Literature DB >> 34336764

A Map of the Initiatives That Harmonize Patient Cohorts Across the World.

Ángel Rodríguez-Laso1, Laura Alejandra Rico-Uribe2, Christine Kubiak3, Josep Maria Haro4, Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas1,5,6, José Luis Ayuso2,7,8.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical cohort; harmonization; integration; patient cohort; repository

Year:  2021        PMID: 34336764      PMCID: PMC8321412          DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.666844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Public Health        ISSN: 2296-2565


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Integration of cohort studies allows taking advantage of already collected information to increase the sample size to study uncommon exposures, rare diseases, less strong associations, or very restricted populations (personalized medicine). It also allows to carry out standardized analyses and avoid publication bias compared to the analysis of published data (1–5). Nevertheless, the growing energy spent in conducting cohort studies across the world in the last decades has not been paralleled by an effort to make them accessible to the scientific community and harmonize their data. This last limitation moved the European Commission to fund the SYNergies for Cohorts in Health: integrating the ROle of all Stakeholders (SYNCHROS) coordination and support action, endowed with almost €2 million from 2019 to 2021. It aims “to establish a sustainable European strategy for the development of the next generation of integrated cohorts, thereby contributing to an international strategic agenda for enhanced coordination of cohorts globally, in order to address the practical, ethical, legal, and methodological challenge of optimizing the exploitation of current and future cohort data, toward the development of stratified and personalized medicine as well as facilitating health policy.” In order to achieve its objectives, the first activity proposed in SYNCHROS was to map the population, patient, and clinical trial cohort integration landscape. That would allow the project to have a first look at the challenges and tried solutions adopted by different groups, and, more importantly, it would provide a list of principal investigators of these initiatives who could be contacted for the process of developing the common strategy. This study reports the result of the mapping of the initiatives that integrate patient cohorts. The mapping of population cohorts will be reported elsewhere. The aim of the study was to obtain a non-exhaustive, but representative, list of these initiatives carried out in recent times in the world. To our knowledge, there is no other repository of integration initiatives of patient cohorts. Although excellent single cohort repositories exist, like the Maelstrom catalog, repositories of initiatives that integrate several patient cohorts could not be found. This mapping will provide researchers with a useful tool to find initiatives on their areas of interest with whom they can share or analyze harmonized data.

Methods

The initiatives included in the mapping were obtained from three different sources: Systematic searches, carried out in MEDLINE and the Maelstrom catalog. Suggestions of potential initiatives to be included in the mapping provided by partners of the SYNCHROS consortium. References and links provided by the initiatives detected in the two previous sources. The inclusion criteria were as follows: a) initiatives that integrated patient, clinical, or disease cohorts; b) individual patient meta-analysis and mega-analyses; and c) at least one cohort included in the initiative having information about the sample at two or more points of time (at least two waves). The exclusion criteria were as follows: a) initiatives that only integrate population cohorts or clinical trials, without including patient cohorts; b) initiatives published before the year 2000; and c) initiatives that did not provide information in English.

Database Searches

MEDLINE Search

The process started with searches restricted to papers published in English from 2000 to 2019 using the terms selected by consensus among the SYNCHROS partners. Those terms which obtained fewer than 500 hits were retained, and the abstracts of the hits were reviewed to find new terms that were used in subsequent searches. In some cases, the term “cohort” was added to these searches to limit the number of hits. The final search strategy used is given as follows: (cohort OR “prospective study” OR “longitudinal study” OR “individual meta-analysis”[All Fields] OR “individual participant data meta-analysis”[All Fields] OR “individual patient data meta-analysis”[All Fields] OR “individual meta analysis”[All Fields] OR “individual participant data meta analysis”[All Fields] OR “individual patient data meta analysis”[All Fields] OR “meta analysis using individual”[All Fields] OR “meta-analysis using individual”[All Fields] OR “meta analysis of individual”[All Fields] OR “meta-analysis of individual”[All Fields] OR “mega-analysis”[All Fields] OR “mega analysis”[All Fields]) AND (“harmonization study” OR “integration study” OR “integration initiative” OR “integrated study” OR “merged cohort” OR “data pooling” OR “pooled sample” OR “combined data” OR “combining data” OR “harmonized data” OR “harmonised data” OR “harmonizing data” OR “data harmonization” OR “data harmonisation” OR “data sharing” OR “common database” OR “multiple cohorts” OR “multiple longitudinal studies” OR “international consortium” OR “collaborative effort”). AND (“2000/01/01”[Date - Publication]: “2019/07/31”[Date - Publication]) AND English[Language] AND Humans[MeSH]

