| Literature DB >> 34314380 |
Wen Lv1, Yumei Yue1, Ting Shen2,3, Xingyue Hu1, Lili Chen1, Fei Xie1, Wenying Zhang1, Baorong Zhang3, Yaxing Gui1, Hsin-Yi Lai1,2,3,4, Fang Ba5.
Abstract
Changes in basal ganglia (BG) perivascular spaces (PVSs) are related to motor and cognitive behaviors in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the correlation between the initial motor phenotype and PVSs distribution/burden in PD freezing of gait (FOG) remains unclear. In addition, the normal-sized PVSs (nPVSs) have not been well-studied. With high-resolution 7T-MRI, we studied nPVSs burden in BG, thalamus, midbrain and centrum semiovale. The numbers and volume of nPVSs were assessed in 10 healthy controls, 10 PD patients without FOG, 20 with FOG [10 tremor dominant (TD), 10 non-TD subtype]. Correlation analyses were further performed in relation to clinical parameters. In this proof of concept study, we found that the nPVS burden of bilateral and right BG were significantly higher in freezers. A negative correlation existed between the tremor score and BG-nPVSs count. A positive correlation existed between the levodopa equivalent daily dose and BG-nPVSs count. The nPVS burden correlated with the progression to FOG in PD, but the distribution and burden of nPVS differ in TD vs. non-TD subtypes. High resolution 7T-MRI is a sensitive and reliable tool to evaluate BG-nPVS, and may be a useful imaging marker for predicting gait impairment that may evolve into FOG in PD.Entities:
Keywords: 7T MRI; Parkinson's disease; basal ganglia; motor phenotype; perivascular spaces
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34314380 PMCID: PMC8351731 DOI: 10.18632/aging.203343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 5/5 | 5/5 | 2/8 | 6/4 | 0.33 | |
|
| 61.36±4.40 | 66.27±4.69 | 65.23±4.92 | 66.23±5.05 | 0.09 | |
|
| 7 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 0.40 | |
|
| 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.60 | |
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.60 | |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0.46 | |
|
| 3.50±2.80 | 4.70±1.95 | 4.80±2.49 | 5.20±4.29 | 0.62 | |
|
| NA | 8.20±6.09 | 11.50±6.34 | 9.40±2.67 | 0.38 | |
|
| NA | NA | 3.18±3.53 | 2.70±2.75 | 0.34 | |
|
| NA | 51.70±18.51 | 61.30±15.76 | 63.40±14.37 | 0.25 | |
|
| NA | 36.67±10.79 | 38.00±3.16 | 42.25±5.42 | 0.25 | |
|
| NA | 29.00±3.61 | 27.50±5.74 | 26.50±6.61 | 0.83 | |
|
| NA | 18.25±14.74 | 27.90±11.96 | 35.44±21.22 | 0.40 | |
|
| NA | 6.00±4.59 | 7.60±4.70 | 1.70±1.34 | <0.01* | |
|
| NA | 4.50±2.07 | 9.25±5.06 | 9.67±3.00 | <0.01* | |
|
| NA | 5.50±1.93 | 6.00±2.83 | 0.66 | ||
|
| NA | 40.54±36.91 | 38.43±21.03 | 0.83 | ||
|
| NA | 7.30±3.37 | 7.80±1.62 | 8.70±4.27 | 0.63 | |
|
| NA | 13.10±5.22 | 13.10±5.00 | 17.70±2.98 | <0.05* | |
|
| NA | 20.40±7.59 | 20.90±5.99 | 26.40±6.19 | 0.10 | |
|
| NA | 0 | 23.50±3.17 | 20.70±7.15 | 0.01* | |
|
| NA | 506.95±299.24 | 647.45±256.15 | 841.55±311.66 | 0.04* | |
|
| 26.70±2.87 | 23.60±4.33 | 20.90±6.23 | 21.00±6.25 | <0.05* | |
|
| 2.80±2.35 | 6.70±5.14 | 12.60±923 | 9.00±6.38 | <0.01* | |
|
| 2.40±2.37 | 9.90±7.25 | 10.70±4.19 | 8.50±5.62 | 0.01* |
Data were presented as mean ± SD. FOG, Freezing of Gait; FOG(T-), FOG without tremor; FOG(T+), FOG with tremor; PD-FOG (-), PD without FOG; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; NFOGQ, New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire; LEDD, Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Scale; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale, NA, Not Applicable.
