The Red Blood Cell Distribution Width-Albumin Ratio: A Promising Predictor of Mortality in Stroke Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Within this study we attempt to express a correlation between the mortality of stroke and stroke related infection to a novel biomarker represented by the red blood cell width-albumin levels ratio within the patient. We hypothesize that this novel biomarker could be utilized as better predictive tool for stroke associated infections.
METHODS: Patient data sets were obtained via the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Database iii V1.4 (MIMIC-iii). Data from 1480 patients were obtained to serve the testing for the RA biomarker tests. Clinical endpoints of 30-, 60-, and 365-day all-cause mortality in stroke patients were used as subgroups within the analyzed population. Estimation of hazard ratios (HR) were obtained from Cox regression models for stroke-associated infection and all-cause mortality in relation to RA values.
RESULTS: A high-RA was associated with increased mortality in ICU patients suffering from a stroke. After adjusting for age and sex, compared to the reference group (the first quartile), the high-RA group had the highest 30-day (HR, 95% CI: 1.88 (1.36, 2.58)), 90-day (HR, 95% CI: 2.12 (1.59, 2.82)), and one-year (HR, 95% CI: 2.15 (1.65, 2.80)) all-cause mortality. The RA values were independently associated with an increased risk of stroke-associated infection when adjusting for confounders.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest RA may be an easily accessible, reproducible, and low-cost biomarker for predicting stroke-associated infections and mortality in patients who have suffered from a stroke.

Introduction

The prevalence of strokes, the leading cause of death in the world, has been on the rise.1 Strokes occur due to cerebral vascular occlusion or hemorrhage resulting in deprivation of oxygen and nutrients, causing a local inflammatory immune response.2 Currently, clinical diagnosis relies on medical history, neurological examination, and neuroimaging. Due to the high incidence and severity of strokes, clinicians urgently need simpler and cheaper biomarkers to predict the prognosis of stroke patients. Even with active treatment from clinicians, recognizing early signs of stroke can be difficult, making the development of early predictive tools imperative.

A key mechanism leading to strokes is low-grade inflammation. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) levels are used to assess systemic inflammation,3,4 so much so that they are often a part of routine blood testing. RDW has been identified as a new prognostic factor for many pathophysiological conditions, including cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.5–8

Serum albumin, a biochemical marker of nutritional status, is synthesized in the liver.9 In experimental studies, serum albumin showed its neuroprotective function via anti-inflammatory activity, blood dilution, reduction of oxidative stress, inhibition of endothelial apoptosis, and regulating microvascular permeability10–12 Studies have shown that low albumin levels are associated with increased stroke risk and poor prognosis of acute ischemic stroke.13

RA is defined as the ratio of RDW to albumin. As a new biomarker, there is no relevant literature showing the relationship between RA and the prognosis of stroke patients. Therefore, our study was conducted to explore (1) the relationship between post-stroke outcome and RA, adjusting for a wide range of potential confounders, and (2) the relationship between RA levels and stroke-associated infection in patients with stroke.

Method

Data Source

Patient data sets were collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Database iii V1.4 (MIMIC-III).14,15 MIMIC-III, developed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is a public critical care database. The database contains 53,423 distinct hospital admissions from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between the years 2001 and 2012. This database includes high resolution hourly vital signs and waveforms from bedside monitors. It also contains laboratory results, prescriptions, procedure, fluid balance, and free-text interpretations of imaging results. Application of the data retrieved from the database was approved by Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Institutional Review Boards.

Population Selection Criteria

International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9) codes were used to identify patients afflicted by strokes. We only included data from the first ICU admission of each patient with age ≥18 years. The following exclusion criteria was used; 1) stayed in ICU < 2 days, and 2) missing key data, such as red blood cell distribution width (RDW), and serum albumin.

Data Extraction and Outcomes

Data from MIMIC-III (V1.4) was extracted via the use of Structure query Language (SQL).15 The following data sets were retrieved: demographics, vital signs, laboratory measurements, comorbidities and scoring systems. Demographic parameters contained: age and sex. Vital signs included: temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP) and percutaneous oxygen saturation (SPO2). Laboratory parameters included: RDW, serum albumin, white blood cell (WBC), platelet counts, bicarbonate, hematocrit, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, glucose, potassium, sodium, chloride, anion gap, international normalized ratio (INR), prothrombin time (PT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) over the first 24 h in the ICU. Comorbidities included: coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation (AF), and sepsis. Scoring systems included: sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA), simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II) and acute physiology score III (APS III).

The primary endpoints of this study were: all-cause mortality. We selected the incidence of explicit sepsis of patients with stroke in ICU as the secondary outcome. Patient mortality information was collected from the social security database of the MIMIC-III database. Patient Data files without survival outcome information were omitted from the final cohort.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables in the present study were expressed as the mean ± SD for normally distributed continuous variables and median (interquartile range) for abnormally distributed continuous variables, and the differences between groups were identified with the Wilcoxon W-test or Kruskal Wallis test. Categorical variables were expressed as the number and percentage, and comparisons between groups were made using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Cox regression models were used for estimating the relationships between RA and all-cause mortality outcomes, results were presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The association between RA and explicit sepsis was assessed by the Cox proportional hazard regressions. Covariates in model 1 were adjusted for age and sex, while covariates in model 2 were also adjusted for SpO2, mean blood pressure, respiratory rate, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, renal disease and liver disease. Stratification analyses were used to examine the effect of RA between different subgroups using differing parameters and comorbidities. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to test the sensitivity and specificity of RA. DeLong tests were applied to compare the area under the curves (AUC) for different parameters.

