| Literature DB >> 34326826 |
Yang Liu1,2, Qian Lin3, Xuan Huang2, Guitao Jiang2, Chuang Li2, Xu Zhang2, Shengli Liu4, Lingyun He5, Yali Liu6, Qiuzhong Dai2, Xingguo Huang1.
Abstract
The present study investigated the effects of ferulic acid (FA) on the growth performance, serum cytokine profile, intestinal morphology, and intestinal microbiota in ducks at the growing stage. 300 female Linwu ducks at 28 days of age with similar body weights were randomly divided into five groups. Each group contained six replicates of 10 birds. The dietary treatments were corn-soybean-based diet supplemented with FA at the concentrations of 0 (control), 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg/kg diet. The results demonstrated that dietary FA at the levels of 200, 400, and 800 mg/kg increased the average daily gain (P = 0.01), 400 and 800 mg/kg FA increased the final body weight (P = 0.02), 100, 200, and 800 mg/kg FA increased the serum glutathione (P = 0.01), and 100, 400, and 800 mg/kg FA increased the glutathione peroxidase activities in birds (P < 0.01). Additionally, 200, 400, and 800 mg/kg dietary FA lowered the serum levels of interleukin-2 (P = 0.02) and interleukin-6 (P = 0.04). Moreover, the morphometric study of the intestines indicated that 400 mg/kg FA decreased the crypt depth in jejunum (P = 0.01) and caecum (P = 0.04), and increased the ratio of villus height to crypt depth in jejunum (P = 0.02). Significant linear and/or quadratic relationships were found between FA concentration and the measured parameters. 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that dietary FA increased the populations of genera Faecalibacterium, Paludicola, RF39, and Faecalicoccus in the cecum (P < 0.05), whereas decreased the populations of Anaerofilum and UCG-002 (P < 0.05). The Spearman correlation analysis indicated that phylum Proteobacteria were negatively, but order Oscillospirales, and family Ruminococcaceae were positively related to the parameters of the growth performance. Phylum Bacteroidetes, class Negativicutes and family Rikenellaceae were negatively associated with the parameters of the antioxidative capability. And phylum Cyanobacteria, Elusimicrobia, and Bacteroidetes, class Bacilli, family Rikenellaceae, and genus Prevotella were positively associated with the parameters of the immunological capability. Thus, it was concluded that the supplementations of 400 mg/kg FA in diet was able to improve the growth performance, antioxidative and immunological capabilities, intestinal morphology, and modulated the gut microbial construction of Linwu ducks at the growing stage.Entities:
Keywords: duck; ferulic acid; growth performance; gut microbiota; intestinal morphology; serum cytokine
Year: 2021 PMID: 34326826 PMCID: PMC8313987 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.698213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Ingredients and nutrient composition of the basal diet (dry matter basis, %).
| Corn | 50.68 | Metabolic energy, MJ/kg | 11.30 |
| Soybean meal | 24.50 | Dry matter (DM) | 87.3 |
| Flour | 10.00 | Crude protein (CP) | 17 |
| Wheat middlings | 7.00 | Calcium (Ca) | 0.90 |
| CaHPO4 | 1.30 | Total phosphorus (TP) | 0.56 |
| Salt | 0.30 | Available phosphorus (AP) | 0.35 |
| 0.27 | Salt | 0.33 | |
| 0.12 | Lysine | 0.9 | |
| Limestone | 1.20 | Methionine | 0.4 |
| Bentonite | 3.63 | Methionine and cystine | 0.789 |
| Premix2 | 1.00 | Isoleucinese | 0.732 |
| Threonine | 0.6 | ||
| Tryptophane | 0.264 |
Effect of different dietary FA supplementation on growth performance of experimental ducks1.
| Initial BW, g | 892.67 | 891.00 | 892.67 | 894.33 | 893.00 | 8.13 | 0.98 | 0.76 | 0.91 |
| Final BW, g | 1,553.33bc | 1,542.33c | 1,599.33ab | 1,615.00a | 1,609.67a | 49.65 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 |
| ADG, g | 22.78c | 22.46bc | 24.37ab | 24.85a | 24.71a | 1.65 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| ADFI, g | 149.00 | 150.98 | 150.97 | 152.15 | 151.72 | 6.98 | 0.96 | 0.56 | 0.74 |
| F/G | 6.57ab | 6.73a | 6.21b | 6.13b | 6.15b | 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
Effect of different dietary FA supplementation on antioxidative parameters of experimental ducks1.
| MDA, nmol/mL | 3.19 | 2.55 | 2.49 | 2.81 | 2.43 | 0.83 | 0.52 | 0.32 | 0.55 |
| GSH, μmol/L | 76.64c | 118.89ab | 140.64a | 93.14bc | 137.48a | 36.14 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.34 |
| SOD, U/mL | 154.85 | 151.26 | 137.25 | 151.55 | 152.65 | 14.36 | 0.22 | 0.78 | 0.49 |
| GSH-Px, U/mL | 580.74c | 692.30ab | 644.77bc | 719.54ab | 776.92a | 99.97 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Effect of different dietary FA supplementation on immunological parameters of experimental ducks1.