Tremor score, the sum of UPDRS item 16 (arms tremor identified by history), 20 (face and four limbs tremor at rest), 21 (arms action or postural tremor); Axial motor score, the sum of UPDRS item 13 (falling), 14 (freezing), 15 (walking), 29 (gait), 30 (postural instability); Rigidity score, UPDRS item 22 (rigidity of neck and four limbs); Akinetic score, the sum of UPDRS item 23 (finger tap), 24 (hand movement), 25 (hand rotation), 26 (feet flexibility), 31 (body bradykinesia), akinetic-rigid score (sum of items 22–26 and 31).*, p<0.05. A 30% improvement in UPDRS-III was considered good levodopa response with levodopa challenge.
a. Comparison among PD groups.
b. Comparison among PD groups and age-matched healthy controls.
Figure 1Comparison of imaging resolution between 7T and 3T MRI for nPVS. Example of comparisons of resolution of nPVSs on T2 weighted images acquired by 7.0T MRI vs 3.0T MRI on the same study participant. (A, B) Indicate centrum semiovale with red square; (C, D) indicate yellow squares for basal ganglia and blue squares for thalamus; (E, F) is midbrain with green squares. nPVS, normal-sized perivascular space.
NPVSs count and volume in basal ganglia.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
| Left | 6.30 ± 0.99 | 8.50 ± 1.20 | 9.50 ± 1.46 | 11.90 ± 2.11 | 0.08 |
| Right | 6.20 ± 0.57 | 9.60 ± 1.77 | 13.20 ± 1.78 | 18.70 ± 2.11 | <0.001* |
| Bilateral | 12.50 ± 1.18 | 18.10 ± 2.27 | 22.70 ± 2.15 | 30.60 ±3.56 | <0.001* |
| Slice with highest count | 7.70 ±0.60 | 11.60 ± 1.42 | 13.80 ± 1.65 | 19.10 ± 2.01 | <0.001* |
|
| |||||
| Left | 74.26 ±8.54 | 52.27±6.14 | 81.48±8.53 | 89.07±9.57 | 0.02* |
| Right | 57.41±8.39 | 54.12±6.48 | 65.02±11.57 | 99.73±13.33 | 0.03* |
| Bilateral | 131.67±15.29 | 106.40±10.09 | 146.49±17.46 | 188.79±20.73 | 0.01* |
| Slice with highest count | 22.71 ± 3.71 | 24.40 ± 2.51 | 28.80 ± 4.12 | 40.51 ± 3.75 | 0.005* |
Data were presented as mean ± SEM. nPVSs, normal-sized perivascular spaces; HCs, healthy controls; FOG, freezing of gait; FOG(-), PD patients without FOG; FOG(TD), PD patients with FOG whose motor phenotype was tremor dominant; FOG(TD-), PD patients with FOG whose motor phenotype was PIGD or indeterminate.
*, p<0.05, one way ANOVA.
And nPVS volume is calculated and presented as: left, unilateral slice with the highest number of nPVS at the left side and two slices below and above; right, unilateral slice with the highest number of nPVS at the right side and two slices below and above; bilateral, the sum of the above left and right; slice with highest count, nPVS analysis on the single slice with the highest number of nPVS bilaterally.
Figure 2Semi-quantitative assessment of nPVSs severity. nPVS severity was assessed using a semi-quantitative scale (none/mild = 0/1, moderate = 2, frequent/severe = 3/4). The severity is shown in the basal ganglia (A), CSO (B), midbrain (C) and thalamus (D). nPVS, normal-sized perivascular space; BG, basal ganglia; CSO, centrum semiovale; FOG, freezing of gait; TD, tremor dominant; HCs, healthy controls; FOG(-), PD patients without FOG; FOG(TD), PD patients with FOG TD subtype; and FOG(TD-) PD patients with FOG, but non-TD subtypes.
Figure 3Correlation between BG nPVS burden with clinical features and WMH score. (A) Correlation between the tremor score and BG nPVSs count; (B) correlation between LEDD and nPVSs count of BG; and (C) correlation between WMH score and nPVSs count of BG. BG, basal ganglia; nPVs, normal-sized perivascular space; WMH, white matter hyperintensity; LEDD, levodopa equivalent daily dose.