxy-benzyl)-N-phenyl-4-trifluoromethyl-benzenesulfonamide (4m): Prepared according to general procedure II; 88% yield; off-white solid; mp = 140–142 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.79–7.37 (m, 4H), 7.24–7.22 (m, 3H), 6.94–6.92 (m, 2H), 6.77 (s, 1H), 6.67–6.64 (m, 2H), 4.68 (s, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.78 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 149.6, 148.7, 142.5, 138.4, 129.2 (3C), 129.1 (2C), 128.4, 128.2 (3C), 127.8, 126.2, 126.1, 121.3, 111.7, 110.8, 55.9 (2C), 55.0; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C22H20F3NNaO4S, 474.0963 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 474.0961 m/z. N-Phenyl-4-trifluoromethyl-benzenesulfonamide (3h):[30] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4m (100 mg, 0.22 mmol, 1.0 equiv); pale-yellow solid (60 mg, 90% yield), R = 0.25 (25% EA/PE); mp = 122–125 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.89 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.26–7.22 (m, 3H), 7.15–7.07 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 142.5, 135.8, 134.8 (JC-F = 33.0 Hz), 129.7 (2C), 127.9 (2C), 126.4 (JC-F = 7.0, 4.0 Hz, 2C), 126.2, 123.2 (JC-F = 271.0 Hz), 122.1 (2C); HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C13H11F3NO2S, 302.0463 m/z (M + H)+; found, 302.0462 m/z. N-(3,4-Dimethoxybenzyl)-N-phenyl-2-trifluoromethyl-benzenesulfonamide (4n): Prepared according to general procedure II; 88% yield; off-white solid; mp = 141–143 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.88 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.16–7.13 (m, 3H), 6.94–6.92 (m, 2H), 6.79 (s, 1H), 6.68–6.62 (m, 2H), 4.82 (s, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.78 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 148.7 (d, JC-F = 30.1 Hz), 138.2, 137.9, 133.0 (2C), 132.7, 131.9, 129.9 (3C), 129.1 (3C), 128.6, 128.2 (2C), 121.4 (2C), 111.8, 110.6, 55.8 (2C); HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C22H20F3NNaO4S, 474.0963 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 474.0958 m/z. N-Phenyl-2-trifluoromethyl-benzenesulfonamide (3i):[31] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4n (100 mg, 0.22 mmol, 1.0 equiv); pale-yellow solid (60 mg, 90% yield); R = 0.25 (25% EA/PE); mp = 96–98 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.0 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.24–7.20 (m, 2H), 7.13–7.06 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 135.7, 133.2, 132.6, 132.3, 129.5 (4C), 128.6 (JC-F = 7.0 Hz), 126.1, 122.3 (3C); HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C13H11F3NO2S, 302.0463 m/z (M + H)+; found, 302.0460 m/z. N-(3,4-Dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-nitro-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (4o): Prepared according to general procedure II; 88% yield; pale-yellow solid; mp = 193–195 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.33 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.26–7.23 (m, 3H), 6.93–6.91 (m, 2H), 6.77 (s, 1H), 6.69–6.63 (m, 2H), 4.70 (s, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 150.1, 149.0, 148.8, 144.6, 138.0, 129.4 (2C), 129.1 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 128.6, 127.6, 124.3 (2C), 121.3, 111.6, 110.7, 55.9 (2C), 55.3; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C21H20N2NaO6S, 451.0940 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 451.0940 m/z. 4-Nitro-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (3j):[29] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 4o (100 mg, 0.23 mmol, 1.0 equiv); pale-yellow solid (58 mg, 90% yield); R = 0.25 (30% EA/PE); mp = 168–170 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.30–7.26 (m, 2H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 150.4, 144.7, 135.4, 129.8 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 126.5, 124.4 (2C), 122.6 (2C); HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C12H11N2O4S, 279.0440 m/z (M + H)+; found, 279.0437 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-phenyl-N-(3-phenyl-allyl)-benzenesulfonamide (5a):[32] Prepared according to general procedure II; 80% yield; white solid; mp = 143–145 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.51 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.18 (m, 10H), 7.08–7.05 (m, 2H), 6.35 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 6.12–6.04 (dt, J = 15.8, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (dd, J = 6.8, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.6, 139.4, 136.5, 135.8, 133.8, 129.6 (2C), 129.1 (2C), 129.0 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 128.0, 127.9, 127.8 (2C), 126.6 (2C), 124.2, 53.4, 21.7; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C22H21NNaO2S, 386.1191 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 386.1185 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (3a):[25] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 5a (100 mg, 0.28 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (55 mg, 81% yield). All data are similar to the compound obtained from 4a. 4-Methyl-N-(3-phenyl-allyl)-N-p-tolyl-benzenesulfonamide (5b):[32] Prepared according to general procedure II; 80% yield; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.52 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.26–7.20 (m, 7H), 7.