Older adults with non-communicable chronic conditions and their health care access amid COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Burgeoning burden of non-communicable disease among older adults is one of the emerging public health problems. In the COVID-19 pandemic, health services in low- and middle-income countries, including Bangladesh, have been disrupted. This may have posed challenges for older adults with non-communicable chronic conditions in accessing essential health care services in the current pandemic. The present study aimed at exploring the challenges experienced by older Bangladeshi adults with non-communicable chronic conditions in receiving regular health care services during the COVID-19 pandemic.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study followed a cross-sectional design and was conducted among 1032 Bangladeshi older adults aged 60 years and above during October 2020 through telephone interviews. Self-reported information on nine non-communicable chronic conditions (osteoarthritis, hypertension, heart disease, stroke, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, chronic kidney disease, cancer) was collected. Participants were asked if they faced any difficulties in accessing medicine and receiving routine medical care for their medical conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The association between non-communicable chronic conditions and accessing medication and health care was analysed using binary logic regression model.
RESULTS: Most of the participants aged 60-69 years (77.8%), male (65.5%), married (81.4%), had no formal schooling (58.3%) and resided in rural areas (73.9%). Although more than half of the participants (58.9%) reported having a single condition, nearly one-quarter (22.9%) had multimorbidity. About a quarter of the participants reported difficulties accessing medicine (23%) and receiving routine medical care (27%) during the pandemic, and this was significantly higher among those suffering from multimorbidity. In the adjusted analyses, participants with at least one condition (AOR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.33-2.85) and with multimorbidity (AOR: 4.75, 95% CI: 3.17-7.10) had a higher likelihood of experiencing difficulties accessing medicine. Similarly, participants with at least one condition (AOR: 3.08, 95% CI: 2.11-4.89) and with multimorbidity (AOR: 6.34, 95% CI: 4.03-9.05) were significantly more likely to face difficulties receiving routine medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that a sizeable proportion of the older adults had difficulties in accessing medicine and receiving routine medical care during the pandemic. The study findings highlight the need to develop an appropriate health care delivery pathway and strategies to maintain essential health services during any emergencies and beyond. We also argue the need to prioritise the health of older adults with non-communicable chronic conditions in the centre of any emergency response plan and policies of Bangladesh.

Introduction

The world is now facing major challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic (WHO) [1]. As of 14th February 2021, there are over 108 million confirmed cases and 2.4 million deaths worldwide and 540,266 confirmed cases with 8,266 deaths [2] in Bangladesh. The nationwide lockdown measures implemented to curb the transmission by many countries, including Bangladesh, limited general people’s access to health care and other needs. Furthermore, the temporary shutdown of public transportation meant that people who relied on those services to visit health facilities were prevented from accessing general and emergency care. Notably, in Bangladesh, most people rely on public transit [3].

The older population, who are at greater risk, has been especially hard hit by the pandemic [4]. More than half of the COVID-19 related deaths in China, Italy [5], and India [6] and almost 39% in Bangladesh [7] were among the older population. The presence of pre-existing non-communicable conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, which are highly correlated with age, contribute to their increased vulnerability [8-10].

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) account for 70% of global deaths and 80% of deaths in Low- and Middle- Income Countries (LMICs) [11]. Multimorbidity, defined as the coexistence of two or more non-communicable chronic conditions, [12] has increased both globally [13] and in Bangladesh [14]. The prevalence of multimorbidity in the community settings of LMICs ranges from 7.8% to 29.7% [15, 16]. Similar estimates from Bangladesh range from 8.4% to 53.8% [14, 17]. The proportion of undiagnosed chronic conditions is high in LMICs [18], including Bangladesh [14, 19]. From this, we can infer that the actual burden of single and multiple chronic conditions is underestimated and is projected to increase in the future with population aging and epidemiological transition. Multimorbidity is associated with reduced quality of life [20, 21] and increased healthcare dependence, increased care needs, and spending [19, 22]. People with multimorbid conditions require a multitude of specialist services and treatment plans and care is currently fragmented in countries such as Bangladesh [23].