A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. R software (Version 3.6.2, ) was used to conduct analyses.

Result

Subject Characteristics

A total of 1,480 eligible patients were identified based upon predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Characteristics of the study patients stratified by RA quartiles are displayed in Table 1. Patients were divided into four groups: 369 patients were in group 1(quartile 1: RA: <3.46); 370 patients were in group 2(quartile 2: RA: 3.46–4.03); 371 patients were in group 3(quartile 3: RA: 4.03–4.94); 370 patients were in group 4(quartile 4: RA: >4.94). Patients within the high-RA group displayed: higher heart rate, respiratory rate, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, renal disease, liver disease, malignancy, respiratory failure, pneumonia, SOFA, APS III, SAPS II scores (p < 0.001 for all) as well as lower blood pressure, temperature, and hemoglobin.

Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population

Characteristics	RA				P value
	<3.46	3.46–4.03	4.03–4.94	>4.94
N	369	370	371	370
Demographics
Age, years	64.4 ± 15.9	69.2 ± 14.8	68.9 ± 15.6	68.2 ± 14.7	<0.001
Gender, n (%)					0.296
Female	153 (41.5)	168 (45.4)	171 (46.1)	179 (48.4)
Male	216 (58.5)	202 (54.6)	200 (53.9)	191 (51.6)
HR, beats/min	78.5 ± 14.5	79.6 ± 14.9	81.9 ± 16.1	88.7 ± 17.0	<0.001
SBP, mmHg	132.1 ± 15.7	132.2 ± 17.8	128.9 ± 17.8	118.1 ± 17.1	<0.001
DBP, mmHg	65.9 ± 10.9	65.8 ± 11.3	62.9 ± 10.9	59.3 ± 11.3	<0.001
MBP, mmHg	85.0 ± 10.9	85.2 ± 11.9	82.7 ± 11.0	76.8 ± 11.1	<0.001
Respiratory rate, times/minute	17.8 ± 3.1	18.3 ± 3.4	19.2 ± 3.9	20.3 ± 4.7	<0.001
T, ℃	37.0 ± 0.6	36.9 ± 0.7	36.9 ± 0.7	36.9 ± 0.7	0.152
SpO2, %	97.5 ± 1.9	97.8 ± 1.9	97.6 ± 2.2	97.5 ± 2.4	0.297
Laboratory findings
RA	3.2 ± 0.2	3.7 ± 0.2	4.4 ± 0.3	6.6 ± 1.8	<0.001
RDW	13.3 ± 0.7	14.0 ± 1.0	14.8 ± 1.4	16.8 ± 2.4	<0.001
Serum albumin, g/dL	4.2 ± 0.3	3.8 ± 0.3	3.4 ± 0.3	2.7 ± 0.5	<0.001
Anion gap, mmol/L	16.4 ± 3.4	16.1 ± 3.6	16.4 ± 4.1	16.9 ± 5.2	0.045
Bicarbonate, mmol/L	25.5 ± 2.8	25.6 ± 3.5	25.3 ± 4.0	24.3 ± 5.0	<0.001
Creatinine, mg/dL	1.0 ± 0.5	1.3 ± 1.3	1.8 ± 2.9	2.0 ± 1.7	<0.001
Chloride, mmol/L	106.4 ± 5.9	107.2 ± 6.0	107.2 ± 6.5	108.4 ± 7.2	<0.001
Hematocrit, %	40.4 ± 4.4	38.3 ± 5.1	36.2 ± 5.5	33.3 ± 6.0	<0.001
Hemoglobin, g/dl	13.8 ± 1.5	13.0 ± 1.8	12.2 ± 1.9	11.0 ± 2.1	<0.001
Platelet counts, 109 /L	258.8 ± 71.9	253.6 ± 102.2	251.3 ± 123.5	238.5 ± 147.6	0.099
Potassium, mmol/L	4.3 ± 0.8	4.4 ± 0.7	4.6 ± 1.0	4.7 ± 0.9	<0.001
INR	1.3 ± 0.6	1.5 ± 1.5	1.6 ± 1.2	2.0 ± 2.0	<0.001
PT, second	14.3 ± 4.7	16.0 ± 11.2	16.5 ± 8.1	19.6 ± 13.8	<0.001
Sodium, mmol/L	141.3 ± 5.0	141.6 ± 5.0	141.1 ± 5.1	141.1 ± 5.4	0.504
BUN, mg/dL	18.4 ± 8.6	23.0 ± 14.0	29.4 ± 24.0	36.8 ± 27.4	<0.001
WBC counts, 109 /L	13.0 ± 4.8	12.8 ± 5.7	12.7 ± 5.6	16.4 ± 21.9	<0.001
Glucose, mg/dL	145.9 ± 42.2	145.9 ± 41.4	146.9 ± 40.3	143.6 ± 42.9	0.736
SAPSII score	31.9 ± 11.4	36.7 ± 12.5	39.4 ± 13.4	46.3 ± 14.7	<0.001
SOFA score	2.9 ± 2.1	3.6 ± 2.4	4.6 ± 3.0	6.6 ± 3.7	<0.001
APSIII score	37.4 ± 16.6	41.3 ± 19.2	45.8 ± 20.0	59.3 ± 24.2	<0.001
LOS_ICU	5.3 ± 7.0	5.5 ± 6.3	6.0 ± 7.2	8.0 ± 9.1	<0.001
SIRS, n (%)					<0.001
0	17 (4.6)	6 (1.6)	3 (0.8)	4 (1.1)
1	59 (16.0)	55 (14.9)	39 (10.5)	26 (7.0)
2	86 (23.3)	107 (28.9)	96 (25.9)	80 (21.6)
3	126 (34.1)	121 (32.7)	142 (38.3)	143 (38.6)
4	81 (22.0)	81 (21.9)	91 (24.5)	117 (31.6)
Comorbidities, n (%)
CHF					<0.001
No	359 (97.3)	335 (90.5)	322 (86.8)	305 (82.4)
Yes	10 (2.7)	35 (9.5)	49 (13.2)	65 (17.6)
AFIB					<0.001
No	292 (79.1)	259 (70.0)	248 (66.8)	244 (65.9)
Yes	77 (20.9)	111 (30.0)	123 (33.2)	126 (34.1)
Renal disease					<0.001
No	362 (98.1)	328 (88.6)	312 (84.1)	289 (78.1)
Yes	7 (1.9)	42 (11.4)	59 (15.9)	81 (21.9)
Liver disease					<0.001
No	365 (98.9)	361 (97.6)	353 (95.1)	334 (90.3)
Yes	4 (1.1)	9 (2.4)	18 (4.9)	36 (9.7)
CAD					0.290
No	311 (84.3)	297 (80.3)	293 (79.0)	298 (80.5)
Yes	58 (15.7)	73 (19.7)	78 (21.0)	72 (19.5)
Malignancy					<0.001
No	340 (92.1)	323 (87.3)	310 (83.6)	288 (77.8)
Yes	29 (7.9)	47 (12.7)	61 (16.4)	82 (22.2)
Respiratory failure					<0.001
No	295 (79.9)	261 (70.5)	245 (66.0)	177 (47.8)
Yes	74 (20.1)	109 (29.5)	126 (34.0)	193 (52.2)
Pneumonia					<0.001
No	300 (81.3)	286 (77.3)	257 (69.3)	239 (64.6)
Yes	69 (18.7)	84 (22.7)	114 (30.7)	131 (35.4)
Explicit sepsis					<0.001
No	363 (98.4)	362 (97.8)	343 (92.5)	280 (75.7)
Yes	6 (1.6)	8 (2.2)	28 (7.5)	90 (24.3)
Mortality, n (%)
30-day					<0.001
No	312 (84.6)	296 (80.0)	269 (72.5)	258 (69.7)
Yes	57 (15.4)	74 (20.0)	102 (27.5)	112 (30.3)
90-day					<0.001
No	300 (81.3)	283 (76.5)	247 (66.6)	224 (60.5)
Yes	69 (18.7)	87 (23.5)	124 (33.4)	146 (39.5)
One-year					<0.001
No	286 (77.5)	262 (70.8)	222 (59.8)	197 (53.2)
Yes	83 (22.5)	108 (29.2)	149 (40.2)	173 (46.8)

