Hao Fu1,2, Haoming Bao1, Hongwen Zhang1, Qian Zhao1, Le Zhou1,2, Shuyi Zhu1,2, Yi Wei1,2, Yue Li1, Weiping Cai1,2. 1. Key Lab of Materials Physics, Anhui Key Lab of Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, Institute of Solid State Physics, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, P. R. China. 2. University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, P. R. China.
Abstract
Practical application of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is greatly limited by the inaccurate quantitative analyses due to the measuring parameter's fluctuations induced by different operators, different Raman spectrometers, and different test sites and moments, especially during the field tests. Herein, we develop a strategy of quantitative SERS for field detection via designing structurally homogeneous and ordered Ag-coated Si nanocone arrays. Such an array is fabricated as SERS chips by depositing Ag on the template etching-induced Si nanocone array. Taking 4-aminothiophenol as the typical analyte, the influences of fluctuations in measuring parameters (such as defocusing depth and laser powers) on Raman signals are systematically studied, which significantly change SERS measurements. It has been shown that the silicon underneath the Ag coating in the chip can respond to the measuring parameters' fluctuations synchronously with and similar to the analyte adsorbed on the chip surface, and the normalization with Si Raman signals can well eliminate the big fluctuations (up to 1 or 2 orders of magnitude) in measurements, achieving highly reproducible measurements (mostly, <5% in signal fluctuations) and accurate quantitative SERS analyses. Finally, the simulated field tests demonstrate that the developed strategy enables quantitatively analyzing the highly scattered SERS measurements well with 1 order of magnitude in signal fluctuation, exhibiting good practicability. This study provides a new practical chip and reliable quantitative SERS for the field detection of real samples.
Practical application of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is greatly limited by the inaccurate quantitative analyses due to the measuring parameter's fluctuations induced by different operators, different Raman spectrometers, and different test sites and moments, especially during the field tests. Herein, we develop a strategy of quantitative SERS for field detection via designing structurally homogeneous and ordered Ag-coated Si nanocone arrays. Such an array is fabricated as SERS chips by depositing Ag on the template etching-induced Si nanocone array. Taking 4-aminothiophenol as the typical analyte, the influences of fluctuations in measuring parameters (such as defocusing depth and laser powers) on Raman signals are systematically studied, which significantly change SERS measurements. It has been shown that the silicon underneath the Ag coating in the chip can respond to the measuring parameters' fluctuations synchronously with and similar to the analyte adsorbed on the chip surface, and the normalization with Si Raman signals can well eliminate the big fluctuations (up to 1 or 2 orders of magnitude) in measurements, achieving highly reproducible measurements (mostly, <5% in signal fluctuations) and accurate quantitative SERS analyses. Finally, the simulated field tests demonstrate that the developed strategy enables quantitatively analyzing the highly scattered SERS measurements well with 1 order of magnitude in signal fluctuation, exhibiting good practicability. This study provides a new practical chip and reliable quantitative SERS for the field detection of real samples.
Surface-enhanced
Raman spectroscopy (SERS) can greatly amplify
the weak inelastic light scattering of analytes and offer their molecular
fingerprints,[1−6] and hence, it is promising to become an ultrasensitive and accurate
detection technique applied in the fields of chemistry,[7,8] biological sciences,[4,9] materials,[10,11] and environment.[12−14] However, in many cases, quantitative SERS is restricted
by the difficulty in obtaining uniform and highly reproducible SERS
signals.[15,16] The signal fluctuations are mainly attributed
to two aspects: the nonuniform SERS chips (substrates), including
their structural and composition heterogeneities, and the fluctuations
of the measuring parameters (such as focusing depth and laser power).[17−19] The structurally nonuniform SERS substrates would induce inhomogeneous
distribution of hot spots, which results in poor signal uniformity
and eventually difficulty in quantitative detection. The fluctuations
of measuring parameters, which easily occur among different operators,
different Raman spectrometers, and different test sites and moments,
would induce great uncertainty of the Raman measurements, especially
during the on-site detection or field tests.[20,21] The fluctuations in measured Raman signals could be up to 1 to 2
orders of magnitude[21] (also see the following Sections and 3.4.2), which make it impossible to carry out
quantitative analysis. Various attempts have been made to try to overcome
the above obstacles for quantitative SERS.For structural uniformity,
many works utilized ordered plasmonic
metal arrays as SERS substrates via self-assembling and patterning
fabrications.[22−29] Such arrays ensure that the hotspots and the adsorbed target molecules
(or analyte) are homogeneously distributed on the chips at the scale
of the incident light spot. For instance, Liu et al. fabricated Ag
nanoplate-built hollow microsphere arrays based on organic colloidal
template-assisted electrodeposition, which showed good signal reproducibility
in detecting trace cyanide.[30] Zhu et al.