Access to healthcare is a constitutional right in Bangladesh, and the government has implemented Universal Health Coverage [24]. Routine medical check-ups, adherence to the treatment regimes, and healthy lifestyles are key strategies for managing non-communicable chronic conditions. During COVID-19 people with NCDs have been reported to be not receiving promotive, preventive, and clinical care, has and this has exacerbated their chronic condition [25-27]. COVID-19 appears to be operating as a syndemic aggravating existing conditions and degrading people’s quality of life. Due to the existing inequalities, people with one or more NCDs conditions appear to have received insufficient health care services during this pandemic in Bangladesh [28, 29].

However, to date, there is no evidence in Bangladesh regarding the extent to which COVID-19 has impacted the receipt of regular health services by older people with NCDs. Therefore, the current study aimed at estimating the challenges experienced by older Bangladeshi adults in receiving routine health care services, including medication access and routine medical treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study’s findings may enable the government, policymakers, and health practitioners to take appropriate actions to support these vulnerable groups during this pandemic.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

A cross-sectional study was conducted remotely, through telephone interviews, in October 2020. A pre-existing registry developed by the authors’ institute through merging the contact information of households from ten different community-based studies served as the sampling frame and included households from all eight administrative divisions of Bangladesh, both urban and rural areas, and different income groups. Assuming a 50% prevalence of the outcome with a 5% margin of error, at 95% confidence level, 90% power of the test, and 80% response rate, the study estimated that the required sample size was 1096. Although 1096 participants were approached, only 1032 eligible participants agreed to participate, resulting in a ~94% study response rate. To ensure representativeness from all eight divisions, probability proportionate to the number of older adults in each division was used [30]. In each administrative division, households were selected using a simple random sampling technique and subsequently, one eligible participant was interviewed from the selected household. Hence, the number of included households and respondents were equal. When the household had more than one eligible participant, the oldest member was nominated for an interview. The only inclusion criterion was defined in terms of age (i.e., ≥ 60 years). The exclusion criteria included severe mental conditions (clinically proved schizophrenia, bipolar mood disorder), a hearing disability, or inability to communicate.

Measures

Outcome measure

This study’s outcome variables were difficulties faced by the participants in getting medicine and in receiving routine medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The participants were asked the following questions: “How much difficulty do you have accessing the medicine that you need because of the COVID-19 pandemic or social distancing rules?” and “How much difficulty do you have with receiving routine medical care that you need because of the COVID-19 pandemic or social distancing rules?”. The responses were dichotomized (1 = No difficulties and 2 = Difficulties faced).

Explanatory variables

Explanatory variables included administrative division (Barishal, Chattogram, Dhaka, Mymensingh, Khulna, Rajshahi, Rangpur, and Sylhet), age (dichotomized as 60–69 and ≥70 years), sex (male/female), marital status (married and widowed), formal schooling (yes/no), family size (≤4 and >4), family income in Bangladeshi taka (BDT) (<5,000, 5,000–10,000, >10,000), residence (urban/rural), current occupation (employed and unemployed), living arrangements (with family/live alone), walking proximity to the nearest health centre (<30 minutes/ ≥30 minutes).

The data on nine non-communicable chronic conditions (Hypertension, Heart diseases, Stroke, Hypercholesterolemia, Diabetes, Chronic respiratory diseases, Chronic kidney disease, Cancer, and Osteoarthritis) were collected through self-reports. For each of the conditions, participants were asked two questions: 1) “Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you have [the condition]?” and 2) “Are you currently taking any medications for [the condition]?” Participants were classified as having a given condition if they reported yes to either of the two questions. The definitions of the individual non-communicable condition, having at least one condition and multimorbidity are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Definition of a single condition and multimorbidity.

