| Literature DB >> 34322294 |
Sumeet Mirgh1, Archana Sharma2,1, Mohammad Rizwan Mohammad Anwar Shaikh2,1, Kirti Kadian2,1, Narendra Agrawal2,1, Vishvdeep Khushoo2,1, Pallavi Mehta2,1, Rayaz Ahmed2,1, Dinesh Bhurani2,1.
Abstract
Both elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and those with baseline infections, when treated with intensive chemotherapy, are associated with high induction mortality. We report 24 patients (16-newly-diagnosed, 8-relapsed/refractory) with AML deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy (by virtue of age >60 years, ECOG-PS 3-4, or those with non-resolving infections at baseline), treated with azacytidine-venetoclax combination as induction chemotherapy. Median follow-up of the study group was 8 months. The overall complete remission (CR)+CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate was 58.3%. 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival of the whole cohort was 44.4% and 55.8%, respectively. On subgroup analysis, newly-diagnosed AML (p=0.05), intermediate-risk cytogenetics (p=0.007), and HMA-naïve (p=0.05) patients had a significantly better outcome. AML patients with baseline infections (versus without infections) treated with azacytidine-venetoclax induction, have lesser induction mortality (compared with historic intensive chemotherapy) with equivalent response rates. A detailed analysis amongst cohorts with different venetoclax durations revealed that, shorter duration (<21 days) venetoclax (versus 21-28 days duration) in induction therapy leads to similar response rates and similar severity of myelosuppression, however, with early count recovery and lesser duration of intravenous antibiotics. AJBREntities:
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; India; azacytidine; elderly; infections; intensive chemotherapy; venetoclax duration
Year: 2021 PMID: 34322294 PMCID: PMC8303019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Blood Res ISSN: 2160-1992