Xiaoqing Shen1, Zhujuan Yang1, Songwei Feng1, Yi Li2. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Jiangsu Shengze Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and Jiangsu Shengze Hospital, 1399 Shunxin Middle Road, Suzhou, 215228, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China. shengzeliyi@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While large-scale genomic analyses symbolize a precious attempt to decipher the molecular foundation of uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS), bioinformatics results associated with the occurrence of ULMS based totally on WGCNA and CIBERSORT have not yet been reported. This study aimed to screen the hub genes and the immune cell infiltration pattern in ULMS by bioinformatics methods. METHODS: Firstly, the GSE67463 dataset, including 25 ULMS tissues and 29 normal myometrium (NL) tissues, was downloaded from the public database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened by the 'limma' package and hub modules were identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Subsequently, gene function annotations were performed to investigate the biological role of the genes from the intersection of two groups (hub module and DEGs). The above genes were calculated in the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network to select the hub genes further. The hub genes were validated using external data (GSE764 and GSE68295). In addition, the differential immune cell infiltration between UL and ULMS tissues was investigated using the CIBERSORT algorithm. Finally, we used western blot to preliminarily detect the hub genes in cell lines. RESULTS: WGCNA analysis revealed a green-yellow module possessed the highest correlation with ULMS, including 1063 genes. A total of 172 DEGs were selected by thresholds set in the 'limma' package. The above two groups of genes were intersected to obtain 72 genes for functional annotation analysis. Interestingly, it indicated that 72 genes were mainly involved in immune processes and the Neddylation pathway. We found a higher infiltration of five types of cells (memory B cells, M0-type macrophages, mast cells activated, M1-type macrophages, and T cells follicular helper) in ULMS tissues than NL tissues, while the infiltration of two types of cells (NK cells activated and mast cells resting) was lower than in NL tissues. In addition, a total of five genes (KDR, CCL21, SELP, DPT, and DCN) were identified as the hub genes. Internal and external validation demonstrated that the five genes were over-expressed in NL tissues compared with USML tissues. Finally, the correlation analysis results indicate that NK cells activated and mast cells activated positively correlated with the hub genes. However, M1-type macrophages had a negative correlation with the hub genes. Moreover, only the DCN may be associated with the Neddylation pathway. CONCLUSION: A series of evidence confirm that the five hub genes and the infiltration of seven types of immune cells are related to USML occurrence. These hub genes may affect the occurrence of USML through immune-related and Neddylation pathways, providing molecular evidence for the treatment of USML in the future.
BACKGROUND: While large-scale genomic analyses symbolize a precious attempt to decipher the molecular foundation of uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS), bioinformatics results associated with the occurrence of ULMS based totally on WGCNA and CIBERSORT have not yet been reported. This study aimed to screen the hub genes and the immune cell infiltration pattern in ULMS by bioinformatics methods. METHODS: Firstly, the GSE67463 dataset, including 25 ULMS tissues and 29 normal myometrium (NL) tissues, was downloaded from the public database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened by the 'limma' package and hub modules were identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Subsequently, gene function annotations were performed to investigate the biological role of the genes from the intersection of two groups (hub module and DEGs). The above genes were calculated in the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network to select the hub genes further. The hub genes were validated using external data (GSE764 and GSE68295). In addition, the differential immune cell infiltration between UL and ULMS tissues was investigated using the CIBERSORT algorithm. Finally, we used western blot to preliminarily detect the hub genes in cell lines. RESULTS: WGCNA analysis revealed a green-yellow module possessed the highest correlation with ULMS, including 1063 genes. A total of 172 DEGs were selected by thresholds set in the 'limma' package. The above two groups of genes were intersected to obtain 72 genes for functional annotation analysis. Interestingly, it indicated that 72 genes were mainly involved in immune processes and the Neddylation pathway. We found a higher infiltration of five types of cells (memory B cells, M0-type macrophages, mast cells activated, M1-type macrophages, and T cells follicular helper) in ULMS tissues than NL tissues, while the infiltration of two types of cells (NK cells activated and mast cells resting) was lower than in NL tissues. In addition, a total of five genes (KDR, CCL21, SELP, DPT, and DCN) were identified as the hub genes. Internal and external validation demonstrated that the five genes were over-expressed in NL tissues compared with USML tissues. Finally, the correlation analysis results indicate that NK cells activated and mast cells activated positively correlated with the hub genes. However, M1-type macrophages had a negative correlation with the hub genes. Moreover, only the DCN may be associated with the Neddylation pathway. CONCLUSION: A series of evidence confirm that the five hub genes and the infiltration of seven types of immune cells are related to USML occurrence. These hub genes may affect the occurrence of USML through immune-related and Neddylation pathways, providing molecular evidence for the treatment of USML in the future.
Authors: Marcin Bobiński; Janusz Jacek Kraczkowski; Elżbieta Witt; Iwona Wertel; Grzegorz Polak; Jan Kotarski; Wiesława Bednarek Journal: Wiad Lek Date: 2016
Authors: Fred R Hirsch; Giorgio V Scagliotti; James L Mulshine; Regina Kwon; Walter J Curran; Yi-Long Wu; Luis Paz-Ares Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrea Petruzziello; William Kondo; Sergio B Hatschback; João A Guerreiro; Flávio Panegalli Filho; Cristiano Vendrame; Murilo Luz; Reitan Ribeiro Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 2.754