| Literature DB >> 34326841 |
Helene Cabanas1,2, Katsuhiko Muraki2,3, Natalie Eaton-Fitch1,2, Donald Ross Staines1,2, Sonya Marshall-Gradisnik1,2.
Abstract
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating multi-systemic chronic condition of unknown aetiology classified as an immune dysfunction syndrome and neurological disorder. The discovery of the widely expressed Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 3 (TRPM3) as a nociceptor channel substantially targeted by certain opioid receptors, and its implication in calcium (Ca2+)-dependent Natural Killer (NK) cell immune functions has raised the possibility that TRPM3 may be pharmacologically targeted to treat characteristic symptoms of ME/CFS. Naltrexone hydrochloride (NTX) acts as an antagonist to the mu (μ)-opioid receptor thus negating its inhibitory function on TRPM3. Based on the benefits reported by patients on their symptoms, low dose NTX (LDN, 3.0-5.0 mg/day) treatment seems to offer some potential benefit suggesting that its effect may be targeted towards the pathomechanism of ME/CFS. As there is no literature confirming the efficacy of LDN for ME/CFS patients in vitro, this study investigates the potential therapeutic effect of LDN in ME/CFS patients. TRPM3 ion channel activity was measured after modulation with Pregnenolone sulfate (PregS) and ononetin in NK cells on 9 ME/CFS patients taking LDN and 9 age- and sex-matched healthy controls using whole-cell patch-clamp technique. We report that ME/CFS patients taking LDN have restored TRPM3-like ionic currents in NK cells. Small ionic currents with a typical TRPM3-like outward rectification were measured after application of PregS, a TRPM3-agonist, in NK cells from patients taking LDN. Additionally, PregS-evoked ionic currents through TRPM3 were significantly modulated by ononetin, a TRPM3-antagonist, in NK cells from ME/CFS patients taking LDN. These data support the hypothesis that LDN may have potential as a treatment for ME/CFS by characterising the underlying regulatory mechanisms of LDN treatment involving TRPM3 and opioid receptors in NK cells. Finally, this study may serve for the repurpose of marketed drugs, as well as support the approval of prospective randomized clinical studies on the role and dose of NTX in treating ME/CFS patients.Entities:
Keywords: calcium; low dose naltrexone; myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; natural killer cells; opioid receptor; transient receptor potential melastatin 3; whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology
Year: 2021 PMID: 34326841 PMCID: PMC8313851 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.687806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Participant demographics.
| HC | ME/CFS taking LDN | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 47.33 ± 4.64 | 48.33 ± 4.972 | 0.8849 | |
| Gender n(%) | Female | 8 (88.9%) | 8 (88.9%) | 0.999 |
| Male | 1 (11.1%) | 1 (11.1%) | 0.999 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.61 ± 0.858 | 24.63 ± 1.227 | 0.8812 | |
| Work Status | Full Time | 5 (55.6%) | 1 (11.1%) | 0.2433 |
| Part Time | 3 (33.3%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Casual | 1 (11.1%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Unemployed | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Illness/Disability | 0 (0%) | 6 (66.7%) | ||
| Education | Primary Education | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
|
| High School | 1 (11.1%) | 2 (22.2%) | ||
| Undergraduate | 1 (11.1%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||
| Postgraduate/Doctoral | 3 (33.3%) | 2 (22.2%) | ||
| Other | 4 (44.4%) | 2 (22.2%) |
Participant age (years), gender, BMI (kg/m2). Work status and education was reported in Table 1. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. BMI, body mass index; HC, healthy controls; ME/CFS, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; n, sample number.
Bold values are results that are statistically significant, set at p < 0.05.
Participant quality of life, disability scores and serology.
