Literature DB >> 34330990

Shape effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles on mild traumatic brain injury.

Dong Hyuk Youn1, Ngoc Minh Tran2, Bong Jun Kim1, Youngmi Kim1, Jin Pyeong Jeon3,4,5, Hyojong Yoo6.   

Abstract

The catalytic performance and therapeutic effect of nanoparticles varies with shape. Here, we investigated and compared the therapeutic outcomes of ceria nanospheres (Ceria NSs) and ceria nanorods (Ceria NRs) in an in vivo study of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). In vivo TBI was induced in a mouse model of open head injury using a stereotaxic impactor. Outcomes including cytoprotective effects, cognitive function, and cerebral edema were investigated after retro-orbital injection of 11.6 mM of ceria nanoparticles. Ceria nanoparticles significantly reduced fluoro-jade B (FJB)-positive cells and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells, and restored mRNA levels of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) and SOD2. They also decreased the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression compared with the untreated control group. Comparing the two nanomaterials, Ceria NRs showed less stable and high-energy (100) and (110) planes, which increased the number of active sites. The Ce3+/Ce4+ molar ratio of Ceria NRs (0.40) was greater than that of Ceria NSs (0.27). Ceria NRs (0.059 ± 0.021) appeared to exhibit better anti-inflammatory effect than Ceria NSs (0.133 ± 0.024), but the effect was statistically insignificant (p = 0.190). Ceria nanoparticles also improved cognitive impairment following mTBI compared with the control group, but the effect did not differ significantly according to the nanoshape. However, Ceria NRs (70.1 ± 0.5%) significantly decreased brain water content compared with Ceria NSs (73.7 ± 0.4%; p = 0.0015), indicating a more effective reduction in brain edema (p = 0.0015). Compared with Ceria NSs, the Ceria NRs are more effective in alleviating cerebral edema following in vivo mTBI.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34330990     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95057-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  28 in total

1.  Memory impairment after mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Frederick G Flynn
Journal:  Continuum (Minneap Minn)       Date:  2010-12

Review 2.  Two decades of advances in understanding of mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ronald Ruff
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.710

3.  Surface engineering on CeO₂ nanorods by chemical redox etching and their enhanced catalytic activity for CO oxidation.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Zhiyun Zhang; Jing Li; Yuanyuan Ma; Yongquan Qu
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 7.790

4.  Oxidative stress following traumatic brain injury in rats: quantitation of biomarkers and detection of free radical intermediates.

Authors:  V A Tyurin; Y Y Tyurina; G G Borisenko; T V Sokolova; V B Ritov; P J Quinn; M Rose; P Kochanek; S H Graham; V E Kagan
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.372

5.  Brain water content. A misunderstood measurement?

Authors:  Richard F Keep; Ya Hua; Guohua Xi
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Fundamentals and Catalytic Applications of CeO2-Based Materials.

Authors:  Tiziano Montini; Michele Melchionna; Matteo Monai; Paolo Fornasiero
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Increase of brain oxidative stress in mild cognitive impairment: a possible predictor of Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Domenico Praticò; Christopher M Clark; Feyan Liun; Joshua Rokach; Virginia Y-M Lee; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2002-06

Review 8.  Pathological correlations between traumatic brain injury and chronic neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Marcela Cruz-Haces; Jonathan Tang; Glen Acosta; Joseph Fernandez; Riyi Shi
Journal:  Transl Neurodegener       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 8.014

9.  Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Improve Outcome after In Vitro and In Vivo Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Zachary S Bailey; Eric Nilson; John A Bates; Adewole Oyalowo; Kevin S Hockey; Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajja; Chevon Thorpe; Heidi Rogers; Bryce Dunn; Aaron S Frey; Marc J Billings; Christopher A Sholar; Amy Hermundstad; Challa Kumar; Pamela J VandeVord; Beverly A Rzigalinski
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 10.  Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer's Disease: The Cerebrovascular Link.

Authors:  Jaime Ramos-Cejudo; Thomas Wisniewski; Charles Marmar; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Mony J de Leon; Silvia Fossati
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 8.143

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Central nervous system injury meets nanoceria: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Wang Yang; Maoting Zhang; Jian He; Mingfu Gong; Jian Sun; Xiaochao Yang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Subsequent Acute Pulmonary Inflammatory Response.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Lim; Harry Jung; Dong Hyuk Youn; Tae Yeon Kim; Sung Woo Han; Bong Jun Kim; Jae Jun Lee; Jin Pyeong Jeon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  The Therapeutic Role of Nanoparticle Shape in Traumatic Brain Injury : An in vitro Comparative Study.

Authors:  Dong Hyuk Youn; Harry Jung; Ngoc Minh Tran; Jin Pyeong Jeon; Hyojong Yoo
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-02-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.