Note: Data were presented as the mean ± SD and n (%).

Abbreviations: RA, red blood cell distribution width - albumin ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MBP, mean blood pressure; T, temperature; SpO2, pulse oximetry-derived oxygen saturation; HR, heart rate; RDW, red blood cell distribution width; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; WBC, white blood cell; PT, prothrombin time; INR, international normalized ratio; CHF, congestive heart failure; AF, atrial fibrillation; CAD, coronary artery disease; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; SAPS II, simplified acute physiology score II; APS III, acute physiology score III; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome; LOS, length of stay; ICU, intensive care unit.

Association Between RA and All-Cause Mortality

A high-RA was associated with increased mortality in ICU patients suffering from stroke (Table 2). After adjusting for age and sex (model 1), compared to group 1, the reference group (the first quartile), group 4 displayed the highest 30-day (HR, 95% CI: 1.88 (1.36, 2.58)), 90-day (HR, 95% CI: 2.12 (1.59, 2.82)), and one-year (HR, 95% CI: 2.15 (1.65, 2.80)) all-cause mortality. When illustrated as continuous variables, within model 1, each unit’s higher RA correlated with increased 30-day (HR, 95% CI: 1.14 (1.08, 1.20); P<0.0001), 90-day (HR, 95% CI: 1.17 (1.12, 1.22); P<0.0001), and one-year (1.17 (1.12, 1.22); P<0.0001) all-cause mortality. After further adjusting for multiple confounders (model 2), high-RA was still independently associated with 30-day (HR, 95% CI: 1.70 (1.21, 2.40)), 90-day (HR, 95% CI: 1.93 (1.42, 2.62)), and one-year (HR, 95% CI: 1.91 (1.44, 2.54)) all-cause mortality within stroke patients. When expressed as continuous variables in the second model, every unit with higher RA was independently associated with increased 30-day (HR, 95% CI: 1.12 (1.06, 1.19); P < 0.0001), 90-day (HR, 95% CI: 1.15 (1.10, 1.21); P < 0.0001), and one-year (HR, 95% CI: 1.15 (1.10, 1.21); P < 0.0001) all-cause mortality (Table 2). When groups were separated as quintiles a similar trend was observed (Table 2). Significant correlations between RA and mortality were observed in the high-RA group (p <0.0001). No significant difference in mortality risk was observed between the mid-RA group and the reference group in neither model 1 nor model 2.

