Literature DB >> 34326393

Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method.

Hyung Woo Kim1, Seok-Jae Heo2, Jae Young Kim1,3, Annie Kim2, Chung-Mo Nam4,5, Beom Seok Kim6.   

Abstract

Dialysis adequacy is an important survival indicator in patients with chronic hemodialysis. However, there are inconveniences and disadvantages to measuring dialysis adequacy by blood samples. This study used machine learning models to predict dialysis adequacy in chronic hemodialysis patients using repeatedly measured data during hemodialysis. This study included 1333 hemodialysis sessions corresponding to the monthly examination dates of 61 patients. Patient demographics and clinical parameters were continuously measured from the hemodialysis machine; 240 measurements were collected from each hemodialysis session. Machine learning models (random forest and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]) and deep learning models (convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit) were compared with multivariable linear regression models. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (Corr) for each model using fivefold cross-validation were calculated as performance measurements. The XGBoost model had the best performance among all methods (MAPE = 2.500; RMSE = 2.906; Corr = 0.873). The deep learning models with convolutional neural network (MAPE = 2.835; RMSE = 3.125; Corr = 0.833) and gated recurrent unit (MAPE = 2.974; RMSE = 3.230; Corr = 0.824) had similar performances. The linear regression models had the lowest performance (MAPE = 3.284; RMSE = 3.586; Corr = 0.770) compared with other models. Machine learning methods can accurately infer hemodialysis adequacy using continuously measured data from hemodialysis machines.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34326393     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94964-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  21 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: Core Concepts, Clinical Applications, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Olivier Niel; Paul Bastard
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Increasing dialysate flow rate increases dialyzer urea mass transfer-area coefficients during clinical use.

Authors:  R Ouseph; R A Ward
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS).

Authors:  F A Gotch; J A Sargent
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Optimizing dialysis dose by increasing blood flow rate in patients with reduced vascular-access flow rate.

Authors:  D R Hassell; F M van der Sande; J P Kooman; J P Tordoir; K M Leunissen
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Accuracy of the urea reduction ratio in predicting dialysis delivery.

Authors:  R A Sherman; R P Cody; M E Rogers; J C Solanchick
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  The urea reduction ratio and serum albumin concentration as predictors of mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Authors:  W F Owen; N L Lew; Y Liu; E G Lowrie; J M Lazarus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Identifying patients at risk for hemodialysis underprescription.

Authors:  J B Leon; A R Sehgal
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.754

8.  Effect of the hemodialysis prescription of patient morbidity: report from the National Cooperative Dialysis Study.

Authors:  E G Lowrie; N M Laird; T F Parker; J A Sargent
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  A guide to deep learning in healthcare.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Alexandre Robicquet; Bharath Ramsundar; Volodymyr Kuleshov; Mark DePristo; Katherine Chou; Claire Cui; Greg Corrado; Sebastian Thrun; Jeff Dean
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database.

Authors:  Alistair E W Johnson; Tom J Pollard; Lu Shen; Li-Wei H Lehman; Mengling Feng; Mohammad Ghassemi; Benjamin Moody; Peter Szolovits; Leo Anthony Celi; Roger G Mark
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 6.444

View more
  1 in total

1.  Deep Learning Model for Predicting Intradialytic Hypotension Without Privacy Infringement: A Retrospective Two-Center Study.

Authors:  Hyung Woo Kim; Seok-Jae Heo; Minseok Kim; Jakyung Lee; Keun Hyung Park; Gongmyung Lee; Song In Baeg; Young Eun Kwon; Hye Min Choi; Dong-Jin Oh; Chung-Mo Nam; Beom Seok Kim
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.