reported that the ordered Ag nanorod bundle arrays exhibited high
signal homogeneity and reproducibility and could quantitatively analyze
the phenolic pollutants.[22] To a certain
extent, these substrates could basically meet the requirements of
signal uniformity with less than 15% in relative standard deviation
(RSD).[31] However, it is still difficult
for these structurally uniform SERS chips to avoid the signal uncertainty
induced by the measuring parameter’s fluctuations from different
operators and Raman spectrometers as well as different test sites
and moments during the nonlab or field tests.Some researchers
tried to reduce the interferences induced by the
fluctuations in measuring parameters via modifying the SERS substrates
with internal standard (IS) substances, which is named as the IS method.[20,32−38] During SERS measurements, the IS substances and the analytes are
distributed in the similar microenvironment and show synchronous evolutions
in Raman signal intensity when the measuring parameters fluctuate.[15,20,21,32,36−40] Thus, using the Raman signals of IS substances to
normalize the analyte’s signals could effectively improve the
reproducibility in measurements.[15,32,37,40] According to the position
of the IS substance on the SERS substrates, the IS method can be further
classified into external mode and embedded mode. For the external
mode, the plasmonic metalSERS substrates are generally modified or
mixed with IS substances, including organic molecules (e.g., rhodamine
6G,[32] acetone,[35] thiolate ligands,[41] and 4-mercaptopyridine[42]) and inorganic substances (e.g., graphene,[37,40] silicon,[43,44] and Mxene[33]). For instance, Yang et al.[42] utilized 4-mercaptopyridine as the IS substance to normalize the
SERS signals of analytes and effectively reduce the signal’s
fluctuation, realizing quantitative analysis of various drugs. As
for the embedded mode, usually, some special organic IS molecules
are immobilized at the interfaces between the core parts and shell
layers in the composite plasmonic metal nanoparticles (NPs).[21,36,39,45] For instance, Shen et al.[20] embedded
some organic molecules (such as 4-mercaptopyridine, 4-mercaptobenzoic
acid, or thiophenol) into the interfaces between Au cores and Ag shells
to form core-molecule-shell NPs, obviously decreasing the fluctuations
in measurements and realizing quantitative SERS analysis in a large
range of analyte concentrations during lab tests.In principle,
the IS method, whether it is the external mode or
the embedded mode, needs one-to-one distribution of the IS substance
and the analyte on the SERS substrate to ensure that the normalized
signal of the analyte maintains a stable value. Otherwise, even if
there is no fluctuation of the measuring parameters, the inconsistent
distribution between the IS substance and the analyte can still lead
to poor reproducibility of the normalized signals, which would make
the IS method lose its calibration function. What is more, the one-to-one
distribution of the IS substance and the analyte on the substrate
is usually very difficult to be achieved. In addition, the organic
IS molecules in the external mode may compete with the target molecules
to occupy the sites on the hot spots and generate interference to
Raman bands, resulting in reduced detection sensitivity and difficulty
in signal recognition. For the embedded mode, it is highly dependent
on the complicated core-molecule-shell nanostructures and the homogeneous
modification of IS molecules in the plasmonic gaps, which increase
the difficulty in the substrate fabrication. All in all, the accurate
quantitative SERS detection, especially during the field tests which
often involve different operators, different Raman spectrometers,
and different test sites and moments and hence produce highly scattered
measurements, is still expected and remains to be a bottleneck for
SERS practical applications.Herein, we present a facile strategy
for accurate and quantitative
SERS for field tests via designing a structurally homogeneous Ag-coated
silicon nanocone array (Ag/SiNCA). Such an array is fabricated as
the SERS chips by depositing Ag on the template etching-induced SiNCA. Typically, 4-aminothiophenol (4-ATP) is taken as the analyte.
It is demonstrated that the Si right below the Ag coating can respond
to the fluctuations of the measuring conditions (such as focusing
depth, laser power, operators, and instruments) synchronously with
and similar to the adsorbed analyte, and the big fluctuations in measurements
can well be eliminated by Si signal normalization or calibration,
achieving excellent signal reproducibility (mostly, <5% in signal
fluctuations) and accurate quantitative SERS detection. Finally, the
simulated field tests show that the presented strategy is suitable
for the quantitative detection on-site with the highly scattered SERS
measurements (1 or 2 orders of magnitude in signal fluctuation), exhibiting
good practicability. This study provides not only a new practical
chip but also effective quantitative SERS for the field tests with
large fluctuations in measuring conditions.
Quantitative
Strategy and SERS Chip Design
As mentioned above, although
the current SERS chips can mostly
ensure the homogeneous distribution of the hotspots on the substrates
at the scale of the incident spot, it is difficult to effectively
eliminate the signal fluctuation induced by the variations in measuring
parameters. The IS methods could effectively reduce the disturbance
from the variations in measuring conditions but need using some organic
molecules, which would cause complex Raman spectral patterns, in addition
to the difficulty in obtaining the one-to-one distribution of the
IS substance and the analyte.Since the characteristic Raman
band of silicon is at 520 cm–1[46,47] and located in the silent region
(usually, below 1000 cm–1) of many organic analytes,
if the silicon is used as the IS substance, its Raman band would not
overlap with the vibrations of the analyte. We can thus strategize
quantitative SERS by designing a Si-embedded plasmonic metal nanostructured
array as the SERS chip, as illustrated in Figure . In this chip, a thin layer of plasmonic
metal film is uniformly coated on an ordered Si nanostructured array
(Figure a). Obviously,
such a SERS chip can not only ensure the uniform distribution of the
hotspots and the adsorbed analyte on the surface due to its ordered
structure but also achieve the one-to-one distribution of the analytes
and the Si substance due to the consistent structure between the Si
array and the thin plasmonic metal film. In this case, the Raman signal
intensities of the Si () and the adsorbed analyte () could synchronously and similarly change
with fluctuant measuring parameters (the inset of Figure a,b). If using to normalize or the ratio / as the Raman measurements, it is
expected that we could effectively eliminate the interferences from
the fluctuations of the measuring parameters (Figure c) and achieve the highly reproducible measurements
and hence the quantitative SERS detection.
Figure 1
Schematic illustration
for the strategy of quantitative SERS based
on Si-embedded plasmonic metal nanostructured array. (a) Thin plasmonic
metal film-coated ordered Si-nanostructured array as a SERS chip.