Table 2

HRs for All-Cause Mortality Across Groups of RA

Exposure	Non-Adjusted		Model 1		Model 2
	HR (95% CIs)	p value	HR (95% CIs)	p value	HR (95% CIs)	p value
30-Day all-cause mortality	1
RA Quartiles
<3.46	Reference group		Reference group		Reference group
3.46–4.03	1.32 (0.94, 1.87)	0.1112	1.18 (0.83, 1.67)	0.3567	1.11 (0.78, 1.58)	0.5478
4.03–4.94	1.89 (1.36, 2.61)	0.0001	1.70 (1.23, 2.35)	0.0014	1.57 (1.13, 2.19)	0.0079
>4.94	2.08 (1.51, 2.85)	<0.0001	1.88 (1.36, 2.58)	0.0001	1.70 (1.21, 2.40)	0.0023
RA Quintiles
<3.37	Reference group		Reference group		Reference group
3.37–3.78	1.25 (0.85, 1.86)	0.2614	1.11 (0.75, 1.64)	0.6134	1.07 (0.72, 1.59)	0.7319
3.78–4.31	1.64 (1.13, 2.38)	0.0093	1.42 (0.98, 2.07)	0.0663	1.33 (0.91, 1.94)	0.1405
4.31–5.36	2.08 (1.45, 2.98)	<0.0001	1.83 (1.27, 2.62)	0.0011	1.67 (1.15, 2.43)	0.0072
>5.36	2.00 (1.39, 2.86)	0.0002	1.79 (1.24, 2.56)	0.0017	1.62 (1.10, 2.38)	0.0138
RA	1.14 (1.08, 1.19)	<0.0001	1.14 (1.08, 1.20)	<0.0001	1.12 (1.06, 1.19)	<0.0001
90-Day all-cause mortality
RA Quartiles
<3.46	Reference group		Reference group		Reference group
3.46–4.03	1.30 (0.95, 1.78)	0.1074	1.17 (0.85, 1.60)	0.3422	1.12 (0.81, 1.54)	0.5011
4.03–4.94	1.94 (1.45, 2.61)	<0.0001	1.77 (1.32, 2.38)	0.0002	1.65 (1.22, 2.23)	0.0012
>4.94	2.32 (1.74, 3.09)	<0.0001	2.12 (1.59, 2.82)	<0.0001	1.93 (1.42, 2.62)	<0.0001
RA Quintiles
<3.37	Reference group		Reference group		Reference group
3.37–3.78	1.18 (0.82, 1.70)	0.3686	1.06 (0.73, 1.53)	0.7646	1.03 (0.71, 1.49)	0.8698
3.78–4.31	1.76 (1.26, 2.47)	0.0010	1.55 (1.10, 2.18)	0.0113	1.47 (1.04, 2.06)	0.0287
4.31–5.36	2.09 (1.50, 2.90)	<0.0001	1.86 (1.34, 2.59)	0.0002	1.72 (1.22, 2.42)	0.0019
>5.36	2.35 (1.70, 3.24)	<0.0001	2.13 (1.54, 2.94)	<0.0001	1.93 (1.37, 2.72)	0.0002
RA	1.16 (1.12, 1.22)	<0.0001	1.17 (1.12, 1.22)	<0.0001	1.15 (1.10, 1.21)	<0.0001
One-year all-cause mortality
RA Quartiles
<3.46	Reference group		Reference group		Reference group
3.46–4.03	1.35 (1.01, 1.80)	0.0398	1.20 (0.90, 1.60)	0.2206	1.13 (0.85, 1.52)	0.3928
4.03–4.94	1.99 (1.52, 2.60)	<0.0001	1.79 (1.37, 2.35)	<0.0001	1.65 (1.25, 2.18)	0.0004
>4.94	2.38 (1.83, 3.09)	<0.0001	2.15 (1.65, 2.80)	<0.0001	1.91 (1.44, 2.54)	<0.0001
RA Quintiles
<3.37	Reference group		Reference group		Reference group
3.37–3.78	1.22 (0.88, 1.70)	0.2296	1.08 (0.77, 1.50)	0.6574	1.05 (0.75, 1.46)	0.7875
3.78–4.31	1.78 (1.31, 2.42)	0.0003	1.53 (1.12, 2.09)	0.0071	1.44 (1.05, 1.97)	0.0235
4.31–5.36	2.20 (1.63, 2.97)	<0.0001	1.93 (1.43, 2.61)	<0.0001	1.76 (1.29, 2.41)	0.0003
>5.36	2.39 (1.78, 3.21)	<0.0001	2.13 (1.59, 2.87)	<0.0001	1.90 (1.38, 2.60)	<0.0001
RA	1.17 (1.12, 1.21)	<0.0001	1.17 (1.12, 1.22)	<0.0001	1.15 (1.10, 1.21)	<0.0001

Notes: Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); Model 1 was adjusted for the confounders age and sex; Model 2 was adjusted for the confounders age, sex, SpO2, mean blood pressure, respiratory rate, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, renal disease and liver disease.

