| Literature DB >> 34316274 |
Essam A Makky1, Manaf AlMatar1, Mahmood H Mahmood1, Ooi Wei Ting1, Wong Zi Qi1.
Abstract
RESEARCHEntities:
Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae; bacterial pathogen; free radicals; secondary metabolites
Year: 2021 PMID: 34316274 PMCID: PMC8284104 DOI: 10.17113/ftb.59.02.21.6658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Technol Biotechnol ISSN: 1330-9862 Impact factor: 3.918
Secondary metabolites identified in the ethyl acetate extract of S. cerevisiae
| Benzeneethanol,4 hydroxy- | C8H10O2 | 11.548 | 12.14 |
| 1-Methyl-3,3-diphenylurea | C14H14N2O | 13.796 | 1.26 |
| 1H-Indole-3-ethanol | C10H11NO | 15.505 | 10.68 |
| Diethyldithiophosphinic acid | C4H11PS2 | 16.082 | 2.09 |
| 9-Hexadecenoic acid | C16H30O2 | 17.020 | 1.66 |
| Diethyldithiophosphinic acid | C4H11PS2 | 17.057 | 1.90 |
| 2-Hydroxy-3,5,5-trimethyl-cyclohex-2-enone | C9H14O2 | 17.230 | 1.80 |
| Hexadecanoic acid, butyl ester | C20H40O2 | 19.133 | 1.15 |
| Octadecanoic acid, butyl ester | C22H44O2 | 20.852 | 0.69 |
| Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione,hexahydro-3-(phenylmethyl)- | C14H16N2O2 | 21.444 | 3.74 |
| 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester | C16H22O4 | 22.152 | 58.33 |
| 2,3-Diphenyl-5,8-dimethoxy-6-acetamidoquinoxaline | C24H21N3O3 | 23.117 | 1.21 |
| l-Proline, N-allyloxycarbonyl-, undec-10-enyl ester | C20H33NO4 | 24.579 | 3.35 |
Fig. 1Antioxidant assays: a) DPPH radical scavenging activity of standard ascorbic acid and Saccharomyces cerevisiae extract, and b) ABTS radical scavenging activity of ascorbic acid and S. cerevisiae extract
FRAP values obtained for different yeast extract concentrations
| FRAP(as AAE)/(μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.0000 | 0 |
| 200 | 0.0402±0.0007 | 36.73 |
| 400 | 0.0742±0.0039 | 39.10 |
| 600 | 0.1130±0.0075 | 43.11 |
| 800 | 0.1364±0.0006 | 43.98 |
| 1000 | 0.1611±0.0041 | 44.40 |
AAE=ascorbic acid equivalents
Antimicrobial screening test of Saccharomyces cerevisiae extract against some bacterial strains
| 100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | ||
| 9.5±2.1 | 10.0±1.4 | 11.0±1.4 | 11.5±2.1 | 18.7±0.6 | |
| 8.5±0.7 | 8.5±0.7 | 10.0±0.0 | 10.5±0.7 | 22.3±0.6 | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.0±0.0 | 9.3±0.6 | 12.0±0.0 | |
Values are expressed as mean±SEM. Analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA, where p<0.05
Fig. 2Minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae extract against the tested microbes