Inset: the anatomy of an analyte-adsorbed building block in the array.
(b) Schematic spectral measurements at different sites or by different
operators or on different Raman spectrometers. (c) Schematic histogram
of the ratio / corresponding
to the Raman spectra in (b).
Schematic illustration
for the strategy of quantitative SERS based
on Si-embedded plasmonic metal nanostructured array. (a) Thin plasmonic
metal film-coated ordered Si-nanostructured array as a SERS chip.
Inset: the anatomy of an analyte-adsorbed building block in the array.
(b) Schematic spectral measurements at different sites or by different
operators or on different Raman spectrometers. (c) Schematic histogram
of the ratio / corresponding
to the Raman spectra in (b).According to the strategy in Figure , the thin plasmonic metal film-coated Si nanostructured
arrays are crucial. The building blocks in the Si array should be
arranged in an ordered pattern, with much smaller size than the laser
spot so that the good structural uniformity is ensured at the scale
of the laser spot. Also, the plasmonic metal coating should be compact
and uniform and appropriate in thickness. An overly thick coating
would mask the Si signal, while an excessively thin metal coating
would lead to low SERS activity. On these bases, here we design a
Ag/SiNCA, which is fabricated by depositing Ag on the template etching-induced
Si array (see the Experimental Section), and
take it as the SERS chip and 4-ATP molecules as the typical analyte
to systematically study the influences of fluctuations in measuring
parameters on Raman signals and demonstrate the effectiveness and
practicability of this strategy.
Results
and Discussion
Morphology and Evaluation
of SERS Chips
The self-assembled polystyrene (PS) colloidal
monolayer was first
fabricated on a Si wafer (3 cm × 3 cm) (Figure S1). Si-ordered NCA was then prepared by reactive ion etching
(RIE) of the PS-covered Si wafer. The Ag/SiNCA was thus fabricated
via depositing a thin layer of Ag on the SiNCA, showing a green color
which arises from the diffraction of a periodic structure,[48,49] as demonstrated in the inset of Figure a. The Ag coating was ca. 20 nm in deposition
thickness. Field emission scanning electron microscopic (FESEM) observations
show that the Ag/SiNCA consists of conic building blocks, which are
450 nm in height, 500 nm in period, and homogeneously arranged in
an ordered hexagonal pattern, as illustrated in Figure a,b. Correspondingly, the energy-dispersive
spectroscopic (EDS) measurements indicate that the array contains
only Ag and Si, and the elemental mapping analysis shows that Si and
Ag are uniformly distributed on the array (Figure S2). The optical absorption spectra, based on the diffuse reflection
spectral measurements, show that there are two peaks around 460 and
530 nm for the Ag/SiNCA, while the bare SiNCA assumes high absorptivity
in the whole measured optical region, as illustrated in Figure S3a. The optical absorption peak at 460
nm and 530 nm should be attributed to the Fabry–Perot (FP)
mode of the Ag coating, and the hybrid mode of the FP and surface
plasmonic resonance, respectively.[46,50,51]
Figure 2
Morphological observation and SERS signal uniformity of
the as-prepared
Ag/SiNCA. (a,b) FESEM images (tilted view and cross-sectional view,
respectively). The inset in (a) is a photo of the as-prepared Ag/SiNCA
with 3 cm × 3 cm. (c) SERS spectrum of the Ag/SiNCA-based chip
after soaking in 4-ATP solution (10–7 M) and exciting
at 532 nm. (d) SERS spectra from 30 randomly selected sites on the
chip after soaking in 10–7 M 4-ATP solution. (e,f)
Histograms for the peak intensities of Si at 520 cm–1 and 4-ATP at 1435 cm–1 before and after normalized
by Si peak intensity [data from the SERS spectra in (d)]. (g) RSD
values of 4-ATP peak intensities at 1075, 1390, and 1435 cm–1 before and after Si-signal normalization.
Morphological observation and SERS signal uniformity of
the as-prepared
Ag/SiNCA. (a,b) FESEM images (tilted view and cross-sectional view,
respectively). The inset in (a) is a photo of the as-prepared Ag/SiNCA
with 3 cm × 3 cm. (c) SERS spectrum of the Ag/SiNCA-based chip
after soaking in 4-ATP solution (10–7 M) and exciting
at 532 nm. (d) SERS spectra from 30 randomly selected sites on the
chip after soaking in 10–7 M 4-ATP solution. (e,f)
Histograms for the peak intensities of Si at 520 cm–1 and 4-ATP at 1435 cm–1 before and after normalized
by Si peak intensity [data from the SERS spectra in (d)]. (g) RSD
values of 4-ATP peak intensities at 1075, 1390, and 1435 cm–1 before and after Si-signal normalization.Such an Ag/SiNCA was then cut into pieces (3 mm × 3 mm) as
SERS chips. Figure c presents the Raman spectrum of the chip after soaking in the 4-ATP
solution with 10–7 M and exciting at 532 nm. The
peaks at 1075 and 1575 cm–1 belong to the vibrations
of C–S and C–C, respectively,[52−55] which are from a1 modes
of 4-ATP molecules. The other three prominent characteristic peaks
at 1140, 1390, and 1435 cm–1 are assigned to the
b2 modes of 4-ATP.[52−55] The sharp Raman peak at 520 cm–1, which is far away from the fingerprint area of the 4-ATP molecules,
belongs to the Raman vibration of the Si crystal.[46,47,50] In addition, it has been shown that the
excitation at 532 nm is optimal compared with that at 633 nm or 785
nm (Figure S3b). Hence, an excitation wavelength
at 532 nm was chosen to demonstrate the SERS performance of the chip.