Association Between RA and the Incidence of Stroke-Associated Infection in Patients with Stroke

As shown in Table 3, the risk of sepsis in ICU patients with stroke was significantly increased as RA increased. In model 1, adjusting for age and sex, the HR (95% CI) for groups 2–4 were 1.45 (0.50, 4.23), 5.35 (2.18, 13.13), 21.27 (9.13, 49.56), respectively, in comparison to the reference group. In model 2, which further adjusts for multiple confounders, the HR (95% CI) for the group 2, group 3 and group 4 were 1.25 (0.42, 3.70), 3.50 (1.40, 8.77) and 9.10 (3.78, 21.88), respectively, compared to the reference group. When examined as continuous variables in model 1, each unit’s higher RA was associated with increased risk of sepsis (HR, 95% CI: 1.66 (1.51, 1.83); P<0.0001). When RA subgroups were quintile based, similar trends appeared. Model 1 results indicated that the HR (95% CIs) for quintiles 2–5 were 0.86 (0.23, 3.25), 3.61 (1.30, 10.03), 7.11 (2.71, 18.67) and 22.29 (8.83, 56.29), respectively, when compared to the reference group (quintile 1). Model 2 results showed that the HR (95% CIs) for quintiles 2–5 were 0.80 (0.21, 3.05), 2.65 (0.94, 7.49), 3.65 (1.35, 9.88) and 9.16 (3.51, 23.86), respectively, when compared to the reference group. Similarly, when examined as continuous variables in model 2, each unit’s higher RA was associated with increased risk of sepsis (HR, 95% CI: 1.44 (1.30, 1.60); P<0.0001).

Table 3

HRs for Incidence of Explicit Sepsis in Hospitals Across Groups of RA

Exposure	Non-Adjusted		Model 1		Model 2
	HR (95% CIs)	p value	HR (95% CIs)	p value	HR (95% CIs)	p value
RA Quartiles
<3.46	Reference group		Reference group		Reference group
3.46–4.03	1.34 (0.46, 3.89)	0.5941	1.45 (0.50, 4.23)	0.4981	1.25 (0.42, 3.70)	0.6825
4.03–4.94	4.94 (2.02, 12.07)	0.0005	5.35 (2.18, 13.13)	0.0002	3.50 (1.40, 8.77)	0.0074
>4.94	19.45 (8.39, 45.08)	<0.0001	21.27 (9.13, 49.56)	<0.0001	9.10 (3.78, 21.88)	<0.0001
RA Quintiles
<3.37	Reference group		Reference group		Reference group
3.37–3.78	0.80 (0.21, 3.01)	0.7413	0.86 (0.23, 3.25)	0.8252	0.80 (0.21, 3.05)	0.7460
3.78–4.31	3.29 (1.19, 9.10)	0.0218	3.61 (1.30, 10.03)	0.0138	2.65 (0.94, 7.49)	0.0655
4.31–5.36	6.52 (2.49, 17.04)	0.0001	7.11 (2.71, 18.67)	<0.0001	3.65 (1.35, 9.88)	0.0108
>5.36	20.39 (8.12, 51.24)	<0.0001	22.29 (8.83, 56.29)	<0.0001	9.16 (3.51, 23.86)	<0.0001
RA	1.66 (1.50, 1.83)	<0.0001	1.66 (1.51, 1.83)	<0.0001	1.44 (1.30, 1.60)	<0.0001

Notes: Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); Model 1 was adjusted for the confounders age and sex; Model 2 was adjusted for the confounders age, sex, SpO2, mean blood pressure, respiratory rate, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, renal disease and liver disease.

Through subgroup analysis we saw that none of the interactions were significant (Table 4). Moreover, the ROC curves were used to evaluate the ability of RA to predict incidence of explicit sepsis in ICU patients with stroke (Figure 1). We found that the area under the curves (AUCs) for RA, RDW, and albumin were 0.806, 0.714, and 0.758, respectively. Comparing AUCs, RA was a better predictor than RDW (P<0.0001) or albumin alone (P=0.0321).

Table 4

Subgroup Analysis of the Associations Between 90-Day All-Cause Mortality and the RA

