| Literature DB >> 29896932 |
Katherine Theisen1, Bruce Jacobs1, Liam Macleod1, Benjamin Davies1.
Abstract
Opioid abuse and addiction is causing widespread devastation in communities across the USA and resulting in significant strain on our healthcare system. There is increasing evidence that prescribers are at least partly responsible for the opioid crisis because of overprescribing, a practice that developed from changes in policy and reimbursement structures. Surgeons, specifically, have been subject to scrutiny as 'adequate treatment' of post-surgical pain is poorly defined and data suggest that many patients receive much larger opioid prescriptions than needed. The consequences of overprescribing include addiction and misuse, dispersion of opioids into the community, and possible potentiation of illicit drug/heroin use. Several solutions to this crisis are currently being enacted with variable success, including Prescription Drug Monitoring Programmes, policy-level interventions aimed to de-incentivize overprescribing, limiting opioid exposures through Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols, and the novel idea of creating surgery- and/or procedure-specific prescribing guidelines. This problem is likely to require not one, but several potential solutions to reverse its trajectory. It is critical, however, that we as physicians and prescribers find a way to stop the needless overprescribing while still treating postoperative pain appropriately.Entities:
Keywords: #UroBPH; analgesics; opioid; overprescribing; pain; postoperative; surgeons
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29896932 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BJU Int ISSN: 1464-4096 Impact factor: 5.588