| Literature DB >> 34316622 |
Kazuya Kawabata1, Reiko Ohdake2, Hirohisa Watanabe2,3, Epifanio Bagarinao2, Kazuhiro Hara1, Aya Ogura1, Michihito Masuda1, Toshiyasu Kato1, Takamasa Yokoi1, Masahisa Katsuno1, Gen Sobue2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) shows a variety of visual deficits including visuoperceptual disturbances, however, the neural basis remains unclear. We aimed to clarify clinical and neural features of visuoperceptual disturbances in PD.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 34316622 PMCID: PMC8298802 DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2020.100036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Park Relat Disord ISSN: 2590-1125
Demographics and cognitive scores of PD and HC.
| PD | HC | Effect size | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 69.5 (8.8) | 69.3 (8.6) | 0.024 | 0.697 |
| Gender M/F, n | 20/28 | 20/28 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| Education, y | 13.1 (2.8) | 13.4 (2.0) | 0.120 | 0.405 |
| MMSE (30) | 28.5 (1.3) | 29.2 (1.0) | 0.607 | 0.003 |
| Cube copying (20) | 17.1 (2.4) | 17.9 (2.7) | 0.285 | 0.046 |
| Pentagon copying (10) | 9.9 (0.3) | 9.9 (0.4) | 0.063 | 0.982 |
| Clock drawing (10) | 9.3 (1.1) | 9.3 (1.0) | 0.000 | 0.759 |
| VOSP | ||||
| Incomplete letters (20) | 18.4 (1.9) | 19.6 (0.5) | 0.867 | <0.001 |
| Dot counting (10) | 9.8 (0.4) | 9.8 (0.4) | 0.053 | 0.971 |
| Position discrimination (20) | 19.4 (1.1) | 20.0 (0.1) | 0.738 | <0.001 |
| Number location (10) | 9.1 (1.2) | 9.1 (1.1) | 0.018 | 0.858 |
| Cube analysis (10) | 9.3 (0.9) | 9.5 (0.7) | 0.188 | 0.574 |
| Duration, y | 6.0 (3.9) | – | – | – |
| MDS-UPDRS part 1 | 9.2 (5.7) | – | – | – |
| MDS-UPDRS part 2 | 10.1 (7.2) | – | – | – |
| MDS-UPDRS part 3 | 33.7 (14.3) | – | – | – |
| MDS-UPDRS part 4 | 2.5 (3.8) | – | – | – |
| Hoehn and Yahr scale | 2.1 (0.6) | – | – | |
| Levodopa Equivalent Dose | 501 (332) | – | – | |
| RBDSQ-J (13) | 4.8 (3.0) | – | – |
Data are expressed as mean (SD); RBDSQ-J, the Japanese version of RBD screening questionnaire; VOSP, Visual Object and Space Perception battery.
Chi-square test.
Statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Differences between the PD-VDP group and the PD-VDN group.
| PD-VDP | PD-VDN | Effect size | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 72.7 (6.5) | 67.5 (9.5) | 0.609 | 0.057 |
| Gender (M/F) | 7/11 | 13/17 | – | 1.000 |
| Education, y | 12.7 (2.8) | 13.3 (2.9) | 0.223 | 0.510 |
| MMSE (30) | 28.2 (1.3) | 28.7 (1.3) | 0.346 | 0.195 |
| Cube copying (20) | 16.6 (3.1) | 17.4 (1.9) | 0.338 | 0.483 |
| Pentagon copying (10) | 9.9 (0.3) | 9.9 (0.3) | 0.158 | 0.609 |
| Clock drawing (10) | 9.2 (1.2) | 9.3 (1.1) | 0.112 | 0.815 |
| VOSP | ||||
| Incomplete letters (20) | 16.4 (1.7) | 19.6 (0.5) | 2.85 | < 0.001 |
| Dot counting (10) | 9.8 (0.5) | 9.8 (0.4) | 0.000 | 0.676 |
| Position discrimination (20) | 18.9 (1.4) | 19.7 (0.7) | 0.746 | 0.022 |
| Number location (10) | 8.7 (1.6) | 9.4 (0.8) | 0.618 | 0.185 |
| Cube analysis (10) | 8.9 (1.1) | 9.6 (0.6) | 0.867 | 0.015 |
| Duration, y | 5.6 (3.9) | 6.2 (4.0) | 0.149 | 0.593 |
| MDS-UPDRS part 1 | 11.1 (7.3) | 8.0 (4.1) | 0.566 | 0.109 |
| MDS-UPDRS part 2 | 11.1 (9.5) | 9.5 (5.5) | 0.220 | 0.966 |
| MDS-UPDRS part 3 | 36.8 (14.6) | 31.8 (14.0) | 0.351 | 0.359 |
| MDS-UPDRS part 4 | 3.2 (4.4) | 2.1 (3.5) | 0.278 | 0.664 |
| part 1.2 score ≥ 2, n | 2 | 3 | 0.169 | 1.000 |
| Hoehn and Yahr scale | 2.3 (0.8) | 2.0 (0.5) | 0.518 | 0.161 |
| Motor phenotype (T/I/P), n | 5/0/13 | 9/4/17 | – | 0.314 |
| Levodopa Equivalent Dose | 514.3 (412.7) | 493.2 (279.5) | 0.063 | 0.516 |
| RBDSQ-J (13) | 5.4 (3.1) | 4.4 (2.9) | 0.333 | 0.213 |
Data are expressed as Mean (SD); T/I/P, Tremor dominant/Intermittent/Postural instability and gait difficulty; VOSP, Visual Object and Space Perception battery.
Chi-square test.
Fisher's exact test.
Statistically significant.
Fig. 1Functional connectivity changes in the PD-VDP group.
A. Extracted resting-state networks related to the visual functions. Green, red-yellow and red areas indicate the primary visual, medial visual and higher visual networks, respectively.
B. Dual-regression analysis results. The regions with decreased functional connectivity. Blue indicates the regions with decreased functional connectivity in the PD-VDP group, and green indicates the primary visual network. (i) Compared with the PD-VDN group. (ii) Compared with the HC group.
C. Seed-based analysis results. Seed regions were created from the peak regions with decreased functional connectivity in the primary visual network. (a) Right seed. (b) Left seed. Blue indicates the regions with decreased interregional functional connectivity from the right seed shown in (a), and red-yellow indicates the regions with increased inter-regional functional connectivity from the right seed in the PD-VDP group compared with the PD-VDN group.
Fig. 2Altered effective connectivity in the PD-VDP group.
A. This schema represents effective connectivity alterations in the PD-VDP group.
B. Scatter plot of effective connectivity from the right lingual gyrus to the calcarine sulcus. Vertical axis: individual mean coupling parameters. Statistical analyses were performed after adjusting for age and gender (see Supplementary materials Table S-4). Black = HC, green = PD-VDN, red = PD-VDP.