Joel J Wackerbarth1, Sandra A Ham2, Joshua Aizen1, John Richgels1, Sarah F Faris3. 1. Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL. 2. Center for Health and the Social Services, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 3. Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: Sfaris@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients who receive tramadol are as likely to develop persistent usage compared to other opioids after urologic surgery and procedures. METHODS: We identified adults 18 to 64 years old who underwent a urologic procedure in the years 2014 to 2017 using the Truven MarketScan database and subsequently filled an opioid prescription within two weeks of discharge. Patients were excluded if they had any previous opioid prescriptions in the year before surgery. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to estimate influence of type of opioid on discharge and various comorbidities on persistent use to determine if persistent use was related to the choice of discharge opioid. We also compared these rates to a 1:3 comorbidities matched, non-surgical cohort of patients from the general population. RESULTS: Overall, 115,687 patients were included. After 1 year, 14.8% of the urologic surgery cohort had persistent opioid usage compared to 10.8% in the opioid naïve matched non-surgical cohort (OR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.35-1.39). Discharge with tramadol was associated with a higher odd of persistent usage compared to class II opioids controlling for type of urologic surgery, age, gender, and pain related comorbidities (OR = 1.23 95% CI 1.13-1.35). The odds of persistent usage varied slightly by type of urologic procedure, but all were higher than matched non-surgical cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients developed persistent opiate usage after urologic surgery compared to a comorbidity matched non-surgical cohort. In this model, tramadol specifically was associated with higher odds of novel persistent opioid usage compared to other opioids. Urologists should not consider tramadol to be a safer choice with regard to developing persistent usage and consider prospective validation of these results.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients who receive tramadol are as likely to develop persistent usage compared to other opioids after urologic surgery and procedures. METHODS: We identified adults 18 to 64 years old who underwent a urologic procedure in the years 2014 to 2017 using the Truven MarketScan database and subsequently filled an opioid prescription within two weeks of discharge. Patients were excluded if they had any previous opioid prescriptions in the year before surgery. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to estimate influence of type of opioid on discharge and various comorbidities on persistent use to determine if persistent use was related to the choice of discharge opioid. We also compared these rates to a 1:3 comorbidities matched, non-surgical cohort of patients from the general population. RESULTS: Overall, 115,687 patients were included. After 1 year, 14.8% of the urologic surgery cohort had persistent opioid usage compared to 10.8% in the opioid naïve matched non-surgical cohort (OR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.35-1.39). Discharge with tramadol was associated with a higher odd of persistent usage compared to class II opioids controlling for type of urologic surgery, age, gender, and pain related comorbidities (OR = 1.23 95% CI 1.13-1.35). The odds of persistent usage varied slightly by type of urologic procedure, but all were higher than matched non-surgical cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients developed persistent opiate usage after urologic surgery compared to a comorbidity matched non-surgical cohort. In this model, tramadol specifically was associated with higher odds of novel persistent opioid usage compared to other opioids. Urologists should not consider tramadol to be a safer choice with regard to developing persistent usage and consider prospective validation of these results.
Authors: Chad M Brummett; Jennifer F Waljee; Jenna Goesling; Stephanie Moser; Paul Lin; Michael J Englesbe; Amy S B Bohnert; Sachin Kheterpal; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Matthew J Ziegelmann; Jason P Joseph; Amy E Glasgow; Mark D Tyson; Raymond W Pak; Halena M Gazelka; Ashton L Schatz; Bradley C Leibovich; Elizabeth B Habermann; Matthew T Gettman Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Calista M Harbaugh; Jay S Lee; Kao-Ping Chua; Brooke Kenney; Theodore John Iwashyna; Michael J Englesbe; Chad M Brummett; Amy S Bohnert; Jennifer F Waljee Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Joe Habbouche; Jay Lee; Rena Steiger; James M Dupree; Caitlin Khalsa; Michael Englesbe; Chad Brummett; Jennifer Waljee Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Daniel B Larach; Jennifer F Waljee; Hsou-Mei Hu; Jay S Lee; Romesh Nalliah; Michael J Englesbe; Chad M Brummett Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 13.787