Literature DB >> 30417737

Randomized Trial of Endoscopic or Open Vein-Graft Harvesting for Coronary-Artery Bypass.

Marco A Zenati1, Deepak L Bhatt1, Faisal G Bakaeen1, Eileen M Stock1, Kousick Biswas1, J Michael Gaziano1, Rosemary F Kelly1, Elaine E Tseng1, Jerene Bitondo1, Jacquelyn A Quin1, G Hossein Almassi1, Miguel Haime1, Brack Hattler1, Ellen DeMatt1, Alexandra Scrymgeour1, Grant D Huang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The saphenous-vein graft is the most common conduit for coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). The influence of the vein-graft harvesting technique on long-term clinical outcomes has not been well characterized.
METHODS: We randomly assigned patients undergoing CABG at 16 Veterans Affairs cardiac surgery centers to either open or endoscopic vein-graft harvesting. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events, including death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. Leg-wound complications were also evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 1150 patients underwent randomization. Over a median follow-up of 2.78 years, the primary outcome occurred in 89 patients (15.5%) in the open-harvest group and 80 patients (13.9%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.51; P=0.47). A total of 46 patients (8.0%) in the open-harvest group and 37 patients (6.4%) in the endoscopic-harvest group died (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.92); myocardial infarctions occurred in 34 patients (5.9%) in the open-harvest group and 27 patients (4.7%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.77 to 2.11), and revascularization occurred in 35 patients (6.1%) in the open-harvest group and 31 patients (5.4%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.85). Leg-wound infections occurred in 18 patients (3.1%) in the open-harvest group and in 8 patients (1.4%) in the endoscopic-harvest group (relative risk, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.99 to 5.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing CABG, we did not find a significant difference between open vein-graft harvesting and endoscopic vein-graft harvesting in the risk of major adverse cardiac events. (Funded by the Cooperative Studies Program, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs; REGROUP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01850082 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30417737     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  19 in total

Review 1.  Highlights from the 2018 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions in Chicago, Illinois.

Authors:  Dylan L Steen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Cardiac surgery 2018 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Steffen Bargenda; Hristo Kirov; Alexandros Moschovas; Sophie Tkebuchava; Rauf Safarov; Mahmoud Diab; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Open radial artery harvesting better preserves endothelial function compared to the endoscopic approach.

Authors:  Mario F Gaudino; Roberto Lorusso; Lucas B Ohmes; Navneet Narula; Patrick McIntire; Antonella Gargiulo; Maria Rosaria Bucci; Jeremy Leonard; Mohamed Rahouma; Antonino Di Franco; Guo-Wei He; Leonard N Girardi; Robert F Tranbaugh; Annarita Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-10-01

4.  Costs of Endoscopic vs Open Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Secondary Analysis of the REGROUP Trial.

Authors:  Todd H Wagner; Brack Hattler; Eileen M Stock; Kousick Biswas; Deepak L Bhatt; Faisal G Bakaeen; Kritee Gujral; Marco A Zenati
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

5.  Epiaortic Ultrasound for Assessment of Intraluminal Atheroma; Insights from the REGROUP Trial.

Authors:  Alexander D Shapeton; Kay B Leissner; Suzana M Zorca; Houman Amirfarzan; Eileen M Stock; Kousick Biswas; Miguel Haime; Venkatesh Srinivasa; Jacquelyn A Quin; Marco A Zenati
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 6.  Saphenous vein grafts in contemporary coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Etem Caliskan; Domingos Ramos de Souza; Andreas Böning; Oliver J Liakopoulos; Yeong-Hoon Choi; John Pepper; C Michael Gibson; Louis P Perrault; Randall K Wolf; Ki-Bong Kim; Maximilian Y Emmert
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  The back-approach technique of endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Tamura; Toshiyuki Maruyama; Shogo Sakurai
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-10-07

Review 8.  Coronary Artery Bypass: Review of Surgical Techniques and Impact on Long-Term Revascularization Outcomes.

Authors:  Brian McNichols; John R Spratt; Jerin George; Scott Rizzi; Eddie W Manning; Ki Park
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2021-01-30

Review 9.  Twenty-Five Years of No-Touch Saphenous Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Structural Observations and Impact on Graft Performance.

Authors:  Ninos Samano; Domingos Souza; Bruno Botelho Pinheiro; Tomislav Kopjar; Michael Dashwood
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-02-01

10.  The effect of endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Jun Ran; Yun Liu; Yuan Li; Qi Li; Yajie Tang; Long Deng; Yunhu Song
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.