| IgG, mg/mL | 20.26 | 28.52 | 20.71 | 21.87 | 19.75 | 7.81 | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.65 |
| IL-1β, ng/mL | 214.11 | 195.49 | 200.81 | 219.54 | 202.87 | 26.24 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.93 |
| IL-6, ng/L | 104.30a | 94.31ab | 78.20b | 74.35b | 78.98b | 20.69 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| IL-2, ng/L | 362.74a | 242.06ab | 223.16b | 197.01b | 139.50b | 112.94 | 0.02 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Effect of different dietary FA supplementation on intestinal morphology of experimental ducks1.
| VH, μm | 429.59 | 417.97 | 328.82 | 404.75 | 413.75 | 77.62 | 0.16 | 0.59 | 0.71 |
| CD, μm | 100.15 | 111.71 | 90.10 | 103.49 | 107.56 | 15.53 | 0.14 | 0.30 | 0.49 |
| VCR | 4.39 | 3.76 | 3.65 | 3.96 | 3.88 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.33 |
| IWT, μm | 193.89 | 212.70 | 195.87 | 227.04 | 205.50 | 42.56 | 0.69 | 0.31 | 0.58 |
| MT, μm | 601.66 | 632.23 | 531.90 | 595.67 | 626.65 | 84.25 | 0.15 | 0.91 | 0.40 |
| VH, μm | 343.11 | 363.83 | 357.62 | 350.50 | 350.54 | 54.25 | 0.98 | 0.66 | 0.91 |
| CD, μm | 101.44a | 102.36a | 89.10ab | 86.91b | 81.69b | 13.38 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| VCR | 3.36c | 3.58bc | 4.00ab | 4.06ab | 4.35a | 0.59 | 0.02 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| IWT, μm | 198.48 | 199.71 | 182.19 | 216.91 | 197.60 | 47.26 | 0.83 | 0.97 | 0.91 |
| MT, μm | 494.59 | 517.67 | 486.43 | 492.01 | 499.14 | 73.48 | 0.97 | 0.45 | 0.64 |
| VH, μm | 310.43 | 366.56 | 380.75 | 306.50 | 326.86 | 65.81 | 0.16 | 0.61 | 0.61 |
| CD, μm | 82.33 | 90.13 | 97.94 | 87.00 | 89.42 | 11.00 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 0.16 |
| VCR | 3.80 | 4.03 | 3.91 | 3.51 | 4.10 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.93 | 0.90 |
| IWT, μm | 183.44 | 227.78 | 224.17 | 196.97 | 195.51 | 38.29 | 0.19 | 0.90 | 0.14 |
| MT, μm | 444.07 | 536.80 | 524.59 | 454.07 | 497.22 | 91.48 | 0.31 | 0.85 | 0.54 |
| VH, μm | 191.94 | 189.09 | 197.99 | 182.21 | 173.82 | 28.93 | 0.68 | 0.26 | 0.38 |
| CD, μm | 53.77a | 50.38ab | 50.34ab | 47.16b | 56.48a | 5.77 | 0.04 | 0.77 | 0.03 |
| VCR | 3.59 | 3.75 | 3.94 | 3.94 | 3.08 | 0.66 | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.04 |
| IWT, μm | 165.01 | 151.48 | 165.03 | 154.10 | 146.35 | 25.72 | 0.67 | 0.30 | 0.57 |
| MT, μm | 237.08 | 251.93 | 272.55 | 243.90 | 237.15 | 34.03 | 0.36 | 0.86 | 0.21 |
FIGURE 1Representative images of jejunal (A–E) and cecal (F–J) morphology of experimental ducks in different groups (40 × magnification). Intestinal issue samples were processed with hematoxylin and eosin stain.
The parameters of α diversity of cecal microbiota in different groups1.
| Shannon | 3.28 | 3.27 | 3.22 | 3.18 | 3.31 | 0.28 | 0.95 |
| Simpson | 0.085 | 0.090 | 0.087 | 0.098 | 0.081 | 0.032 | 0.94 |
| ACE | 142.49 | 146.99 | 143.85 | 143.44 | 144.66 | 13.74 | 0.99 |
| Chao | 140.03 | 149.85 | 149.57 | 147.77 | 145.21 | 18.81 | 0.91 |
FIGURE 2Principal component analysis ordinated plots of cecal microbial composition at the genera level of ducks in different groups.
FIGURE 3Classification and differences in cecal microbial composition of ducks in different groups. The eight most abundant bacteria at the phyla level (A) and bacteria with significant difference at genus level (B) among five groups were showed. Relative abundance of altered cecal microbiota levels were tested under ANOVA and Tukey post hoc analysis. Significant correlations were marked by *0.01 < P < 0.05, **0.001 < P ≤ 0.01.
FIGURE 4Classification and differences in cecal microbial composition at the genera level among five groups. The relative abundance of microbial genera that significantly altered included Faecalibacterium (A), Paludicola (B), Anaerofilum (C), norank_f_norank_o_RF39 (D), Faecalicoccus (E), and UCG-002 (F). Data were shown as means ± SD (n = 6), *P < 0.05 compared with Group 1.
FIGURE 5Spearman correlation heatmap of cecal microbiota and the measured parameters. The intensity of the colors demonstrated the degree of association (blue, negative correlation; red, positive correlation). Significant correlations marked by *0.01 < P ≤ 0.05, **0.001 < P ≤ 0.01. ADG, average daily weight gain; F/G, ratio of feed intake to weight gain; MDA, malonaldehyde; GSH, glutathione; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IL-1β, interlukin-1β; IL-6, interlukin-6; IL-2, interleukin-2.