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.36 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.09 (dt, J = 15.8, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (dd, J = 6.1 Hz, 0.8 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 2.29 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.5, 137.9, 136.6, 136.5, 135.9, 133.7, 129.7, 129.5, 128.8, 128.6, 127.9, 126.5, 124.4, 53.5, 21.7, 21.2; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C23H23NNaO2S, 400.1347 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 400.1349 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-p-tolyl-benzenesulfonamide (3b):[25] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 5b (100 mg, 0.26 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (53 mg, 78% yield). All data are similar to the compound obtained from 4b. N-(2,4-Dimethyl-phenyl)-4-methyl-N-(3-phenyl-allyl)-benzenesulfonamide (5c): Prepared according to general procedure II; 82% yield; off-white solid; mp = 105–107 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.62 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.20 (m, 7H), 7.04 (s, 1H), 6.84–6.82 (m, 1H), 6.52 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.28 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 6.13–6.05 (m, 1H), 4.44 (dd, J = 16.0 Hz, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.03 (dd, J = 14 Hz, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 2.26 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.4, 139.6, 138.3, 136.6, 136.5, 135.5, 134.0, 132.1, 129.5 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 128.3, 128.0 (2C), 127.9, 127.0, 126.5 (2C), 123.9, 54.4, 21.6, 21.1, 18.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C24H25NNaO2S, 414.1504 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 414.1503 m/z. N-(2,4-Dimethyl-phenyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3c):[26] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 5c (100 mg, 0.26 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (53 mg, 76% yield). All data are similar to the compound obtained from 4c. N-(3,4-Dihydro-naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-4-methyl-N-o-tolyl-benzenesulfonamide (5d): Prepared according to general procedure II; 89% yield; off-white solid; mp = 128–130 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.59 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 7.28–7.17 (m, 2H), 7.09–7.07 (m, 3H), 6.86–6.85 (m, 1H), 6.64–6.63 (m, 1H), 6.03 (s, 1H), 4.47 (d, J = 13.0 Hz, 1H), 3.93 (d, J = 13.0 Hz, 1H), 2.78–2.72 (m, 2H), 2.70 (s, 3H), 2.47 (s, 3H), 2.40–2.38 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.5, 139.8, 138.0, 135.0, 134.0, 132.5, 131.4, 129.4 (3C), 128.0 (3C), 127.4, 127.3, 127.1, 126.3, 126.0 (2C), 125.9, 57.3, 27.8, 25.2, 21.6, 18.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C25H26NO2S, 404.1684 m/z (M + H)+; found, 404.1678 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-o-tolyl-benzenesulfonamide (3k):[33] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 5d (100 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (55 mg, 84% yield); R = 0.25 (25% EA/PE); mp = 95–97 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.64 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.15–7.09 (m, 3H), 6.57 (s, 1H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 2.03 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.7, 136.7, 134.5, 131.4, 130.7, 129.5 (2C), 127.1 (2C), 126.8, 126.1, 124.3, 21.5, 17.5; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C14H16NO2S, 262.0902 m/z (M + H)+; found, 262.0899 m/z. N-(3,4-Dihydro-naphthalen-2-ylmethyl-N-(3,4-dimethoxy-phenyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (5e). Prepared according to general procedure II; 89% yield; off-white solid; mp = 130–132 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.48 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.05–7.01 (m, 3H), 6.83–6.82 (m, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.53–6.50 (m, 2H), 6.08 (s, 1H), 4.21 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 2.69 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 2.36 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 148.8, 148.6, 143.5, 135.4 (2C), 131.6, 129.5 (3C), 128.0 (3C), 127.4, 127.2, 127.0, 126.4, 126.0, 121.2, 112.6, 110.7, 56.8, 56.0, 55.9, 28.0, 24.8, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C26H28NO4S, 450.1739 m/z (M + H)+; found, 450.1742 m/z. N-(3,4-Dimethoxy-phenyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3e):[27] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 5e (100 mg, 0.22 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (37 mg, 55% yield). All data are similar to the compound obtained from 4e. 3,4-Dihydro-naphthalen-2-ylmethyl)-[4,5-dimethoxy-2-(toluene-4-sulfonyl)-phenyl amine (Detosylated product) (5e’): Obtained during the course of the C–N bond cleavage of 5e according to general procedure IV; white solid (13 mg, 12% yield); R = 0.22 (35% EA/PE); mp = 123–125 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.47 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.08–6.98 (m, 6H), 6.85 (s, 1H), 6.50 (s, 1H), 6.35 (s, 1H), 5.89 (s, 1H), 3.72 (s, 6H), 2.95 (s, 2H), 2.62 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.26 (s, 3H), 1.89 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 148.0, 147.5, 143.9, 139.3, 136.7, 134.3, 134.1, 129.7 (3C), 127.6, 127.3 (3C), 126.9, 126.7, 126.0, 124.2, 113.2, 109.8, 56.1, 56.0, 39.2, 28.0, 27.1, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C26H28NO4S, 450.1739 m/z (M + H)+; found, 450.1737 m/z. N-Benzyl-N-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (6a): Prepared according to general procedure II; 89% yield; off-white solid; mp = 110–112 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.74 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.23–7.22 (m, 3H), 7.08–7.07 (m, 2H), 6.98–6.95 (m, 2H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.29 (s, 2H), 4.26 (s, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 2.44 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 159.2, 143.3, 137.8, 135.9, 130.1 (3C), 129.8, 128.6 (3C), 128.6 (2C), 127.6, 127.3 (3C), 113.8, 55.3, 50.3, 49.9, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C22H24NO3S, 382.1477 m/z (M + H)+; found, 382.1473 