Conditions	Definition
Hypertension	Self-reports of hypertension and/or taking antihypertensive medications
Heart diseases	Self-reports of heart attack, angina, or “heart trouble”, and/or taking medications for heart diseases
Stroke	Self-reports of the previous stroke or taking medication for a recent episode of stroke
Hypercholesterolemia	Self-reports of taking medication for hypercholesterolemia
Diabetes	Self-reports of diabetes or taking insulin or antidiabetic medications
Chronic respiratory diseases	Self-reports of the conditions or taking medication for any chronic respiratory diseases
Chronic kidney disease	Self-reports of chronic kidney disease, taking medication for the disease or undergone dialysis
Cancer	Self-reports of cancer diagnosis, taking medication for cancer, or past or current cancer therapy, including chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
Osteoarthritis	Self-report of joint pain problems
At least one condition	The presence of at least one of the above nine conditions.
Multimorbidity	The presence of two or more of the above nine conditions. Multimorbidity, a binary outcome variable, was defined as non-multi-morbid (i.e., none or single conditions) and multi-morbid (i.e., two or more conditions).

Data collection tools and techniques

A pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire in the Bengali language was used to collect the information through a telephone interview. Data collection was accomplished electronically using SurveyCTO mobile app (Version 2.70.6, SurveyCTO CATI feature, Dobility, Inc., Washington, DC, USA) (https://www.surveycto.com/) by ten research assistants recruited based on previous experience of administering a health survey on an electronic platform. The research assistants were trained extensively, through Zoom meeting (Version 5.4.2, Zoom Video Communications, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA), for four days before the data collection.

The English version of the questionnaire was first translated to Bengali language and then back-translated to English by two researchers to ensure its consistency. The Bengali version of the tool was piloted among a small sample (n = 10) of older adults through telephone interviews to refine the language of the final version which ensures face validity of the questionnaire. The final Bengali questionnaire was used for data collection.

Statistical analyses

R version 4.0.3 was used for all analyses. Descriptive summaries (frequency and proportion) are present for the explanatory variables by outcome variables, and differences were assessed using the Chi-square test. We performed a multinomial logistic regression model with no condition as the base outcome to determine the association between having at least one condition and multimorbidity with difficulties receiving medicine and routine medical care. A separate multivariable model was fitted for each outcome variable. Each was adjusted for age, sex, marital status, formal schooling, family size and income, residence, current occupation, living arrangement, proximity to the nearest health centre. Crude and adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) are reported.

The sensitivity of our logistic regression results was assessed using the propensity score approach as an alternative confounding adjustment tool. We used the propensity score weighting to reweights both unexposed (no-condition of non-communicable disease) and exposed (at least one condition and multimorbidity) to emulate a propensity score weighted population [31]. We estimated the propensity scores using multinomial logistic regression with the covariates age, sex, literacy, occupation, marital status, administrative division, residence, family income, family size, living arrangement, and distance to the nearest health centre. The standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.2 [32] among exposed and non-exposed was considered a good covariate balancing. The outcome model was the binary logistic regression on the propensity score weighted data, adjusted for potential confounders to remove the small residual covariate imbalance between the exposed and non-exposed [33].

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Institute of Health Economics, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh (Ref: IHE/2020/1037). Verbal informed consent was sought from the participants before administering the survey. Participation was voluntary, and participants did not receive any compensation.

Results

Participants’ characteristics

Table 2 describes the sociodemographic characteristics of participants, reflecting that the demographics of the study sample was predominantly aged 60–69 years (77.8%), male (65.5%), married (81.4%), devoid of formal schooling (58.3%), rural residents (73.9%), and living with family members (92.3%).

Table 2

Participants’ characteristics and bivariate analysis (N = 1032).

