| Literature DB >> 34335669 |
Muhammad Ahmad1,2, Thibault Leroy2, Nikos Krigas3, Eva M Temsch2, Hanna Weiss-Schneeweiss2, Christian Lexer2, Eva Maria Sehr1, Ovidiu Paun2.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Quantifying genetic variation is fundamental to understand a species' demographic trajectory and its ability to adapt to future changes. In comparison with diploids, however, genetic variation and factors fostering genetic divergence remain poorly studied in polyploids due to analytical challenges. Here, by employing a ploidy-aware framework, we investigated the genetic structure and its determinants in polyploid Alkanna tinctoria (Boraginaceae), an ancient medicinal herb that is the source of bioactive compounds known as alkannin and shikonin (A/S). From a practical perspective, such investigation can inform biodiversity management strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Alkanna; EBG; Greece; RAD-seq; genetic variation; polyploid
Year: 2021 PMID: 34335669 PMCID: PMC8317432 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.706574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Sampling localities of Alkanna and its genetic structure in Greece. Alkanna tinctoria was sampled across Greece, and A. sieberi on Crete island (localities AT27 and AT28). Geographical coordinates of sampling locations are provided in Supplementary Table S1. Ancestry proportions inferred with TESS3 averaged for sampling locality are plotted as pie charts. Inset shows ancestry proportions from STRUCTURE as vertical bars where each vertical bar represents an individual and each color represents a genetic cluster. (A) K = 3, and (B) K = 5. Genetic structure estimates are based on RAD-seq data. For TESS3 and STRUCTURE, 7,935 and 1,000 SNPs, respectively, present across at least 90% individuals were used. The map of Greece was extracted from the WorldClim database (Hijmans et al., 2005).
Genome size [average picogram (pg) ± standard deviation (SD)] of Greek Alkanna tinctoria and A. sieberi as measured by flow cytometry.
| Geographic origin | Number of individuals | Genome size: 1 C (pg ± SD.) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AT28 | Central Crete | 3 | 1.08 ± 0.02 |
| AT27 | Western Crete | 2 | 1.21 ± 0.01 |
| AT02 | South | 2 | 1.22 ± 0.01 |
| AT19 | Center | 1 | 1.21 |
| AT03 | North | 7 | 1.28 ± 0.01 |
Genomic diversity in Alkanna populations.
| Locality | Greek region | π | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT28 | Central Crete | 11 | 0.007 | 0.101 | −0.005 | 136 |
| AT27 | Western Crete | 11 | 0.006 | 0.090 | 0.071 | 39 |
| AT01 | South | 9 | 0.008 | 0.113 | −0.010 | 6 |
| AT10 | South | 8 | 0.006 | 0.097 | 0.052 | 25 |
| AT02 | South | 9 | 0.007 | 0.105 | 0.036 | 8 |
| AT06 | South | 9 | 0.008 | 0.110 | 0.009 | 9 |
| AT07 | South | 9 | 0.008 | 0.116 | −0.071 | 16 |
| AT08 | South | 9 | 0.007 | 0.102 | 0.049 | 18 |
| AT17 | Center | 9 | 0.007 | 0.096 | 0.081 | 13 |
| AT19 | Center | 9 | 0.006 | 0.092 | 0.089 | 19 |
| AT21 | Center | 9 | 0.006 | 0.085 | 0.025 | 17 |
| AT25 | Center | 9 | 0.006 | 0.080 | −0.036 | 6 |
| Mean ± S.E. for Southern-Central Greece | 0.0069 ± 0.0002 | 0.0996 ± 0.0037 | 0.0225 ± 0.015 | 1,551 | ||
| AT03 | North | 11 | 0.009 | 0.124 | 0.030 | 10 |
| AT04 | North | 9 | 0.009 | 0.125 | 0.059 | 11 |
| AT13 | North | 8 | 0.009 | 0.125 | 0.011 | 3 |
| ATA8 | North | 9 | 0.008 | 0.110 | 0.039 | 14 |
| Mean ± S.E. for Northern Greece | 0.008 ± 0.0002 | 0.121 ± 0.0036 | 0.034 ± 0.009 | 375 | ||
Summary statistics per sampling locality and mean of genetic data of Greek A. tinctoria and A. sieberi. Estimates are inferred from 16,107 SNPs present across 148 individuals. N, number of individuals analyzed; π, nucleotide diversity; He, gene diversity; F, inbreeding coefficient; and P, private alleles. The statistics of genetic groups identified in A. tinctoria by clustering-based approaches (North vs. South) are highlighted in bold and represented as mean ± standard error (SE).
Figure 2Population genomic data consistent with tetrasomic inheritance. Genotype frequencies (y-axis) as function of allele frequencies (x-axis) in A. tinctoria. The inset shows raw plotting of genotype and allele frequencies of A. tinctoria. The estimates are derived from 16,107 SNPs present across all individuals. For tetrasomic inheritance, all five genotypes are expected to be observe at intermediate (0.5) allele frequency. In addition, the three middle peaks are expected to be of similar height. The pattern observed here is largely consistent with tetrasomic inheritance (see section “Discussion”).
Figure 3Genomic variation in Alkanna. (A) Heatmap of pairwise relatedness between 148 individuals from 16 different localities across Greece based on 16,107 SNPs present across all individuals. Regional origins of individuals are given below the heatmap, and each population is indicated on the left side of the heatmap. Darker colors represent higher relatedness, according to the legend included on the top right side. For improved color resolution, the estimates on the diagonal were excluded. An arrow points to a potentially admixt individual in population AT01 that is discussed in the text. (B,C) Genetic structure in the Greek Alkanna populations inferred based on EBG-derived tetraploid genotypes (n = 148) as revealed by principal component analysis (PCA).
Figure 4Isolation by distance (IBD) and isolation by environment (IBE). Influence of geographical and environmental covariates on genetic differentiation in Greek populations of A. tinctoria. (A) R2 weighted importance of environmental covariates that explains genetic gradients estimated using gradient forest. Top 3 environmental covariates are given in gray. Relationship of genetic distances (FST/1 − FST) and (B) log-transformed geographical distances, or (C) environmental distances. Analysis are based on 16,107 SNPs present across all individuals.
Summary of multiple matrix regression with randomization (MMRR) and commonality analysis (CA).
| Model: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | Unique (U) | Common (C) | Total (T) | |
| GEO | 0.037 | 0.29 (54%) | 0.11 (21%) | 0.41 (74%) |
| ENV | 0.025 | 0.13 (24%) | 0.11 (21%) | 0.25 (45%) |
significant at p = 0.001.
Pairwise genomic divergence (F U, unique; C, common; and total, T variance partitioning of each explanatory variable contributing to genomic divergence. The proportion in parenthesis represents the percentage contribution of each predictor to the total variance explained by the model and calculated from CA coefficient as: (unique, common, or total/R * 100. F.