Then, the characteristic peaks of 4-ATP at 1075 and 1575 cm–1 were chosen to evaluate the enhancement factor (EF) of the chip
according to previous reports.[30,56] The EF values of the
chip are 1.5 × 106 and 2.3 × 106 for
the peaks at 1075 and 1575 cm–1, respectively, as
shown in Figure S3c,d (the details of the
EF determination are seen in the Supporting Information).In order to demonstrate the Raman signal uniformity of the
Ag/SiNCA-based
SERS chip, the Raman spectra were measured from 30 randomly selected
sites on the 4-ATP solution-soaked chip, as shown in Figure d. All these Raman spectra
are similar in pattern, but there are small differences in peak intensities.
The RSD in intensity was calculated to be 4.8 and 5.4% for the peaks
at 520 and 1435 cm–1, respectively, as illustrated
in Figure e. Such
low RSD values indicate that the structure and hot spots on the SERS
chip are homogeneously distributed at the scale of the incident laser
spot. In addition, from the histograms in Figure e, it is noticed that the Si Raman peak at
520 cm–1 exhibits signal fluctuations similar to
the characteristic vibration of 4-ATP at 1435 cm–1 and the nearly synchronous change with 4-ATP peaks. Such signal
fluctuation could mainly originate from the fluctuations of measuring
parameters (such as focusing depth and laser power. see the next section).
Further, the difference in the 4-ATP Raman signals measured at different
sites on the chip can be reduced if the intensity () of the Si peak at 520 cm–1 is used to normalize the intensities () of the 4-ATP peaks in the same Raman spectrum
or the ratio / is used
as the peak intensity of 4-ATP. Typically, for the peak at 1435 cm–1, the RSD value of the intensity was decreased from
5.4 to 4.1% after such Si signal normalization, as shown in Figure f. Similarly, the
RSD values of the normalized intensities for the peaks at 1075 and
1390 cm–1 were also obviously decreased (Figure g). We also tested
the analytes without sulfhydryl or isothiohydrogen, such as rhodamine
6G (R6G) and crystal violet (CV), as illustrated in Figures S4 and S5, respectively. The results are similar to
those for 4-ATP, or the reproducibility is quite good and the Si-signal
normalization can significantly improve the reproducibility of Raman
measurements.Finally, the influence of the Ag coating thickness
on the SERS
performances was examined for the Ag/SiNCA-based chips. When the thickness
of the silver coating was increased from 10 to 40 nm, the EF value
to the analyte (4-ATP) increased from 1.1 × 106 to
2.7 × 106 for the peak at 1075 cm–1, while the Raman signal intensity of Si was ever-decreasing, as
shown in Figure S6. Such thickness dependence
is attributed to the contribution of the Ag coating to the field enhancement
and its masking effect on Si. It should be noted that the over-thin
Ag coating (say, 10 nm or less) can cause the strong Si signal that
may mask the analyte’s signals, especially when the concentration
is low, while the over-thick coating (say, 40 nm or larger) would
lead to the weak Si signal that is not conducive to the quantitative
analysis of the analyte with a high concentration. Therefore, the
thickness of the plasmonic metal coating on the SiNCA should be balanced
according to need. In the next sections, only the 20 nm-thick Ag/SiNCA
was used.In addition, the 250 nm PS-covered Si wafer without
etching and
the bare Si wafer were also deposited with a 20 nm thick silver film
on them (denoted as Ag/PS array and Ag NP film, respectively). The
corresponding morphology and uniformity in the Raman signal are illustrated
in Figures S7 and S8, showing less homogeneous
structures and much lower EF values (∼105 in order
of magnitude) than those of the Ag/SiNCA-based chip (Figure S9 and Table S1).
Antimeasuring
Condition’s Fluctuations
In practical applications
or field tests, the measurement often
involves different operators and test sites, different environments,
and Raman spectrometers as well as different test moments, which unavoidably
lead to fluctuations in the measurement parameters, such as focusing
depth and laser power. Occasionally, the Raman intensity was normalized
with the laser power and integration time.[57] However, Raman is a scattering process and the collected signals
depend highly on the measuring conditions. If the measuring condition
is changed during the test, such as changing the objective, the normalized
intensity will still fluctuate. Such fluctuations would induce highly
scattered measurements and hence quantitative analyses would be difficult.
Here, we demonstrate the validity of the Ag/SiNCA chip-based quantitative
SERS strategy even in the case with significant measuring parameters’
fluctuations or variations.
Focusing Depth Variation
Focusing
depth is an important parameter in Raman spectral measurement. Here,
we adjusted the position of the SERS chip in the Z-axis direction and kept the laser beam fixed to simulate the fluctuation
of the focusing depth, as schematically shown in Figure a. The optimal position, at
which the chip is located and the strongest Raman signal is obtained,
is defined as the focal plane or zero defocusing distance. Figure b presents the Raman
spectra, under different defocusing distances (from −50 to
50 μm), for the Ag/SiNCA-based chip after soaking in 10–7 M 4-ATP solution and drying. A slight variation of
the focusing depth induces a significant change in the intensity of
Raman signals. The Raman signals from 4-ATP and Si synchronically
decay with the rising defocusing distance, and the maximum fluctuation
in the Raman signal is more than 1 order of magnitude in the used
defocusing range, as shown in Figure c (the upper frame). However, if the Raman peak intensities
of 4-ATP are normalized by the Si signal in the corresponding spectrum,
the influence of the variation in the focusing depth on the measured
Raman signals can be nearly completely eliminated, as demonstrated
in Figure c (the lower
frame). The normalized intensities (or /) of the characteristic peaks of 4-ATP are nearly
independent of the defocusing distance varied in the large range from
−50 to 50 μm, while the RSD values for the absolute peak
intensities are as high as ∼85%, as shown in Figure d. These indicate that the
defocusing-induced fluctuation of Raman signals can be well eliminated
via using the Ag/SiNCA-based chip and Si signal normalization.
