Literature DB >> 34333685

State of the art in translating experimental myelomeningocele research to the bedside.

Lourenço Sbragia1, Karina Miura da Costa1, Antonio Landolffi Abdul Nour1, Rodrigo Ruano2, Marcelo Volpon Santos3, Hélio Rubens Machado4.   

Abstract

Myelomeningocele (MMC), the commonest type of spina bifida (SB), occurs due to abnormal development of the neural tube and manifest as failure of the complete fusion of posterior arches of the spinal column, leading to dysplastic growth of the spinal cord and meninges. It is associated with several degrees of motor and sensory deficits below the level of the lesion, as well as skeletal deformities, bladder and bowel incontinence, and sexual dysfunction. These children might develop varying degrees of neuropsychomotor delay, partly due to the severity of the injuries that affect the nervous system before birth, partly due to the related cerebral malformations (notably hydrocephalus-which may also lead to an increase in intracranial pressure-and Chiari II deformity). Traditionally, MMC was repaired surgically just after birth; however, intrauterine correction of MMC has been shown to have several potential benefits, including better sensorimotor outcomes (since exposure to amniotic fluid and its consequent deleterious effects is shortened) and reduced rates of hydrocephalus, among others. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele, nevertheless, would not have been made possible without the development of experimental models of this pathological condition. Hence, the aim of the current article is to provide an overview of the animal models of MMC that were used over the years and describe how this knowledge has been translated into the fetal treatment of MMC in humans.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experimental myelomeningocele; Fetal surgery; Myelomeningocele; Spina bifida

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34333685     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05299-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  110 in total

1.  Leg dysfunctions in a hatched chick model of spina bifida aperta.

Authors:  Katsumi Mominoki; Masae Kinutani; Hiroyuki Wakisaka; Shouichirou Saito; Naoto Kobayashi; Takashi Fujiwara; Seiji Matsuda
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Partial or complete coverage of experimental spina bifida by simple intra-amniotic injection of concentrated amniotic mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Beatrice Dionigi; Azra Ahmed; Joseph Brazzo; John Patrick Connors; David Zurakowski; Dario O Fauza
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Sharing of the same embryogenic pathway in anorectal malformations and anterior sacral myelomeningocele formation.

Authors:  Y Liu; F Sugiyama; K Yagami; H Ohkawa
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Experimental contribution to the pathogenesis of spina bifida.

Authors:  J Rokos; J Knowles
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Heritable spina bifida in sheep: A potential model for fetal repair of myelomeningocele.

Authors:  John W Steele; Sharon Bayliss; John Bayliss; Ying Linda Lin; Bogdan J Wlodarczyk; Robert M Cabrera; Yohannes G Asfaw; Thomas J Cummings; Richard H Finnell; Timothy M George
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Hindbrain herniation develops in surgically created myelomeningocele but is absent after repair in fetal lambs.

Authors:  B W Paek; D L Farmer; C C Wilkinson; C T Albanese; W Peacock; M R Harrison; R W Jennings
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Retinoic acid induced myelomeningocele in fetal rats: characterization by histopathological analysis and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E Danzer; U Schwarz; S Wehrli; A Radu; N S Adzick; A W Flake
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele.

Authors:  N Scott Adzick; Elizabeth A Thom; Catherine Y Spong; John W Brock; Pamela K Burrows; Mark P Johnson; Lori J Howell; Jody A Farrell; Mary E Dabrowiak; Leslie N Sutton; Nalin Gupta; Noel B Tulipan; Mary E D'Alton; Diana L Farmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Intrauterine treatment of spina bifida: primate model.

Authors:  M Michejda
Journal:  Z Kinderchir       Date:  1984-08

10.  Vascular and apoptotic changes in the placode of myelomeningocele mice during the final stages of in utero development.

Authors:  Joaquim L Reis; Jorge Correia-Pinto; Mariana P Monteiro; Madalena Costa; Grover M Hutchins
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Is there a role in the central nervous system development for using corticosteroids to treat meningomyelocele and hydrocephalus?

Authors:  I José Nogueira Gualberto; G Araújo Medeiros; M Volpon Santos; L da Silva Lopes; H Rubens Machado; L Sbragia
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 1.532

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.