m/z. N-Benzyl-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3l):[34] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 6a (100 mg, 0.26 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (53 mg, 78% yield); R = 0.25 (25% EA/PE); mp = 113–115 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.74 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.29–7.23 (m, 5H), 7.19–7.17 (m, 2H), 4.97–4.95 (m, 1H), 4.09 (d, J = 6.00 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.6, 136.9, 136.4, 129.8 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 128.0 (3C), 127.3 (2C), 47.3, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C14H16NO2S, 262.0902 m/z (M + H)+; found, 262.0898 m/z. N-(4-Fluoro-benzyl)-N-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (6b): Prepared according to general procedure II; 87% yield; off-white solid; mp = 105–107 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.73 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.04–7.01 (m, 2H), 6.94–6.86 (m, 4H), 6.73 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 4.23 (s, 2H), 4.22 (s, 2H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 2.44 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 162.2 (d, JC-F = 244.5 Hz), 159.2, 143.4, 137.5, 131.8 (d, JC-F = 3.1 Hz), 130.2 (d, JC-F = 8.1, 2C), 130.0 (2C), 129.8 (2C), 127.4, 127.2 (2C), 115.2 (d, JC-F = 21.3, 2C), 113.8 (2C), 55.3, 50.3, 49.7, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C22H23FNO3S, 400.1383 m/z (M + H)+; found, 400.1379 m/z. N-(4-Fluoro-benzyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3m):[34] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 6b (100 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (57 mg, 81% yield); R = 0.25 (35% EA/PE); mp = 92–94 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.72 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.17–7.15 (m, 2H), 6.95–6.90 (m, 2H), 5.05–5.02 (m, 1H), 4.07 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 162.4 (d, JC-F = 244.8 Hz), 143.8, 136.9, 132.2, 129.9 (2C), 129.7 (d, JC-F = 8.2 Hz, 2C), 127.2 (2C), 115.6 (d, JC-F = 21.4, 2C), 46.6, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C14H15FNO2S, 280.0808 m/z (M + H)+; found, 280.0809 m/z. N,N-Bis-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-benzenesulfonamide (6c): Prepared according to general procedure II; 89% yield; off-white solid; mp = 105–107 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.72 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.96 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4H), 4.22 (s, 4H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 2.44 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 159.2, 143.3, 138.0, 130.0 (5C), 129.8 (2C), 127.8, 127.3 (2C), 113.8 (5C), 55.4 (2C), 49.6 (2C), 21.7; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C23H26NO4S, 412.1583 m/z (M + H)+; found, 412.1583 m/z. 4-Methyl-benzenesulfonamide (3n): Prepared according to general procedure IV using 6c (100 mg, 0.24 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (33 mg, 80% yield); R = 0.25 (35% EA/PE); mp = 132–134 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.81 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.95 (s, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.8, 139.2, 129.9 (2C), 126.6 (2C), 21.7; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C7H10NO2S, 172.0432 m/z (M + H)+; found, 172.0426 m/z. N-(4-Methoxy-benzyl)-4,N-dimethyl-benzenesulfonamide (7a): Prepared according to general procedure II; 87% yield; white solid; mp = 69–71 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.71 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 4.04 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 2.54 (s, 3H), 2.45 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 159.4, 143.5, 134.3, 129.8 (3C), 127.6 (3C), 114.1 (3C), 55.4, 53.7, 34.2, 21.7; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C16H20NO3S, 306.1164 m/z (M + H)+; found, 306.1167 m/z. 4,N-Dimethyl-benzenesulfonamide (3o):[35] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 7a (100 mg, 0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (49 mg, 76% yield); R = 0.2 (20% EA/PE); mp = 70–72 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.74 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.75–4.70 (m, 1H), 2.62 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.6, 135.8, 129.8 (2C), 127.4 (2C), 29.4, 21.6; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C8H12NO2S, 186.0589 m/z (M + H)+; found, 186.0586 m/z. N-(4-Methoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-propyl-benzenesulfonamide (7b): Prepared according to general procedure II; 87% yield; off-white solid; mp = 79–81 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.71 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 4.23 (s, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 3.02–2.99 (m, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 1.34–1.28 (m, 2H), 0.67 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 159.1, 143.1, 137.1, 129.7 (2C), 129.6 (2C), 128.5, 127.1 (2C), 113.8 (2C), 55.2, 51.3, 49.6, 21.5, 21.4, 11.2; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C18H24NO3S, 334.1477 m/z (M + H)+; found, 334.1475 m/z. 4-Methyl-N-propyl-benzenesulfonamide (3p):[35] Prepared according to general procedure IV using 7b (100 mg, 0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv); white solid (49 mg, 76% yield); R = 0.2 (20% EA/PE); mp = 90–92 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.75 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 4.86 (s, 1H), 2.90–2.84 (m, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 1.49–1.43 (m, 2H), 0.84 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.4, 137.0, 129.8 (2C), 127.2 (2C), 45.0, 23.0, 21.6, 11.2; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C10H16NO2S, 214.0902 m/z (M + H)+; found, 214.0898 m/z.