Figure 3
Defocusing-induced
SERS-signal fluctuation and its normalization.
(a) Schematic illustration of adjusting the defocusing distance. (b)
SERS spectra of the 10–7 M 4-ATP solution-soaked
Ag/SNCA-based chip under the defocusing distances varied from −50
to 50 μm. (c) Upper frame: the absolute peak intensities at
520 and 1435 cm–1 vs the defocusing distance; lower
frame: the Si signal-normalized peak intensities (/) vs the defocusing distance [the data from
(b)]. (d) RSD values of the 4-ATP peak intensities before and after
Si-signal normalization [the data from (b) and the lower frame in
(c)]. (e,f) RSD values of the 4-ATP peak intensities before and after
Si-signal normalization for the 10–7 M 4-ATP solution-soaked
Ag/PS array-covered Si wafer and the Ag NP film-covered Si wafer,
respectively (the data from Figures S10 and S11, and defocusing range: −10 to 10 μm).
Defocusing-induced
SERS-signal fluctuation and its normalization.
(a) Schematic illustration of adjusting the defocusing distance. (b)
SERS spectra of the 10–7 M 4-ATP solution-soaked
Ag/SNCA-based chip under the defocusing distances varied from −50
to 50 μm. (c) Upper frame: the absolute peak intensities at
520 and 1435 cm–1 vs the defocusing distance; lower
frame: the Si signal-normalized peak intensities (/) vs the defocusing distance [the data from
(b)]. (d) RSD values of the 4-ATP peak intensities before and after
Si-signal normalization [the data from (b) and the lower frame in
(c)]. (e,f) RSD values of the 4-ATP peak intensities before and after
Si-signal normalization for the 10–7 M 4-ATP solution-soaked
Ag/PS array-covered Si wafer and the Ag NP film-covered Si wafer,
respectively (the data from Figures S10 and S11, and defocusing range: −10 to 10 μm).In contrast, for the Ag/PS array-covered Si wafer, the Raman
signals
from 4-ATP show quite different evolutions with the defocusing distance
from those of Si, as shown in Figure S10. The RSD values of the 4-ATP peak intensities are higher than 30%
and similar before and after Si-signal normalization, as shown in Figure e corresponding to
the defocusing range from −10 to 10 μm. As for the Ag
NP film-covered Si wafer, the RSD values of the normalized 4-ATP peak’s
intensities are significantly higher than those for the Ag/SiNCA-based
chip (Figures f and S11).
Laser Power Fluctuation
The laser
power is also an important parameter in Raman measurement, and the
intensity of the Raman signal increases with increasing power.[18] Generally, the incident laser power would inevitably
fluctuate or vary among the different operators and Raman spectrometers
as well as the different test sites and environments, resulting in
fluctuations of Raman spectral measurements. The influence of the
power variation on the Raman signals was thus examined. We fixed the
laser spot on the 4-ATP solution-soaked Ag/SiNCA chip and measured
the Raman spectra under different laser powers varying in the range
from 2.5 to 500 W/cm2, as shown in Figure a. The Raman peak intensities of 4-ATP and
Si increase synchronously with the increasing laser power, as shown
in Figure a or more
intuitively in Figure b. The characteristic peaks of 4-ATP and Si significantly fluctuate
in intensity up to about 160 times when the laser power was varying
from 2.5 to 500 W/cm2. However, after the normalization
by the Si signal, the intensities of the 4-ATP characteristic peaks
are nearly independent of the power variations in the large range
from 2.5 to 500 W/cm2, and the RSD values are less than
8.5% (Figure c). This
suggests that the Si-signal normalization can effectively overcome
the disturbance from laser power fluctuations for the Ag/SiNCA-based
chip. For the Ag/PS array-covered Si wafer, however, the normalized
intensities of the 4-ATP peaks are still highly scattered with RSD
values more than 40%, probably due to the light absorption of the
PS monolayer between the Ag coating and the Si wafer, as illustrated
in Figure S12.
Figure 4
Laser power variation-induced
SERS signal fluctuation and its normalization.
(a) Schematic illustration of the laser spot, with powers varied from
2.5 to 500 W/cm2, on the 10–7 M 4-ATP
solution-soaked Ag/SiNCA-based chip and the corresponding SERS spectra.
(b) Absolute peak intensities at 520 and 1435 cm–1 vs the laser power [data from (a)]. (c) Si signal-normalized peak
intensities (/) vs the
laser power.
Laser power variation-induced
SERS signal fluctuation and its normalization.
(a) Schematic illustration of the laser spot, with powers varied from
2.5 to 500 W/cm2, on the 10–7 M 4-ATP
solution-soaked Ag/SiNCA-based chip and the corresponding SERS spectra.
(b) Absolute peak intensities at 520 and 1435 cm–1 vs the laser power [data from (a)]. (c) Si signal-normalized peak
intensities (/) vs the
laser power.