Subgroups	N	RA				P for Interaction
		<3.46	3.46–4.03	4.03–4.94	>4.94
Age, years						0.0342
≤69.36	742	1.0	1.32 (0.77, 2.27) 0.3169	2.12 (1.30, 3.47) 0.0027	3.40 (2.17, 5.35) <0.0001
>69.36	738	1.0	1.09 (0.74, 1.61) 0.6730	1.60 (1.11, 2.32) 0.0122	1.59 (1.10, 2.31) 0.0144
Gender						0.4753
Female	671	1.0	1.21 (0.78, 1.89) 0.3887	1.54 (1.01, 2.35) 0.0464	1.95 (1.30, 2.91) 0.0012
Male	809	1.0	1.35 (0.86, 2.12) 0.1913	2.36 (1.57, 3.57) <0.0001	2.66 (1.77, 4.00) <0.0001
HR-mean, beats/min						0.1158
≤80.6	739	1.0	1.63 (1.02, 2.62) 0.0421	2.55 (1.64, 3.98) <0.0001	3.26 (2.06, 5.16) <0.0001
>80.6	738	1.0	1.01 (0.66, 1.55) 0.9657	1.44 (0.97, 2.14) 0.0701	1.59 (1.10, 2.30) 0.0133
SBP-mean, mmHg						0.6961
≤127.8	738	1.0	1.57 (0.92, 2.66) 0.0977	2.27 (1.40, 3.70) 0.0010	2.86 (1.81, 4.53) <0.0001
>127.8	738	1.0	1.16 (0.78, 1.73) 0.4612	1.80 (1.23, 2.62) 0.0024	1.94 (1.26, 2.98) 0.0026
DBP-mean, mmHg						0.8706
≤62.36	738	1.0	1.20 (0.74, 1.94) 0.4541	1.78 (1.15, 2.77) 0.0104	2.28 (1.51, 3.45) <0.0001
>62.36	738	1.0	1.35 (0.89, 2.06) 0.1589	2.06 (1.38, 3.06) 0.0004	2.17 (1.41, 3.33) 0.0004
MBP-mean, mmHg						0.6113
≤81.79	739	1.0	1.08 (0.66, 1.78) 0.7495	1.73 (1.10, 2.71) 0.0168	2.28 (1.50, 3.46) 0.0001
>81.79	738	1.0	1.45 (0.96, 2.18) 0.0747	2.09 (1.41, 3.10) 0.0002	2.15 (1.38, 3.33) 0.0006
Respiratory rate, times/minute						0.8793
≤18.25	738	1.0	1.30 (0.85, 2.00) 0.2301	2.04 (1.35, 3.07) 0.0007	2.49 (1.65, 3.78) <0.0001
>18.25	737	1.0	1.24 (0.78, 1.98) 0.3606	1.75 (1.14, 2.68) 0.0107	2.04 (1.35, 3.08) 0.0007
T, ℃						0.0635
≤36.87	730	1.0	1.85 (1.15, 2.97) 0.0113	2.10 (1.33, 3.33) 0.0015	3.21 (2.08, 4.97) <0.0001
>36.87	731	1.0	0.97 (0.63, 1.49) 0.8789	1.85 (1.26, 2.72) 0.0018	1.81 (1.22, 2.67) 0.0029
SpO2, %						0.2956
≤97.97	738	1.0	1.25 (0.75, 2.10) 0.3904	2.17 (1.37, 3.44) 0.0010	2.97 (1.91, 4.61) <0.0001
>97.97	738	1.0	1.23 (0.83, 1.84) 0.3054	1.69 (1.16, 2.48) 0.0068	1.85 (1.27, 2.70) 0.0014
Anion gap-max, mmol/L						0.9495
≤15	668	1.0	1.38 (0.79, 2.44) 0.2594	2.16 (1.26, 3.69) 0.0050	2.67 (1.59, 4.47) 0.0002
>15	801	1.0	1.32 (0.90, 1.94) 0.1567	1.85 (1.30, 2.64) 0.0006	2.24 (1.58, 3.16) <0.0001
Bicarbonate-max, mmol/L						0.3524
≤24	620	1.0	1.37 (0.85, 2.22) 0.1992	1.55 (0.99, 2.44) 0.0558	1.92 (1.25, 2.94) 0.0027
>24	853	1.0	1.23 (0.81, 1.87) 0.3398	2.20 (1.49, 3.25) <0.0001	2.54 (1.71, 3.75) <0.0001
Creatinine-max, mg/dL						0.8927
≤0.9	595	1.0	1.29 (0.79, 2.12) 0.3096	1.89 (1.18, 3.02) 0.0079	2.53 (1.60, 4.02) <0.0001
>0.9	881	1.0	1.24 (0.82, 1.87) 0.3133	1.84 (1.25, 2.70) 0.0019	2.07 (1.43, 3.00) 0.0001
Chloride-max, mmol/L						0.5514
≤106	696	1.0	1.23 (0.79, 1.91) 0.3695	1.96 (1.30, 2.96) 0.0014	2.72 (1.82, 4.07) <0.0001
>106	780	1.0	1.35 (0.86, 2.13) 0.1911	1.90 (1.24, 2.90) 0.0030	2.07 (1.37, 3.11) 0.0005
Hematocrit-max, %						0.5223
≤36.9	731	1.0	1.16 (0.65, 2.06) 0.6192	1.62 (0.95, 2.77) 0.0745	2.23 (1.34, 3.72) 0.0019
>36.9	745	1.0	1.34 (0.91, 1.97) 0.1418	2.16 (1.49, 3.15) <0.0001	2.01 (1.27, 3.18) 0.0029
Hemoglobin-max, g/dl						0.2200
≤12.4	713	1.0	0.98 (0.52, 1.84) 0.9508	1.59 (0.89, 2.82) 0.1150	2.15 (1.24, 3.74) 0.0067
>12.4	763	1.0	1.43 (0.98, 2.08) 0.0630	2.06 (1.41, 3.00) 0.0002	1.72 (1.06, 2.80) 0.0289
Platelet counts-max, 109 /L						0.7529
≤ 238	736	1.0	1.21 (0.75, 1.94) 0.4435	1.98 (1.28, 3.07) 0.0021	2.49 (1.64, 3.78) <0.0001
>238	740	1.0	1.37 (0.90, 2.09) 0.1467	1.86 (1.24, 2.78) 0.0027	2.09 (1.39, 3.13) 0.0004
Potassium-max, mmol/L						0.0961
≤4.2	677	1.0	1.72 (1.08, 2.75) 0.0221	2.51 (1.59, 3.97) <0.0001	3.44 (2.19, 5.40) <0.0001
