| Literature DB >> 34336162 |
Xi Zhang1, Zhenfang Wang1, Jun Liu2, Lulin Bi3, Weilan Yan1, Yueyue Yan1.
Abstract
To analyze the brain CT imaging data of children with cerebral palsy (CP), deep learning-based electronic computed tomography (CT) imaging information characteristics were used, thereby providing help for the rehabilitation analysis of children with CP and comorbid epilepsy. The brain CT imaging data of 73 children with CP were collected, who were outpatients or inpatients in our hospital. The images were randomly divided into two groups. One group was the artificial intelligence image group, and hybrid segmentation network (HSN) model was employed to analyze brain images to help the treatment. The other group was the control group, and original images were used to help diagnosis and treatment. The deep learning-based HSN was used to segment the CT image of the head of patients and was compared with other CNN methods. It was found that HSN had the highest Dice score (DSC) among all models. After treatment, six cases in the artificial intelligence image group returned to normal (20.7%), and the artificial intelligence image group was significantly higher than the control group (X 2 = 335191, P < 0.001). The cerebral hemodynamic changes were obviously different in the two groups of children before and after treatment. The VP of the cerebral artery in the child was (139.68 ± 15.66) cm/s after treatment, which was significantly faster than (131.84 ± 15.93) cm/s before treatment, P < 0.05. To sum up, the deep learning model can effectively segment the CP area, which can measure and assist the diagnosis of future clinical cases of children with CP. It can also improve medical efficiency and accurately identify the patient's focus area, which had great application potential in helping to identify the rehabilitation training results of children with CP.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34336162 PMCID: PMC8318752 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6472440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1CNN model.
Figure 2The average validation set DSC of 2D CNN and 3D CNN in 100 training cycles.
Figure 32D CNN.
Figure 43D CNN.
Figure 5Training process of different loss function.
Figure 6The average DSC of the verification set of different loss functions.
Figure 7Quantitative results of the test set.
Figure 8Qualitative segmentation results of different experiments on the test set (red was the artificial segmentation area, and blue was the model segmentation area). (a) HSN; (b) HSN-Dice; (c) HSN-S3D.
Figure 9Changes in DQ of the two groups of children before and after treatment (indicated significant difference.).
Figure 10Difference of GM FM scale scores before and after treatment in the two groups of children (indicated significant difference).