Interferences
from Operators and Instruments
Comprehensively, the Raman
measurements could significantly fluctuate
among different operators and instruments as well as at different
test moments and sites, which would induce fluctuations in both laser
power and focusing depth. Figure a shows the intensity histogram of the 4-ATP characteristic
peak at 1435 cm–1, measured for the 10–7 M 4-ATP solution-soaked Ag/SNCA-based chip by different operators
or at different moments or on different Raman spectrometers but under
the same measuring requirements (power, focusing depth, integral time,
etc.). The results measured by operator O1 for the 10–7 M 4-ATP-spiked samples using lake (Dongpu Lake in Hefei, China)
and ground water are also given in Figure a. The corresponding spectral measurements
are shown in Figure S13. Obviously, the
measured results are highly scattered among different operators or
different spectrometers. The maximal difference among these measured
results was up to 6 times, and the RSD value was up to 40.3% for the
peak intensity at 1435 cm–1 in this group of experiments.
In other words, the measured results are of big uncertainty. However,
after Si-signal normalization, the measurements are highly reproducible
and almost the same among these measuring conditions, with only a
small fluctuation (RSD = 2.0% for the peak at 1435 cm–1), as clearly shown in Figure b. For the analyte R6G, the measured intensities of the main
peak are also highly scattered (RSD > 30%) among different conditions,
but the Si signal-normalized results show highly consistent measurements
(RSD = 1.6%), as shown in Figure S14. These
indicate that the difference in measurements among the different operators
and Raman spectrometers as well as the different test moments and
aqueous solutions and so forth can be eliminated almost completely
via using the Ag/SiNCA-based chip and normalizing with the Si signal.
Figure 5
Histograms
of the 4-ATP characteristic peak intensity at 1435 cm–1, measured for the 10–7 M 4-ATP
solution-soaked chip by different operators or at different moments
or on different Raman spectrometers but under the same measurement
requirements before (a) and after (b) Si-signal normalization. O1,
O2, O3, and O4 represent the results obtained by different operators;
O1-2 and O1-3 represent the measurements obtained by operator O1 at
different test moments; I2 represents the measurements obtained by
operator O1 on another Raman spectrometer; LW and GW are the results
measured by operator O1 for the 4-ATP spiked samples using lake (Dongpu
Lake in Hefei, China) and ground water, respectively (All data are
from Figure S13).
Histograms
of the 4-ATP characteristic peak intensity at 1435 cm–1, measured for the 10–7 M 4-ATP
solution-soaked chip by different operators or at different moments
or on different Raman spectrometers but under the same measurement
requirements before (a) and after (b) Si-signal normalization. O1,
O2, O3, and O4 represent the results obtained by different operators;
O1-2 and O1-3 represent the measurements obtained by operator O1 at
different test moments; I2 represents the measurements obtained by
operator O1 on another Raman spectrometer; LW and GW are the results
measured by operator O1 for the 4-ATP spiked samples using lake (Dongpu
Lake in Hefei, China) and ground water, respectively (All data are
from Figure S13).
Synchronous Response-Induced Good Reproducibility
As mentioned above, via using Ag/SiNCA-based chip and Si-signal
normalization, we can effectively eliminate the interferences from
the fluctuations of the measuring conditions and ensure excellent
reproducibility in measurements and hence the quantitative SERS analyses.
This is attributed to the special structure of the Ag/SiNCA-based
chips. Here, the highly ordered structure ensures that the hotspots
are homogeneously distributed and the analyte molecules are adsorbed
uniformly on the chip’s surface at the scale of laser spot.
The SiNCA, which is right underneath the Ag coating film and has
a focusing depth similar to the Ag coating film, can respond to the
fluctuations of the measurement parameters (or the focusing depth
and laser power) synchronously with and similar to the analyte adsorbed
on the Ag film due to their one-to-one distribution (Figure S15a). The disturbances from the fluctuations of the
measuring parameters can thus be eliminated effectively via Si-signal
normalization, leading to good signal reproducibility (Figures c, 4c, and 5b). For the Ag/PS array-covered Si
wafer, however, the Ag coating layer has a significantly different
focusing depth from the Si wafer due to the PS monolayer between them
(Figure S15b). In this case, there is no
one-to-one distribution between the adsorbed analyte and the silicon,
or they would not synchronously response to the fluctuations of the
measurement parameters, leading to the highly scattered measurements
even after Si-signal normalization (Figures e, S10c and S12c).
Quantitative SERS Analysis and Practical Application
The variations in the measuring conditions could induce significant
fluctuation or uncertainty in the Raman measurements, which does not
allow the quantitative analysis. However, if using the Ag/SiNCA-based
chip and normalizing with the Si signal, we can well eliminate the
disturbance from fluctuations in measuring parameters and achieve
the highly reproducible measurements and hence quantitative SERS analyses.
Lab Test
The Raman spectra were
first measured by the same operator on the same Raman spectrometer
at the lab for the Ag/SiNCA-based chip after soaking in 4-ATP solutions
with different concentrations, as shown in Figure a. The characteristic peaks of 4-ATP remain
distinguishable even when the concentration was as low as 10–10 M (or 12.5 ppt), indicating the high sensitivity of the Ag/SiNCA-based
chip. Figure b shows
the concentration-dependent intensities of the 4-ATP peaks at 1075,
1390, and 1435 cm–1. These characteristic peaks
increased in intensity with the rising 4-ATP concentration () up to 5 × 10–7 M,
and the higher concentration (10–6 M or higher)
led to the insignificant change in the peak intensity (or the signal
saturation). The peak intensities are obviously scattered. However,
the Si signal-normalized characteristic peak intensities show good
linear relation with the logarithmic concentration in the range from
5 × 10–9 M (∼0.6 ppb) to 10–6 M (∼0.1 ppm), as illustrated in Figure c. In addition, we performed such a test
with a handheld Raman spectrometer (type: ATR6500) and also achieved
the good linear relation between the normalized peak intensities and
the logarithmic concentration, as shown in Figure S16. According to such
a linear relation, we can thus quantitatively determine the 4-ATP
concentration. These demonstrate that the accurate quantitative SERS
detections can be achieved based on the Ag/SiNCA-based chip and Si-signal
normalization.