>4.3	799	1.0	0.97 (0.63, 1.50) 0.9002	1.48 (1.01, 2.18) 0.0470	1.66 (1.14, 2.40) 0.0077
INR-max						0.9554
≤1.1	471	1.0	1.28 (0.77, 2.11) 0.3389	1.59 (0.94, 2.72) 0.0864	2.11 (1.17, 3.82) 0.0133
>1.2	962	1.0	1.22 (0.80, 1.84) 0.3549	1.78 (1.22, 2.59) 0.0028	2.02 (1.41, 2.91) 0.0001
PT, second						0.9631
≤13.9	703	1.0	1.25 (0.81, 1.92) 0.3069	1.85 (1.22, 2.79) 0.0035	2.09 (1.32, 3.33) 0.0018
>13.9	730	1.0	1.17 (0.73, 1.89) 0.5189	1.60 (1.03, 2.50) 0.0378	1.85 (1.21, 2.81) 0.0042
Sodium-max, mmol/L						0.4935
≤140	683	1.0	1.56 (0.94, 2.57) 0.0840	2.33 (1.47, 3.69) 0.0003	3.00 (1.93, 4.66) <0.0001
>140	793	1.0	1.11 (0.74, 1.67) 0.6142	1.67 (1.13, 2.45) 0.0094	1.89 (1.29, 2.76) 0.0010
BUN-max, mg/dL						0.2957
≤19	677	1.0	1.49 (0.94, 2.36) 0.0925	2.19 (1.41, 3.40) 0.0005	1.89 (1.13, 3.16) 0.0151
>19	799	1.0	0.95 (0.62, 1.48) 0.8313	1.40 (0.94, 2.10) 0.0988	1.76 (1.20, 2.58) 0.0036
WBC counts-max, 109 /L						0.1184
≤12.1	730	1.0	1.22 (0.73, 2.04) 0.4531	2.15 (1.34, 3.44) 0.0014	3.06 (1.95, 4.82) <0.0001
>12.1	746	1.0	1.39 (0.93, 2.08) 0.1088	1.80 (1.23, 2.62) 0.0025	1.86 (1.29, 2.70) 0.0010
Glucose-mean, mg/dL						0.0091
≤136.87	731	1.0	1.67 (0.92, 3.02) 0.0904	2.89 (1.67, 5.00) 0.0001	4.39 (2.61, 7.39) <0.0001
>136.87	739	1.0	1.16 (0.80, 1.70) 0.4332	1.57 (1.10, 2.25) 0.0126	1.61 (1.12, 2.30) 0.0095
APSIII group						0.5006
≤40	723	1.0	1.40 (0.87, 2.25) 0.1702	2.23 (1.42, 3.50) 0.0005	1.92 (1.10, 3.34) 0.0209
>40	757	1.0	1.08 (0.71, 1.64) 0.7339	1.42 (0.96, 2.10) 0.0778	1.57 (1.09, 2.26) 0.0144
SAPSII score						0.2838
≤36	706	1.0	1.35 (0.79, 2.32) 0.2692	1.85 (1.10, 3.10) 0.0201	2.48 (1.42, 4.32) 0.0013
>36	774	1.0	0.96 (0.65, 1.42) 0.8243	1.40 (0.97, 2.01) 0.0708	1.30 (0.92, 1.83) 0.1443
CHF						0.2888
No	1321	1.0	1.37 (0.99, 1.90) 0.0578	1.97 (1.45, 2.68) <0.0001	2.55 (1.90, 3.44) <0.0001
Yes	159	1.0	0.51 (0.13, 2.02) 0.3352	1.17 (0.34, 4.00) 0.8009	0.88 (0.26, 3.00) 0.8436
AFIB						0.0249
No	1043	1.0	1.33 (0.90, 1.97) 0.1499	1.92 (1.33, 2.77) 0.0005	2.86 (2.02, 4.04) <0.0001
Yes	437	1.0	1.06 (0.62, 1.82) 0.8339	1.66 (1.01, 2.73) 0.0470	1.31 (0.79, 2.18) 0.2985
Renal disease						0.7970
No	1291	1.0	1.24 (0.89, 1.72) 0.2048	1.88 (1.38, 2.55) <0.0001	2.30 (1.71, 3.11) <0.0001
Yes	189	1.0	2.38 (0.31, 18.19) 0.4036	3.16 (0.43, 23.46) 0.2603	3.28 (0.45, 23.97) 0.2427
Liver disease						0.0728
No	1413	1.0	1.27 (0.92, 1.75) 0.1440	1.99 (1.48, 2.68) <0.0001	2.13 (1.58, 2.87) <0.0001
Yes	67	1.0	1.90 (0.21, 17.03) 0.5651	0.83 (0.09, 7.43) 0.8680	3.25 (0.44, 24.13) 0.2485
CAD						0.2491
No	1199	1.0	1.26 (0.90, 1.76) 0.1730	1.77 (1.29, 2.42) 0.0004	2.14 (1.58, 2.90) <0.0001
Yes	281	1.0	2.03 (0.71, 5.75) 0.1844	4.28 (1.64, 11.18) 0.0030	4.80 (1.84, 12.50) 0.0013
Malignancy						0.2886
No	1261	1.0	1.33 (0.95, 1.85) 0.0964	1.94 (1.42, 2.66) <0.0001	2.07 (1.51, 2.84) <0.0001
Yes	219	1.0	1.06 (0.39, 2.93) 0.9031	1.89 (0.76, 4.68) 0.1698	3.24 (1.38, 7.62) 0.0070
Respiratory failure						0.8316
No	978	1.0	1.14 (0.78, 1.67) 0.5126	1.79 (1.26, 2.55) 0.0012	2.03 (1.40, 2.94) 0.0002
Yes	502	1.0	1.56 (0.86, 2.81) 0.1427	2.06 (1.17, 3.61) 0.0120	2.32 (1.36, 3.96) 0.0020
Pneumonia						0.2582
No	1082	1.0	1.51 (1.04, 2.19) 0.0305	2.14 (1.50, 3.06) <0.0001	2.54 (1.79, 3.61) <0.0001
Yes	398	1.0	0.76 (0.42, 1.40) 0.3802	1.29 (0.76, 2.17) 0.3445	1.51 (0.92, 2.49) 0.1043
Explicit sepsis						0.2489
No	1348	1.0	1.27 (0.92, 1.75) 0.1392	1.76 (1.30, 2.39) 0.0003	2.13 (1.57, 2.89) <0.0001
Yes	132	1.0	2.74 (0.28, 26.36) 0.3827	6.10 (0.81, 45.76) 0.0785	3.86 (0.53, 28.04) 0.1820

