| Literature DB >> 34335839 |
Jingxian Yan1, Yi Yan2, Andrew Young3, Zhiyong Yan4, Zhimin Yan5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Behcet's disease (BD) is an autoimmune disease of systemic vasculitis with an unclear pathogenesis. Although western medicines remain the mainstay interventions, effectiveness and safety are significant challenges. Complementary and alternative medicine, including herbal medicine, are gaining more attention. Chinese medicine decoctions, which have been used for centuries, are the most common form of traditional therapies.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34335839 PMCID: PMC8313333 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8202512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Flow diagram of study selection.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Author (year) | Grouping (blinding) | Sample size | Mean age (year) | Sex (male/female) | Mean disease course (year) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Control | Experimental | Control | Experimental | Control | Experimental | Control | ||
| Fu (2017) [ | Random allocation by SPSS21.0 statistical software | 42 | 42 | 36.47 ± 9.22 | 36.33 ± 9.05 | 20/22 | 23/19 | — | |
| Gong (2013) [ | Random allocation by SPSS16.0 statistical software | 30 | 30 | 36.47 ± 9.22 | 36.33 ± 9.05 | 17/13 | 14/16 | — | |
| Gu et al. (2015) [ | Random allocation | 27 | 23 | 30.2 ± 2.0 | 29.6 ± 1.7 | 12/15 | 13/10 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.6 |
| Huang (2018) [ | Simple randomization | 30 | 30 | 38.00 ± 12.38 | 41.26 ± 11.82 | 12/18 | 11/19 | 5.20 ± 2.57 | 4.80 ± 2.20 |
| Kao (2008) [ | Random allocation | 16 | 14 | 30.2 | 29.8 | 6/10 | 5/9 | 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Lin (2011) [ | Random allocation | 32 | 28 | 30.2 | 29.6 | 12/20 | 10/18 | 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Ma et al. (2020) [ | Random number table | 25 | 25 | 27.3 | 27.9 | 12/13 | 11/14 | — | |
| Peng (2013) [ | Random allocation | 12 | 12 | 37.5 ± 8.4 | 15/9 | 10.4 ± 1.2 | |||
| Qu et al. (2016) [ | Block randomization | 20 | 20 | 36.95 ± 9.36 | 37.34 ± 8.95 | 12/8 | 11/9 | 3.54 ± 1.62 | 3.78 ± 1.48 |
| Wang (2012) [ | Completely random principle; single blind | 15 | 15 | 34.20 ± 9.92 | 40 ± 11.24 | 10/5 | 8/7 | 6.65 ± 5.72 | 8.52 ± 8.24 |
| Wang (2014) [ | Completely random principle; single blind | 20 | 20 | 38.00 ± 13.20 | 38.55 ± 11.89 | 10/10 | 11/9 | — | |
| Wang (2019) [ | Random number table | 25 | 25 | 39.12 ± 2.45 | 39.60 ± 2.44 | 16/9 | 10/15 | 7.52 ± 0.87 | 7.40 ± 0.81 |
| Wang et al. (2018) [ | Random number table | 25 | 25 | 46.54 ± 13.37 | 45.68 ± 12.98 | 15/10 | 17/8 | — | |
| Wang et al. (2019) [ | Random number table | 50 | 50 | 32.7 ± 7.3 | 32.2 ± 6.9 | 27/23 | 26/24 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 2.2 ± 0.8 |
| Zhang et al. (2015) [ | Random number table | 50 | 50 | 40.00 ± 9.21 | 36.20 ± 8.10 | 28/22 | 31/19 | 5.21 ± 4.32 | 3.65 ± 1.53 |
| Zhou (2010) [ | Random allocation | 50 | 46 | — | 20/30 | 18/28 | — | ||
Interventions and treatment course in the included studies.