Figure 6
Quantitative SERS analyses of 4-ATP by lab tests. (a)
SERS spectra
of the Ag/SiNCA-based chip after soaking in the 4-ATP solutions with
different concentrations. (b) Intensities of the 4-ATP peaks at 1075,
1390, and 1435 cm–1 as a function of the logarithmic
concentration (). (c) Plots of the
Si signal-normalized peak intensities vs the logarithmic concentration.
The lines are the linear fitting results.
Quantitative SERS analyses of 4-ATP by lab tests. (a)
SERS spectra
of the Ag/SiNCA-based chip after soaking in the 4-ATP solutions with
different concentrations. (b) Intensities of the 4-ATP peaks at 1075,
1390, and 1435 cm–1 as a function of the logarithmic
concentration (). (c) Plots of the
Si signal-normalized peak intensities vs the logarithmic concentration.
The lines are the linear fitting results.Similarly, for some other target molecules which can be adsorbed
on the plasmonic metal surface, we can also achieve accurate quantitative
detection in the lab. Typically, R6G and CV were selected as target
molecules because of their affinity to the metallic surface through
electrostatic interaction. Figure S17a,c shows the concentration-dependent SERS spectra of R6G and CV, respectively.
Here, the prominent peaks at 612 cm–1 and 913 cm–1 were chosen as the identification positions for the
quantitative analyses of R6G and CV, respectively.[37,39,45,58] The intensities
of these peaks increase with the increasing concentration up to 10–4 M. The Si signal-normalized intensities show much
better linear relations with the logarithmic concentration than those
without Si-signal normalization for both analytes, as demonstrated
in Figure S17b,d.
Practical
Applications— Simulated
Field Tests
Finally, the practicability of the proposed strategy
was examined by simulating the field test which would lead to the
badly reproducible measurements. The spectral measurements were carried
out for the Ag/SiNCA-based chip after soaking in the 4-ATP spiked
solutions with different concentrations, by different operators, at
different moments, or on different Raman spectrometers but under the
same measurement requirements. Here, the 4-ATP-spiked solutions were
prepared by using deionized water or lake (Dongpu Lake in Hefei, China)
water or groundwater. The corresponding Raman spectra are shown in Figure S18. We can thus make plots of the characteristic
peak intensity versus logarithmic concentration. Representatively, Figure a shows the results
for the peak at 1435 cm–1 under different measuring
conditions. The data points are very scattered, and the measurements
seem to be highly uncertain and unreliable. After the normalization
using the corresponding Si signals, however, all these scattered data
points, from the different operators and Raman spectrometers as well
as different water, are close to or fall on a straight line, showing
independence of the varied measuring conditions, as clearly shown
in Figure b. Similarly,
for the characteristic peaks at 1075 and 1390 cm–1, we can also obtain the good linear relations after the corresponding
Si-signal normalization (Figure S19). In
addition, the parameter values obtained by the linear fitting for
the plots of / versus
Log() are close to those of the corresponding
lines shown in Figure c, as listed in Table S2. All these results
demonstrate the practicability of the strategy, as shown in Figure , and the possibility
of the accurate and quantitative SERS-based detection on-site.
Figure 7
Quantitative
SERS detection of 4-ATP in the simulated field tests
(see the text in detail). (a) Raman intensities of the 4-ATP peak
at 1435 cm–1 vs logarithmic concentration. (b) Plot
of the Si signal-normalized peak intensities at 1435 cm–1 vs the logarithmic concentration. The line is the linear fitting
result. The meanings of O1, O2, O3, O4, O1-2 and O1-3, I2, LW, and
GW are seen in the caption of Figure . All data are from Figure S18.
Quantitative
SERS detection of 4-ATP in the simulated field tests
(see the text in detail). (a) Raman intensities of the 4-ATP peak
at 1435 cm–1 vs logarithmic concentration. (b) Plot
of the Si signal-normalized peak intensities at 1435 cm–1 vs the logarithmic concentration. The line is the linear fitting
result. The meanings of O1, O2, O3, O4, O1-2 and O1-3, I2, LW, and
GW are seen in the caption of Figure . All data are from Figure S18.
Conclusions
and Remarks
In summary, we have developed a strategy of reliable
quantitative
SERS for the field tests based on the Ag/SiNCA-based chips, which
were fabricated by depositing a thin layer of uniform Ag film on the
template etching-induced Si NCAs. The prepared Ag/SiNCA-based chips
are structurally homogeneous and ordered, which ensures that the hot
spots and the adsorbed analytes are uniformly distributed on the chip
surface, exhibiting good uniformity of SERS signals with an RSD value
less than 4.1%. Since the Si right below the Ag-coating film can correspond
to the adsorbed analyte one-to-one, the SERS measurements can be normalized
by the corresponding Si signals, achieving quantitative analyses.