Characteristics		Overall	Experienced difficulties accessing medicine		Experienced difficulties receiving routine medical care (n = 281, 27.2%)
			(n = 240, 23.3%)
		n (%)	%	P	%	P
Administrative division
	Barishal	149 (14.4)	24.2	0.026	24.2	0.005
	Chattogram	137 (13.3)	26.3		32.1
	Dhaka	210 (20.4)	28.6		33.8
	Mymensingh	63 (6.1)	17.5		20.6
	Khulna	158 (15.3)	26.6		31.7
	Rajshahi	103 (10.0)	22.3		27.2
	Rangpur	144 (14.0)	12.5		15.3
	Sylhet	68 (6.6)	20.6		25.0
Age in years
	60–69	803 (77.8)	21.8	0.037	26.3	0.198
	≥ 70	229 (22.2)	28.4		30.6
Sex
	Male	676 (65.5)	22.3	0.336	27.4	0.891
	Female	356 (34.5)	25.0		27.0
Marital status
	Married	840 (81.4)	22.3	0.114	26.6	0.304
	Widowed	192 (18.6)	27.6		30.2
Formal schooling
	No	602 (58.3)	23.9	0.550	25.1	0.067
	Yes	430 (41.7)	22.3		30.2
Family size
	≤4	318 (30.8)	18.9	0.026	19.8	<0.001
	>4	714 (69.2)	25.2		30.5
Family income (BDT)a
	<5,000	145 (14.1)	24.1	0.162	22.8	<0.001
	5,000–10,000	331 (32.1)	19.6		16.9
	>10,000	556 (53.9)	25.2		34.5
Residence
	Urban	269 (26.1)	21.2	0.351	28.6	0.550
	Rural	763 (73.9)	24.0		26.7
Current occupation
	Employed	419 (40.6)	21.2	0.205	28.2	0.577
	Unemployed	613 (59.4)	24.6		26.6
Living arrangement
	Live with family	953 (92.3)	23.1	0.652	27.6	0.356
	Live alone	79 (7.7)	25.3		22.8
Walking proximity to the nearest health centre
	<30 minute	508 (49.2)	22.8	0.753	25.4	0.192
	≥30 minutes	524 (50.8)	23.7		29.0
Non-communicable chronic conditions
	No condition	424 (41.1)	13.2	<0.001	12.3	<0.001
	At least one condition	372 (36.1)	23.1		30.7
	Multimorbidity	236 (22.8)	41.5		78.7

aBDT: Bangladeshi taka. 1 BDT~0.012 United States Dollar. P-value from chi-square test comparing participants experiencing and not-experiencing difficulty.

Experienced difficulties getting medicine and receiving routine medical care

About one in four participants experienced difficulties accessing medicine (23%) and receiving routine medical care (27%) (Table 1). A significantly higher proportion of the participants with at least one condition and multimorbidity experienced difficulties accessing both medicine and receiving routine medical care (Table 2).

Prevalence of at least one condition and multimorbidity

Overall, 58.9% of study participants reported having at least one condition. Nearly one fourth (22.9%) of the participants reported having multimorbidity with a median of two conditions. Nearly a third (29.6%) of the participants had osteoarthritis, while diabetes (19.3%), hypertension (17.8%), and heart disease (12.8%) were the other most prevalent conditions (Table 3).

Table 3

Prevalence of single conditions and multimorbidity (n = 1032).

Conditions	Prevalence (%)
Osteoarthritis	29.6
Diabetes	19.3
Hypertension	17.8
Heart disease	12.8
Chronic respiratory disease	3.7
Stroke	3.3
Hypercholesterolaemia	2.2
Chronic kidney disease	1.7
Cancer	0.2
At least one condition	58.9
Multimorbidity	22.9

Difficulties faced by the multimorbid patient for medical support during COVID-19

Table 4 shows the crude and adjusted odds ratio of having at least one condition and multimorbidity with difficulties to receive medicine and routine medical care among older Bangladeshi adults during COVID-19. On the adjusted analyses, compared to participants having no condition, those with at least one condition had two times higher odds (AOR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.33–2.85) and those with multimorbidity had nearly five times higher odds (AOR: 4.75, 95% CI: 3.17–7.10) of experiencing difficulties accessing medicine. Similarly, in comparison to those having no condition, participants with at least one condition were thrice more likely (AOR: 3.08, 95% CI: 2.11–4.89) and those with multimorbidity were six times more likely (AOR: 6.34, 95% CI: 4.03–9.05) to face difficulties receiving routine medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Table 4

Association between multimorbidity, presence of any NCD conditions and difficulties receiving medication and health care among Bangladeshi older adults during COVID-19.

