Literature DB >> 32400533

Suprathreshold contrast response in normal and anomalous trichromats.

Kenneth Knoblauch, Brennan Marsh-Armstrong, John S Werner.   

Abstract

Maximum likelihood difference scaling was used to measure suprathreshold contrast response difference scales for low-frequency Gabor patterns, modulated along luminance and L-M color directions in normal, protanomalous, and deuteranomalous observers. Based on a signal-detection model, perceptual scale values, parameterized as $ d^\prime $d', were estimated by maximum likelihood. The difference scales were well fit by a Michaelis-Menten model, permitting estimates of response and contrast gain parameters for each subject. Anomalous observers showed no significant differences in response or contrast gain from normal observers for luminance contrast. For chromatic modulation, however, anomalous observers displayed higher contrast and lower response gain compared to normal observers. These effects cannot be explained by simple pigment shift models, and they support a compensation mechanism to optimize the mapping of the input contrast range to the neural response range. A linear relation between response and contrast gain suggests a neural trade-off between them.

Year:  2020        PMID: 32400533     DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.380088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  9 in total

1.  Adapting to an enhanced color gamut - implications for color vision and color deficiencies.

Authors:  Ivana Ilic; Kassandra R Lee; Yoko Mizokami; Lorne Whitehead; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.833

2.  Color Compensation in Anomalous Trichromats Assessed with fMRI.

Authors:  Katherine E M Tregillus; Zoey J Isherwood; John E Vanston; Stephen A Engel; Donald I A MacLeod; Ichiro Kuriki; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Color appearance model incorporating contrast adaptation - implications for individual differences in color vision.

Authors:  Kevin A G Smet; Michael A Webster; Lorne A Whitehead
Journal:  Color Res Appl       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 1.668

4.  Color perception and compensation in color deficiencies assessed with hue scaling.

Authors:  Kara J Emery; Mohana Kuppuswamy Parthasarathy; Daniel S Joyce; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 1.984

5.  Task-dependent contrast gain in anomalous trichromats.

Authors:  John E Vanston; Katherine E M Tregillus; Michael A Webster; Michael A Crognale
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 1.984

Review 6.  Plasticity in perception: insights from color vision deficiencies.

Authors:  Zoey J Isherwood; Daniel S Joyce; Mohana Kuppuswamy Parthasarathy; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Fac Rev       Date:  2020-11-13

7.  Coloured filters can simulate colour deficiency in normal vision but cannot compensate for congenital colour vision deficiency.

Authors:  Leticia Álvaro; João M M Linhares; Monika A Formankiewicz; Sarah J Waugh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Linking perceived to physical contrast: Comparing results from discrimination and difference-scaling experiments.

Authors:  Christopher Shooner; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Conjoint measurement of perceived transparency and perceived contrast in variegated checkerboards.

Authors:  Guillermo Aguilar; Marianne Maertens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.