| Literature DB >> 34331489 |
Ling Bai1,2, Gong-Jun Ji3,4, Yongxia Song1, Jinmei Sun3,4, Junjie Wei4, Fang Xue5, Lu Zhu6, Rui Li2, Yanfang Han2, Liu Zhang1, Jinying Yang7,8, Bensheng Qiu7,8, Guo-Rong Wu9, Jing Zhang5, Jingfang Hong1, Kai Wang3,4,10,11, Chunyan Zhu3,4,10,11.
Abstract
With the growing population and rapid change in the social environment, nurses in China are suffering from high rates of stress; however, the neural mechanism underlying this occupation related stress is largely unknown. In this study, mental status was determined for 81 nurses and 61 controls using the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) scale. A subgroup (n = 57) was further scanned by resting-state functional MRI with two sessions. Based on the SCL-90 scale, "somatic complaints" and "diet/sleeping" exhibited the most prominent difference between nurses and controls. This mental health change in nurses was further supported by the spatial independent component analysis on functional MRI data. First, dynamic functional connectome analysis identified two discrete connectivity configurations (States I and II). Controls had more time in the State I than II, while the nurses had more time in the State II than I. Second, nurses showed a similar static network topology as controls, but altered dynamic properties. Third, the symptom-imaging correlation analysis suggested the functional alterations in nurses as potential imaging biomarkers indicating a high risk for "diet/sleeping" problems. In summary, this study emphasized the high risk of mental deficits in nurses and explored the underlying neural mechanism using dynamic brain connectome, which provided valuable information for future psychological intervention.Entities:
Keywords: dynamic; functional connectivity; mental health; nurse
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34331489 PMCID: PMC8519872 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Brain Mapp ISSN: 1065-9471 Impact factor: 5.038
FIGURE 1Independent components and their static connectivity. The 50 independent components were sorted into seven functional networks: basal ganglia (BG); auditory (AUD); sensorimotor (SMN); visual (VIS); default mode (DMN); cognitive executive (CEN); and cerebellar (CB) networks. The correlation matrix between component pairs was computed using the entire resting‐state data. Index numbers of independent components are written on the left and bottom sides of the matrix
Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants
| Measures | Nurse ( | Control ( | Statistics/raw |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Age (Y) | 24.3 ± 1.26z | 24.1 ± 1.47 | 0.60 |
| Gender (M/F) | 3/82 | 2/59 | <0.01 |
| Months after graduation | 16.7 ± 7.75 | 17.1 ± 7.22 | 2507 |
|
| |||
| Somatic complaints | 1.5 ± 0.45 | 1.3 ± 0.23 | 1,520 |
| Obsessive–compulsive | 1.8 ± 0.47 | 1.6 ± 0.42 | 2018 |
| Interpersonal sensitivity | 1.6 ± 0.49 | 1.4 ± 0.42 | 2030 |
| Depression | 1.6 ± 0.50 | 1.4 ± 0.42 | 1944 |
| Anxiety | 1.6 ± 0.47 | 1.4 ± 0.37 | 1790 |
| Hostility | 1.5 ± 0.45 | 1.3 ± 0.36 | 1994 |
| Phobic anxiety | 1.4 ± 0.41 | 1.2 ± 0.26 | 1867 |
| Paranoid ideation | 1.4 ± 0.42 | 1.2 ± 0.30 | 1893 |
| Psychoticism | 1.4 ± 0.41 | 1.2 ± 0.41 | 1709 |
| Diet/sleeping | 1.6 ± 0.47 | 1.3 ± 0.37 | 1723 |
| No. of risk items | 38.8 ± 22.6 | 24.3 ± 17.3 | 1645 |
| Total score | 138.8 ± 36.9 | 121.3 ± 25.6 | 1819 |
Note: Means ± SDs.
Abbreviations: F, female; M, male; NA, not available; Y, year.
According to the chi‐square test.
According to the two‐sample t‐test.
According to the Mann–Whitney U test.
FIGURE 2Connectivity feature of two mental states. (a) Cluster centroids for each state. The total number of occurrences and percentage of total occurrences are listed above each matrix. (b) Top 5% connections (i.e., the largest absolute correlation coefficients) in the circular maps. Index numbers of independent components are written in squares. Color and gray lines represent intra‐ and inter‐network connectivity, respectively. (c) The average intra‐network connectivity strength is higher in State I than State II, while the inter‐network connectivity was the inverse
FIGURE 3Temporal properties of the dynamic states. (a) The mean fractional windows spent in each state as measured by percentage (i.e., total time spent in State I vs. State II) is different between groups. The diet/sleeping score is positively correlated to the different dwelling time between States II and I. (b) The mean dwelling time (i.e., number of consecutive windows spent in each state before switching) in State I is shorter in nurses than controls, while that in State II is the inverse. * FDR corrected p < .05
FIGURE 4The temporal variance of brain network topology. The coefficient of variation of local and global efficiency is smaller in nurses than controls. * FDR corrected p < .05