| HC | ME/CFS | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Physical Functioning | 93.33 ± 5.528 | 30.78 ± 7.297 |
|
| Physical Role | 99.31 ± 0.6944 | 15.97 ± 8.597 |
|
| Pain | 91.94 ± 3.859 | 41.94 ± 7.117 |
|
| General Health | 83.33 ± 4.39 | 34.25 ± 6.544 |
|
| Social Functioning | 100 ± 0 | 19.44 ± 8.866 |
|
| Emotional Role | 100 ± 0 | 71.3 ± 12.51 |
|
| Emotional Wellbeing | 79.94 ± 2.922 | 42.28 ± 3.577 |
|
|
| |||
| Communication & Understanding | 2.78 ± 1.840 | 40.74 ± 4.436 |
|
| Mobility | 1.67 ± 1.66 | 51.11 ± 8.571 |
|
| Self-Care | 0 ± 0 | 25.0 ± 8.398 |
|
| Interpersonal Relationships | 0 ± 0 | 34.72 ± 7.591 |
|
| Life Activities | 0 ± 0 | 63.89 ± 10.77 |
|
| Participation in Society | 0.69 ± 0.69 | 55.17 ± 9.372 |
|
|
| |||
| White Cell Count (x109/L) | 5.79 ± 0.42 | 5.711 ± 0.6647 | 0.9223 |
| Lymphocytes (x109/L) | 1.95 ± 0.23 | 2.039 ± 0.2975 | 0.8085 |
| Neutrophils (x109/L) | 3.14 ± 0.23 | 3.05 ± 0.346 | 0.5457 |
| Monocytes (x109/L) | 3.14 ± 0.25 | 0.453 ± 0.06 | 0.7819 |
| Eosinophils (x109/L) | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.134 ± 0.03 |
|
| Basophils (x109/L) | 0.05 ± 0.004 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.3532 |
| Platelets (x109/L) | 304.1 ± 19.64 | 275.3 ± 15.47 | 0.2667 |
| Red Cell Count (x1012/L) | 4.38 ± 0.15 | 4.52 ± 0.177 | 0.5606 |
| Haematocrit | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 0.412 ± 0.01 | 0.7391 |
| Haemoglobin (g/L) | 132.6 ± 3.81 | 136.8 ± 4.71 | 0.4958 |
SF-36 and WHODAS scores were analysed using participant questionnaire responses. Results from routine full blood were analysed in ME/CFS patients taking LDN and HC. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; ME/CFS, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; SF-36, 36-item short form survey; WHO, world health organization; DAS, disability assessment schedule.
ME/CFS symptom characteristics.
| Age of diagnosis (Years [Mean ± SD]) | 26.78 ± 10.44 | |||
| Disease duration (Years [Mean ± SD]) | 22 ± 14.04 | |||
| Infectious onset, n(%) | 6 (66.7%) | |||
| Other onset, n(%) | 3 (33.3%) | |||
| Duration since taking LDN (Month [Mean ± SD]) | 21.11 ± 24.66 | |||
| Dosage of LDN (mg/day [Mean ± SD]) | 4.06 ± 0.68 | |||
| Prior n(%) | After n(%) | P-value | ||
| Impaired thought, concentration and cognitive overload | None | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
|
| Mild | 0 (0%) | 4 (44.4%) | ||
| Moderate | 2 (22.2%) | 4 (44.4%) | ||
| Severe | 6 (66.7) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Extreme | 1 (11.%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Memory consolidation issues | None | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.077 |
| Mild | 1 (11.%) | 5 (55.6%) | ||
| Moderate | 5 (55.6%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||
| Severe | 2 (22.2%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Extreme | 1 (11.%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Sleep Disturbances | None | 0 (0%) | (0%) | 0.077 |
| Mild | 0 (0%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Moderate | 4 (44.4%) | 7 (77.8%) | ||
| Severe | 5 (55.6%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Extreme | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Muscle pain | None | 1 (11.%) | 2 (22.2%) | 0.605 |
| Mild | 3 (33.3%) | 2 (22.2%) | ||
| Moderate | 1 (11.1%) | 2 (22.2%) | ||
| Severe | 3 (33.3%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||
| Extreme | 1 (11.1%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Joint pain | None | 2 (22.2%) | 2 (22.2%) | 0.730 |
| Mild | 3 (33.3%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||
| Moderate | 1 (11.1%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||
| Severe | 3 (33.3%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Extreme | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Sore throat | None | 0 (0%) | 1 (11.1%) | 0.077 |
| Mild | 2 (22.2%) | 5 (55.6%) | ||
| Moderate | 4 (44.4%) | 2 (22.2%) | ||
| Severe | 3 (33.3%) | 1 (11.1%0 | ||
| Extreme | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Tender lymph nods | None | 1 (11.1%) | 3 (33.3%) | 0.136 |
| Mild | 4 (44.4%) | 5 (55.6%) | ||
| Moderate | 3 (33.3%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Severe | 1 (11.1%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Extreme | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Other immune disturbances | None | 0 (0%) | 1 (11.1%) |
|
| Mild | 0 (0%) | 2 (22.2%) | ||
| Moderate | 5 (55.6%) | 6 (66.7%) | ||
| Severe | 4 (44.4%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Extreme | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Gastrointestinal Disturbances | None | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.297 |
| Mild | 3 (33.3%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||
| Moderate | 1 (11.1%) | 5 (55.6%) | ||
| Severe | 4 (44.4%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Extreme | 1 (11.1%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Urinary Disturbances | None | 0 (0%) | 3 (33.3%) | 0.136 |
| Mild | 5 (55.6%) | 4 (44.4%) | ||
| Moderate | 3 (33.3%) | 2 (22.2%) | ||
| Severe | 1 (11.1%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Extreme | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| POTS | None | 3 (33.3%) | 3 (33.3%) | 0.489 |
| Mild | 0 (0%) | 2 (22.2%) | ||
| Moderate | 3 (33.3%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||
| Severe | 2 (22.2%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Extreme | 1 (11.1%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Thermostatic Instability | None | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.077 |
| Mild | 1 (11.1%) | 4 (44.4%) | ||
| Moderate | 1 (11.1%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||
| Severe | 6 (66.7%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Extreme | 1 (11.1%) | 1 (11.1%) |
ME/CFS patients self-reported the severity of their symptoms prior and after taking LDN. Data are presented as mean ± SD or frequency n(%). HC, healthy controls; ME/CFS, myalgic encephalomyelitis/ chronic fatigue syndrome; n, sample number; POTS, Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.