Procedure for Control Experiments (Scheme )

Scheme i. To a stirred solution of N-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide 4a (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) in superdry dichloroethane (2 mL), Bi(OTf)3 (8 mg, 0.0125 mmol, 0.05 equiv) was added along with 4Å molecular sieves, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 2 h. A trace amount of the cleavage product was formed. Scheme ii. To a stirred solution of N-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide 4a (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) in dry dichloroethane (2 mL), water (0.2 mL) and Bi(OTf)3 (8 mg, 0.0125 mmol, 0.05 equiv) were added, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC to ensure completion. On completion, DCE was removed under reduced pressure and the crude mixture was directly subjected to purification by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture as the eluent, affording the desired cleavage product 3a in 93% yield. Scheme iii. To a stirred solution of N-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide 4a (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) in dichloroethane (2 mL), TfOH (2.2 μL, 0.025 mmol, 0.1 equiv) was added, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC to ensure completion. On completion, DCE was removed under reduced pressure and the crude mixture was directly subjected to purification by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture as the eluent, affording the desired cleavage product 3a in 89% yield. Scheme iv. To a stirred solution of N-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide 4a (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) in dichloroethane (2 mL), TfOH (2.2 μL, 0.025 mmol, 0.1 equiv) and the acid scavenger DTBMP (77 mg, 0.375 mmol, 1.5 equiv) were added, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 2 h. A trace amount of the cleavage product was formed. Scheme v. To a stirred solution of N-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide 4a (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) in degassed dichloroethane (2 mL), water (0.2 mL) and Bi(OTf)3 (0.05 equiv) were added, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 2 h under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction was monitored by TLC to ensure completion. On completion, DCE was removed under reduced pressure and the crude mixture was directly subjected to purification by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture as the eluent, affording the desired cleavage product 3a in 91% yield. Scheme vi. To a stirred solution of N-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide 4a (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) in dry dichloroethane (2 mL), water (0.2 mL) and Bi(OTf)3 (8 mg, 0.0125 mmol, 0.05 equiv) were added, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 2 h under a dark condition. The reaction was monitored by TLC to ensure completion. On completion, DCE was removed under reduced pressure and the crude mixture was directly subjected to purification by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture as the eluent, affording the desired cleavage product 3a in 90% yield. Scheme vii. To a stirred solution of N-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide 4a (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) in dry dichloroethane (2 mL), water (0.2 mL), Bi(OTf)3 (8 mg, 0.0125 mmol, 0.05 equiv), and the radical scavenger BHT (66 mg, 0.3 mmol, 1.2 equiv) were added, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC to ensure completion. On completion, DCE was removed under reduced pressure and the crude mixture was directly subjected to purification by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture as the eluent, affording the desired cleavage product 3a in 89% yield.

