Literature DB >> 34317865

Commentary: Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting-Minimally invasive, but potentially fatal.

Danny Ramzy1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 34317865      PMCID: PMC8302876          DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JTCVS Tech        ISSN: 2666-2507


× No keyword cloud information.
Danny Ramzy, MD, PhD Since its introduction, endoscopic vein harvesting has been considered a safe technique, but carbon dioxide embolus can be deadly. Our surgical community must be vigilant in preventing and treating it. See Article page 183. Since its introduction, endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting has been considered a safe and effective technique for procuring conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting.1, 2, 3 Its reduced morbidity and superior cosmetic appearance relative to the open technique led to its wide adoption.1, 2, 3 Initial phase discussion focused on outcomes and graft patency. The PREVENT IV, and ROOBY trials, endoscopic harvesting studies, demonstrated reduced graft patency and increased major adverse cardiac events. Meanwhile, the REGROUP study showed no increase in complication rates. In their 2017 consensus statement, the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery, reaffirmed that endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting is safe and associated with neither decreased graft patency nor an increase in adverse events. Despite the broad successes of endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting, however, unforeseen morbidity and mortality associated with its application have emerged. With most of the literature focused on graft patency and cardiac-related morbidity and mortality, it is easy to forget the unique and potentially fatal complications associated with this technology. In the current issue of The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Techniques, Kawabori and colleagues and his team provide a case report describing the potential life-threatening complication that can occur with endoscopic harvesting—more specifically, massive carbon dioxide embolus resulting in cardiac arrest. Although not the first to report this complication, Kawabori and colleagues provide a detailed survey of this potential complication, beginning with diagnosis and proceeding to the corrective clinical steps. Our cardiothoracic surgery community has become complacent regarding the potential risks of this approach. In another study, Lin and associates concluded that moderate carbon dioxide embolisms occurred in approximately 4% of patients. To illustrate this point, Kawabori and colleagues describe their coronary artery bypass grafting of a 74-year-old female patient. During conduit harvesting, the patient became bradycardic, and arrest occurred as the result of a massive carbon dioxide embolus, with carbon dioxide seen in every chamber of the heart. Carbon dioxide was even seen in the ascending aorta, because the patient had a patient foramen ovale. The team eloquently and persuasively describes their assessment, with overwhelming evidence demonstrating that the air embolus resulted from carbon dioxide embolization from vein harvesting. My own surgical team has also noted this problem on occasion and has been careful to identify and treat it aggressively. As described by Kawabori and colleagues, immediate heparinization and initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass are lifesaving in cases of cardiac arrest. What is both needed and lacking, however, is a treatment protocol for a moderate or lesser degree of carbon dioxide embolization. For this common contingency, step-by-step management includes rapid heparinization, Trendelenburg positioning, and pharmacologic elevation of blood pressure. The most vital step, however, is the cessation of carbon dioxide insufflation at the earliest sign of right-sided embolization. If cardiovascular collapse progresses, needle aspiration of the right atrium, left ventricle, or aorta can be performed, and rapid institution of cardiopulmonary bypass may ultimately be necessary in extreme cases. Kawabori and colleagues describe isolating the inferior vena cava and continuing with endoscopic vein harvesting with carbon dioxide insufflation. Although their approach limits the risk of embolization, I recommend conversion to an alternative approach which does not require gas insufflation, such as open harvesting, or deployment of a nonsealed endoscopic system to complete the vein harvesting. The report of Kawabori and colleagues highlights the importance of vigilance of the cardiac surgical team in identifying and preventing these technical issues before they become life-threatening.
  9 in total

1.  Letter by Bisleri and Muneretto Regarding Article, "Saphenous Vein Graft Failure After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Insights From PREVENT IV".

Authors:  Gianluigi Bisleri; Claudio Muneretto
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  K B Allen; G L Griffith; D A Heimansohn; R J Robison; R G Matheny; J J Schier; E B Fitzgerald; C J Shaar
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Randomized Trial of Endoscopic or Open Vein-Graft Harvesting for Coronary-Artery Bypass.

Authors:  Marco A Zenati; Deepak L Bhatt; Faisal G Bakaeen; Eileen M Stock; Kousick Biswas; J Michael Gaziano; Rosemary F Kelly; Elaine E Tseng; Jerene Bitondo; Jacquelyn A Quin; G Hossein Almassi; Miguel Haime; Brack Hattler; Ellen DeMatt; Alexandra Scrymgeour; Grant D Huang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial.

Authors:  Marco A Zenati; A Laurie Shroyer; Joseph F Collins; Brack Hattler; Takeyoshi Ota; G Hossein Almassi; Morteza Amidi; Dimitri Novitzky; Frederick L Grover; Ali F Sonel
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Tzu-Yu Lin; Kuan-Ming Chiu; Ming-Jiuh Wang; Shu-Hsun Chu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Renato D Lopes; Gail E Hafley; Keith B Allen; T Bruce Ferguson; Eric D Peterson; Robert A Harrington; Rajendra H Mehta; C Michael Gibson; Michael J Mack; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Robert M Califf; John H Alexander
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Endoscopic vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Z Davis; H K Jacobs; M Zhang; C Thomas; Y Castellanos
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 8.  Endoscopic Conduit Harvest in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: An ISMICS Systematic Review and Consensus Conference Statements.

Authors:  Francis D Ferdinand; John K MacDonald; Husam H Balkhy; Gianluigi Bisleri; Ho Young Hwang; Patricia Northrup; Richard H J Trimlett; Lai Wei; Bob B Kiaii
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct

9.  Cardiac arrest from massive carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting.

Authors:  Masashi Kawabori; Conor Kinford; Jamel Ortoleva; Gregory S Couper
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-02-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.