Maelstrom Catalog

The Maelstrom research catalog, supported by the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, “contains comprehensive information about epidemiological research networks and studies, and the data they have collected. It also provides information about harmonized data generated by these research networks.” We looked for initiatives included in the “Networks” section of the catalog.

Selection of Initiatives

Initiatives that were obtained from the systematic searches and provided by the partners were evaluated against the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two different investigators. In case of a disagreement, a third reviewer was consulted.

Extraction of Information

The following information was extracted from each initiative: name of the initiative, principal investigator, partners, name of the institution responsible for the initiative, funding resources, contact person, information source, whether the research team is currently active, main objectives, criteria for the cohorts to be included in the initiative, type of harmonization (prospective/retrospective), number of cohorts included in the initiative (the total number and the number of harmonized cohorts), whether more cohorts are foreseen to be harmonized, number of participants (the total number and the number of participants with harmonized data), age range of the sample, threats to representativeness of the sample, maximum number of variables that have been harmonized, including those where harmonization was not possible for all the cohorts, setting of the harmonized cohorts (local-regional/national/international, including country of origin of the cohorts), and a brief description of the population considered by the initiative. All this information was retrieved from the webpage and/or the scientific article that presented the initiative. Missing information was requested from the principal investigators of the projects, who were contacted initially by email and, if there was no answer, by phone call or by post.

Analysis

Results of the identification process of the initiatives are presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Results of the search for harmonization initiatives of patient cohorts.

Results of the search for harmonization initiatives of patient cohorts. Partners of the SYNCHROS project provided 39 initiatives. Of those, 28 were excluded, mainly because there was no data harmonization or because eligibility could not be ascertained due to unresponsiveness from the principal investigators. The remaining 11 initiatives were selected. The descendent search from these initiatives provided two additional ones. In the MEDLINE search, out of 843 hits obtained, 677 were excluded after reading their title and abstract. Of the remaining articles, 166 were read and, from those, 140 excluded. The main reasons for exclusion were that initiatives dealt only with population cohorts, that they had already been submitted by partners or already presented in another reference, or that the integration was only cross-sectional. In the end, 26 initiatives were selected. The reference list of these initiatives included five additional ones. The search in the Maelstrom catalog only provided initiatives that harmonized population cohorts. Overall, 44 initiatives were retrieved. They are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Initiatives that harmonize patient cohorts ordered by different categories of diseases (selected information).

