Literature DB >> 34327653

Predicting Life Expectancy to Target Cancer Screening Using Electronic Health Record Clinical Data.

Alexandra K Lee1,2, Bocheng Jing3,4, Sun Y Jeon5,3, W John Boscardin5,3,6, Sei J Lee5,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend breast and colorectal cancer screening for older adults with a life expectancy >10 years. Most mortality indexes require clinician data entry, presenting a barrier for routine use in care. Electronic health records (EHR) are a rich clinical data source that could be used to create individualized life expectancy predictions to identify patients for cancer screening without data entry.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and internally validate a life expectancy calculator from structured EHR data.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using national Veteran's Affairs (VA) EHR databases. PATIENTS: Veterans aged 50+ with a primary care visit during 2005. MAIN MEASURES: We assessed demographics, diseases, medications, laboratory results, healthcare utilization, and vital signs 1 year prior to the index visit. Mortality follow-up was complete through 2017. Using the development cohort (80% sample), we used LASSO Cox regression to select ~100 predictors from 913 EHR data elements. In the validation cohort (remaining 20% sample), we calculated the integrated area under the curve (iAUC) and evaluated calibration. KEY
RESULTS: In 3,705,122 patients, the mean age was 68 years and the majority were male (97%) and white (85%); nearly half (49%) died. The life expectancy calculator included 93 predictors; age and gender most strongly contributed to discrimination; diseases also contributed significantly while vital signs were negligible. The iAUC was 0.816 (95% confidence interval, 0.815, 0.817) with good calibration.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed a life expectancy calculator using VA EHR data with excellent discrimination and calibration. Automated life expectancy prediction using EHR data may improve guideline-concordant breast and colorectal cancer screening by identifying patients with a life expectancy >10 years.
© 2021. Society of General Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34327653      PMCID: PMC8858374          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07018-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  48 in total

Review 1.  Shared Decision Making-The Importance of Diagnosing Preferences.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Nan Cochran; Michael Pignone
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Scott M Grundy; Neil J Stone; Alison L Bailey; Craig Beam; Kim K Birtcher; Roger S Blumenthal; Lynne T Braun; Sarah de Ferranti; Joseph Faiella-Tommasino; Daniel E Forman; Ronald Goldberg; Paul A Heidenreich; Mark A Hlatky; Daniel W Jones; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Nuria Lopez-Pajares; Chiadi E Ndumele; Carl E Orringer; Carmen A Peralta; Joseph J Saseen; Sidney C Smith; Laurence Sperling; Salim S Virani; Joseph Yeboah
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2018: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; Stacey A Fedewa; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley; Richard C Wender
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Defining the Scope of Prognosis: Primary Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Predicting the Future Health of Older Adults.

Authors:  John M Thomas; Terri R Fried
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  The Case for Algorithmic Stewardship for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies.

Authors:  Stephanie Eaneff; Ziad Obermeyer; Atul J Butte
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Prognostic indices for older adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsey C Yourman; Sei J Lee; Mara A Schonberg; Eric W Widera; Alexander K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.

Authors:  L C Walter; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Chronic conditions and mortality among the oldest old.

Authors:  Sei J Lee; Alan S Go; Karla Lindquist; Daniel Bertenthal; Kenneth E Covinsky
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Predicting 10-year mortality for older adults.

Authors:  Marisa Cruz; Kenneth Covinsky; Eric W Widera; Irena Stijacic-Cenzer; Sei J Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sameer D Saini; Sandeep Vijan; Philip Schoenfeld; Adam A Powell; Stephanie Moser; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  Do functional status and Medicare claims data improve the predictive accuracy of an electronic health record mortality index? Findings from a national Veterans Affairs cohort.

Authors:  William James Deardorff; Bocheng Jing; Sun Y Jeon; W John Boscardin; Alexandra K Lee; Kathy Z Fung; Sei J Lee
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.070

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.