| Author (year) | Intervention | Course (month) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Control | ||
| Fu (2017) [ | (i) Same treatment as the control group | (i) Thalidomide (50 mg, qn, po) | 3 |
| Gong (2013) [ | (i) Same treatment as the control group | (i) Thalidomide (50 mg, qn, po) | 3 |
| Gu et al. (2015) [ | (i) Same treatment as the control group | (i) Azathioprine (100 mg, qd, po): the dose was reduced after the condition stabilized, reduced 5 mg every two weeks. The maintenance dose was 5 mg/d. | 2 |
| Huang (2018) [ | (i) Same treatment as the control group | (i) Thalidomide (50 mg, tid, po) | 3 |
| Kao (2008) [ | (i) Yiqi Tuodu decoction (administered twice a day; total daily dose 400 ml) | (i) Prednisone (10 mg, bid, po): the dose was reduced after the condition stabilized, reduced 5 mg every two weeks. The maintenance dose was 5 mg/d. | 2 |
| Lin (2011) [ | (i) Modified Gancao Xiexin decoction (administered twice a day; total daily dose 400 ml) | (i) Prednisone (10 mg, bid, po) | 2 |
| Ma et al. (2020) [ | (i) Same treatment as the control group | (i) Thalidomide (50 mg/d, po): adjust the dose according to the situation | 3 |
| Peng (2013) [ | (i) Modified Gancao Xiexin decoction | (i) Prednisone (10 mg, bid, po) | 4 |
| Qu et al. (2016) [ | (i) The same treatment as the control group | (i) Thalidomide (50 mg/d, po) | 3 |
| Wang (2012) [ | (i) Self-designed basic decoction (administered warm once after breakfast and once after dinner) | (i) Thalidomide (50 mg, hs, po) | 2 |
| Wang (2014) [ | (i) Self-designed basic decoction based on promoting qi and resolving toxin (administered warm once after breakfast and once after dinner) | (i) Thalidomide (50 mg, hs, po) | 2 |
| Wang (2019) [ | (i) Modified Jiawei Xiaoyao powder (apply it in the form of decoction, administered warm once after breakfast and once after dinner) | (i) Thalidomide (50 mg, bid, po) | 2 |
| Wang et al. (2018) [ | (i) Same treatment as the control group | (i) Basic drug treatment for disease not directly related to Behcet's syndrome | 2 |
| Wang et al. (2019) [ | (i) Same treatment as the control group | (i) Azathioprine (the dose was tapered after high-dose treatment) | 2 |
| Zhang et al. (2015) [ | (i) Modified Gancao Xiexin decoction and Sanhuang (administered warm once after breakfast and once after dinner) | (i) Prednisone (30 mg, bid, po), after 2-3 weeks, depending on the improvement of symptoms, the maintenance dose was gradually reduced to 10–20 mg/time | 3 |
| Zhou (2010) [ | (ii) Gan Chi decoction (administered warm twice a day; total daily dose 200 ml) | (i) Prednisone (10 mg/d, po) | 3 |
Outcome measures and adverse events in the included studies.
| Author (year) | Primary outcomes | Secondary outcomes | Adverse events | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical feature score | Laboratory index level | |||
| Fu (2017) [ | Total effective rate | Oral ulcer; eye lesion | ESR; CRP | Sleepiness, dizziness (experimental: 2; control: 5) |
| Gong (2013) [ | Total effective rate | Oral ulcer; eye lesion | ESR; CRP | Sleepiness, dizziness (experimental: 1; control: 5) |
| Gu et al. (2015) [ | Total effective rate | — | CRP; IgA | Skin rash (experimental: 1; control: 1) |
| Huang (2018) [ | Total effective rate | Oral ulcer; eye lesion | ESR; CRP | No adverse events occurred |
| Kao (2008) [ | Total effective rate | Oral ulcer; eye lesion | ESR; CRP | — |
| Lin (2011) [ | Total effective rate | Oral ulcer; eye lesion | ESR; CRP | — |
| Ma et al. (2020) [ | Total effective rate | — | ESR; CRP | Dizziness (experimental: 2; control: 3) |
| Peng (2013) [ | Total effective rate | Oral ulcer; eye lesion | ESR; CRP | — |
| Qu et al. (2016) [ | Total effective rate | — | ESR; CRP | Dizziness, sleepiness (experimental: 1; control: 2) |
| Wang (2012) [ | Total effective rate | Oral ulcer; eye lesion | ESR; CRP | Loose stool (experimental: 2) |
| Wang (2014) [ | Total effective rate | Oral ulcer; eye lesion | ESR; CRP | Diarrhea (experimental: 1) |
| Wang (2019) [ | Total effective rate | Oral ulcer; eye lesion | ESR; CRP | Slight abdominal distension (control: 5) |
| Wang et al. (2018) [ | Total effective rate | — | CRP; IgA | Hypoleucocytosis (experimental: 1; control: 2) |
| Wang et al. (2019) [ | Total effective rate | — | CRP; IgA | — |
| Zhang et al. (2015) [ | Total effective rate | Oral ulcer; eye lesion | ESR; CRP; IgA | — |
| Zhou (2010) [ | Total effective rate | Oral ulcer; eye lesion | ESR; CRP; IgA | Diarrhea (experimental: 3) |
Figure 2Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figure 3Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study. +: low risk of bias. −: high risk of bias. ?: unclear risk of bias.
Figure 4Forest plots of (a) total effective rate, (b) recovery rate, and (c) recurrence rate.
Figure 5Forest plots of clinical features score: (a) oral ulcer, (b) eye lesion, and (c) genital ulcer.
Figure 6Forest plots of clinical features score: (a) skin lesion, (b) pathergy reaction, (c) arthropathy, and (d) fever.
Figure 7Forest plots of laboratory indexes level: (a) CRP, (b) ESR, and (c) IgA.
Figure 8Forest plots of (a) total effective rate, (b) recovery rate, and (c) recurrence rate. (A meta-analysis of modified Gancao Xiexin Decoction for BD treatment.)
Figure 9Forest plots of (a) oral ulcer, (b) eye lesion, (c) genital ulcer, and (d) skin lesion. (A meta-analysis of modified Gancao Xiexin Decoction for BD treatment.)
Figure 10Forest plots of (a) pathergy reaction, (b) arthropathy, (c) fever, (d) CRP, and (e) ESR. (A meta-analysis of modified Gancao Xiexin Decoction for BD treatment.)
Figure 11The funnel plot of the total effective rate.
Figure 12The filled funnel plot of the total effective rate.