InitiativeTypes of cohortsRegion, Country were the cohorts were collectedMain objectiveNumber of cohorts with harmonized dataMore cohorts foreseen to be harmonized?Number of participants with harmonized dataAge range of the sampleNo. of harmonized variables (Maximum)Population
CINECA: Common Infrastructure for National Cohorts in Europe, Canada and AfricaDisease cohorts. Population cohortsAfrica, Canada and EuropeTo develop a federated cloud enabled infrastructure to make population scale genomic and biomolecular data accessible across international borders, to accelerate research, and improve the health of individuals across continentsIn progressPossiblyIn progressBirth to old ageIn progressThe dataset provides a diverse representation of studies in rare disease, common disease and national cohorts over time (longitudinal)
CNODES: the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect StudiesDisease cohortsCanada, US and UKUse collaborative, population-based approaches to obtain rapid answers to questions about drug safety and effectivenessDepends on the research questionNoDepends on the research questionAll agesDepends on the research questionPopulation of Canada, UK and US which is prescribed or dispensed drugs
EHDEN: European Health Data and Evidence NetworkDisease cohortsAll Horizon 2020 member states and associated countriesHarmonize in excess of 100 million anonymized health records to the OMOP common data model, supported by an ecosystem of certified SMEs, and technical architecture for a federated networkIn progress18ConsiderableEuropean patients aged 18+
MIRACUM: Medical Informatics in Research and Care in University MedicineDisease cohortsSeven states of GermanyThe spotlight is here on the data integration centers that will be embedded in the hospital IT-infrastructure and will facilitate the collection and exchange of data within the consortia university hospitals. Furthermore, we will elaborate a programme for strengthening medical informatics by extending the academic offer, including new professorships in the field of medical informatics, a novel, innovative master programme and personnel training. The MIRACUM partners have agreed to share data, based on interoperable data integration centers, develop common and interoperable tools and services, realize the power of such data and tools in innovative IT solutions, which shall enhance patient-centered collaborative research as well as clinical care processes, and finally to strengthen biomedical informatics in research, teaching and continued education11No information obtainedNo information obtained0 to the highest age of patientsNo information obtainedPatients attended in hospitals of seven German states
Sentinel initiativeDisease cohortsUSServe as a system to analyze and assess safety risks in FDA-approved drugs and medical products using electronic health data17No information obtained310 millionAll agesNo information obtainedPopulation of US which is prescribed or dispensed drugs
BiomarCaRE: Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment across EuropeDisease cohorts. Population cohorts. Clinical trialsAustralia, Europe, Israel, Latin America, New Zealand, South Africa, United StatesAssess the value of established and emerging biomarkers for cardiovascular risk prediction4No information obtained8.746No information obtainedNo information obtainedPatients with coronary heart disease or at risk of developing it
CADISP: Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic PatientsDisease cohortsWestern Europe and TurkeyInternational Consortium performing research on ischemic stroke in young and middle-aged adults and in particular on cervical artery dissectionNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedCervical artery dissection and ischemic stroke patients from some Western European countries and Turkey
Development and validation of the AMPREDICT modelDisease cohortsUSThe objective of this study was the development of AMPREDICT-Mobility, a tool to predict the probability of independence in either basic or advanced mobility 1 year after dysvascular major lower extremity amputation2No information obtained200No information obtained38Individuals undergoing their first major lower extremity amputation because of complications of peripheral artery disease or diabetes
ESCAPE-NET: European Sudden Cardiac Arrest network: toward Prevention, Education and NEw TreatmentDisease cohorts. Population cohortsCzech Republic, Denmark, France, Italy, Sweden, The NetherlandsAims to study: (1) risk factors and mechanisms for the occurrence of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the population, and (2) risk factors and treatment strategies for survival after SCA on a European scaleNo information obtainedYesNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedPatients with sudden cardiac arrest
After Breast Cancer Pooling ProjectDisease cohorts (one is based on the follow-up of a randomized clinical controlled trial)China (Shanghai), USExamine the role of physical activity, adiposity, dietary factors, supplement use, and quality of life in breast cancer prognosis4Yes18.31420–83No information obtainedBreast cancer survivors (women). Cancers were diagnosed between 1976 and 2006
B-CAST: Breast CAncer STratificationDisease cohortsNo information obtainedIn B-CAST tools will be developed to allow precise identification of the individual risk of breast cancer, the subtype of cancer that is most likely to develop and the prognosis of that particular subtypeNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedPatients with breast cancer
Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian CancerDisease cohortsWorldwideStudy risk factors of oavarian cancer58No information obtained31,000No information obtainedNo information obtainedWomen with ovarian cancer
GENIE: Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information ExchangeDisease cohortsCanada, France, Netherlands, Spain, UK, USAIt is a multi-phase, multi-year, international data-sharing project that aims to catalyze precision cancer medicine19Yes70,000All agesNo information obtainedCancer patients treated at multiple international institutions
HARMONY: European Public-Private Partnership for Big Data in HematologyDisease cohorts. Clinical trialsAll EuropeThe HARMONY Alliance uses big data technologies to improve the treatment of seven hematologic malignanciesAcute Myeloid Leukemia: 5 patient cohorts. Multiple myeloma: 15 patient cohortsIn progress11,664 (aims to harmonize between 75,000 and 100,000 anonymized hematologic patients by the end of the funding period)All ages are consideredIt depends on the specific research questionPatients with blood malignancies