Preparation of Inactive Substrates 4p–4s

N-(3,4-Dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methoxy-N-phenyl-benzamide (4p). To a solution of N-(3,4-dimethoxybenzyl)aniline (200 mg, 0.82 mmol) in DMF, NaH (60% suspension, 30 mg, 1.23 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was added and stirred at room temperature for 1 h, followed by the addition of 4-methoxybenzoyl chloride (0.11 mL, 0.84 mmol, 1.02 equiv). The resultant mixture was stirred at 80 °C, and after the complete consumption of reactants (as monitored by TLC), the reaction was quenched with 1.0 M HCl aqueous solution, extracted with EtOAc, washed with brine, dried with Na2SO4, and evaporated in vaccuo. Purification of the crude product by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture (35% EA/PE) as the eluent afforded the desired titled compound 4p (216 mg, 70%) as a colorless oil; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.28 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.17–7.08 (m, 3H), 6.89 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 6.84 (s, 1H), 6.81–6.73 (m, 2H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 5.04 (s, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.71 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 170.1, 160.7, 148.8, 148.3, 144.0, 131.0 (2C), 130.4, 129.1 (2C), 128.1, 127.8 (2C), 126.6, 121.0, 113.0 (2C), 111.8, 110.8, 55.9 (2C), 55.3, 53.8; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C23H23NNaO4, 400.1525 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 400.1523 m/z. N-(3,4-Dimethoxy-benzyl)-N-phenyl-acetamide (4q): To a solution of N-(3,4-dimethoxybenzyl)aniline (200 mg, 0.82 mmol) in acetic acid, Ac2O (0.15 mL, 1.64 mmol, 2.0 equiv) was added, and the resultant mixture was heated to 100 °C, and after the complete consumption of reactants (as monitored by TLC), the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3 solution, extracted with EtOAc, washed with brine, dried with Na2SO4, and evaporated in vaccuo. Purification of the crude product by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture (35% EA/PE) as the eluent afforded the desired titled compound 4q (198 mg, 85%) as a colorless oil; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.33–7.29 (m, 3H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (s, 1H), 6.72 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.81 (s, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 1.87 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 170.4, 148.8, 148.4, 142.7, 130.1, 129.5, 128.9, 128.4, 128.0, 121.4, 119.9, 112.2, 110.8, 55.8 (2C), 52.5, 22.8; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C17H19NNaO3, 308.1263 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 308.1263 m/z. Allyl-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-phenyl-amine (4r): To a solution of N-(3,4-dimethoxybenzyl)aniline (200 mg, 0.82 mmol) in DMF, NaH (60% suspension, 30 mg, 1.23 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was added and stirred at room temperature for 1 h, followed by the addition of allyl bromide (0.072 mL, 0.84 mmol, 1.02 equiv). The resultant mixture was stirred at 80 °C, and after the complete consumption of reactants (as monitored by TLC), the reaction was quenched with 1.0 M HCl aqueous solution, extracted with EtOAc, washed with brine, dried with Na2SO4, and evaporated in vaccuo. Purification of the crude product by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture (20% EA/PE) as the eluent afforded the desired titled compound 4r (192 mg, 83%) as a colorless thick oil; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.20 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.81–6.70 (m, 6H), 5.94–5.84 (m, 1H), 5.22–5.20 (m, 1H), 5.18 (s, 1H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 4.00 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 149.2 (2C), 148.0, 133.8, 131.5, 129.2 (2C), 118.7, 116.7, 116.5, 112.7 (2C), 111.2, 109.8, 56.1, 55.9, 53.9, 52.8; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C18H22NO2, 284.1651 m/z (M + H)+; found, 284.1648 m/z. N-Benzyl-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (4s):[15] Prepared according to general procedure II; 89% yield; white solid; mp = 118–120 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.45 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.16–7.08 (m, 8H), 6.90–5.88 (m, 2H), 4.63 (s, 2H), 2.35 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 143.6, 140.0, 136.0, 135.5, 129.6 (2C), 129.0 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 128.4 (2C), 127.9, 127.8 (2C), 127.6, 54.7, 21.7; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C20H19NNaO2S, 360.1034 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 360.1031 m/z.

