| Literature DB >> 31014226 |
H Cabanas1,2,3, K Muraki4,5, C Balinas6,7,5, N Eaton-Fitch6,7,5, D Staines6,7,5, S Marshall-Gradisnik6,7,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is a complex multifactorial disorder of unknown cause having multi-system manifestations. Although the aetiology of CFS/ME remains elusive, immunological dysfunction and more particularly reduced cytotoxic activity in natural killer (NK) cells is the most consistent laboratory finding. The Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) superfamily of cation channels play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of immune diseases and are therefore potential therapeutic targets. We have previously identified single nucleotide polymorphisms in TRP genes in peripheral NK cells from CFS/ME patients. We have also described biochemical pathway changes and calcium signaling perturbations in NK cells from CFS/ME patients. Notably, we have previously reported a decrease of TRP cation channel subfamily melastatin member 3 (TRPM3) function in NK cells isolated from CFS/ME patients compared with healthy controls after modulation with pregnenolone sulfate and ononetin using a patch-clamp technique. In the present study, we aim to confirm the previous results describing an impaired TRPM3 activity in a new cohort of CFS/ME patients using a whole cell patch-clamp technique after modulation with reversible TRPM3 agonists, pregnenolone sulfate and nifedipine, and an effective TRPM3 antagonist, ononetin. Indeed, no formal research has commented on using pregnenolone sulfate or nifedipine to treat CFS/ME patients while there is evidence that clinicians prescribe calcium channel blockers to improve different symptoms.Entities:
Keywords: Calcium; Chronic fatigue syndrome/Myalgic encephalomyelitis; Natural killer cells; Patch-clamp; Transient receptor potential Melastatin 3
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31014226 PMCID: PMC6480905 DOI: 10.1186/s10020-019-0083-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Med ISSN: 1076-1551 Impact factor: 6.354
Blood parameters and patient demographic. SF-36 scores were analysed using participant questionnaire responses. Results from routine full blood analysis in CFS/ME patients and HC
| CFS/ME | HC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 42.5 ± 3.5 | 43.5 ± 3.9 | 0.699 |
| Gender n(%) | |||
| Male | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
| Female | 5 | 5 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.04 ± 0.74 | 23.8 ± 1.46 | 0.589 |
| WHODAS | 47.4 ± 6.47 | 4.34 ± 3.68 | 0.002 |
| SF-36 | |||
| General Health (%) | 28.47 ± 5.63 | 75.69 ± 3.3 | 0.002 |
| Physical Functioning (%) | 35.83 ± 8.89 | 95.83 ± 1.54 | 0.002 |
| Role Physical (%) | 5.27 ± 4.09 | 97.92 ± 2.08 | 0.002 |
| Role Emotional (%) | 70.48 ± 15.32 | 100 ± 0 | 0.180 |
| Social Functioning (%) | 35.42 ± 13.85 | 98 ± 2 | 0.030 |
| Body Pain (%) | 37 ± 14.12 | 94.58 ± 2.45 | 0.004 |
| Pathology | |||
| White Cell Count (× 109/L) | 6.18 ± 0.38 | 6.15 ± 0.51 | 1.000 |
| Lymphocytes (× 109/L) | 2.11 ± 0.22 | 1.85 ± 0.10 | 0.132 |
| Neutrophils (× 109/L) | 3.24 ± 0.28 | 3.62 ± 0.10 | 0.589 |
| Monocytes (× 109/L) | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 0.48 ± 0.08 | 0.699 |
| Eosinophils (× 109/L) | 0.26 ± 0.10 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.394 |
| Basophils (× 109/L) | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.937 |
| Platelet (× 109/L) | 237 ± 8.99 | 269.33 ± 16.64 | 0.180 |
| Red Cell Count (× 1012/L) | 4.49 ± 0.17 | 4.80 ± 0.31 | 0.485 |
| Haematocrit | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.394 |
| Haemoglobin (g/L) | 137.17 ± 5.88 | 140.83 ± 5.17 | 0.485 |
Data presented as mean ± SEM. Abbreviations: CFS/ME, chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis; HC, healthy controls; BMI, body mass index; WHODAS: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule
Fig. 1Natural Killer cell purity. a Gating strategy used to identify NK cells. Representative flow cytometry plots from the PBMCs of one of the study participants. The lymphocytes were live gated during acquisition using the side and forward scatter dot plot display and then single and dead cells were excluded. Furthermore, by using the negative and positive gating strategies, CD3− as well as CD56+ lymphocyte populations were identified. b Bar graphs representing isolated NK cell purity for HC and CFS/ME patients. Data presented as mean ± SEM. HC = 95.3% ± 1.322 and CFS/ME = 95.98% ± 1.093. Abbreviations: 7-AAD, 7-amino-actinomycin; CFS/ME, chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis; FSC, forward scatter; HC, healthy controls; NK cell, natural killer cell; SSC, side scatter