International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical CancerDisease cohortsCosta Rica, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, UK, USStudy the effects of hormonal contraceptive use and other factors on the risk of cervical cancer9No information obtained2,109No information obtainedNo information obtainedWomen with cervical cancer
MaGIC: Malignant Germ Cell International ConsortiumDisease cohortsNo information obtainedDeveloping more effective treatments for germ cell tumors (GCT) through scientific inquiryNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedGCT patients all over the world
NCI: National Cancer Institute Cohort ConsortiumDisease cohorts. Population cohorts. Clinical trialsAustralia, Canada, New Zealand, USAFoster communication among investigators leading cohort studies of cancer, promote collaborative research projects for topics not easily addressed in a single study and identify common challenges in cohort research and search for solutionsNo information obtainedYesNo information obtained18+No information obtainedBreast and colon family cancer patients and their families
Second primary malignancies in thyroid cancer patientsDisease cohortsFrance, Italy, SwedenEvaluate the risk of second cancer and leukemia in patients with papillary or follicular thyroid cancer treated with radioiodine or external beam radiation therapy3No6,8417–80 (at time of diagnosis of thyroid cancer)Around 10Patients with papillary or follicular thyroid cancer
The International CLL-IPI working groupDisease cohorts. Clinical trialsFrance, Germany, Poland, UK, USWe established an international consortium with the aim to create an international prognostic index for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL-IPI) that integrates the major prognostic parameters21,254No information obtained18Chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients
COASt: Clinical Outcomes in Arthroplasty StudyDisease cohortsEuropeDescribe whether body mass index is a clinically meaningful predictor of patient reported outcomes following primary total hip replacement (THR) surgery4No information obtained4,413No information obtained24Patients receiving primary THR for osteoarthritis
MARC-35: 35th Multicenter Airway Research CollaborationDisease cohortsUSExamine the association between the infectious etiology of a child's severe bronchiolitis and the level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) during severe bronchiolitis, with the severity of this illness, and the subsequent development of recurrent wheezing by age 3 years and combine these clinical and laboratory data to derive the wheezing index that will identify children at higher risk of developing recurrent wheezing by age 3 years17No9200–1ThousandsChildren age <1 year hospitalized with severe bronchiolitis
COSMIC: Cohort Studies of Memory in an International ConsortiumDisease cohortsThe worldHarmonizing shared, non-identifiable data from cohort studies that longitudinally examine change in cognitive function and the development of dementia in older individuals (60+ years).Data are harmonized on a project-by-project basis, and only subgroups of the member studies contribute to particular projectsYesData are harmonized on a project-by-project basis, and only subgroups of the member studies contribute to particular projects40–105Harmonization is done on a project-by-project basis and the number of studies per project varies. For the largest project with 20 studies there are 16 harmonized variables60+ years old individuals from 29 countries all over the world
Lifebrain: Healthy minds 0–100 years: Optimizing the use of European brain imaging cohortsDisease cohorts. Population cohortsWestern EuropeMaximize the exploitation of brain imaging cohorts by bringing together studies on how differences and changes in brain age relate to cognitive function and mental health1 of anxiety and depression patientsNo information obtained2,981No information obtainedNo information obtainedPatients with anxiety or depression
Seasonal plasticity of cognitionDisease cohorts. Population cohortsCanada, France, USTest the hypotheses that season has a significant association with cognition, the odds of being diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia, cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer disease biomarkers, and the expression of cognition-associated modules of coexpressed genes in the human brain2No information obtained592No information obtainedNo information obtainedAlzheimer disease patients or patients with cognitive disorders visited in tertiary care clinics
HarmonicSS: HARMONIzation and integrative analysis of regional, national and international Cohorts on primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS) toward improved stratification, treatment and health policy making diseaseDisease cohorts. Clinical trialsEurope, USTo bring together the largest well-characterized regional, national and international longitudinal cohorts of patients with Primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS) including those participating in clinical trials, and by taking into consideration the ethical, legal, privacy and intelectual propiety rights issues for sharing data from different countries, to semantically interlink and harmonize them into an integrative pSS cohort structure on the cloudNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedCohorts and clinical trials of patients with Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
SABER: SAfety Assessment of Biologic ThERapyDisease cohortsUSUnderstanding the absolute and comparative risks of adverse events of biologic treatments for patients with autoimmune diseases4No information obtained239,806All agesNo information obtainedPatients with autoimmune diseases who had at least one dispensing of a biologic agent or comparison non-biologic regimen relevant to their autoimmune disease