Experimental Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds 8a and 8b

To a stirred solution of N-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyl)-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide 4a (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) in dichloroethane (2 mL), Bi(OTf)3 (8 mg, 0.0125 mmol, 0.05 equiv) and 1,2-dimethoxybenzene (0.064 mL, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv) were added, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC to ensure completion. On completion, DCE was removed under reduced pressure and the crude mixture was directly subjected to purification by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture as the eluent, affording the desired cleavage product 3a in 93% yield along with 8a (45% yield) and 8b (23% yield). 4-Methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (3a): Yield = 93%; all data are consistent with the molecule prepared according to general procedure IV. Bis(3,4-dimethoxy-phenyl)methane (8a):[36] 45% yield; brown thick oil; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 9.84 (s, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.41(s, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 8H), 6.70 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 3.96 (s, 3H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 8H), 3.84 (s, 24H), 3.82 (s, 24H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 149.0 (2C). 147.4 (2C), 134.0 (2C), 120.8 (2C), 112.2 (2C), 111.3 (2C), 56.0 (2C), 55.9 (2C), 41.1; HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C17H21O4, 289.1440 m/z (M + H)+; found, 289.1433 m/z. [bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)methane and 3,4-dimethoxybenzaldehyde obtained in a 4:1 ratio] 1-(2,3-Dimethoxybenzyl)-5-(3,4-dimethoxybenzyl)-2,3-dimethoxybenzene (8b): 23% yield; pale-yellow oil; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.65 (s, 2H), 6.60–6.57 (m, 4H), 3.84 (s, 10H), 3.80 (s, 6H), 3.76 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 149.0 (2C), 147.5 (2C), 147.4 (2C), 133.6 (2C), 131.3 (2C), 120.6 (2C), 113.9 (2C), 112.0 (2C), 111.2 (2C), 56.1 (2C), 56.0 (2C), 55.9 (2C), 38.2 (2C); HRMS (ESI)+ calcd for C26H31O6, 439.2121 m/z (M + H)+; found, 439.2117 m/z.

