Literature DB >> 3432173

Comparison of the efficacy of nicardipine, a new calcium channel blocker, with nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.

C Armstrong1, J Garnham, R Blackwood.   

Abstract

Thirty-nine patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension participated in a parallel, single-blind study comparing 6 weeks' treatment of nicardipine hydrochloride (90 mg/day) with nifedipine (40 mg/day). Nicardipine-treated patients commenced therapy with a significantly higher mean supine diastolic blood pressure than the nifedipine-treated patients. There was a statistically significant fall in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) on both treatments at the 3 and 6 week follow-up visits. On adjusting the results for the baseline inequality, no statistically significant differences were found between treatment groups. Seven patients withdrew from nifedipine therapy and six patients withdrew from nicardipine therapy due to adverse events. The results show that nicardipine hydrochloride at 90 mg/day is an effective anti-hypertensive agent. The incidence and nature of adverse events were similar on the two treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3432173      PMCID: PMC2428341          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.63.740.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  12 in total

1.  Relation between initial blood pressure and its fall with treatment.

Authors:  J S Gill; A V Zezulka; D G Beevers; P Davies
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Calcium antagonists. Clinical use in the treatment of systemic hypertension.

Authors:  C Spivack; S Ocken; W H Frishman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The effect of nifedipine on arterial pressure and reflex cardiac control.

Authors:  W A Littler; T J Stallard; R D Watson; R A McLeay
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Baroreflex setting and sensitivity after acute and chronic nicardipine therapy.

Authors:  M A Young; R D Watson; W A Littler
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 6.124

5.  Nifedipine tablets for hypertension: a study using continuous ambulatory intra-arterial recording.

Authors:  R S Hornung; B A Gould; R I Jones; T Sonecha; E B Raftery
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  F Brennan; M Flanagan; S Blake; P Cannon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Controlled trial of nifedipine and bendroflumethiazide in hypertension.

Authors:  L Hallin; L Andrén; L Hansson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.105

8.  Verapamil compared with nifedipine in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  K Midtbø; O Hals; J van der Meer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.105

9.  Influence of nicardipine on the blood pressure at rest and on the pressor responses to cold, isometric exertion, and dynamic exercise in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  S H Taylor; B Silke; R C Ahuja; R Okoli
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.105

10.  Role of nifedipine in treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  M B Murphy; A J Scriven; C T Dollery
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-07-23
View more
  1 in total

1.  Double-blind, randomized comparative study of the antihypertensive effect of nicardipine slow-release and nifedipine slow-release in hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  F K Maetzel; W E Teufel; A Griebel; M H Glocke
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.727

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.