Andrew Fu Wah Ho1,2, Timothy Xin Zhong Tan3, Ejaz Latiff4, Nur Shahidah4, Yih Yng Ng5,6,7, Benjamin Sieu-Hon Leong8, Shir Lynn Lim9, Pin Pin Pek4,5,10, Han Nee Gan11, Desmond Renhao Mao12, Michael Yih Chong Chia6, Si Oon Cheah13, Lai Peng Tham14, Marcus Eng Hock Ong4,6,10. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. sophronesis@gmail.com. 2. Pre-hospital and Emergency Research Center, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. sophronesis@gmail.com. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. timothy.tbj13@gmail.com. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 5. Pre-hospital and Emergency Research Center, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 6. Emergency Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 7. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. 8. Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 9. Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore. 10. Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 11. Accident & Emergency, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 12. Department of Acute and Emergency Care, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 13. Emergency Medicine Department, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 14. Children's Emergency, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Organ donation after brain death is the standard practice in many countries. Rates are low globally. This study explores the potential national number of candidates for uncontrolled donations after cardiac death (uDCD) amongst out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients and the influence of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) on the candidacy of these potential organ donors using Singapore as a case study. METHODS: Using Singapore data from the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study, we identified all non-traumatic OHCA cases from 2010 to 2016. Four established criteria for identifying uDCD candidates (Madrid, San Carlos Madrid, Maastricht and Paris) were retrospectively applied onto the population. Within these four groups, a condensed ECPR eligibility criteria was employed and thereafter, an estimated ECPR survival rate was applied, extrapolating for possible neurologically intact survivors had ECPR been administered. RESULTS: 12,546 OHCA cases (64.8% male, mean age 65.2 years old) qualified for analysis. The estimated number of OHCA patients who were eligible for uDCD ranged from 4.3 to 19.6%. The final projected percentage of potential uDCD donors readjusted for ECPR survivors was 4.2% (Paris criteria worst-case scenario, n = 532) to 19.4% of all OHCA cases (Maastricht criteria best-case scenario, n = 2428), for an estimated 14.3 to 65.4 uDCD donors per million population per year (pmp/year). CONCLUSIONS: In Singapore case study, we demonstrated the potential numbers of candidates for uDCD among resuscitated OHCA cases. This sizeable pool of potential donors demonstrates the potential for an uDCD program to expand the organ donor pool. A small proportion of these patients might however survive had they been administered ECPR. Further research into the factors influencing local organ and patient outcomes following uDCD and ECPR is indicated.
BACKGROUND: Organ donation after brain death is the standard practice in many countries. Rates are low globally. This study explores the potential national number of candidates for uncontrolled donations after cardiac death (uDCD) amongst out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients and the influence of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) on the candidacy of these potential organ donors using Singapore as a case study. METHODS: Using Singapore data from the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study, we identified all non-traumatic OHCA cases from 2010 to 2016. Four established criteria for identifying uDCD candidates (Madrid, San Carlos Madrid, Maastricht and Paris) were retrospectively applied onto the population. Within these four groups, a condensed ECPR eligibility criteria was employed and thereafter, an estimated ECPR survival rate was applied, extrapolating for possible neurologically intact survivors had ECPR been administered. RESULTS: 12,546 OHCA cases (64.8% male, mean age 65.2 years old) qualified for analysis. The estimated number of OHCA patients who were eligible for uDCD ranged from 4.3 to 19.6%. The final projected percentage of potential uDCD donors readjusted for ECPR survivors was 4.2% (Paris criteria worst-case scenario, n = 532) to 19.4% of all OHCA cases (Maastricht criteria best-case scenario, n = 2428), for an estimated 14.3 to 65.4 uDCD donors per million population per year (pmp/year). CONCLUSIONS: In Singapore case study, we demonstrated the potential numbers of candidates for uDCD among resuscitated OHCA cases. This sizeable pool of potential donors demonstrates the potential for an uDCD program to expand the organ donor pool. A small proportion of these patients might however survive had they been administered ECPR. Further research into the factors influencing local organ and patient outcomes following uDCD and ECPR is indicated.
Authors: Beatriz Domínguez-Gil; Jacques Duranteau; Alonso Mateos; Jose R Núñez; Gaelle Cheisson; Ervigio Corral; Wim De Jongh; Francisco Del Río; Ricard Valero; Elisabeth Coll; Marie Thuong; Mohammed Z Akhtar; Rafael Matesanz Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Janet M Bellingham; Chandrasekar Santhanakrishnan; Nikole Neidlinger; Philip Wai; Jim Kim; Silke Niederhaus; Glen E Leverson; Luis A Fernandez; David P Foley; Joshua D Mezrich; Jon S Odorico; Robert B Love; Nilto De Oliveira; Hans W Sollinger; Anthony M D'Alessandro Journal: Surgery Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: P Af Geijerstam; S Forsberg; A Claesson; T Djärv; M Jonsson; P Nordberg; A Tibell; F Rosell Ortiz; M Ringh Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Hsuan Lai; Caroline V Choong; Stephanie Fook-Chong; Yih Yng Ng; Eric A Finkelstein; Benjamin Haaland; E Shaun Goh; Benjamin Sieu-Hon Leong; Han Nee Gan; David Foo; Lai Peng Tham; Rabind Charles; Marcus Eng Hock Ong Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Chiara Lazzeri; Manuela Bonizzoli; Andrea Franci; Giovanni Cianchi; Stefano Batacchi; Marco Ciapetti; Giorgio Enzo Fulceri; Mario Rugna; Adriano Peris Journal: Eur J Emerg Med Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 2.799
Authors: Beatriz Domínguez-Gil; Bernadette Haase-Kromwijk; Hendrik Van Leiden; James Neuberger; Leen Coene; Philippe Morel; Antoine Corinne; Ferdinand Muehlbacher; Pavel Brezovsky; Alessandro Nanni Costa; Rafail Rozental; Rafael Matesanz Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2011-04-19 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Bradley J Kaufman; Stephen P Wall; Alexander J Gilbert; Nancy N Dubler; Lewis R Goldfrank Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-10-05 Impact factor: 9.097