The validity of the strategy has been demonstrated by taking 4-ATP,
CV, and R6G as the typical analytes. Due to the homogenous and ordered
structure of the Ag/SiNCA-based chip, the SiNCA underneath the Ag
coating can respond to the fluctuations of the measuring parameters
(such as laser power and focusing depth), possibly from different
operators and instruments as well as different measuring moments and
sites, and so forth, synchronously with and similar to the adsorbed
analyte, which can well eliminate the signal fluctuations in measurements
just by the Si-signal normalization and achieve good signal reproducibility
(mostly, <5% in signal fluctuations). Finally, the practicability
of the proposed strategy was demonstrated by simulating the field
tests. Although the original measurements from the different operators
and Raman spectrometers and so forth were highly scattered and uncertain,
the Si signal-normalized results show independence of the varied measuring
conditions and can give highly certain measurements. We have thus
realized the accurate and reliable quantitative SERS detection on-site
and demonstrated the good practicability of the presented strategy.Furthermore, for the strategy of quantitative SERS, as shown in Figure , the other plasmonic
metal (Au or Au–Ag alloys)-coated Si nanostructured arrays,
in addition to Ag, could also be used as the SERS chips. Typically,
Au-coated Si NCAs have been fabricated and used as the chip. We have
obtained similar results, as demonstrated in Figure S20. Au-based SERS chips have a lower EF than Ag-based ones
but have a higher stability because Ag suffers easily from oxidation.[59]Finally, it should be mentioned that the
preconditions of IS-based
quantification are consistency (or uniformity) in the signals from
both IS and analytes on a whole SERS chip and synchronization in the
signal change of both IS and analytes with the variations in measuring
conditions. Both the preconditions are indispensable. If the signals
from either the IS or the analytes are inconsistent on the SERS chip,
we cannot obtain good reproducibility. For instance, for the analytes
which interact weakly with plasmonic metals, they would hardly be
adsorbed on the chip after the soaking process or could be only in-homogeneously
distributed on the chip after dropping the analyte-contained solution
on it and drying. In this case, we can not achieve good reproducibility
and quantification analyses if using the above chip without any modification.
Nevertheless, for these weakly interacted analytes, the quantitative
SERS detection could also be achieved if we appropriately surface-modify
the chip in such a way that the analytes can be uniformly adsorbed
on the modified chip, which is in progress. All in all, this work
provides practical chips and an effective route for reliable quantitative
SERS detection. Especially, this strategy is suitable for the quantitative
SERS detection in the field tests, which often involve different operators
and Raman spectrometers or environmental conditions as well as different
test sites and measuring moments and could produce highly uncertain
measurements.
Experimental Section
Chemicals and Materials
The PS sphere
(PS, 500 and 250 nm in diameter) suspension (5% wt) and the (100)-plane
polished silicon wafers were purchased from Shanghai Huge Biotechnology
Co., Ltd and Zhejiang Lijing Silicon Material Co., Ltd, respectively.
Ethanol, acetone, 4-ATP, R6G, and CV were bought from Alfa Aesar Corporation
with analytical purity. The sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) etching
gas was offered by Nanjing Special Gas Factory Co., Ltd. The deionized
water used in our experiments had a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ·cm
at 25 °C and was produced in a Millipore Milli-Q system.
Fabrication of the Ag/SiNCA
The Ag/SiNCA
was fabricated via PS colloidal template-assisted RIE process and
sputtering deposition technique, as schematically illustrated in Figure S21.First, a uniform PS colloidal
monolayer template was prepared on a Si wafer through an air–water
interface self-assembly method, according to our previous works.[60−62] In brief, the PS suspension was diluted into the ethanol to form
a mixture with a volume ratio of 1:1 and slowly dropped on a deionized
water film-covered hydrophilic silicon wafer (3 cm × 3 cm) from
its edge. Due to the energy minimization, the PS self-assembled on
the air–water interface and formed a close-packed monolayer.
After removing the water with a filter paper and drying naturally,
the ordered PS colloidal monolayer template was fabricated on the
Si wafer (Figure S21a).The as-prepared
PS-covered Si wafer was then heated at 70 °C
for 20 min to fix the PS spheres on the wafer firmly and etched with
SF6 plasma in a RIE machine (200 W in power and 60 sccm
in gas flow rate). After etching for 150 s, a highly ordered SiNCA
was obtained with the much smaller etched (or residual) PS on its
top (Figure S21b). Subsequently, the etched
sample was rinsed with ethanol and annealed at 600 °C for 2 h
to remove the residual PS (Figure S21c).
Finally, a thin silver film was coated on the SiNCA via sputtering
deposition for a certain time at the rate of 0.5 nm/s in a VTC-16-SM
magnetron sputtering instrument, and the Ag/SiNCA was thus prepared
(Figure S21d).Also, the as-prepared
PS-covered Si wafer without etching and the
bare Si wafer were deposited with a thin silver film on them for reference.
Characterization
The morphological
observations and composition analyses were performed on a field emission
scanning electron microscope (FEI Sirion 200) equipped with an energy
dispersion spectroscope (Oxford IE250X-Max50). The optical absorption
spectra based on the diffuse reflection spectral measurements were
recorded on a Shimadzu UV-2600 spectrometer.
Raman
Spectral Measurements
The as-obtained
Ag/SiNCA was cut into 3 mm × 3 mm pieces as SERS chips. Such
Ag/SiNCA-based chips were immersed into analyte (4-ATP, R6G, or CV)
aqueous solutions (50 mL in volume) with certain concentrations. After
soaking for 24 h, the chips were taken out, rinsed with water, and
dried in the flow of N2. Then, Raman spectral measurements
were performed on a confocal microprobe Raman spectrometer (Renishaw
inVia). The laser powers were 1 mW for 532 nm, 1.7 mW for 633 nm,
and 2.5 mW for 785 nm. The spot of incident laser beam on chips was
ca. ∼5 μm in diameter, and the acquisition time of Raman
signals was 1 s. All obtained Raman spectra were given after baseline
corrections.