Thousand Faces of LupusDisease cohortsCanadaEvaluate factors affecting therapeutic approaches used in clinical practice for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), in a multicenter cohort10No information obtained1,497No information obtainedNo information obtainedPatients who meet American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha antagonist use and cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritisDisease cohortsCanada and USEstimate the association between treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and development of cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis3No information obtained8,45865+No information obtainedRheumathoid arthritis patients who had been prescribed DMARDs or methotrexate
GEMRIC: Global ECT-MRI Research CollaborationDisease cohortsJapan, Western Europe and US. Currently approaching ChinaCreating a large database of multi-site imaging data and clinical/behavioral/physiological and metadata for analysis of the neural mechanisms and predictors of electroconvulsive therapy-related clinical response15Yes34519–86More than a thousand because the initiative includes diagnostic imaging variablesPatients receiving electroconvulsive therapy
Predictors and moderators of cognitive and behavioral therapy outcomes for obsessive-compulsive dissorderDisease cohorts. Clinical trialsAustralia, Canada, Europe, and USIdentify potential factors that affect the outcome of cognitive and behavioral treatments of obsessive-compulsive disorders8No35918+ (very few over 65)Around 20Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorders
Antibiotic treatment and survival of nursing home patients with lower respiratory tract infectionDisease cohortsThe Netherlands and USAssess the effects of different antibiotic treatment strategies on survival of elderly nursing home residents with lower respiratory tract infections in the United States and the Netherlands, where treatment approaches are quite different2No1,22170+Around 40Elderly nursing home residents with lower respiratory tract infections
ART-CC: Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort CollaborationDisease cohortsWestern Europe and North AmericaEstimate prognosis of HIV-1 positive, treatment naïve patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART)No information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedHIV-1 positive, treatment naïve patients cohorts from Europe and North America
COHERE: Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research EuropeDisease cohortsWestern Europe and North AmericaPool and harmonize existing longitudinal data on HIV-positive persons collected across Europe to answer key research questions that, in the era of potent combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), could not be addressed adequately by individual cohortsNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNot reportedHIV-infected people residing in Europe
Early Antibiotic Treatment for Pediatric Febrile Urinary Tract Infection and Renal ScarringDisease cohortsUSDetermine, in a well-characterized sample of children with febrile urinary track infections, whether delay in the initiation of antimicrobial therapy was associated with the occurrence and severity of renal scarring and to determine whether these associations persisted after adjusting for potential confounding factors2No8022–72 monthsNo information obtainedChildren aged 2–72 months with a urinary tract infection producing fever
HAART and early mortalityDisease cohortsBrazil and USCompare the early mortality pattern and the causes of death among patients starting HAART in Brazil and the United States2No information obtained1,774No information obtained10HIV-infected patients
IeDEA: International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDSDisease cohortsAfrica, Asia-Pacific region, the Central/South America/Caribbean region, and North AmericaCollect and define key variables, harmonize data, and implement methodology to effectively pool data as a cost-effective means of generating large data sets to address the high priority research questions and streamline HIV/AIDS researchNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedHIV/AIDS patients from Africa, the Asia-Pacific region, the Central/South America/Caribbean region, and North America
ReCoDID: Reconciliation of Cohort data in Infectious DiseasesDisease cohortsNo information obtainedDevelop an equitable, accessible, and sustainable model for the storage, curation, and analyses of clinical-epidemiological and high-dimensional sample data collected by infectious disease cohorts in low-and-midle-income countriesNo information obtainedIn progressNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedPatients with infectious diseases
RESPOND: International Cohort Consortium of Infectious DiseaseDisease cohortsAustralia, Georgia and Western EuropeBuild an innovative, flexible and dynamic cohort consortium for the study of infectious diseases, including HIV and people at risk for HIV, as a generic structure for facilitating multi stakeholder involvementNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedPeople 18+ at high risk of acquiring HIV and people living with HIV and/or with other infectious diseases or across Europe, South America and Australia
Adults Born Preterm International CollaborationDisease cohortsAustralia, Canada, Finland, Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Norway, USOur main aim was to identify factors that either increase or decrease risk of high blood pressure among adults born with very low birth weight9No information obtained1,571 patients and 777 controlsNo information obtainedNo information obtainedVery low birth weight and very preterm babies who reach adulthood
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) studyDisease cohortsAustria and The NetherlandsThe first aim of the study was to correlate the occurrence of a blood stream infection (BSI) during the early phase of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) with intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) levels, as a marker for loss of gut wall integrity owing to mucosal damage, and Interleukin (IL)-8 levels, as a biomarker for the pro-inflammatory cascade in NEC. The second aim of the study was to investigate the relation between the occurrence of a BSI and disease outcome2No information obtained5724–40 weeks13Patients with necrotizing enterocolitis
Recurrent leg venous ulcers studyDisease cohortsEastern AustraliaIdentify risk and protective factors for recurrence of venous leg ulcers3Yes25026–9624Patients with a healed leg ulcer of primarily venous etiology