Preparation of Tribenzocyclononane (2,3,7,8,12,13-Hexamethoxy-10,15-dihydro-5H-tribenzo[a,]cyclononane) 10 (ii)

2,3,7,8,12,13-Hexamethoxy-10,15-dihydro-5H-tribenzo[a,d,g]cyclononane (10):[22] To a stirred solution of 3,4-dimethoxyphenylmethanol (0.1 g, 0.59 mmol) in dichloroethane (2 mL), Bi(OTf)3 (0.05 equiv; 0.02 g) was added, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 1 h. After the complete consumption of alcohol, the reaction mixture was cooled down and next evaporated in vaccuo. Purification of the crude product by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture (30% EA/PE) as the eluent afforded the desired titled compound 10 (68 mg, 76% yield). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 6.83 (s, 6H), 4.77 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 3H), 3.84 (s, 18H), 3.55 (d, J = 13.6 H, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 147.8, 131.9, 113.2, 56.1, 36.6; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C27H30NaO6, 473.1940 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 473.2135 m/z. One-pot amide synthesis in a gram scale (Scheme ) N-Acetyl-4-methyl-N-phenyl-benzenesulfonamide (11): To a stirred solution of tertiary sulfonamide 4a (1.0 g, 2.51 mmol, 1 equiv) in dichloroethane (15 mL), Bi(OTf)3 (82 mg, 0. 125 mmol, 0.05 equiv) was added, and the resultant mixture was refluxed at 85 °C for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC to ensure complete consumption of 4a, and then, Ac2O (0.50 mL, 5.02 mmol, 2.0 equiv) was added to the same reaction pot. After the complete consumption of C–N bond cleavage product 3a (confirmed by TLC), the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3 solution, extracted with EtOAc, washed with brine, dried with Na2SO4, and evaporated in vaccuo. Purification of the crude product by flash column chromatography using an EtOAc and petroleum ether mixture (20% EA/PE) as the eluent afforded the desired titled compound 11 (680 mg, 94% overall yield). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.92 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.49–7.47 (m, 3H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.25 (m, 2H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 1.85 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 170.2, 145.1, 137.0, 136.1, 130.1 129.0 (4C), 129.5 (2C), 129.3 (2C), 25.2, 21.8; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H15NNaO3S, 312.0670 m/z (M + Na)+; found, 312.0670 m/z.
  31 in total

1.  Radical-scavenging activity of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and its metabolites.

Authors:  Seiichiro Fujisawa; Yoshinori Kadoma; Ichiro Yokoe
Journal:  Chem Phys Lipids       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.329

2.  Sulfonyl vs. carbonyl group: which is the more electron-withdrawing?

Authors:  Isabelle Chataigner; Cécilia Panel; Hélène Gérard; Serge R Piettre
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Hidden Brønsted acid catalysis: pathways of accidental or deliberate generation of triflic acid from metal triflates.

Authors:  Tuan Thanh Dang; Florian Boeck; Lukas Hintermann
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.354

4.  Copper-catalyzed Chan-Lam coupling between sulfonyl azides and boronic acids at room temperature.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Moon; Jungsoo Nam; Kris Rathwell; Won-Suk Kim
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 6.005

5.  DYKAT of vinyl aziridines: total synthesis of (+)-pseudodistomin D.

Authors:  Barry M Trost; Daniel R Fandrick
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 6.005

6.  (+)-saxitoxin: a first and second generation stereoselective synthesis.

Authors:  James J Fleming; Matthew D McReynolds; J Du Bois
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Formal total synthesis of (+)-gephyrotoxin.

Authors:  Marco Santarem; Corinne Vanucci-Bacqué; Gérard Lhommet
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 4.354

8.  Metal-free reductive cleavage of C-N and S-N bonds by photoactivated electron transfer from a neutral organic donor.

Authors:  Steven O'Sullivan; Eswararao Doni; Tell Tuttle; John A Murphy
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Fe(OTf)3-catalysed Friedel-Crafts reaction of benzenoid arenes with α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds: easy access to 1,1-diarylalkanes.

Authors:  Aditya Bhattacharya; Pushpendra Mani Shukla; Biswajit Maji
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  A Gold Carbene Manifold to Prepare Fused γ-Lactams by Oxidative Cyclisation of Ynamides.

Authors:  Fernando Sánchez-Cantalejo; Joshua D Priest; Paul W Davies
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.