		Experienced difficulties accessing medicine		Experienced difficulties receiving routine medical care
		OR (95% CI)	AOR1 (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	AOR1 (95% CI)
Non-communicable chronic conditions
	No-condition	Ref.	Ref.	Ref.	Ref.
	At least one condition	1.97 (1.36–2.86)	1.95 (1.33–2.85)	3.16 (2.20–4.55)	3.08 (2.11–4.89)
	Multimorbidity	4.67 (3.18–6.84)	4.75 (3.17–7.10)	6.80 (4.62–10.01)	6.34 (4.03–9.05)

OR: Odds ratio (unadjusted); AOR: Adjusted odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval; Ref.: Reference category.

1 Model adjusted for age, sex, marital status, formal schooling, family size and income, residence, current occupation, living arrangement, proximity to the nearest health centre.

S1 File shows the SMD between no condition, having at least one condition and multimorbidity in unadjusted and propensity score weighted samples. Although there was an imbalance in the covariates before weighting, we observed a good balance after weighting (all SMDs ≤ 0.10). The result of sensitivity analysis using the propensity score weighting approach in the association between non-communicable chronic conditions and difficulties to receive medical support is presented in S2 File. Like the primary analysis, we observed approximately similar strength of association of non-communicable chronic conditions with facing difficulties getting medicine and facing difficulties receiving routine medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Discussion

Bangladesh has experienced an epidemiological transition, with a burgeoning older population whose social, health, and economic needs should be prioritized. Given a disproportionate number of the older population with non-communicable chronic conditions in Bangladesh [34], this study aimed to assess the challenges faced by Bangladeshi older adults with NCDs or multimorbid conditions in assessing routine health care services amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

We found that both the people with at least one condition and multimorbidity experienced significantly greater difficulties in getting medicine and receiving routine medical care than those having no condition during the COVID-19 pandemic. Two-fifth of the participants with multimorbidity experienced difficulties getting medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. In adjusted analyses, participants with multimorbidity had three times increased odds of experiencing difficulties compared to those without multimorbidity. While our study is the first of its kind from Bangladesh conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic and lacks a previous national comparison, findings from other countries are in line with our findings [35, 36]. A recent study described the effects of the COVID-19 on the lives of people with NCDs, noting the disruption to essential public health services in Bangladesh [25].

Acknowledging that access to health care for non-communicable chronic conditions is an ongoing issue and existed in Bangladeshi society even before COVID-19 [37, 38], we believe that it is likely that the current pandemic has exacerbated this. The countrywide travel restrictions and limited availability of transportations during this pandemic have made it difficult to access healthcare centres located mainly in urban areas [39]. Notably, the most common means of transport in Bangladesh is public transportation [3], and distance to healthcare facilities and transportation might have placed significant barriers in accessing healthcare in Bangladesh [40]. The shutdown in transportation has also impacted the distribution and availability of medicine in rural areas, from where most of our sample drawn. While health insurance policy is still in a nascent stage in Bangladesh, out-of-pocket medical expenses are high in Bangladesh [41]. In light of another study reporting increased out-of-pocket cost during the COVID-19 pandemic [42], affordability of medicine and access to health care services during the pandemic may also have contributed to the difficulty experienced by participants in our study. In Bangladeshi society, the male adult is morally obliged to provide care and support to their older parents. While many of our participants may not have been actively employed, they were nevertheless economically dependent on adult children who may have lost a source of income during the pandemic, subsequently impacting our participant’s ability to pay for health care and medicine.