MARS: Multicenter AVM Research StudyDisease cohortsScotland and USIdentify risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage in the natural history course of brain arteriovenous malformations4Yes2,525No information obtained13Patients with arteriovenous malformations
Pulmonary embolism presentationDisease cohorts (one clinical trial)Belgium, France and SwitzerlandCompare clinical characteristics between women and men with suspected and confirmed pulmonary embolism (PE) and their impact on clinical probability prediction scores and on diagnostic work-up of PE, and to assess whether differences at presentation could account for the increased recurrence rate in men3No3,41418–98Around 30Patients with a clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism
BIOMAP: Biomarkers in Atopic Dermatitis and PsoriasisDisease cohorts. Clinical trialsNo information obtainedExamine the causes and mechanisms of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis to enable optimal treatments and an individualized therapy scheme for each patientNo information obtainedIn progressNo information obtainedNo information obtainedNo information obtainedPatients with atopic dermatitis and psoriasis
Initiatives that harmonize patient cohorts ordered by different categories of diseases (selected information). Table 1 shows a selection of the most relevant information obtained from each of the initiatives. Complete information can be found in the repository of the SYNCHROS project. They are ordered by types of diseases covered (starting with those which consider several diseases) and by alphabetical order. Of the 44 initiatives found, no further information could be obtained from principal investigators in almost half (20) of them. Eight initiatives (BIOMAP, CINECA, EHDEN, ESCAP-NET, HarmonicSS, HARMONY, Lifebrain, and ReCoDID) have recently started adding cohorts; 21 are led by active research teams; and 12 are adding, or considering adding, cohorts now. Nevertheless, there is plenty of missing information on the activity status of the initiatives. In the selected initiatives, the most represented group of diseases is cancer (10 initiatives), followed by infectious diseases (8 initiatives, of which 5 focus on HIV) and cardiovascular disease (4 initiatives). There are five initiatives that have harmonized data from more than one type of disease. Other diseases and conditions producing a high burden in the high-income countries (6) are represented (dementia, osteoarthritis), but others included in this list (unipolar depressive disorders, alcohol use disorders, hearing loss, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, road traffic accidents) or poor-defined conditions with a well-defined impact on life-expectancy and quality of life (like back pain or functional deterioration) are missing. There is one initiative about a specific rare disease (Sjögren syndrome). There is a sizable number of initiatives that have harmonized other types of cohorts in addition to patient cohorts. After Breast Cancer Pooling Project, BIOMAP, CLL-IPI, HARMONY, and the initiatives on obsessive-compulsive disorder and pulmonary embolism have harmonized at least one clinical trial cohort. CINECA, ESCAPE-NET, Lifebrain, and the project “Seasonal plasticity of cognition” have also harmonized population cohorts. BiomarCaRE and the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium have harmonized the three types of cohorts: patient, population and clinical trials cohorts. Most of them (33) have an international scope, compared to seven national initiatives and one regional/local initiative. Two initiatives report that they include cohorts from across the world and eight initiatives incorporate cohorts from high- and low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); 30 (75%) initiatives only include cohorts from high-income countries, and none harmonize data from LMIC countries alone. Most initiatives are partnered with universities, hospitals, and research institutes. Governmental institutions take part in a few of them (9). The presence of patient associations and pharmaceutical companies as partners is anecdotal. The number of partners ranges between 2 and more than 100, with a median of 12. Three quarters comprise 20 partners or fewer. Most initiatives have been or are funded by American (12) or European (10) institutions. Canadian funding comes third (4). The vast majority have received public funding alone (22). Five have received combined funding from public institutions and non-profit organizations. Private funding was provided in isolation to one initiative (RESPOND), combined with public funding to another one (EHDEN), and combined with non-profit funding to a third one (Tumor necrosis factor α antagonist use). Their objectives may be classified into four general categories (some initiatives share more than one): determining the prognosis of subgroups of patients (14), providing a repository of patients (11), establishing the efficacy (6) or safety (4) of treatments, and exploring risk factors and biomarkers of diseases (10). The median number of cohorts included in each initiative is 5, ranging from 1 (which also harmonizes population cohorts) to 58; three quarters include 17 cohorts or fewer. The number of individuals included varies wildly, from 57 to 310 million (Sentinel initiative). The median is 6,841. Eight out of 37 (21.6%) initiatives have harmonized fewer than 1,000 patients and the same proportion have harmonized 100,000 patients or more. Twenty-six have harmonized all or almost all the cohorts incorporated to the initiative, two (EHDEN and CINECA) are still in the process of harmonizing their cohorts and another two (CNODES and COSMIC) harmonize data on a project-by-project basis. Eight initiatives included patients from all ages, eight included only adult patients, three included only children, and two included exclusively older people. Of those which have declared the number of variables in their harmonized database, there are between 10 and more than 1,000 (median 24), with two out of 15 (13.3%) including more than 1,000 variables. Four initiatives harmonized administrative databases. Thirty-three were retrospective vs. four prospective. The great majority do not report major threats to the representativity of their samples.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset generated by this study can be found in the webpage of the SYNCHROS project https://www.synchros.es.

