Literature DB >> 8668809

Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images.

C A Cuénod1, J D Laredo, S Chevret, B Hamze, J F Naouri, X Chapaux, J M Bondeville, J M Tubiana.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To distinguish malignant from osteoporotic acute vertebral collapses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three osteoporotic and 30 malignant vertebral collapses were studied in 51 patients (aged 33-88 years) with T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images (n=93), gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images (n=72), and T2-weighted images (n=53).
RESULTS: Four findings were suggestive of osteoporosis: retropulsion of a bone fragment (10 osteoporotic cases vs 0 malignant cases), preservation of normal signal intensity on T1-weighted images (43 vs four), return to normal signal intensity after gadolinium injection (42 vs four) with horizontal bandlike patterns, and isointense vertebrae on T2-weighted images (28 vs two). Six findings were suggestive of malignancy: convex posterior cortex (21 malignant cases vs four osteoporotic cases), epidural mass (24 vs 0), diffuse low signal intensity within the vertebral body on T1-weighted images (23 vs 12) and in the pedicles (24 vs four), high or inhomogeneous signal intensity after gadolinium injection (17 vs 0) and on T2-weighted images (17 vs 0).
CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced and unenhanced MR images are useful in the differentiation of vertebral collapses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8668809     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  39 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of acute vertebral compressions: specific diagnosis of benign versus malignant pathologic fractures.

Authors:  D A Finelli
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Acute benign vertebral compression fractures: "see-through sign" on contrast-enhanced MR images.

Authors:  Eugene Lee; Joon Woo Lee; Jinyoung Lee; Guen Young Lee; Woo Young Kang; Bo Reum Yoo; Yoon Joo Shin; Joong Mo Ahn; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Which MR imaging sequences are necessary in determining the need for radiation therapy for cord compression? A prospective study.

Authors:  A J Johnson; J Ying; T El Gammal; R D Timmerman; R Y Kim; B Littenberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 5.  Comparative review of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Alicia Santiago Chinchilla; Luis Guzmán Álvarez; Antonio Luis Pérez Abela; Maria Del Mar Castellano García; Miguel Pajares López
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28

6.  Can you diagnose for vertebral fracture correctly by plain X-ray?

Authors:  Z Ito; A Harada; Y Matsui; M Takemura; N Wakao; T Suzuki; T Nihashi; S Kawatsu; H Shimokata; N Ishiguro
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  [Diagnostics in osteology].

Authors:  F Jakob; F Genest; L Seefried; E Tsourdi; C Lapa; L C Hofbauer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in patients with leukemia.

Authors:  J Wang; X Zhang; J Niu
Journal:  J Tongji Med Univ       Date:  2001

9.  Pedicle involvement on MR imaging is common in osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  M Ishiyama; S Fuwa; Y Numaguchi; N Kobayashi; Y Saida
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.