| Literature DB >> 34336166 |
Jingjing Wang1, Mohammed Abdella Kemal2.
Abstract
Background: The metabolic characteristics of body fluids of excellent water polo players before and after competition have not been reported. The purpose of the study was to compare the metabolites in the urine of water polo players before and after competition by 1H-NMR-based metabolomic approach.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34336166 PMCID: PMC8318763 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7600835
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Basic information of subjects.
| Gender | Male ( | Female ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 20.36 ± 1.12 | 20.27 ± 0.79 |
| Weight (kg) | 73.13 ± 4.84 | 57.81 ± 3.37 |
| Height (cm) | 180.55 ± 5.68 | 166.73 ± 5.14 |
| Training years (years) | 14.18 ± 1.83 | 13.82 ± 1.40 |
Identification of major metabolites in players' urine maps.
| No. | Metabolites |
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3-Aminoisobutyrate | 1.19(d), 1.20(d) |
| 2 | Lactic acid | 1.34(d), 1.33(d) |
| 3 | N-Acetyl-glycoproteins | 2.05(s) |
| 4 | Glutamine | 2.13(s) |
| 5 | Acetoacetate | 2.27(s) |
| 6 | Glutamate | 2.35(s) |
| 7 | Citrate | 2.55(s) |
| 8 | Citric acid | 2.57(s) |
| 9 | Dimethylacetamide | 2.68(s) |
| 10 | Dimethylamine | 2.71(d), 2.73(d) |
| 11 | Succinimide | 2.78(s) |
| 12 | Succinic acid | 2.81(s) |
| 13 | Dimethylglycine | 2.95(s) |
| 14 | Creatinine | 3.02(s), 3.05(s), 4.06(s) |
| 15 | Diethyl malonate | 3.12(s) |
| 16 | Choline | 3.20(d), 3.21(d) |
| 17 | Carnitine | 3.23(s) |
| 18 | Trimethylamine N-oxide | 3.27(s) |
| 19 | Taurine acid | 3.28(s) |
| 20 | Scyllo-inositol | 3.37(s) |
| 21 | Glucose | 3.45(d) |
| 22 | Glycine | 3.57(s) |
| 23 | Phenylacetylglycine | 3.67(s), 7.35(s), 7.37(q) |
| 24 | Ethanol | 3.68(s) |
| 25 |
| 3.75(s) |
| 26 | Guanidinoacetic acid | 3.81(s) |
| 27 | Pantothenic acid | 3.96(s) |
| 28 | Hippurate | 3.97∼3.98(d), 7.56(s), 7.57(s), 7.83(s), 7.85(q) |
| 29 | Guanine | 7.68(s) |
| 30 | Hypoxanthine | 8.13(d), 8.14(d) |
Figure 1Diagram of urine 1H-NMR metabolites in water polo players.
Figure 2(a) PLS-DA scatter plot. (b) PLS-DA model validation plot. (c) OPLS-DA scatter plot. (d) OPLS-DA S-plot between A group and B group.
Figure 3(a, b) Comparison of peak areas of different metabolites in urine 1H-NMR spectra of subjects at three time points (A, B, and C). P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and 0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with A group. ###P < 0.001, ##P < 0.01, and #0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with B group. (c, d) Comparison of peak areas of different metabolites in urine 1H-NMR spectra of subjects at three time points (A, B, and C). P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and 0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with A group. ##P < 0.001, ###P < 0.001, ##P < 0.01, and #0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with B group. (e, f) Comparison of peak areas of different metabolites in urine 1H-NMR spectra of subjects at three time points (A, B, and C). P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and 0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with A group. ##P < 0.001, ###P < 0.001, ##P < 0.01, and #0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with B group. (g, h) Comparison of peak areas of different metabolites in urine 1H-NMR spectra of subjects at three time points (A, B, and C). P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and 0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with A group. ##P < 0.001, ###P < 0.001, and ##P < 0.01, #0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with B group. (i, j) Comparison of peak areas of different metabolites in urine 1H-NMR spectra of subjects at three time points (A, B, and C). P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and 0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with A group. ##P < 0.001, ###P < 0.001, ##P < 0.01, and #0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with B group. (k, l) Comparison of peak areas of different metabolites in urine 1H-NMR spectra of subjects at three time points (A, B, and C). P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and 0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with A group. ##P < 0.001, ###P < 0.001, ##P < 0.01, and #0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with B group. (m, n) Comparison of peak areas of different metabolites in urine 1H-NMR spectra of subjects at three time points (A, B, and C). P < 0.001, P < 0.01, 0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with A group. ##P < 0.001, ###P < 0.001, ##P < 0.01, and #0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with B group. (o) Comparison of peak areas of different metabolites in urine 1H-NMR spectra of subjects at three time points (A, B, and C). P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and 0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with A group. ##P < 0.001, ###P < 0.001, ##P < 0.01, and #0.01 < P < 0.05, compared with B group.
Figure 4Correlation analysis of differential metabolites.
Figure 5(a) Pathway analysis of metabolites. (b) Analysis of metabolic pathways.
Urine routine indicators of subjects at different time points.
| Items | One week before competition (A) | Immediately after competition (B) | One week after competition (C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urine pH value | 6.16 ± 0.32 | 5.84 ± 0.39 | 6.34 ± 0.39## |
| PRO (%) | 9.66 ± 1.02 | 18.45 ± 1.73 | 9.40 ± 0.82# |
| URO (%) | 5.17 ± 0.84 | 36.25 ± 2.88 | 13.6 ± 0.21# |
P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 compared with A group; #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 compared with B group.
The biochemical index levels in the blood of the subjects at different time points.
| Items | One week before competition (A) | Immediately after competition (B) | One week after competition (C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDH (U/L) | 2428.87 ± 302.99 | 2843.65 ± 260.02 | 2539.24 ± 359.65# |
| BUN (mM) | 4.70 ± 0.75 | 6.29 ± 0.99 | 5.00 ± 0.56# |
| CK (U/mL) | 0.48 ± 0.27 | 1.20 ± 0.50 | 0.54 ± 0.28## |
| AST (U/L) | 8.05 ± 1.74 | 11.12 ± 2.60 | 8.11 ± 2.00## |
P < 0.01 compared with A group; #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 compared with B group.