Author Contributions

ÁR-L performed the database searches, extracted the information from the initiatives, and drafted the article. ÁR-L, LR-U, and CK evaluated the initiatives against inclusion and exclusion criteria. All authors made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the paper, analysis and interpretation of data, reviewed the manuscript, and read and approved its final version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology.

Authors:  M Blettner; W Sauerbrei; B Schlehofer; T Scheuchenpflug; C Friedenreich
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Thinking big: large-scale collaborative research in observational epidemiology.

Authors:  Alexander Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Commentary: meta-analysis of individual participants' data in genetic epidemiology.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Philip S Rosenberg; James J Goedert; Thomas R O'Brien
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  The PhenX Toolkit: get the most from your measures.

Authors:  Carol M Hamilton; Lisa C Strader; Joseph G Pratt; Deborah Maiese; Tabitha Hendershot; Richard K Kwok; Jane A Hammond; Wayne Huggins; Dean Jackman; Huaqin Pan; Destiney S Nettles; Terri H Beaty; Lindsay A Farrer; Peter Kraft; Mary L Marazita; Jose M Ordovas; Carlos N Pato; Margaret R Spitz; Diane Wagener; Michelle Williams; Heather A Junkins; William R Harlan; Erin M Ramos; Jonathan Haines
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Nicole M Kuderer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Challenges of data sharing in European Covid-19 projects: A learning opportunity for advancing pandemic preparedness and response.

Authors:  Evelina Tacconelli; Anna Gorska; Elena Carrara; Ruth Joanna Davis; Marc Bonten; Alex W Friedrich; Corinna Glasner; Herman Goossens; Jan Hasenauer; Josep Maria Haro Abad; José L Peñalvo; Albert Sanchez-Niubo; Anastassja Sialm; Gabriella Scipione; Gloria Soriano; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Ellen Vorstenbosch; Thomas Jaenisch
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-08-04

2.  Collaborative Challenges of Multi-Cohort Projects in Pharmacogenetics-Why Time Is Essential for Meaningful Collaborations.

Authors:  Filippo Franchini; Katharina Kusejko; Catia Marzolini; Christoph Tellenbach; Simona Rossi; Susanne Stampf; Michael Koller; Jivko Stoyanov; Burkhard Möller; Alexander Benedikt Leichtle
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-09-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.