Fig. 2TRPM3 activity after successive applications of PregS and nifedipine. Data were obtained under whole-cell patch clamp conditions. a. A representative time-series of current amplitude at + 100 mV and − 100 mV showing the effect of 100 μΜ PregS and 100 μM nifedipine on ionic currents in isolated NK cells from HC. b. I–V before and after PregS stimulation in a cell corresponding with (a.). c. I–V before and after nifedipine stimulation in a cell corresponding with (a.). d. A representative time-series of current amplitude at + 100 mV and − 100 mV showing the effect of 100 μΜ PregS and 100 μM nifedipine on ionic currents in isolated NK cells from CFS/ME patients. e. I–V before and after PregS stimulation in a cell as shown in (d.). f. I–V before and after nifedipine stimulation in a cell as shown in (d.). g. Bar graphs representing TRPM3 current amplitude at + 100 mV after stimulation with 100 μΜ PregS and 100 μM nifedipine in CFS/ME patients (N = 6; n = 24) compared with HC (N = 6; n = 18). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Abbreviations: CFS/ME, chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis; HC, healthy controls; NK, natural killer; PregS, Pregnenolone sulfate; TRPM3, Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 3
Fig. 3Modulation of PregS- and nifedipine- evoked currents with Ononetin. Data were obtained under whole-cell patch clamp conditions. a. A representative time-series of current amplitude at + 100 mV and − 100 mV showing the effect of 10 μΜ ononetin on ionic currents in the presence of PregS or nifedipine in isolated NK cells from HC. b. I–V before and after application of ononetin in the presence of PregS in a cell as shown in (a.). c. I–V before and after application of ononetin in the presence of nifedipine in a cell as shown in (a.). d. A representative time-series of current amplitude at + 100 mV and − 100 mV showing the effect of 10 μΜ ononetin on ionic currents in the presence of PregS or nifedipine in isolated NK cells CFS/ME patients. e. I–V before and after application of ononetin in the presence of PregS in a cell as shown in (d.). f. I–V before and after application of ononetin in the presence of nifedipine in a cell as shown in (d.). g.h. Scatter plots representing change of each current amplitude before and after ononetin application in presence of PregS in all NK cells from HC and CFS/ME patients. Each cell represented as red lines had reduction in currents by ononetin. i.j. Scatter plots representing change of each current amplitude before and after ononetin application in presence of nifedipine in all NK cells from HC and CFS/ME patients. Each cell represented as red lines had reduction in currents by ononetin. k. Table summarizing data for sensitive and insensitive cells to 10 μΜ ononetin in presence of PregS in HC (N = 6; n = 18) compared to CFS/ME patients (N = 6; n = 24). l. Table summarizing data for sensitive and insensitive cells to 10 μΜ ononetin in presence of nifedipine in HC (N = 6; n = 17) compared to CFS/ME patients (N = 6; n = 24). Data are analysed with Fisher’s exact test. Abbreviations: CFS/ME, chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis; HC, healthy controls NK, natural killer; PregS, Pregnenolone sulfate; TRPM3, Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 3
Fig. 4TRPM3 activity after stimulation with nifedipine alone. Data were obtained under whole-cell patch clamp conditions. a. A representative time-series of current amplitude at + 100 mV and − 100 mV showing the effect of 100 μΜ nifedipine on ionic currents in isolated NK cells from HC. b. I–V before and after nifedipine stimulation in a cell corresponding with (a.). c. A representative time-series of current amplitude at + 100 mV and − 100 mV showing the effect of 100 μΜ nifedipine on ionic currents in isolated NK cells from CFS/ME patients. d. I–V before and after nifedipine stimulation in a cell as shown in (c.). e Bar graphs representing TRPM3 current amplitude at + 100 mV after stimulation with 100 μΜ nifedipine in CFS/ME patients (N = 6; n = 25) compared with HC (N = 6; n = 23). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Abbreviations: CFS/ME, chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis; HC, healthy controls NK, natural killer; PregS, Pregnenolone sulfate; TRPM3, Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 3
Fig. 5TRPM3 activity after co-modulation with nifedipine and ononetin. Data were obtained under whole-cell patch clamp conditions. a. A representative time-series of current amplitude at + 100 mV and − 100 mV showing the effect of 10 μΜ ononetin on ionic currents in the presence of nifedipine in isolated NK cells from HC. b. I–V before and after application of ononetin in a cell as shown in (a.). c. A representative time-series of current amplitude at + 100 mV and − 100 mV showing the effect of 10 μΜ ononetin on ionic currents in the presence of nifedipine in isolated NK cells CFS/ME patients. d. I–V before and after application of ononetin in a cell as shown in (c.). e. f. Scatter plots representing change of each current amplitude before and after ononetin application in all NK cells from HC and CFS/ME patients. Each cell represented as red lines had reduction in currents by ononetin. g. Table summarizing data for sensitive and insensitive cells to 10 μΜ ononetin in HC (N = 6; n = 25) compared to CFS/ME patients (N = 6; n = 23). Data are analysed with Fisher’s exact test. Abbreviations: CFS/ME, chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis; HC, healthy controls NK, natural killer; PregS, Pregnenolone sulfate; TRPM3, Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 3