Additional factors such as changed priorities within the health sector to COVID-19 should also be considered as possible barriers. Many countries’ healthcare systems, including Bangladesh, were strained to accommodate the increasing number of COVID-19 patients [28, 43]. Moreover, many of the tertiary care centres were converted into COVID-19 hospitals, limiting access to regular health care services [39]. Especially for older adults with multimorbidity, regular medical check-ups and access medications are important ways to avoid the severe consequences of their diseases including disability or mortality [44]. Although the broader impact of inaccessibility on health care for multimorbid patients is yet to be fully understood, national response framework and plans should be more holistic and have plan to address both emerging and existing needs of older adults with non-communicable chronic conditions, that will ensure the health and well-being during the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Acknowledging that, with immunisation, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care is likely to become less severe, this study’s broader implications should be contextualized for future pandemics, public health emergencies, and disasters of national or global scales. Bangladesh’s high migration, crowded urban areas, poor sanitation, and fragile health care system are likely to incubate further outbreaks, including COVID-19 variants [28]. At the same time, the increasing prevalence of NCDs and multimorbidity, the traditional “just-in-time” approach of dealing with crises, and inadequately resourced health facilities make it more vulnerable to future pandemics and resulting loss and sufferings [45, 46]. WHO defines pandemic preparedness as “having national response plans, resources, and the capacity to support operations in the event of a pandemic”. During a pandemic, in addition to preventing, detecting, and containing outbreaks, health systems need to continue to deliver essential health care, especially to the most vulnerable populations like older adults with non-communicable disease. The current pandemic provides us with an opportunity to evaluate our existing practices to deliver essential health care services during emergencies to the most vulnerable groups and strengthen national emergency preparedness system. Engagement of both private and public healthcare institutions along with other stakeholders in health service design [47] would be essential design people centred care model to maintain access to basic health services (such as screening, medical check-ups, and pharmacy services) during the emergency and beyond. Decision makers should also design the strategies that can address the needs of the older adults with non-communicable disease to provide basic health care services required for maintaining good health at the community level through primary health care approach. health care access that we found in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Moreover, non-government organizations, health volunteers, and community health workers working locally can be important partners in ensuring the delivery of essential drugs for NCDs management, especially to the socio-economically vulnerable older people, and those lacking mobility and social support [48]. To reduce economic dependency on family members and promote autonomy, a comprehensive health and social care program need to be introduced to ensure access for older adults. This may include telehealth, remote health consultations, and dissemination of people friendly health information and resources.

Strengths and limitations of the study

This is the first nationwide study carried out in Bangladesh, exploring the challenges faced by the patients suffering from chronic conditions in receiving routine medical care amid this COVID-19 pandemic. Also, our findings of having higher odds of facing difficulties to receive medical support among the participants with at least one non-communicable chronic condition and multimorbidity are robust to sensitivity analysis when we applied the propensity score approach. However, the study also had several limitations. Firstly, there is a possibility of selection bias as the sampling frame was developed from the available household-level information in our registry. Secondly, all the information was self-reported and based on the participants’ perceptions. Moreover, we were not able to access the participants’ medical records to verify their chronic conditions.

Conclusion

We found that Bangladeshi older adults with NCDs or multimorbidity face challenges in receiving routine medical treatments during this COVID-19 pandemic. Policymakers and health care practitioners need to consider innovative strategies to ensure continued care provision and routine medical care to older people with NCDs during COVID-19 and prepare adequately for similar needs during any future public health emergencies. Future research should also focus on strengthening the fragile health care system so that it has the capacity to support chronic patients in emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Data file of the study.

(DTA)

Click here for additional data file.

Standardized mean differences (SMD) between no non-communicable chronic condition, at least one condition, and multimorbidity in unadjusted and propensity score weighted samples.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Sensitivity analysis using propensity score analysis for the association between multimorbidity and difficulties receiving medical support among Bangladeshi older adults during COVID-19.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

28 Jun 2021

PONE-D-21-17040

Older adults with non-communicable chronic conditions and their health care access amid COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: findings from a cross-sectional study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mistry,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please pay attention in English so that the paper is readable. Also improve Introduction and conclusion providing details on literature reviews, research gap and findings.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 08 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Enamul Kabir

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors reported on access to health care for elderly people with NCDs in Bangladesh and revealed that elder people with NCD faced difficulties receiving routine medical care during the pandemic. It might be a serious issue for people in the world. Therefore, their findings are valuable real-world data.

