Literature DB >> 34324034

[Radiological aspects in the diagnostics of pathological fractures].

Christian von Falck1, Mohamed Omar2.   

Abstract

Radiological diagnostics play a key role in the identification and assessment of pathological fractures. Conventional projection radiography is still the mainstay of imaging investigations. With knowledge of the patient history, the morphology and location of a fracture as well as concomitant findings, such as osteolysis or periosteal reactions can add valuable information on the origin of the fracture. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for the local diagnostic work-up as it provides insights into the medullary cavity and visualizes potential extraosseous tumor tissue in the fracture zone. Computed tomography (CT) imaging provides valuable information on the morphological features of fractures and is useful for the planning of the surgical approach. Furthermore, it is the modality of choice for whole-body staging. In most cases of pathological fractures without a history of malignancy, a biopsy and histological work-up is recommended.
© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; Malignancy; Osteolysis; Radiography; Tomography, X‑ray computed

Year:  2021        PMID: 34324034     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-021-01067-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  13 in total

1.  FATIGUE, INSUFFICIENCY, AND PATHOLOGIC FRACTURES.

Authors:  R L PENTECOST; R A MURRAY; H H BRINDLEY
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1964-03-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Bone quality--the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Ego Seeman; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Imaging Features and Management of Stress, Atypical, and Pathologic Fractures.

Authors:  Richard A Marshall; Jacob C Mandell; Michael J Weaver; Marco Ferrone; Aaron Sodickson; Bharti Khurana
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Distinction of long bone stress fractures from pathologic fractures on cross-sectional imaging: how successful are we?

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; Satomi Kawamoto; Ihab R Kamel; David A Bluemke; John Eng; Frank J Frassica; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Epidemiology and site specificity of stress fractures.

Authors:  K L Bennell; P D Brukner
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.182

6.  Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images.

Authors:  C A Cuénod; J D Laredo; S Chevret; B Hamze; J F Naouri; X Chapaux; J M Bondeville; J M Tubiana
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Incidence of fracture through metastases in long bones.

Authors:  M Fidler
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981-12

Review 8.  [Radiologic diagnosis of pathologic fractures].

Authors:  Felix Wuennemann; Laurent Kintzelé; Marc-André Weber; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Christoph Rehnitz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Stress fractures presenting as tumours: a retrospective analysis of 22 cases.

Authors:  Andreas Fottner; Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Christof Birkenmaier; Volkmar Jansson; Hans-Roland Dürr
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A Modified Lodwick-Madewell Grading System for the Evaluation of Lytic Bone Lesions.

Authors:  Jamie T Caracciolo; H Thomas Temple; G Douglas Letson; Mark J Kransdorf
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.