Bold values are results that are statistically significant, set at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Natural Killer cell purity. (A) Gating strategy used to identify NK cells. Representative flow cytometry plots from the PBMCs of one of the study participants. The lymphocytes were live gated during acquisition using the side and forward scatter dot plot display and then single and dead cells were excluded. Furthermore, by using the negative and positive gating strategies, CD3− as well as CD56+ lymphocyte populations were identified. (B) Bar graphs representing isolated NK cell purity for HC and ME/CFS patients taking LDN. Data presented as mean ± SEM. HC = 92.42% ± 1.849 and ME/CFS taking LDN= 82.20% ± 9.409. 7-AAD, 7-amino-actinomycin; FSC, forward scatter; HC, healthy controls; LDN, low dose naltrexone; ME/CFS, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; NK cell, natural killer cell; SSC, side scatter. NS, not significant.
Figure 2TRPM3 activity after PregS stimulation in NK cells from ME/CFS patients taking LDN compared to HC. Data were obtained under whole-cell patch clamp conditions. (A) A representative time-series of current amplitude at + 100 mV and − 100 mV showing the effect of stimulation with 100 mu;Mu; PregS (grey) on ionic currents in isolated NK cells from HC. (B) I–V before and after PregS stimulation in a cell corresponding with (A). (C) A representative time-series of current amplitude at + 100 mV and − 100 mV showing the effect of stimulation with 100 mu;Mu; PregS (grey) on ionic currents in isolated NK cells from ME/CFS patients taking LDN. (D) I–V before and after PregS stimulation in a cell as shown in (C). (E) Bar graphs representing TRPM3 current amplitude at + 100 mV after stimulation with 100 mu;Mu; PregS in isolated NK cells from ME/CFS patients taking LDN (N = 9; n = 49) compared with HC (N = 9; n = 56). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. HC, healthy controls; LDN, low dose naltrexone; ME/CFS, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; NK, natural killer; PregS, Pregnenolone sulfate; TRPM3, Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 3. NS, not significant.
Figure 3Modulation of PregS- evoked currents with Ononetin in NK cells from ME/CFS patients taking LDN compared to HC. Data were obtained under whole-cell patch clamp conditions. (A) A representative time-series of current amplitude at +100 mV and −100 mV showing the effect of 10 µM ononetin (grey) on ionic currents in the presence of 100 µM PregS in NK cells from HC. (B) I–V before and after application of ononetin in the presence of PregS in a cell as shown in (A). (C) Scatter plots representing change of each current amplitude before and after application of ononetin in presence of PregS in all NK cells from HC. Each cell represented as red lines had reduction in currents by ononetin. (D) A representative time-series of current amplitude at +100 mV and −100 mV showing the effect of 10 µM ononetin (grey) on ionic currents in the presence of 100 µM PregS in NK cells from ME/CFS patients taking LDN. (E) I–V before and after application of ononetin in the presence of PregS in a cell as shown in (D). (F) Scatter plots representing change of each current amplitude before and after application of ononetin in presence of PregS in all NK cells from ME/CFS patients taking LDN. Each cell represented as red lines had reduction in currents by ononetin. (G) Table summarizing data for sensitive and insensitive cells to the application of 10 µM ononetin in presence of PregS in ME/CFS patients taking LDN (N = 9; n = 49) compared to HC (N = 9; n = 56). Data are analysed with Fisher’s exact test. (H). Bar graphs representing TRPM3 current amplitude at + 100 mV after stimulation with 100 mu;Mu; PregS and application of 10 µM ononetin in presence of PregS in isolated NK cells from ME/CFS patients taking LDN (N = 9; n = 25) compared with HC (N = 9; n = 35). Only the records sensitive to ononetin have been included from (G). The ROUT outlier test has been applied and any outliers identified have been removed. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. HC, healthy controls; LDN, low dose naltrexone; ME/CFS, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome; NK, natural killer; PregS, Pregnenolone sulfate.