Notes: Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Abbreviations: RA, red blood cell distribution width - albumin ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MBP, mean blood pressure; T, temperature; SpO2, pulse oximetry-derived oxygen saturation; HR, heart rate; RDW, red blood cell distribution width; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; WBC, white blood cell; PT, prothrombin time; INR, international normalized ratio; CHF, congestive heart failure; AF, atrial fibrillation; CAD, coronary artery disease; SAPS II, simplified acute physiology score II; APS III, acute physiology score III.

Figure 1

ROC plot of single parameters (RA, RDW, albumin). ROC Analysis using single parameters in the predicted of 90-day mortality.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the study is the first research to evaluate the relationship between RA and post-stroke outcome. Elevated RA was significantly related to an elevated risk of all-cause mortality of stroke patients. More importantly, RA may be a more effective biomarker for predicting stroke-associated infection compared to albumin, RDW.

Many studies have shown that the RDW may be closely related to the development of ischemic stroke and higher RDW could independently predict adverse outcomes in patients in this condition. The higher the RDW level, the higher the mortality rate of stroke patients.6,16 However, the pathophysiological mechanisms explaining the relationship between increased values of the RDW and worse prognosis are not exactly clear. The study showed a significant correlation between the hs-CRP inflammatory parameter and RDW.17 A hypothesis also connects higher RDW inflammation and treats them as a marker of oxidative stress. Erythropoiesis in oxidative stress and inflammation leads to the formation of large immature red blood cells present in the circulatory system that transport oxygen capabilities are thus inferior and, therefore, likely induce hypoxia.18 These studies found that RDW is associated with inflammation and oxidative stress, which may explain the independent predictive ability of increased RDW for nosocomial infection after stroke. Similarly, serum albumin levels have been shown to predict outcome in ischemic stroke patients. The higher the albumin level, the higher the mortality rate of stroke patients.9 Our study shows that RA can effectively predict the mortality of stroke patients, especially when RA level is high, which may be related to the fact that both RDW and albumin are independent predictors of stroke.

Finfer et al found that patients with severe sepsis receiving albumin were at a lower, although not significantly lower, risk for death than those receiving normal saline.19 A subsequent study pointed out a potential benefit of maintaining serum albumin at a level of more than 30 g per liter in critically ill patients.20 This protective effect of albumin in patients with sepsis may partly explain the independent predictive power of RA for post-stroke hospital infection. Besides some studies found a robust and independent association of RDW with mortality in septic patients. This can also explain the predictive ability of RA on stroke to some extent.21

But compared with RDW and albumin, RA has a better predictive effect, the AUC intuitively shows this. RA can also be quickly and easily read from the admission laboratory and is not based on volatile parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate. The RA could therefore be a simple but relatively reliable parameter for risk stratification of stroke patients - possibly even before admission to the ICU, in the emergency department. Since RA is independently associated with mortality in septic patients, it could also contribute to the granularity of established risk scores.

However, there are some limitations in this study: first, because the data in this study are all from the MIMIC-III database, it is a retrospective study conducted in a single center, there may be potential bias. We should carry out further research on the basis of multiple centers. Second, in the process of variable selection, some variables are not included because of too many missing values in the database, which may make the model imperfect. Thirdly, the result developed in this study was not verified by clinical data. Although there are some shortcomings, there is no doubt about the prognostic ability of RA for stroke patients.

Conclusion

We provided the first evidence that elevated RA is independently associated with increased odds of all-cause mortality in people with stroke. Elevated RA was significantly related to an elevated risk of stroke-associated infection.