However, I have small difficulty in understanding their research. The following comments maybe helpful the authors.

1. Definition of NCDs is unclear (Table 1). I was concerned about the difference between taking some medications and self-reported. Although both are inherently self-reported, in the case of "Self-reported"(not taking medication or therapy), how did the authors determine if they need to go to hospital or clinic.

2. Could you provide the average or median of multimorbidity? I am interested in that data because there is a differnce from a minimum of 2 to a maximum of 9.

Reviewer #2: Authors focused a burning and time demanding topic to discuss in this pandemic. Methodology was clearly discussed, findings were presented appropriately. Please, edit the conclusion section of abstract.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

2 Jul 2021

Dear Editor,

We greatly appreciate the valuable comments from the Editor and the reviewers and have modified the enclosed manuscript accordingly. Here, we include our responses to each of the reviewers’ comments.

Editor

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Author’s response: We confirm that the manuscript complies with the PLOS One guidelines

Reviewer 1

1. Definition of NCDs is unclear (Table 1). I was concerned about the difference between taking some medications and self-reported. Although both are inherently self-reported, in the case of "Self-reported"(not taking medication or therapy), how did the authors determine if they need to go to hospital or clinic.

Author’s response: Thank you very much for bringing this to our notice, and we apologize for the ambiguity. We have revised our statements for clarity by adding the questions that were asked to the participants. Our revised paragraph reads as below on page 7 line 171-179 of the revised manuscript.

“The data on nine non-communicable chronic conditions (Hypertension, Heart diseases, Stroke, Hypercholesterolemia, Diabetes, Chronic respiratory diseases, Chronic kidney disease, Cancer, and Osteoarthritis) were collected through participants’ self-reports. For each of the conditions, participants were asked two questions: 1) “Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you have [the condition]?” and 2) “Are you currently taking any medications for [the condition]?” Participants were classified as having a given condition if they reported yes to either of the two questions. The definitions of the individual non-communicable condition, having at least one condition and multimorbidity are presented in table 1.”

2. Could you provide the average or median of multimorbidity? I am interested in that data because there is a differnce from a minimum of 2 to a maximum of 9.

Author’s response: Thank you. The median of multimorbidity was 2 which have been added in the in the revised manuscript (Result section under sub-heading “Prevalence of at least one condition and multimorbidity”). Please see page 12 line 246-248.

Reviewer 2

Authors focused a burning and time demanding topic to discuss in this pandemic. Methodology was clearly discussed, findings were presented appropriately. Please, edit the conclusion section of abstract.

Author’s response: Thank you very much for appreciating our paper. We have edited the conclusion of the abstract as suggested.

Concluding Remarks

We are extremely appreciative of the Editor’s and reviewers’ time and helpful comments and hope that our revisions have adequately addressed their concerns. We are confident that the revisions have strengthened our manuscript. We look forward to hearing from you with a final decision regarding the acceptance of our manuscript.

Regards,

Authors

Submitted filename: Review response_R1.docx

Click here for additional data file.

19 Jul 2021

Older adults with non-communicable chronic conditions and their health care access amid COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: findings from a cross-sectional study

PONE-D-21-17040R1

Dear Dr. Mistry,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Enamul Kabir

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for your great work. The authors has strengthened the manuscript. I am confident that this manuscript can contribute to the health policies of Bangladesh.

Reviewer #2: Current study focused on a time demanding issue. Authors did a good review of existing literature, methodology and results were clear.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

22 Jul 2021

PONE-D-21-17040R1

Older adults with non-communicable chronic conditions and their health care access amid COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: findings from a cross-sectional study

Dear Dr. Mistry:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Enamul Kabir

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE