Literature DB >> 34315652

Perceptions of Vocal Performance Impairment in Singers with and without Hearing Loss.

Gurmehr Brar1, Einav Silverstein2, Melissa Zheng3, M Eugenia Castro3, Raymond Goldsworthy3, Lynn Helding4, Michael M Johns5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is well understood that hearing plays an important role in accurate vocal production. Singers in particular rely on auditory cues and auditory feedback to reproduce specific pitch contours. Therefore, even mild hearing loss may have a detrimental effect on a singer's ability to perform. This study investigates the effect of hearing loss on self-reported vocal production in singers, specifically in the domains of pitch matching, pitch maintenance, vowel production, and dynamic control as well as the effect of hearing loss on vocal handicap.
METHODS: An 18-item electronic self-report survey was distributed to the members of the National Association of Teachers of Singing and to the Voice Foundation. Data collected included demographics, the Singing Voice Handicap Index-10 (SVHI-10), and a series of closed and open-ended questions. Demographic variables, variables related to the SVHI-10, and variables related to the newly introduced survey were included in a hierarchical regression analysis to determine significant relationships.
RESULTS: Among 206 eligible participants, 37 individuals reported a voice problem, 58 reported hearing loss, and 19 reported concurrent hearing loss and a voice problem. Among males, there were no significant differences between hearing impaired and normal hearing singers in reported pitch matching, pitch maintenance, dynamic control, and vowel matching when those with voice problems were excluded and included. However, in females, when singers with voice problems were excluded, there was a significant difference between hearing impaired and normal hearing singers in pitch matching (P = 0.38). Additionally, when singers with voice problems were included in the female subset, significant differences emerged between the hearing impaired and normal hearing singers in areas of pitch matching (P = 0.01) and vowel matching (P = 0.02). Further, controlling for gender, when excluding voice problems, there was a significant difference between the SVHI-10 scores of normal hearing (mean = 9.03) and hearing impaired participants (mean = 11.30, P = 0.02). This difference continued to be significant when including those with voice problems (normal hearing mean = 9.97, hearing impaired mean=14.1, P <0.0001). Additionally, individuals with hearing impairments were more likely to report higher perceived vocal handicap scores as reflected on the SVHI-10 than normal hearing respondents (P = 0.002). Other factors associated with higher likelihood of SVHI-10 score include older age (P = 0.008), having a voice problem (P <0.0001), and being paid to sing within the past six months (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: When controlling for voice problems, singers with hearing impairments subjectively did not perceive that they performed less accurately on pitch matching, pitch maintenance, dynamic control, and vowel matching, yet they scored higher on the SVHI-10 indicating vocal handicap. Further study is needed to characterize the relationship between perceived and measured vocal accuracy in singers with hearing loss.
Copyright © 2021 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Singers—Hearing impairment—Self-perception—Voice problem—Voice satisfaction

Year:  2021        PMID: 34315652      PMCID: PMC9365312          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.300


  13 in total

1.  Significance of auditory and kinesthetic feedback to singers' pitch control.

Authors:  Dirk Mürbe; Friedemann Pabst; Gert Hofmann; Johan Sundberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Pitch matching accuracy of trained singers, untrained subjects with talented singing voices, and untrained subjects with nontalented singing voices in conditions of varying feedback.

Authors:  Christopher Watts; Jessica Murphy; Kathryn Barnes-Burroughs
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults.

Authors:  H Lane; J W Webster
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Creation and validation of the Singing Voice Handicap Index.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; Barbara H Jacobson; C Gaelyn Garrett; J Pieter Noordzij; Michael G Stewart; Albert Attia; Robert H Ossoff; Thomas F Cleveland
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Experience-dependent neural substrates involved in vocal pitch regulation during singing.

Authors:  Jean Mary Zarate; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Normative Value of SVHI-10. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maria Sobol; Ewelina M Sielska-Badurek; Anna Rzepakowska; Ewa Osuch-Wójcikiewicz
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 7.  Control of speech and voice in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Anirudh Gautam; James G Naples; Steven J Eliades
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children.

Authors:  C R Smith
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1975-12

9.  Development and validation of the Singing Voice Handicap-10.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; Melissa Statham; Clark A Rosen; Thomas Zullo
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 10.  Speech production in hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  T Gold
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.